If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
No-spank's last stand
Why do no-spanks keep yammering about paddling in schools? Because
they have lost the battle in the homes. They know it. Well, most of 'em do anyway. There are still one or two *George W. Bush* types around thinking that if they can launch still more assaults then they can prove that their version of a failed invasion is not a quagmire. Even *abused* children are tired of being *liberated* by decitful self-appointed saviors with an overly ambitious agenda that overlooks their needs. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
No-spank's last stand
Opinions wrote: desperately..... Why do no-spanks keep yammering about paddling in schools? Bother you to see the data, does it? 0:- Because they have lost the battle in the homes. Odd, we are starting to see more places in the US where bans on spanking ... anywhere, home or school...are being seriously considered. And over the years fewer and fewer polled adults support the practice. Used to be 90% and more, now it's around 65%. I suspect where the truth known, if they didn't expect heat from relatives (who are still sick compulsives and apologists) more would speak out against spanking. You know it and it's got you on the run. Poor sad pitiful losers. R R R R R They know it. Well, most of 'em do anyway. What we know is the trend. Just as it took time for slavery to be brought to an end as an institution in the United States, so too it will take time for child CP to come to an end. The time is not the critical issue, the end is. The trend is moving inexhorably to and end to spanking as an institutionalized practice. Live with it. There are still one or two *George W. Bush* types around thinking that if they can launch still more assaults then they can prove that their version of a failed invasion is not a quagmire. You are aware that Barbara made it plain she spanked her boys, right? Even *abused* children are tired of being *liberated* by decitful self-appointed saviors with an overly ambitious agenda that overlooks their needs. Actually an abused child, once they come to understand they did not deserve to be treated as they were are quite happy to have been liberated. Your hyperbole quotient is going up, I see. "*liberated*" "decitful" [sic] "self-appointed saviors" "overly ambitious" folks like us are overlooking which "needs" of children, Opinion? The need to be hit by their ONLY protectors.....until the state catches on and steps in? The law is coming. And you are ****tin' yourself over it and can't figure out what to do about it, other than rant, while we do real work to make it happen. Try cruising the internet for anti-spanking information sites and see what you find. Including religious ones, friend. http://www.webmd.com/content/Article...000_1000_tn_02 There is already massive amounts of similar data historically, and there's more coming, though we certainly don't need it for a moral attack on hitting children. Imagine, hitting a child, a tiny little child you are charged to protect. Tsk. Bullies. That's all you are. Weak minded, self deluded bullies. And people are figuring this out and opting OUT of being one of you. Every day. More and more. And we enjoy lowering crime rates, better academic outcomes, and more responsible citizens. The payoff feels good too, so they tell me. How you going to stop us, Opie? Share your plan. Eh? R R R R R R RR .... 0:- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
No-spank's last stand
Opinions wrote: desperately..... Why do no-spanks keep yammering about paddling in schools? Bother you to see the data, does it? 0:- Because they have lost the battle in the homes. Odd, we are starting to see more places in the US where bans on spanking ... anywhere, home or school...are being seriously considered. And over the years fewer and fewer polled adults support the practice. Used to be 90% and more, now it's around 65%. I suspect where the truth known, if they didn't expect heat from relatives (who are still sick compulsives and apologists) more would speak out against spanking. You know it and it's got you on the run. Poor sad pitiful losers. R R R R R They know it. Well, most of 'em do anyway. What we know is the trend. Just as it took time for slavery to be brought to an end as an institution in the United States, so too it will take time for child CP to come to an end. The time is not the critical issue, the end is. The trend is moving inexhorably to and end to spanking as an institutionalized practice. Live with it. There are still one or two *George W. Bush* types around thinking that if they can launch still more assaults then they can prove that their version of a failed invasion is not a quagmire. You are aware that Barbara made it plain she spanked her boys, right? Even *abused* children are tired of being *liberated* by decitful self-appointed saviors with an overly ambitious agenda that overlooks their needs. Actually an abused child, once they come to understand they did not deserve to be treated as they were are quite happy to have been liberated. Your hyperbole quotient is going up, I see. "*liberated*" "decitful" [sic] "self-appointed saviors" "overly ambitious" folks like us are overlooking which "needs" of children, Opinion? The need to be hit by their ONLY protectors.....until the state catches on and steps in? The law is coming. And you are ****tin' yourself over it and can't figure out what to do about it, other than rant, while we do real work to make it happen. Try cruising the internet for anti-spanking information sites and see what you find. Including religious ones, friend. http://www.webmd.com/content/Article...000_1000_tn_02 There is already massive amounts of similar data historically, and there's more coming, though we certainly don't need it for a moral attack on hitting children. Imagine, hitting a child, a tiny little child you are charged to protect. Tsk. Bullies. That's all you are. Weak minded, self deluded bullies. And people are figuring this out and opting OUT of being one of you. Every day. More and more. And we enjoy lowering crime rates, better academic outcomes, and more responsible citizens. The payoff feels good too, so they tell me. How you going to stop us, Opie? Share your plan. Eh? R R R R R R RR .... 0:- |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
