Deadbeats

Pammie1 wrote:

Just tough out the 18+ years and learn from your past experience.

Then why don't you just tough out the next 18+ years of your life, and
suck it up? Or is that not an acceptable option for your tastes?

Pammie1 wrote:

Just tough out the 18+ years and learn from your past experience.

Then why don't you just tough out the next 18+ years of your life, and
suck it up? Or is that not an acceptable option for your tastes?

Pammie1 wrote:

Just tough out the 18+ years and learn from your past experience.

Then why don't you just tough out the next 18+ years of your life, and
suck it up? Or is that not an acceptable option for your tastes?

In article . net, Phil #3
says...

Your advise could be used as a reason to outlaw abortion on demand again.
Who are you referring to when you state: "the people still don't want to pay
even if the amount was low." and how do you know this since it hasn't been
"low" for decades?
You, like most angry women, forget that many of us supported our children
well without complaint while we were with them. The difference is we are no
longer paying for the children's expenses but their mother's as well, at
least partly.
Phil #3
====
As long as there is no requirement that CPs account for how CS is spent, it
cannot possibly be anything except money for women.
====
====

In article . net, Phil #3
says...

Your advise could be used as a reason to outlaw abortion on demand again.
Who are you referring to when you state: "the people still don't want to pay
even if the amount was low." and how do you know this since it hasn't been
"low" for decades?
You, like most angry women, forget that many of us supported our children
well without complaint while we were with them. The difference is we are no
longer paying for the children's expenses but their mother's as well, at
least partly.
Phil #3
====
As long as there is no requirement that CPs account for how CS is spent, it
cannot possibly be anything except money for women.
====
====

In article . net, Phil #3
says...

Your advise could be used as a reason to outlaw abortion on demand again.
Who are you referring to when you state: "the people still don't want to pay
even if the amount was low." and how do you know this since it hasn't been
"low" for decades?
You, like most angry women, forget that many of us supported our children
well without complaint while we were with them. The difference is we are no
longer paying for the children's expenses but their mother's as well, at
least partly.
Phil #3
====
As long as there is no requirement that CPs account for how CS is spent, it
cannot possibly be anything except money for women.
====
====

"Jon" wrote in message
...
Pammie1 wrote:

So Pammie, what do you think of deadbeat mothers? My son's mother
attempted
suicide 7 times, and I still had to go to court to get custody. She has
the
huge child support requirement of $76 a month. On the other hand, for two
years, I was paying $518 PLUS $750 in alimony to her. She of course,
gets
knocked up, quits her job and goes on welfare. Now she has the legal
right
to not pay a damn dime to support her 14 year old son, since she slutted
around and got a brand new one.
My vote is for anyone who is willing to abolish the corrupt child support
system and re-instate personal responsiblity.
Jon


" She has the huge child support requirement of $76 a month."

For someone who wants the system abolished you seem to have no problem
collecting that from her even though you have gained custody. Not to
mention you sought collection from someone who has tried to kill themselves
7 times.

"Jon" wrote in message
...
Pammie1 wrote:

So Pammie, what do you think of deadbeat mothers? My son's mother
attempted
suicide 7 times, and I still had to go to court to get custody. She has
the
huge child support requirement of $76 a month. On the other hand, for two
years, I was paying $518 PLUS $750 in alimony to her. She of course,
gets
knocked up, quits her job and goes on welfare. Now she has the legal
right
to not pay a damn dime to support her 14 year old son, since she slutted
around and got a brand new one.
My vote is for anyone who is willing to abolish the corrupt child support
system and re-instate personal responsiblity.
Jon


" She has the huge child support requirement of $76 a month."

For someone who wants the system abolished you seem to have no problem
collecting that from her even though you have gained custody. Not to
mention you sought collection from someone who has tried to kill themselves
7 times.

"Jon" wrote in message
...
Pammie1 wrote:

So Pammie, what do you think of deadbeat mothers? My son's mother
attempted
suicide 7 times, and I still had to go to court to get custody. She has
the
huge child support requirement of $76 a month. On the other hand, for two
years, I was paying $518 PLUS $750 in alimony to her. She of course,
gets
knocked up, quits her job and goes on welfare. Now she has the legal
right
to not pay a damn dime to support her 14 year old son, since she slutted
around and got a brand new one.
My vote is for anyone who is willing to abolish the corrupt child support
system and re-instate personal responsiblity.
Jon


" She has the huge child support requirement of $76 a month."

For someone who wants the system abolished you seem to have no problem
collecting that from her even though you have gained custody. Not to
mention you sought collection from someone who has tried to kill themselves
7 times.

"Pammie1" wrote in message
lkaboutparenting.com...
I know I hear a lot of people complain about the amount being so high.
The
people still don't want to pay even if the amount was low. It all boils
down to, "you should have thought about it before you decided to have
sex." I know as a single parent I should have thought about things too.
We live and learn. Just tough out the 18+ years and learn from your past
experience.


If you can't handle it then turn over custody to the father or share
physical custody with him. Problem solved.
Just be thankful you have your child living with you from day to day and
have not been reduced to vistor status.