Child's First Right Is to Be Born, Insists Holy See

On 6 May 2007 14:54:22 -0700, Relayer wrote:

On May 5, 11:05=EF=BF=BDpm, (Paul Anderson) wrote:
On Sat, 5 May 2007 18:52:00 -0700, "DB" wrote:

"Paul Anderson" wrote in

Again with the lies. =A0A fetus is not A LIFE -- which in this case
would refer to the life of a human being.

It certainly is a life.

A lie. Why must you lie?

On 6 May 2007 14:55:09 -0700, Relayer wrote:

On May 6, 6:45=EF=BF=BDam, (Paul Anderson) wrote:
On Sat, 5 May 2007 22:36:08 -0700, "Bob Whiteside"





wrote:

"Paul Anderson" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 5 May 2007 18:17:46 -0700, "Bob Whiteside"
wrote:

...

Let me get this straight. =A0You post that Blackstone is your authori=
ty on
Old
English Law regarding abortion.

No, I use Blackstone to show that you lied when you claimed abortion
was homicide under Common Law. =A0You've been dancing ever since.

Now you are getting the posters mixed up. =A0I said abortion was murder.

Big whoopie ****. =A0Murder is a subset of homicide. =A0Abortion is not a
homicide nor a murder. =A0Never has been. =A0*ALL* Pro-Lifers are liars on
this subject as without this lie you cannot justify denying the woman
her basic human rights.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Basic human right? To kill? You be it should be deprived.

There is no right to kill -- that is just another of the Pro-Life
lies.

On 6 May 2007 14:57:05 -0700, Relayer wrote:

On May 6, 10:56=EF=BF=BDam, Robert wrote:
On Sat, 5 May 2007 18:52:00 -0700, "DB" wrote:

"Paul Anderson" wrote in

YOU claimed that abortion was homicide under English Common Law. =A0As
anyone can see, abortion was not only not a homicide, it was not even
a felony. =A0It was, a misdemeander.

So by your reasoning, failure to pay CS was never a felony until recentl=
y,
so the crime shouldn't exist.

=A0 Contempt of Court has always been a felony, and a Judge has the
power to Jail anyone in contempt until the person agrees to comply
with a court order.

Regardless if you regard abortion a crime or not, having a life extracted
from your body ain't exactly the same as extracting a rotten tooth.

=A0 =A0Well it cost more, but a unwanted fetus is really more of a danger
than a rotten tooth. And a fetus like a rotten tooth, will eventually
fall out. A rotten tooth, will seldom kill, pregnancy is far more
likely to kill than a rotten tooth.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

Well, one thing is obvious. There is no clear distinction between you
and a rotting tooth.. Its really a shame your mother didn't have you
extracted with a coat hanger.

Pro-Lifers *ARE* quite consistent in wishing harm upon those they
disagree with.

"Robert" wrote in

A intelligent man protects himself, a idiot that knock a
woman up that he doesn't love, deserves no sympathy.


Here's a news flash Genious, there's plenty of Americans having lots of sex
with each other that don't have a dying love for each other. Do you still
drive a horse and buggy in Utah?

"Paul Anderson" wrote in

On 6 May 2007 14:54:22 -0700, Relayer wrote:

On May 5, 11:05=EF=BF=BDpm, (Paul Anderson) wrote:
On Sat, 5 May 2007 18:52:00 -0700, "DB" wrote:

"Paul Anderson" wrote in

Again with the lies. =A0A fetus is not A LIFE -- which in this case
would refer to the life of a human being.

It certainly is a life.

A lie. Why must you lie?


OK, just for the record, what is a Fetus if it is not a human life?

On Sun, 06 May 2007 21:08:36 GMT, "Kenneth S."
wrote:


"Bob Whiteside" wrote in message
m...

"Paul Anderson" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 5 May 2007 22:36:08 -0700, "Bob Whiteside"
wrote:


"Paul Anderson" wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 5 May 2007 18:17:46 -0700, "Bob Whiteside"
wrote:


It's almost as if the pro-choice feminists have absolutely NO
justification in principle for the inconsistency between the choices they
would allow women and the choices they would allow men. It's almost as if
the whole thing has been decided by the relative strengths of the feminist
movement and what would be called the masculinist movement, if such a thing
existed. But it couldn't be that simple, could it?