No-spank's last stand
They are hoping that with repeated LIES, some fools will believe them. Doan On 16 Nov 2005, Opinions wrote: Why do no-spanks keep yammering about paddling in schools? Because they have lost the battle in the homes. They know it. Well, most of 'em do anyway. There are still one or two *George W. Bush* types around thinking that if they can launch still more assaults then they can prove that their version of a failed invasion is not a quagmire. Even *abused* children are tired of being *liberated* by decitful self-appointed saviors with an overly ambitious agenda that overlooks their needs. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
No-spank's last stand
Every no-spank is his or her own propaganda minister. Even children
frequently realize that no-spanks have a few loose roof shingles flapping in the wind. Doan wrote: They are hoping that with repeated LIES, some fools will believe them. Doan On 16 Nov 2005, Opinions wrote: Why do no-spanks keep yammering about paddling in schools? Because they have lost the battle in the homes. They know it. Well, most of 'em do anyway. There are still one or two *George W. Bush* types around thinking that if they can launch still more assaults then they can prove that their version of a failed invasion is not a quagmire. Even *abused* children are tired of being *liberated* by decitful self-appointed saviors with an overly ambitious agenda that overlooks their needs. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
No-spank's last stand
Opinions wrote: Every no-spank is his or her own propaganda minister. Even children frequently realize that no-spanks have a few loose roof shingles flapping in the wind. TWO screeching dancing monkeyboys now? How quaint. Spanking is on its way out. Has been for decades. Or are you planning a revival? R R R R R R 0:- ...snip.... |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
NEANDERTHAL OR CRETIN ? YOU DECIDE No-spank's last stand
GO AWAY. KEEP YOUR BUTT OUT OF THE FOSTER CARE ROOM UNTIL YOU
CAN CONTRIBUTE SOMETHING USEFUL TO THE GROUP. YOU'RE A PILLAGER AND NEED TO BE PILLAGED YOURSELF. wrote in message oups.com... : : Opinions wrote: desperately..... : : Why do no-spanks keep yammering about paddling in schools? : : Bother you to see the data, does it? 0:- : : Because : they have lost the battle in the homes. : : Odd, we are starting to see more places in the US where bans on : spanking ... anywhere, home or school...are being seriously considered. : And over the years fewer and fewer polled adults support the practice. : Used to be 90% and more, now it's around 65%. I suspect where the truth : known, if they didn't expect heat from relatives (who are still sick : compulsives and apologists) more would speak out against spanking. : : You know it and it's got you on the run. Poor sad pitiful losers. R R R : R R : : They know it. Well, most of : 'em do anyway. : : What we know is the trend. Just as it took time for slavery to be : brought to an end as an institution in the United States, so too it : will take time for child CP to come to an end. The time is not the : critical issue, the end is. : : The trend is moving inexhorably to and end to spanking as an : institutionalized practice. Live with it. : : There are still one or two *George W. Bush* types around thinking that : if they can launch still more assaults then they can prove that their : version of a failed invasion is not a quagmire. : : You are aware that Barbara made it plain she spanked her boys, right? : : Even *abused* children : are tired of being *liberated* by decitful self-appointed saviors with : an overly ambitious agenda that overlooks their needs. : : Actually an abused child, once they come to understand they did not : deserve to be treated as they were are quite happy to have been : liberated. : : Your hyperbole quotient is going up, I see. : : "*liberated*" "decitful" [sic] "self-appointed saviors" "overly : ambitious" folks like us are overlooking which "needs" of children, : Opinion? : : The need to be hit by their ONLY protectors.....until the state catches : on and steps in? : : The law is coming. And you are ****tin' yourself over it and can't : figure out what to do about it, other than rant, while we do real work : to make it happen. Try cruising the internet for anti-spanking : information sites and see what you find. Including religious ones, : friend. : : http://www.webmd.com/content/Article...000_1000_tn_02 : : There is already massive amounts of similar data historically, and : there's more coming, though we certainly don't need it for a moral : attack on hitting children. Imagine, hitting a child, a tiny little : child you are charged to protect. Tsk. : : Bullies. That's all you are. Weak minded, self deluded bullies. And : people are figuring this out and opting OUT of being one of you. Every : day. More and more. And we enjoy lowering crime rates, better academic : outcomes, and more responsible citizens. The payoff feels good too, so : they tell me. : : How you going to stop us, Opie? Share your plan. Eh? : : R R R R R R RR .... : : 0:- : |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
NEANDERTHAL OR CRETIN ? YOU DECIDE No-spank's last stand
