If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
CANCER INC
On 12/2/10 3:42 AM, john wrote:
http://whale.to/cancer.html Thank you for showing how alternative medicine has a whole bunch of unsupported claims based on no evidence. All alternative medicine is interested in is making money. Allopathic medicine has increased the survival rate for kids with cancer to over 75% and the survival rate for all people with cancer to around 60%. It is far from ideal, but compared to the alternatives (which in the case of alternative medicine is really nothing), it is far better. Jeff |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
CANCER INC
"dr_jeff" wrote in message ... On 12/2/10 3:42 AM, john wrote: http://whale.to/cancer.html Thank you for showing how alternative medicine has a whole bunch of unsupported claims based on no evidence. All alternative medicine is interested in is making money. Allopathic medicine has increased the survival rate for kids with cancer to over 75% and the survival rate for all people with cancer to around 60%. It is far from ideal, but compared to the alternatives (which in the case of alternative medicine is really nothing), it is far better. Jeff More tin can rattling from the allopathic mob. Don't you ever get tired of rationalising allopathic medicine with cures always "just around the corner" for this and that? "Oh science hasn't got all the answers, but alternative medicine is wrong" blah blah blah! -- carole www.conspiracee.com "Its pretty hard to keep in touch with reality when you see so little of it." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
CANCER INC
On 12/2/10 10:29 AM, carole wrote:
wrote in message ... On 12/2/10 3:42 AM, john wrote: http://whale.to/cancer.html Thank you for showing how alternative medicine has a whole bunch of unsupported claims based on no evidence. All alternative medicine is interested in is making money. Allopathic medicine has increased the survival rate for kids with cancer to over 75% and the survival rate for all people with cancer to around 60%. It is far from ideal, but compared to the alternatives (which in the case of alternative medicine is really nothing), it is far better. Jeff More tin can rattling from the allopathic mob. Don't you ever get tired of rationalising allopathic medicine with cures always "just around the corner" for this and that? 75% of kids being cured doesn't sound like "just around the corner." "Oh science hasn't got all the answers, but alternative medicine is wrong" blah blah blah! No one ever said science has all the answers. However, alternative medicine is unproven, at best. Jeff |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
CANCER INC
"dr_jeff" wrote in message ... On 12/2/10 10:29 AM, carole wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/2/10 3:42 AM, john wrote: http://whale.to/cancer.html Thank you for showing how alternative medicine has a whole bunch of unsupported claims based on no evidence. All alternative medicine is interested in is making money. Allopathic medicine has increased the survival rate for kids with cancer to over 75% and the survival rate for all people with cancer to around 60%. It is far from ideal, but compared to the alternatives (which in the case of alternative medicine is really nothing), it is far better. Jeff More tin can rattling from the allopathic mob. Don't you ever get tired of rationalising allopathic medicine with cures always "just around the corner" for this and that? 75% of kids being cured doesn't sound like "just around the corner." Doesn't sound too bad if its true. However, there are some cures that were 100% such as rife's. What I've heard is that "cured" means 5 years alive from diagnosis. What I've also heard is on average people live longer with no treatment than conventional. "Oh science hasn't got all the answers, but alternative medicine is wrong" blah blah blah! No one ever said science has all the answers. However, alternative medicine is unproven, at best. On the one hand you say that science doesn't have all the answers, and on the other hand you say that it knows that alternative remedies don't work. Which is to say that allopathic knows alternative is no good because it doesn't follow the same rules as allopathic. There have been alternative treatments that have been suppressed you know, they say they're "quack" medicine and get rid of them as quickly as they can in the interests of "getting rid of snake oil salesmen". Well that's what is called a "cover story". The real reason is protect the profits of big pharma. -- carole www.conspiracee.com "Its pretty hard to keep in touch with reality when you see so little of it." |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
CANCER INC
On 12/2/10 9:11 PM, carole wrote:
wrote in message ... On 12/2/10 10:29 AM, carole wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/2/10 3:42 AM, john wrote: http://whale.to/cancer.html Thank you for showing how alternative medicine has a whole bunch of unsupported claims based on no evidence. All alternative medicine is interested in is making money. Allopathic medicine has increased the survival rate for kids with cancer to over 75% and the survival rate for all people with cancer to around 60%. It is far from ideal, but compared to the alternatives (which in the case of alternative medicine is really nothing), it is far better. Jeff More tin can rattling from the allopathic mob. Don't you ever get tired of rationalising allopathic medicine with cures always "just around the corner" for this and that? 75% of kids being cured doesn't sound like "just around the corner." Doesn't sound too bad if its true. It is. However, there are some cures that were 100% such as rife's. So? Where is the Rife's cure today? What is the evidence that it works? What I've heard is that "cured" means 5 years alive from diagnosis. That cutoff is often used. After all, if you use a much longer time-frame, you would have to wait like 60 years for cures of kids with cancer. While there are exceptions, if a cancer doesn't recur within five years, it rarely does. What I've also heard is on average people live longer with no treatment than conventional. You've heard? That's not strong evidence. People with certain types and stages of cancer are not helped with conventional. But considering that over 50% are cured, what you heard is incorrect. Jeff "Oh science hasn't got all the answers, but alternative medicine is wrong" blah blah blah! No one ever said science has all the answers. However, alternative medicine is unproven, at best. On the one hand you say that science doesn't have all the answers, and on the other hand you say that it knows that alternative remedies don't work. Which is to say that allopathic knows alternative is no good because it doesn't follow the same rules as allopathic. There have been alternative treatments that have been suppressed you know, they say they're "quack" medicine and get rid of them as quickly as they can in the interests of "getting rid of snake oil salesmen". Well that's what is called a "cover story". The real reason is protect the profits of big pharma. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
CANCER INC
On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 21:46:09 -0500, in misc.health.alternative,
dr_jeff wrote: On 12/2/10 9:11 PM, carole wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/2/10 10:29 AM, carole wrote: wrote in message ... On 12/2/10 3:42 AM, john wrote: http://whale.to/cancer.html Thank you for showing how alternative medicine has a whole bunch of unsupported claims based on no evidence. All alternative medicine is interested in is making money. Allopathic medicine has increased the survival rate for kids with cancer to over 75% and the survival rate for all people with cancer to around 60%. It is far from ideal, but compared to the alternatives (which in the case of alternative medicine is really nothing), it is far better. Jeff More tin can rattling from the allopathic mob. Don't you ever get tired of rationalising allopathic medicine with cures always "just around the corner" for this and that? 75% of kids being cured doesn't sound like "just around the corner." Doesn't sound too bad if its true. It is. However, there are some cures that were 100% such as rife's. So? Where is the Rife's cure today? What is the evidence that it works? There was no evidence back in the day. That's why there was court action. It was deemed a scam/con. What I've heard is that "cured" means 5 years alive from diagnosis. That cutoff is often used. After all, if you use a much longer time-frame, you would have to wait like 60 years for cures of kids with cancer. While there are exceptions, if a cancer doesn't recur within five years, it rarely does. What I've also heard is on average people live longer with no treatment than conventional. You've heard? That's not strong evidence. Hear-say or is the mere-say? People with certain types and stages of cancer are not helped with conventional. But considering that over 50% are cured, what you heard is incorrect. I known people that had pancreatic cancer lived over 5-8 years after treatments. And the nice thing is those extra years are something they wouldn't have had without the treatments. "Oh science hasn't got all the answers, but alternative medicine is wrong" blah blah blah! No one ever said science has all the answers. However, alternative medicine is unproven, at best. On the one hand you say that science doesn't have all the answers, and on the other hand you say that it knows that alternative remedies don't work. Which is to say that allopathic knows alternative is no good because it doesn't follow the same rules as allopathic. There have been alternative treatments that have been suppressed you know, they say they're "quack" medicine and get rid of them as quickly as they can in the interests of "getting rid of snake oil salesmen". Well that's what is called a "cover story". The real reason is protect the profits of big pharma. -- Bob Officer "One of my pet hates is being made an idiot out of ...but you go right ahead" Carole Hubbard in Message-ID: . com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Breast Cancer Statistics - How Breast Cancer Survival Rates Increased 50$B!s(B | [email protected] | General | 0 | January 11th 08 05:41 AM |
What Is Cancer? | [email protected] | Kids Health | 0 | January 1st 08 06:15 PM |
Vaginal Cancer after Breast cancer | Novi | Breastfeeding | 0 | July 8th 07 04:13 PM |
The Abraham Cherrix cancer story the media won't print: Harry Hoxsey's cancer cures and the US government campaign to destroy them | Ilena Rose | Kids Health | 45 | August 8th 06 07:08 PM |
Yo tuve Cancer-I have Cancer | elisa ramiez conde | General | 0 | December 14th 04 01:59 PM |