If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Monkey on no-spank's back
It is up to no-spanks to prove to the satisfaction of parents that they
have the best interest of children at heart rather perpetuating a self-serving agenda. The more antagonistic no-spanks become, the more questions they raise about both their childhoods and their motives. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Monkey on no-spank's back
Opinions wrote: It is up to no-spanks to prove to the satisfaction of parents that they have the best interest of children at heart rather perpetuating a self-serving agenda. As far as I know, other than the sense of moral rightness that comes from protecting others less able to protect themselves, I have no self serving going on. And why would I have to prove anything? It's been done for me again and again. From neurological research, to the public school classroom again and again it's been shown that spanking hurts, injures, and cause disfunctions, and that other methods work better for the child. States with more restrictions on spanking in schools show higher academic scoring. Children from families that don't spank simply don't show up in jail, not for "crimes," unless they are crimes of conscience. Like protesting war, or protecting the environment. A study attempted many years ago on this flopped. The researcher, a Prof. Fischer out of the Chicago School of Social Work went to the prisons and set up interview schedules. He COULD NOT FIND ANY INMATE THAT HAD NOT BEEN SPANKED, or worse. Not..........one. The more antagonistic no-spanks become, the more questions they raise about both their childhoods and their motives. That's why we aren't antagonistic. We are truthful. You are antagonistic, and you lie. You appear to even argue in favor of doing away with laws protecting victims of battering, since "they don't work," according to you. You are illogical and stupid and persistently wrong. It's fun to watch though. You are a stereotypically compulsive spanker. You folks lost in this this ng years ago. Chris laid you out in a neat row, one right after the other. You've had nothing to do since by antagonistically come back and rant and try to foist the same sordid garbage, to protect your whining need to hit little children. It's over, trust me. This is the mop up, only Kane |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
misc.kids FAQ on Breastfeeding Past the First Year | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | October 19th 05 05:36 AM |
debunking the hysterical lies and downright deceit of the anti-circumcision cult. | decurian | Pregnancy | 0 | September 1st 04 04:42 AM |
Slouching relieves back pain? | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | August 6th 04 02:55 PM |
misc.kids FAQ on Breastfeeding Past the First Year | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | December 15th 03 09:42 AM |
FDA MDR: Obstetric tables (also: Pregnancy low back pain/Lordex Spine Institute) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | September 30th 03 05:49 PM |