"Pop" wrote in message ... : GO AWAY. KEEP YOUR BUTT OUT OF THE FOSTER CARE ROOM UNTIL YOU : CAN CONTRIBUTE SOMETHING USEFUL TO THE GROUP. YOU'RE A PILLAGER : AND NEED TO BE PILLAGED YOURSELF. : : wrote in message : oups.com... :: :: Opinions wrote: desperately..... :: :: Why do no-spanks keep yammering about paddling in schools? :: :: Bother you to see the data, does it? 0:- :: :: Because :: they have lost the battle in the homes. :: :: Odd, we are starting to see more places in the US where bans on :: spanking ... anywhere, home or school...are being seriously : considered. :: And over the years fewer and fewer polled adults support the : practice. :: Used to be 90% and more, now it's around 65%. I suspect where : the truth :: known, if they didn't expect heat from relatives (who are still : sick :: compulsives and apologists) more would speak out against : spanking. :: :: You know it and it's got you on the run. Poor sad pitiful : losers. R R R :: R R :: :: They know it. Well, most of :: 'em do anyway. :: :: What we know is the trend. Just as it took time for slavery to : be :: brought to an end as an institution in the United States, so : too it :: will take time for child CP to come to an end. The time is not : the :: critical issue, the end is. :: :: The trend is moving inexhorably to and end to spanking as an :: institutionalized practice. Live with it. :: :: There are still one or two *George W. Bush* types around : thinking that :: if they can launch still more assaults then they can prove : that their :: version of a failed invasion is not a quagmire. :: :: You are aware that Barbara made it plain she spanked her boys, : right? :: :: Even *abused* children :: are tired of being *liberated* by decitful self-appointed : saviors with :: an overly ambitious agenda that overlooks their needs. :: :: Actually an abused child, once they come to understand they did : not :: deserve to be treated as they were are quite happy to have been :: liberated. :: :: Your hyperbole quotient is going up, I see. :: :: "*liberated*" "decitful" [sic] "self-appointed saviors" : "overly :: ambitious" folks like us are overlooking which "needs" of : children, :: Opinion? :: :: The need to be hit by their ONLY protectors.....until the state : catches :: on and steps in? :: :: The law is coming. And you are ****tin' yourself over it and : can't :: figure out what to do about it, other than rant, while we do : real work :: to make it happen. Try cruising the internet for anti-spanking :: information sites and see what you find. Including religious : ones, :: friend. :: :: : http://www.webmd.com/content/Article...000_1000_tn_02 :: :: There is already massive amounts of similar data historically, : and :: there's more coming, though we certainly don't need it for a : moral :: attack on hitting children. Imagine, hitting a child, a tiny : little :: child you are charged to protect. Tsk. :: :: Bullies. That's all you are. Weak minded, self deluded bullies. : And :: people are figuring this out and opting OUT of being one of : you. Every :: day. More and more. And we enjoy lowering crime rates, better : academic :: outcomes, and more responsible citizens. The payoff feels good : too, so :: they tell me. :: :: How you going to stop us, Opie? Share your plan. Eh? :: :: R R R R R R RR .... :: :: 0:- :: : : |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
No-spank's last stand
Opinions wrote: Why do no-spanks keep yammering about paddling in schools? Because they have lost the battle in the homes. They know it. Well, most of 'em do anyway. Many people who believe children have the right to live without fear of being hit and hurt in the name of discipline, both in schools and at home, view where children are physically assaulted as irrelevant. There was a time in history where wives could be subjected to CP, and people of color were considered objects to be owned. Changing this took a war in one instance, and a process in another. There are still one or two *George W. Bush* types around thinking that if they can launch still more assaults then they can prove that their version of a failed invasion is not a quagmire. Even *abused* children are tired of being *liberated* by decitful self-appointed saviors with an overly ambitious agenda that overlooks their needs. Talked to an abused child lately? LaVonne |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
No-spank's last stand
Opinions wrote: Every no-spank is his or her own propaganda minister. Even children frequently realize that no-spanks have a few loose roof shingles flapping in the wind. Really? Of course you have evidence to back up this statement. Or is this just another opinion from "Opinions" that is written as fact? LaVonne Doan wrote: They are hoping that with repeated LIES, some fools will believe them. Doan On 16 Nov 2005, Opinions wrote: Why do no-spanks keep yammering about paddling in schools? Because they have lost the battle in the homes. They know it. Well, most of 'em do anyway. There are still one or two *George W. Bush* types around thinking that if they can launch still more assaults then they can prove that their version of a failed invasion is not a quagmire. Even *abused* children are tired of being *liberated* by decitful self-appointed saviors with an overly ambitious agenda that overlooks their needs. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
I need your help, if you own a Sit N Stand stroller | christine_cmc | General | 0 | January 25th 05 12:18 AM |
OB 'at home on the witness stand' (Richard M. Houck, MD) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | January 23rd 05 07:33 PM |
Constantly Trying to Stand!! | Carol Ann | Pregnancy | 18 | October 27th 04 10:43 AM |
WI: Dad spanks teen at HS-no abuse or neglect seen Milwaukee | Fern5827 | Spanking | 0 | February 28th 04 05:54 AM |
I can't stand anymore heat | alissa | Pregnancy | 14 | February 18th 04 12:37 AM |