If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#311
|
|||
|
|||
Two Defamatory "Sux" Websites Shut Down
"Bob Hirschfeld, JD" wrote in message s.com... "krp" wrote in message ... Only a fool would fear a lawsuit from you except for the massive amount of time and legal bills they would have to endure dealing with your madness. Sounds good so far. "Sux" is such a fool. Perhaps so is "KRP". Maybe I aam not. Tell you what Bob why don't you put it to the test? You know where I live. You're dumb enough to take me on. |
#312
|
|||
|
|||
Two Defamatory "Sux" Websites Shut Down
"Bob Hirschfeld, JD" wrote in message s.com... "krp" wrote in message ... Only a fool would fear a lawsuit from you except for the massive amount of time and legal bills they would have to endure dealing with your madness. Sounds good so far. "Sux" is such a fool. Perhaps so is "KRP". Maybe I aam not. Tell you what Bob why don't you put it to the test? You know where I live. You're dumb enough to take me on. |
#313
|
|||
|
|||
Two Defamatory "Sux" Websites Shut Down
"Bob Hirschfeld, JD" wrote in message s.com... "krp" wrote in message ... Only a fool would fear a lawsuit from you except for the massive amount of time and legal bills they would have to endure dealing with your madness. Sounds good so far. "Sux" is such a fool. Perhaps so is "KRP". Maybe I aam not. Tell you what Bob why don't you put it to the test? You know where I live. You're dumb enough to take me on. |
#314
|
|||
|
|||
Troll "Moon Shyne"
On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 17:27:24 GMT, "Bob Hirschfeld, JD"
wrote: Nice, complete quote, Jill. Did you have anything to add? Sure. I hit the wrong button. Sue me. "Jill" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 14:45:28 GMT, "Bob Hirschfeld, JD" wrote: "Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... C'mon, Bob - it ain't defamation when it's the truth - didn't they teach you that in law school? What is defamation will be decided in a Court of Law. Trolls who snipe from hiding cannot prove the "truth" of their defamatory lies from their places of hiding. That includes you "Moon Shyne". |
#315
|
|||
|
|||
Troll "Moon Shyne"
On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 17:27:24 GMT, "Bob Hirschfeld, JD"
wrote: Nice, complete quote, Jill. Did you have anything to add? Sure. I hit the wrong button. Sue me. "Jill" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 14:45:28 GMT, "Bob Hirschfeld, JD" wrote: "Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... C'mon, Bob - it ain't defamation when it's the truth - didn't they teach you that in law school? What is defamation will be decided in a Court of Law. Trolls who snipe from hiding cannot prove the "truth" of their defamatory lies from their places of hiding. That includes you "Moon Shyne". |
#316
|
|||
|
|||
Troll "Moon Shyne"
On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 17:27:24 GMT, "Bob Hirschfeld, JD"
wrote: Nice, complete quote, Jill. Did you have anything to add? Sure. I hit the wrong button. Sue me. "Jill" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 14:45:28 GMT, "Bob Hirschfeld, JD" wrote: "Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... C'mon, Bob - it ain't defamation when it's the truth - didn't they teach you that in law school? What is defamation will be decided in a Court of Law. Trolls who snipe from hiding cannot prove the "truth" of their defamatory lies from their places of hiding. That includes you "Moon Shyne". |
#317
|
|||
|
|||
Pangborn
"krp" wrote in message
... No Bob, I support its use by QUALIFIED experts and NOT on children. Remember YOU tried to use a Socxial Worker as an EXPERT for you. The people I work with all have a Ph.D. or an MD. Yep I do support its use when used by QUALIFIED experts and is used appropriately within medical guidelines. There IS NO legitimate use for use of the Penile Plethysmograph other than its original purpose: to determine whether nerve connection exist in paraplegics to their lower body, including the penis. There are NO QUALIFIED EXPERTS on the ersatz use regarding sexual interest resolution, "which type of sexually explicit photograph produces a larger microscopic erection." PPG is still not scientifically accepted evidence, notwithstanding the