Could children be hit by teachers in the 70's?

Doan wrote:

On Fri, 2 Sep 2005, R. Steve Walz wrote:

Nonsense. You're a ****head.
Steve

LOL! Did my **** get into your mouth again?

Doan
---------------------------
You project your fecal/oral-fear fixation when you're confused.
Steve

Doan isn't just looking for an excuse to trash the police. He's also
continually attempting to link legally subduing an offender as a last
resort or using force as self-defense to spanking.

As you said, police who use a baton when not necessary to subdue an
offender can, should, and often are prosecuted for assault.

Children may be assaulted daily in the name of discipline with no legal
recourse.

LaVonne

dragonlady wrote:

Ah -- I'd forgotten that you are someone who is always sure the police
are wrong -- and always sure you know all of the circumstances, whether
you were there or not.

Any excuse to trash the police.

(Who, for the record, don't always behave the way they should -- but
when they DO, in fact, use a baton without good reason, CAN (and should)
be prosecuted for assault -- or at the very least, inappropriate use of
force.) (See entire post below)

In article ,
Doan wrote:


On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, dragonlady wrote:


In article ,
Doan wrote:


On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Carlson LaVonne wrote:


Parents may legally spank their children in every state. Parents
spanking children is not illegal in Oregon nor is California soon to ban
parental disciplinary spanking of children. I don't know where you get
your misinformation, but it needs to stop.

LaVonne

And spanking is assault but a police striking you with a baton is not?

Doan



Don't be stupid.

Anyone striking you with a baton *for no reason* is an assault.
--
Children won't care how much you know until they know how much you care


The police *always* have a *reason*. They even used a taser on a SIX-YEAR
OLD!

Doan




Ah -- I'd forgotten that you are someone who is always sure the police
are wrong -- and always sure you know all of the circumstances, whether
you were there or not.

Any excuse to trash the police.

(Who, for the record, don't always behave the way they should -- but
when they DO, in fact, use a baton without good reason, CAN (and should)
be prosecuted for assault -- or at the very least, inappropriate use of
force.)

And you were "assaulted" by your parents, LaVonne? Logic and the
anti-spanking zealotS... are they mutually exclusive? ;-)

Doan

On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Carlson LaVonne wrote:

Doan isn't just looking for an excuse to trash the police. He's also
continually attempting to link legally subduing an offender as a last
resort or using force as self-defense to spanking.

As you said, police who use a baton when not necessary to subdue an
offender can, should, and often are prosecuted for assault.

Children may be assaulted daily in the name of discipline with no legal
recourse.

LaVonne

dragonlady wrote:

Ah -- I'd forgotten that you are someone who is always sure the police
are wrong -- and always sure you know all of the circumstances, whether
you were there or not.

Any excuse to trash the police.

(Who, for the record, don't always behave the way they should -- but
when they DO, in fact, use a baton without good reason, CAN (and should)
be prosecuted for assault -- or at the very least, inappropriate use of
force.) (See entire post below)

In article ,
Doan wrote:


On Wed, 31 Aug 2005, dragonlady wrote:


In article ,
Doan wrote:


On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Carlson LaVonne wrote:


Parents may legally spank their children in every state. Parents
spanking children is not illegal in Oregon nor is California soon to ban
parental disciplinary spanking of children. I don't know where you get
your misinformation, but it needs to stop.

LaVonne

And spanking is assault but a police striking you with a baton is not?

Doan



Don't be stupid.

Anyone striking you with a baton *for no reason* is an assault.
--
Children won't care how much you know until they know how much you care


The police *always* have a *reason*. They even used a taser on a SIX-YEAR
OLD!

Doan




Ah -- I'd forgotten that you are someone who is always sure the police
are wrong -- and always sure you know all of the circumstances, whether
you were there or not.

Any excuse to trash the police.

(Who, for the record, don't always behave the way they should -- but
when they DO, in fact, use a baton without good reason, CAN (and should)
be prosecuted for assault -- or at the very least, inappropriate use of
force.)

Doan wrote:

And you were "assaulted" by your parents, LaVonne? Logic and the
anti-spanking zealotS... are they mutually exclusive? ;-)

Doan
------------------------
Your grasp of logic is defective.
Steve