A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » alt.parenting » Spanking
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The decline of rape



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old February 26th 07, 06:56 PM posted to alt.parenting.spanking
Doan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,380
Default The decline of rape


You are wasting your time, David. You are arguing with someone who
doesn't understand the concept of correllation vs. causal. Kane
still thinks that automobile crash studies are only correlational
because they use dummies instead of readl humans!

Doan

On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, David J. Hughes wrote:

0:-] wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 18:32:33 -0600, "David J. Hughes"
wrote:


0:-] wrote:

On 22 Feb 2007 16:32:17 -0800, "Greegor" wrote:



Is this a SPANKING issue?
Why was it posted ONLY to alt.parenting.spanking ???


Oh, maybe because spanking is falling into more and more disfavor,
with less of it going on.

And:

"The youngest teenagers (presumably those raised with the most modern
attitudes) show the biggest declines of all. Over the last 30 years,
rape arrest rates have fallen by 80% among Californians under age 15,
much larger than the 25% drop among residents age 40 and older."

The claim that "youth is running wild," has been around since it was
popular to claim it in ancient Rome.

The truth is the less corporal punishment the less youth crime, Greg.

Correlation does not imply causation..



Oddly you are wrong. In fact, correlation is one of the contributing
parts of findings of causation, but this is a popular comment to make,
and you made it.


The statement "correlation does not imply causation" is inarguably true.
Likewise, the statement "Correlation suggests a link to causation" is
equally true.
You stated "The truth is the less corporal punishment the less youth crime".
This is true, but you statement suggests causation, without support.
Had you stated "There is good evidence that the less corporal punishment
the less youth crime", particularly with citations of the evidence, I
would have had no reason to post.

I intentionally used a mixture of possible, arguable and ridiculous true
correllations to point out the validity of the the statement
"Correlation does not imply causation."

Correlations, statistically examined reach the point of being accepted
as cause in many instances.


"Lies, damned lies and statistics" g.
Statistical evidence can support a hypothesis, but can never prove it.
At best, it can support the statement "this may be true by the best
evidence we have avaialble at this time."
Note, please, that my disagreement is not with your position, but rather
with how you presented your position.
Anytime anyone presents anything as the absolute TRUTH, I feel the need
to put one hand on my wallet and look for the nearest exit.



Premise: there is less youth crime currently than formerly.
It is equally valid to say:



No, actually it's not. There must be some logical reasonable
connections or connection.


The less corporal punishment the less youth crime



Violent crime, and other crime, has been causaly linked to childhood
"trauma." Trauma is what cp is about, and it's intent.


The more internet porn the less youth crime



The might actually be a connection. It should be examined.


The greater the violence in video games the less youth crime



Nope. This one has not been examined. Nice try though.


This one could be argued on the structure of the studies conducted.
"Self fulfilling prophecies" are one of the major stumbling blocks in
any such study.


The higher the average planetary temperature the less youth crime



RIDICULOUS.


Almost certainly.


The higher the atmospheric concentration of CO2 the less youth crime


Equally ridiculous as the previous.

The higher the median family income the less youth crime
The greater the availability of consensual sex acts the less youth crime



All ridiculous, because there is no logical connection by correlation.


Both these last two are arguable, particularly since you were using sex
crimes as the primary focus of your post.
Logical connections are the reduction in financial and sexual needs to
prompt criminal action.

You must show a track of violence to crime.


Nonsense. Criminal behavior exists in persons who have never been the
victim of violence, and victims of the most horrific violence have
become upright, law abiding individuals.

The violence/crime connection is a factor, but not an absolute.

Spanking is a violent
act,and even the users would agree to that, but fight the use of the
language.

The point of CP is to cause PAIN. Causing pain is violent.


Causing injury MAY be violent. Pain is frequently an unfortunate side
effect of beneficial behavior.
Causing pain is not necessarily violent. Deflowering one's virgin wife
in the marriage bed can very painful, but that is not the intent.
Please examine your language use for clarity.
Emotionally laden terms tend to hamper meaningful discussions.


The trends have followed each other very closely.

It used to be, for instance, that while toddlers were spanked (they
still are) it tended to continue on into older age groups as well.

It no longer does.

Read up. Get educated. Learn the truth...or are you afraid you'll lose
all your biases?

R R R R R R RRRRRRRRRRRRR R R ....

Kane




You are to be commended. You did a great job, repeating like a parrot,
the claim of "correlation is not causation."


"Correlation does not imply causation" is not the same as "correlation
is not causation."
If you must parrot, please do so correctly. G


Problem is correlation is a very useful tool, IF it's used correctly.


Agreed.

Thanks for bringing this up.

I've said it before, though, and I will again.

Kane



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----




----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----


  #12  
Old February 26th 07, 08:18 PM posted to alt.parenting.spanking
0:-]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 805
Default The decline of rape

On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:56:05 -0800, Doan wrote:


You are wasting your time, David. You are arguing with someone who
doesn't understand the concept of correllation vs. causal. Kane
still thinks that automobile crash studies are only correlational
because they use dummies instead of readl humans!


Show me any study that extends to humans causally when using other
than human subject, Doan.