flummery of you and you alleged "experts". Pangborn's favorite PPG apparatus was prohibited for such minors in Arizona by the Appellate Courts, the legislature, and public opinion, because of my legal advocacy representing one of the PPG victims and his mother. The entire $2 million/year Phoenix Memorial Hospital "Sexuality and Addiction" program for Juveniles which primarily inflicted PPG upon such juvenile boys, was closed within several weeks of the public exposure of the scientifically worthless practice. Pangborn made part of his income in those days by kickbacks from an East Coast fraudulent PPG practitioner, to whom Pangborn referred fathers accused of molestation to "prove" that they had no sexual interest in minors. Typical Pangborn Fraud. WHO would that "EAST COAST fraudulent practitioner" be? Got a NAME for us Bobby? I'm sure you know who he is. You've made a lot of fraudulent money by referring your clients to him. Let's get something straight, the "program" you refer to was a rogue operation devised by a UNQUALIFIED social worker. The guy should have been neutered for what hee did in his CRACKPOT "averseion therapy? program, or at least sent to prison for sexual abuse of the boys in his little "experiment." That ANY medical device can be ABUSED, Bob is NO secret. Say Bob, we STILL use the PPG quite effectively. But as ALWAYS Bob, you believe yourself to be this GREAT EXPERT on nearly everything. But this is a case of you not knowing what you don't know. Your ignorance level on this subject is 150%. Nonsense. I am an expert litigator in some disciplines, and certainly the research which supported my successful legal prohibition of PPG in AZ entitles me to some substantial credibility. Use of the PPG for distinguishing between types of sexual interest, or any establishment of existence of sexual interest, are charlatanism. I do not seek respect from Pangborn, who destroyed his own credibility decades ago. I have FAR more than YOU Bob! Now that's REALLY hilarious, Pangborn. Obviously, you cannot joust with me publicly without immediately attracting the hordes of your own enemies. You would be well advised to seek a lesser adversary than me. Hate to tell you Bob, Moore is 10 times the adversary that YOU are. The record on you is absolute.There is a little wiggle room for Moore. Pangborn deserves the dogged, decades-long exposure and opposition from his huge number of online detractors, of which one may be named "Moore". I don't waste my time with Pangborn, unless he emerges from his kennel and barks at me. No doubt "Moore" will be pleased at Pangborn's admission quoted above, regarding "Moore's" persistence and apparent credibility. He is MORE credible than you Bob. But then so is a tree slug. That's no high praise. Moore has not yet been CONVICTED of being a liar, YOU HAVE! The disbarment was a politically driven civil, not criminal action. There was no "conviction." Once again, Pangborn would be well advised to seek a lesser adversary than me. Bob there are NO lesser adversaries than YOU.. You'd better come to grips with that FUGITIVE! I travel freely within the United States, as I did twice in the past month and a half. Your claim above that I have the status of "fugitive" is another example of your actionable libels. Beware of your future liability. I don't hide from you, I reserve the right to file an action near Pinellas Park on my next annual visit to Florida, or in a valid forum more convenient to me. You may avoid such consequence by absolutely abandoning the thread between us, and concentrating on your very real adversaries whom you above claim are more effective against you than I. Now, before your knee hits your jaw, or your finger hits the keyboard, THINK. Bob Hirschfeld, JD |
#318
|
|||
|
|||
Pangborn
"krp" wrote in message