Yep, if a man doesn't want to be a father he can avoid impregnating
the woman. Several options are available, abstain, use a condom with
spermcide, preferred since it also protects him from catching a STD.
Or a vasectomy which is useless against a STD.
A woman with little taste in men, and has sex with several is risky
for STDS. A intelligent man protects himself, a idiot that knock a
woman up that he doesn't love, deserves no sympathy.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On 6 May 2007 14:55:47 -0700, Relayer wrote:

On May 6, 10:56?am, Robert wrote:
On Sat, 5 May 2007 18:52:00 -0700, "DB" wrote:

"Paul Anderson" wrote in

YOU claimed that abortion was homicide under English Common Law.
s
anyone can see, abortion was not only not a homicide, it was not even
a felony. t was, a misdemeander.

So by your reasoning, failure to pay CS was never a felony until recently,
so the crime shouldn't exist.

Contempt of Court has always been a felony, and a Judge has the
power to Jail anyone in contempt until the person agrees to comply
with a court order.

Regardless if you regard abortion a crime or not, having a life extracted
from your body ain't exactly the same as extracting a rotten tooth.

ell it cost more, but a unwanted fetus is really more of a danger
than a rotten tooth. And a fetus like a rotten tooth, will eventually
fall out. A rotten tooth, will seldom kill, pregnancy is far more
likely to kill than a rotten tooth.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

Contempt is not a felony.

Yep, however most Judges will let it slide if you agree to comply.
However a judge can keep you in jail until he leaves office or dies.
Unless you comply with the order.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On 6 May 2007 14:57:05 -0700, Relayer wrote:

On May 6, 10:56?am, Robert wrote:
On Sat, 5 May 2007 18:52:00 -0700, "DB" wrote:

"Paul Anderson" wrote in

YOU claimed that abortion was homicide under English Common Law.
s
anyone can see, abortion was not only not a homicide, it was not even
a felony. t was, a misdemeander.

So by your reasoning, failure to pay CS was never a felony until recently,
so the crime shouldn't exist.

Contempt of Court has always been a felony, and a Judge has the
power to Jail anyone in contempt until the person agrees to comply
with a court order.

Regardless if you regard abortion a crime or not, having a life extracted
from your body ain't exactly the same as extracting a rotten tooth.

ell it cost more, but a unwanted fetus is really more of a danger
than a rotten tooth. And a fetus like a rotten tooth, will eventually
fall out. A rotten tooth, will seldom kill, pregnancy is far more
likely to kill than a rotten tooth.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

Well, one thing is obvious. There is no clear distinction between you
and a rotting tooth.. Its really a shame your mother didn't have you
extracted with a coat hanger.

Your Christian love gives me a warm fuzzy feel.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On Sun, 06 May 2007 22:19:52 GMT, (Paul Anderson)
wrote:

On 6 May 2007 14:54:22 -0700, Relayer wrote:

On May 5, 11:05=EF=BF=BDpm, (Paul Anderson) wrote:
On Sat, 5 May 2007 18:52:00 -0700, "DB" wrote:

"Paul Anderson" wrote in

Again with the lies. =A0A fetus is not A LIFE -- which in this case
would refer to the life of a human being.

It certainly is a life.

A lie. Why must you lie?

A devout Christian pro-lifer has nothing but lies to live by.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

On Sun, 06 May 2007 22:21:52 GMT, (Paul Anderson)
wrote:

On 6 May 2007 14:57:05 -0700, Relayer wrote:

On May 6, 10:56=EF=BF=BDam, Robert wrote:
On Sat, 5 May 2007 18:52:00 -0700, "DB" wrote:

"Paul Anderson" wrote in

YOU claimed that abortion was homicide under English Common Law. =A0As
anyone can see, abortion was not only not a homicide, it was not even
a felony. =A0It was, a misdemeander.

So by your reasoning, failure to pay CS was never a felony until recentl=
y,
so the crime shouldn't exist.

=A0 Contempt of Court has always been a felony, and a Judge has the
power to Jail anyone in contempt until the person agrees to comply
with a court order.

Regardless if you regard abortion a crime or not, having a life extracted
from your body ain't exactly the same as extracting a rotten tooth.

=A0 =A0Well it cost more, but a unwanted fetus is really more of a danger
than a rotten tooth. And a fetus like a rotten tooth, will eventually
fall out. A rotten tooth, will seldom kill, pregnancy is far more
likely to kill than a rotten tooth.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account fromhttp://www.teranews.com

Well, one thing is obvious. There is no clear distinction between you
and a rotting tooth.. Its really a shame your mother didn't have you
extracted with a coat hanger.

Pro-Lifers *ARE* quite consistent in wishing harm upon those they
disagree with.

It's the Christian way, don't you know?

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com