If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)
"DB" wrote in message . net... "Gini" wrote in So unless you have something useful to say, it's pointless posting here because nobody is reading it! :-) == She doesn't know where "here," is--She thinks "here" is there (FamilyKB). And that's a forum website with about 3 people! LOL And two or three of them all use the same IP address to post. I have to admit I did learn something new from them. Until one of them used the term I had no idea what the word "niglet" meant. The Urban Dictionary helped me out! Of course, I would be considered a racist if I used that word. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)
DB wrote:
"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in She sure has a lot of free time for working 70 hours a week LOL [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] I think you guys are paranoid. Can you prove I am on any ones kill file list, As you said, you are not computer savvy! Lots of people read Usenet, but rarely post as they take a few minutes to read things that are worthwhile! They know the posters that are posting useful information, everything else they filter out with an ignore list which eliminates a lot of the flack that they just don't need to see. By now they've figure out your posts are full of tripe, Arrest all the dead beats, you keep beating the same old drum that previous Femwits used to beat. They are gone now because nobody responded to them! Right now you're just sparring with some of the long term regulars because you provide some entertainment for them, they will soon tire of you and put you on their Kill file list. So unless you have something useful to say, it's pointless posting here because nobody is reading it! :-) I could understand if alt.child support was to only present the non custodial point of view, but it is not. If you and yours don’t want to bother with what my opinions and views are, it seems to me, you could have already moved on with your life and your group. You did not, and that means you want to know my opinions. Say no all you want, and make you lame attempts to insult me, but that fact that you put so much effort in doing so leads to two conclusions: 1. You like to read what I post, and my comments 2. You have no life, this is your life, and you own little world Because, as you said, you can make it to where you don’t have to see it, if you have a problem, do it. Then only the custodial parents will respond, and I will not have to be laughing at your warped perception of reality. -- Message posted via http://www.familykb.com |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)
Bob Whiteside wrote:
"Gini" wrote in [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] And that's a forum website with about 3 people! LOL And two or three of them all use the same IP address to post. I have to admit I did learn something new from them. Until one of them used the term I had no idea what the word "niglet" meant. The Urban Dictionary helped me out! Of course, I would be considered a racist if I used that word. You are considered racist if you want to use it. Even thinking about using that phrase makes you a racist. Black people are very sensitive, I guess 300 years of opression is bound to make one a little testy. You should not have even shared the term with the rest of us. -- Message posted via FamilyKB.com http://www.familykb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...nting/200710/1 |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)
"DB" wrote in message ... "Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in She sure has a lot of free time for working 70 hours a week LOL On Usenet, you can be anything you want, even a law enforcement clerk working 70 hours per week! LOL I think you guys are paranoid. Can you prove I am on any ones kill file list, As you said, you are not computer savvy! Lots of people read Usenet, but rarely post as they take a few minutes to read things that are worthwhile! They know the posters that are posting useful information, everything else they filter out with an ignore list which eliminates a lot of the flack that they just don't need to see. By now they've figure out your posts are full of tripe, Arrest all the dead beats, you keep beating the same old drum that previous Femwits used to beat. They are gone now because nobody responded to them! Right now you're just sparring with some of the long term regulars because you provide some entertainment for them, they will soon tire of you and put you on their Kill file list. So unless you have something useful to say, Yeah, starting with FACTS. it's pointless posting here because nobody is reading it! :-) |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)
"No Spam" wrote in message ... "Illiana" u38194@uwe wrote in message news:7996cd2fa0c2c@uwe... Why is the DBP crew in every group, discussion, topic, and thread when it is about child support? Is it possible for them to gripe anymore about something that is in place to help single parents take care of their children? I wonder why those people are so adamant about not paying child support. They all claim not to be deadbeats, or enablers, yet their comments, way of thinking, and bashing of the custodial parents tell a different story. A good place to get DBP's noticed is http://www.deadbeatparents.info I posted my childrens father there, and it gives me a chance to share with others. LAME website, to say the least. LOL I've noticed that out of your overwhelming membership of THREE (3), no one identifies theirself. Even the Administrator conceals their identy. WHY? Stand up and BE PROUD that you are going after the "deadbeats". LOL ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)