... No Bob, I support its use by QUALIFIED experts and NOT on children. Remember YOU tried to use a Socxial Worker as an EXPERT for you. The people I work with all have a Ph.D. or an MD. Yep I do support its use when used by QUALIFIED experts and is used appropriately within medical guidelines. There IS NO legitimate use for use of the Penile Plethysmograph other than its original purpose: to determine whether nerve connection exist in paraplegics to their lower body, including the penis. There are NO QUALIFIED EXPERTS on the ersatz use regarding sexual interest resolution, "which type of sexually explicit photograph produces a larger microscopic erection." PPG is still not scientifically accepted evidence, notwithstanding the flummery of you and you alleged "experts". Pangborn's favorite PPG apparatus was prohibited for such minors in Arizona by the Appellate Courts, the legislature, and public opinion, because of my legal advocacy representing one of the PPG victims and his mother. The entire $2 million/year Phoenix Memorial Hospital "Sexuality and Addiction" program for Juveniles which primarily inflicted PPG upon such juvenile boys, was closed within several weeks of the public exposure of the scientifically worthless practice. Pangborn made part of his income in those days by kickbacks from an East Coast fraudulent PPG practitioner, to whom Pangborn referred fathers accused of molestation to "prove" that they had no sexual interest in minors. Typical Pangborn Fraud. WHO would that "EAST COAST fraudulent practitioner" be? Got a NAME for us Bobby? I'm sure you know who he is. You've made a lot of fraudulent money by referring your clients to him. Let's get something straight, the "program" you refer to was a rogue operation devised by a UNQUALIFIED social worker. The guy should have been neutered for what hee did in his CRACKPOT "averseion therapy? program, or at least sent to prison for sexual abuse of the boys in his little "experiment." That ANY medical device can be ABUSED, Bob is NO secret. Say Bob, we STILL use the PPG quite effectively. But as ALWAYS Bob, you believe yourself to be this GREAT EXPERT on nearly everything. But this is a case of you not knowing what you don't know. Your ignorance level on this subject is 150%. Nonsense. I am an expert litigator in some disciplines, and certainly the research which supported my successful legal prohibition of PPG in AZ entitles me to some substantial credibility. Use of the PPG for distinguishing between types of sexual interest, or any establishment of existence of sexual interest, are charlatanism. I do not seek respect from Pangborn, who destroyed his own credibility decades ago. I have FAR more than YOU Bob! Now that's REALLY hilarious, Pangborn. Obviously, you cannot joust with me publicly without immediately attracting the hordes of your own enemies. You would be well advised to seek a lesser adversary than me. Hate to tell you Bob, Moore is 10 times the adversary that YOU are. The record on you is absolute.There is a little wiggle room for Moore. Pangborn deserves the dogged, decades-long exposure and opposition from his huge number of online detractors, of which one may be named "Moore". I don't waste my time with Pangborn, unless he emerges from his kennel and barks at me. No doubt "Moore" will be pleased at Pangborn's admission quoted above, regarding "Moore's" persistence and apparent credibility. He is MORE credible than you Bob. But then so is a tree slug. That's no high praise. Moore has not yet been CONVICTED of being a liar, YOU HAVE! The disbarment was a politically driven civil, not criminal action. There was no "conviction." Once again, Pangborn would be well advised to seek a lesser adversary than me. Bob there are NO lesser adversaries than YOU.. You'd better come to grips with that FUGITIVE! I travel freely within the United States, as I did twice in the past month and a half. Your claim above that I have the status of "fugitive" is another example of your actionable libels. Beware of your future liability. I don't hide from you, I reserve the right to file an action near Pinellas Park on my next annual visit to Florida, or in a valid forum more convenient to me. You may avoid such consequence by absolutely abandoning the thread between us, and concentrating on your very real adversaries whom you above claim are more effective against you than I. Now, before your knee hits your jaw, or your finger hits the keyboard, THINK. Bob Hirschfeld, JD |
#319
|
|||
|
|||
Pangborn
"krp" wrote in message
... No Bob, I support its use by QUALIFIED experts and NOT on children. Remember YOU tried to use a Socxial Worker as an EXPERT for you. The people I work with all have a Ph.D. or an MD. Yep I do support its use when used by QUALIFIED experts and is used appropriately within medical guidelines. There IS NO legitimate use for use of the Penile Plethysmograph other than its original purpose: to determine whether nerve connection exist in paraplegics to their lower body, including the penis. There are NO QUALIFIED EXPERTS on the ersatz use regarding sexual interest resolution, "which type of sexually explicit photograph produces a larger microscopic erection." PPG is still not scientifically accepted evidence, notwithstanding the flummery of you and you alleged "experts". Pangborn's favorite PPG apparatus was prohibited for such minors in Arizona by the Appellate Courts, the legislature, and public opinion, because of my legal advocacy representing one of the PPG victims and his mother. The entire $2 million/year Phoenix Memorial Hospital "Sexuality and Addiction" program for Juveniles which primarily inflicted PPG upon such juvenile boys, was closed within several weeks of the public exposure of the scientifically worthless practice. Pangborn made part of his income in those days by kickbacks from an East Coast fraudulent PPG practitioner, to whom Pangborn referred fathers accused of molestation to "prove" that they had no sexual interest in minors. Typical Pangborn Fraud. WHO would that "EAST COAST fraudulent practitioner" be? Got a NAME for us Bobby? I'm sure you know who he is. You've made a lot of fraudulent money by referring your clients to him. Let's get something straight, the "program" you refer to was a rogue operation devised by a UNQUALIFIED social worker. The guy should have been neutered for what hee did in his CRACKPOT "averseion therapy? program, or at least sent to prison for sexual abuse of the boys in his little "experiment." That ANY medical device can be ABUSED, Bob is NO secret. Say Bob, we STILL use the PPG quite effectively. But as ALWAYS Bob, you believe yourself to be this GREAT EXPERT on nearly everything. But this is a case of you not knowing what you don't know. Your ignorance level on this subject is 150%. Nonsense. I am an expert litigator in some disciplines, and certainly the research which supported my successful legal prohibition of PPG in AZ entitles me to some substantial credibility. Use of the PPG for distinguishing between types of sexual interest, or any establishment of existence of sexual interest, are charlatanism. I do not seek respect from Pangborn, who destroyed his own credibility decades ago. I have FAR more than YOU Bob! Now that's REALLY hilarious, Pangborn. Obviously, you cannot joust with me publicly without immediately attracting the hordes of your own enemies. You would be well advised to seek a lesser adversary than me. Hate to tell you Bob, Moore is 10 times the adversary that YOU are. The record on you is absolute.There is a little wiggle room for Moore. Pangborn deserves the dogged, decades-long exposure and opposition from his huge number of online detractors, of which one may be named "Moore". I don't waste my time with Pangborn, unless he emerges from his kennel and barks at me. No doubt "Moore" will be pleased at Pangborn's admission quoted above, regarding "Moore's" persistence and apparent credibility. He is MORE credible than you Bob. But then so is a tree slug. That's no high praise. Moore has not yet been CONVICTED of being a liar, YOU HAVE! The disbarment was a politically driven civil, not criminal action. There was no "conviction." Once again, Pangborn would be well advised to seek a lesser adversary than me. Bob there are NO lesser adversaries than YOU.. You'd better come to grips with that FUGITIVE! I travel freely within the United States, as I did twice in the past month and a half. Your claim above that I have the status of "fugitive" is another example of your actionable libels. Beware of your future liability. I don't hide from you, I reserve the right to file an action near Pinellas Park on my next annual visit to Florida, or in a valid forum more convenient to me. You may avoid such consequence by absolutely abandoning the thread between us, and concentrating on your very real adversaries whom you above claim are more effective against you than I. Now, before your knee hits your jaw, or your finger hits the keyboard, THINK. Bob Hirschfeld, JD |
#320
|
|||
|
|||
Hirschfeld threats!