"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in message news:79bb89b8f7437@uwe... Bob Whiteside wrote: "Gini" wrote in [quoted text clipped - 4 lines] And that's a forum website with about 3 people! LOL And two or three of them all use the same IP address to post. I have to admit I did learn something new from them. Until one of them used the term I had no idea what the word "niglet" meant. The Urban Dictionary helped me out! Of course, I would be considered a racist if I used that word. You are considered racist if you want to use it. Even thinking about using that phrase makes you a racist. Black people are very sensitive, I guess 300 years of opression is bound to make one a little testy. You should not have even shared the term with the rest of us. Interesting twist of logic. The mother who uses a racially charged word regarding their child is given a pass. But the person who hears it, and thinks about what it means, is a racist. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)
On Oct 15, 2:58 pm, "Chris" wrote:
"No Spam" wrote in message ... "Illiana" u38194@uwe wrote in messagenews:7996cd2fa0c2c@uwe... Why is the DBP crew in every group, discussion, topic, and thread when it is about child support? Is it possible for them to gripe anymore about something that is in place to help single parents take care of their children? I wonder why those people are so adamant about not paying child support. They all claim not to be deadbeats, or enablers, yet their comments, way of thinking, and bashing of the custodial parents tell a different story. A good place to get DBP's noticed is http://www.deadbeatparents.info I posted my childrens father there, and it gives me a chance to share with others. LAME website, to say the least. LOL I've noticed that out of your overwhelming membership of THREE (3), no one identifies theirself. Even the Administrator conceals their identy. WHY? Stand up and BE PROUD that you are going after the "deadbeats". LOL ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.comThe #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Why exactly is it that women like Ileana feel that it's only the MAN's responsibility to take care of the children financially? It's funny because it's pretty darn obvious that you custodial mothers (not all, just some like Ileana) want to PUNISH the dad's for having slept with them and getting them pregnant... it's like because they were PUNISHED by having to take care of a child, they feel they should PUNISH the ex and make him pay...If your child is such a drain on you, why did you have him? If he's such a drain on you, why don't you give him to the father? Because you want to control everyone's life...How sad that you feelt that YOUR sacrifice to raise your kid means that someone should pay you for it...Lousy excuse for women...very sick. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
deadbeat and enabler list (another thread that went off topic)
"Illiana via FamilyKB.com" u38194@uwe wrote in message news:79addffe777f7@uwe... Kenneth S. wrote: Why is the DBP crew in every group, discussion, topic, and thread when it is [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] Is it possible to stop trying to bash custodial parents, and allow one of these threads to just have replies relevant to the topic? I've been following this group for more than 10 years. As I see it, one of the group's functions is to provide those who read it with a wider perspective on the issue of "child support" (a payment that I try to remember always to put in quote marks, because the money isn't to support children--very obviously, the money is intended to support the mothers of the children in question). The wider perspective available here isn't to be found in the media in the U.S., because the media is almost universally feminist and politically correct in outlook. Here's one element in the wider perspective. "He should not be held responsible for having sex, only I should," you say. So "child support"--which is money you want to get from him--is a penalty for having sex? There's a name for those who get paid for having sex, and another name for those who pay to have sex. Those who pay to have sex are called "johns" by law enforcement. You may not want to think about the name assigned to those who accept payment for having sex. The simple truth about "child support" is that the rules all are derived from the fact that men pay it and women receive it. If any significant number of women had to pay it, the system would look ENTIRELY different. Also, there are indications in the research that there would be fewer divorces and fatherless families if women thought there was any danger that they would have to pay CS, not receive it. That is not true. There are a lot of men that are custodial parents, And there are a lot of lottery winners too. So QUICK, run out and buy your tickets so you too will win MILLIONS! Can you say "special pleading"? women are requeired to pay child support. If the rule is in fact derived from the simple fact men pay and women get, then the term would be mother and father, not custodial parent and non custodial parent. "CP" and "NCP" are merely code words for mother/father which is nothing more than propoganda to conceal the TRUTH! Of course "child support" and "in the best interest of the children" are too. Argumentum ad misericordiam. So long as people like you buy into it, then it is people like YOU who perpetuate the lie. -- Message posted via FamilyKB.com http://www.familykb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...nting/200710/1 |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
deadbeat and enabler Brief Rant
X-No-Archive: no