"Bob Hirschfeld, JD" wrote in message
s.com... There IS NO legitimate use for use of the Penile Plethysmograph other than its original purpose: to determine whether nerve connection exist in paraplegics to their lower body, including the penis. There are NO QUALIFIED EXPERTS on the ersatz use regarding sexual interest resolution, "which type of sexually explicit photograph produces a larger microscopic erection." PPG is still not scientifically accepted evidence, notwithstanding the flummery of you and you alleged "experts". Hirschfeld you remain suffering compound ingorance. You don't even know what you don't know. The PPG .... HAS been accepted under the Frye standards in several states. I think 19 at this point. YOU chave never seen one, have ZERO idea how they operate. And the PPG is NOW accepted within Psychology and Psychiatry. I won't argue with an ASS weho has ZERO concept of the state of science. Hell, Bob, I don't think you can even SPELL science. Your claims to the contrary date back to your HUGE VICTORY in the 80's. Don't let me break this to you Bobby, know what a CD is? How about a DVD? Technology has m,oved a liuttle bit since the STONE AGE that YOU live in in your mountain HIDEaway in Meeeehhhheeeeco Bob! The research in the PPG is SOLID and accaptance EVEN IN ARIZONA you TWERP is established as well.. WHO would that "EAST COAST fraudulent practitioner" be? Got a NAME for us Bobby? I'm sure you know who he is. You've made a lot of fraudulent money by referring your clients to him. Ah so you have NO such NAME Bob., Thought so! Just More Hirschfeld BULL**** one more LIE from a professional CONVICTED liar! Just one more claim you have MADE UP! Nonsense. I am an expert litigator in some disciplines, and certainly the research which supported my successful legal prohibition of PPG in AZ entitles me to some substantial credibility. Use of the PPG for distinguishing between types of sexual interest, or any establishment of existence of sexual interest, are charlatanism. You are an expert at NOTHING Hirshfeld except making fraudulent claims. The problem with the PPG in Arizona was that it was being used by a person TOTALLY UNQUALIFIED to use it. A social worker with ZERO training on its use, and using it on a child to satisfy his own twisted sexual interests. But that was the 1980's bob. This IS, in case you have failed to notice, the year 2004. Lots has changed, including weeding out the social workers and high school drop out cops using the PPG inappropriately There is now a professional organization that has set standards for the administration of PPG evaluations, but you ALWAYS have proceeded with fragmentary knowledge and made WILD and UNTRUE claims, which is what cost you your law license. I do not seek respect from Pangborn, who destroyed his own credibility decades ago. I have FAR more than YOU Bob! Now that's REALLY hilarious, Pangborn. I still HAVE my licenses Bobby. I was NEVER convicted of being a LIAR Bob, YOU have been more than once! Once again, Pangborn would be well advised to seek a lesser adversary than me. Bob there are NO lesser adversaries than YOU.. You'd better come to grips with that FUGITIVE! I travel freely within the United States, as I did twice in the past month and a half. Your claim above that I have the status of "fugitive" is another example of your actionable libels. Beware of your future liability. I don't hide from you, I reserve the right to file an action near Pinellas Park on my next annual visit to Florida, or in a valid forum more convenient to me. Bob you are welcome to do that, you'll find that if you did, it would wind up being a suppository you'd have difficulty removing. I didn't say you were a fugitive from the law, but we both know that you have some former clients who have threatened to beat you into a bloody pulp. I don't see you standing up to THEM Bob! You may avoid such consequence by absolutely abandoning the thread between us, and concentrating on your very real adversaries whom you above claim are more effective against you than I. Hirschfeld YOU have tried your pathetic blackmail threats on me in the past. I will answer you today the same way I answered you in 1982... "SCREW YOU HIRSCHFELD.... GO FOR IT!" Just remember Bob.......... RULE 11! I will cram that SO FAR up your pipe that you will speak like a sopranno for the rest of your life, GOT IT? The TRUTH is an ABSOLUTE defense. Go scare some children Bob! Now, before your knee hits your jaw, or your finger hits the keyboard, THINK. BRING IT ON BOB! NOBODY is afraid of a DISGRACED DISBARRED EX LAWYER! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
misc.kids FAQ on Allergies and Asthma (part 3/4) | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 1 | June 28th 04 07:42 PM |
A sick OB joke: 'Free' vagina slicing | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 1 | March 20th 04 03:59 AM |
Help Eliminate an Instrument of Child Torture | Kane | Spanking | 34 | December 29th 03 04:54 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Allergies and Asthma (part 1/4) | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 3 | December 15th 03 09:44 AM |
Stop killing Innocent Puppies! (Petition) | The Puppy Wizard | General | 0 | October 10th 03 06:59 PM |