"whatamess" wrote ................................ Why exactly is it that women like Ileana feel that it's only the MAN's responsibility to take care of the children financially? It's funny because it's pretty darn obvious that you custodial mothers (not all, just some like Ileana) want to PUNISH the dad's for having slept with them and getting them pregnant... it's like because they were PUNISHED by having to take care of a child, they feel they should PUNISH the ex and make him pay...If your child is such a drain on you, why did you have him? If he's such a drain on you, why don't you give him to the father? Because you want to control everyone's life...How sad that you feelt that YOUR sacrifice to raise your kid means that someone should pay you for it...Lousy excuse for women...very sick. ===== OK--My Rant of the Month....Have I had one yet this month? Can't remember. Oh well. Women can blame the National Organization for Women for relegating them to pathetic government/man dependent, entitlement-minded creatures, incapable of standing on their own two feet with pride and confidence in their abilities to survive on their own devices. NOW transformed women's rights to equality to women's rights to preferential treatment demanding that courts rescue weak women from the throes of evil men. At the same time, they convinced an entire generation (or two) of women that if they did not go after these men (defined only by gender), they were somehow stupid and short-changing their children. Of course, those who welcomed this attitude (weak, unmotivated women), now would rather spend years digging and scratching for a few pennies handout from men and government, screaming with all their might that the men deserve to be chased down like animals--for some reason, and need to be taught a lesson--for something. Dignity and self-reliance in women became chastised and ridiculed as faults rather than virtues. The most tragic outcome is the creation of an entire generation of girls who are taught they are more important and smarter than men and can do perfectly fine without the "idiots" as long as they get to take his wallet when they leave. This is called having your cake and eating it too, and an entire court system seemed quite happy to pat them on the head and lament, "Poor girl." That is why women, such as those we have seen deluging ACS from "FamilyKB" with the whining mantra of "Please help me! He's sooo bad and I need rescued," both nauseate and anger me just as all the advertisement/ marketing portraying men as buffoons and morons worthy of nothing more than financing women. If you are curious as to how all this media/court portraiture might affect a generation of young boys and men, do a web search of "looking-glass self," (which is usually correctly cited as part of the "passive bigotry" [an oxymoron] that has endangered generations of black men). Yeah, this ****es me off--I have five extraordinarily important sons, including my stepson. So, in conclusion.....You can mess with Texas all you want, but leave my sons alone :-) |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
deadbeat and enabler Brief Rant
"Gini" wrote in message news:MkUQi.1798$pl2.479@trndny09... X-No-Archive: no "whatamess" wrote ............................... Why exactly is it that women like Ileana feel that it's only the MAN's responsibility to take care of the children financially? It's funny because it's pretty darn obvious that you custodial mothers (not all, just some like Ileana) want to PUNISH the dad's for having slept with them and getting them pregnant... it's like because they were PUNISHED by having to take care of a child, they feel they should PUNISH the ex and make him pay...If your child is such a drain on you, why did you have him? If he's such a drain on you, why don't you give him to the father? Because you want to control everyone's life...How sad that you feelt that YOUR sacrifice to raise your kid means that someone should pay you for it...Lousy excuse for women...very sick. ===== OK--My Rant of the Month....Have I had one yet this month? Can't remember. Oh well. Women can blame the National Organization for Women for relegating them to pathetic government/man dependent, entitlement-minded creatures, incapable of standing on their own two feet with pride and confidence in their abilities to survive on their own devices. NOW transformed women's rights to equality to women's rights to preferential treatment demanding that courts rescue weak women from the throes of evil men. At the same time, they convinced an entire generation (or two) of women that if they did not go after these men (defined only by gender), they were somehow stupid and short-changing their children. Of course, those who welcomed this attitude (weak, unmotivated women), now would rather spend years digging and scratching for a few pennies handout from men and government, screaming with all their might that the men deserve to be chased down like animals--for some reason, and need to be taught a lesson--for something. Dignity and self-reliance in women became chastised and ridiculed as faults rather than virtues. The most tragic outcome is the creation of an entire generation of girls who are taught they are more important and smarter than men and can do perfectly fine without the "idiots" as long as they get to take his wallet when they leave. This is called having your cake and eating it too, and an entire court system seemed quite happy to pat them on the head and lament, "Poor girl." That is why women, such as those we have seen deluging ACS from "FamilyKB" with the whining mantra of "Please help me! He's sooo bad and I need rescued," both nauseate and anger me just as all the advertisement/ marketing portraying men as buffoons and morons worthy of nothing more than financing women. If you are curious as to how all this media/court portraiture might affect a generation of young boys and men, do a web search of "looking-glass self," (which is usually correctly cited as part of the "passive bigotry" [an oxymoron] that has endangered generations of black men). Yeah, this ****es me off--I have five extraordinarily important sons, including my stepson. So, in conclusion.....You can mess with Texas all you want, but leave my sons alone Excellent rant, Gini. =c) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CT: New Haven witch hunt for deadbeat fathers - notice that NO mothers were on their list... | Dusty | Child Support | 1 | April 5th 05 06:37 AM |
Guest Speaker: Dr. Rita Laws Topic: Topic: Why Kids Lie and What We Can Do About It | wexwimpy | Foster Parents | 0 | March 2nd 04 05:42 PM |
Waiting list for POFAK mailing list | Herself | General | 3 | October 15th 03 06:26 PM |
Waiting list for POFAK mailing list | Herself | Breastfeeding | 3 | October 15th 03 06:26 PM |