The medical field, for instance, is replete with studies using animals
where readers of the reports are routinely warned NOT to extrapolate
to humans what was found in non-human subjects.


Doan


Still winging it, I see.

0:+]




On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, David J. Hughes wrote:

0:-] wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 18:32:33 -0600, "David J. Hughes"
wrote:


0:-] wrote:

On 22 Feb 2007 16:32:17 -0800, "Greegor" wrote:



Is this a SPANKING issue?
Why was it posted ONLY to alt.parenting.spanking ???


Oh, maybe because spanking is falling into more and more disfavor,
with less of it going on.

And:

"The youngest teenagers (presumably those raised with the most modern
attitudes) show the biggest declines of all. Over the last 30 years,
rape arrest rates have fallen by 80% among Californians under age 15,
much larger than the 25% drop among residents age 40 and older."

The claim that "youth is running wild," has been around since it was
popular to claim it in ancient Rome.

The truth is the less corporal punishment the less youth crime, Greg.

Correlation does not imply causation..


Oddly you are wrong. In fact, correlation is one of the contributing
parts of findings of causation, but this is a popular comment to make,
and you made it.


The statement "correlation does not imply causation" is inarguably true.
Likewise, the statement "Correlation suggests a link to causation" is
equally true.
You stated "The truth is the less corporal punishment the less youth crime".
This is true, but you statement suggests causation, without support.
Had you stated "There is good evidence that the less corporal punishment
the less youth crime", particularly with citations of the evidence, I
would have had no reason to post.

I intentionally used a mixture of possible, arguable and ridiculous true
correllations to point out the validity of the the statement
"Correlation does not imply causation."

Correlations, statistically examined reach the point of being accepted
as cause in many instances.


"Lies, damned lies and statistics" g.
Statistical evidence can support a hypothesis, but can never prove it.
At best, it can support the statement "this may be true by the best
evidence we have avaialble at this time."
Note, please, that my disagreement is not with your position, but rather
with how you presented your position.
Anytime anyone presents anything as the absolute TRUTH, I feel the need
to put one hand on my wallet and look for the nearest exit.



Premise: there is less youth crime currently than formerly.
It is equally valid to say:


No, actually it's not. There must be some logical reasonable
connections or connection.


The less corporal punishment the less youth crime


Violent crime, and other crime, has been causaly linked to childhood
"trauma." Trauma is what cp is about, and it's intent.


The more internet porn the less youth crime


The might actually be a connection. It should be examined.


The greater the violence in video games the less youth crime


Nope. This one has not been examined. Nice try though.


This one could be argued on the structure of the studies conducted.
"Self fulfilling prophecies" are one of the major stumbling blocks in
any such study.


The higher the average planetary temperature the less youth crime


RIDICULOUS.


Almost certainly.


The higher the atmospheric concentration of CO2 the less youth crime


Equally ridiculous as the previous.

The higher the median family income the less youth crime
The greater the availability of consensual sex acts the less youth crime


All ridiculous, because there is no logical connection by correlation.


Both these last two are arguable, particularly since you were using sex
crimes as the primary focus of your post.
Logical connections are the reduction in financial and sexual needs to
prompt criminal action.

You must show a track of violence to crime.


Nonsense. Criminal behavior exists in persons who have never been the
victim of violence, and victims of the most horrific violence have
become upright, law abiding individuals.

The violence/crime connection is a factor, but not an absolute.

Spanking is a violent
act,and even the users would agree to that, but fight the use of the
language.

The point of CP is to cause PAIN. Causing pain is violent.


Causing injury MAY be violent. Pain is frequently an unfortunate side
effect of beneficial behavior.
Causing pain is not necessarily violent. Deflowering one's virgin wife
in the marriage bed can very painful, but that is not the intent.
Please examine your language use for clarity.
Emotionally laden terms tend to hamper meaningful discussions.


The trends have followed each other very closely.

It used to be, for instance, that while toddlers were spanked (they
still are) it tended to continue on into older age groups as well.

It no longer does.

Read up. Get educated. Learn the truth...or are you afraid you'll lose
all your biases?

R R R R R R RRRRRRRRRRRRR R R ....

Kane




You are to be commended. You did a great job, repeating like a parrot,
the claim of "correlation is not causation."


"Correlation does not imply causation" is not the same as "correlation
is not causation."
If you must parrot, please do so correctly. G


Problem is correlation is a very useful tool, IF it's used correctly.


Agreed.

Thanks for bringing this up.

I've said it before, though, and I will again.

Kane



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----


  #13  
Old February 27th 07, 02:06 AM posted to alt.parenting.spanking
Doan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,380
Default The decline of rape

On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, 0:-] wrote:

On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 09:56:05 -0800, Doan wrote:


You are wasting your time, David. You are arguing with someone who
doesn't understand the concept of correllation vs. causal. Kane
still thinks that automobile crash studies are only correlational
because they use dummies instead of readl humans!


Show me any study that extends to humans causally when using other
than human subject, Doan.

Hahaha! So how is it only CORRELATIONAL then, Kane?

The medical field, for instance, is replete with studies using animals
where readers of the reports are routinely warned NOT to extrapolate
to humans what was found in non-human subjects.

So how does that turns a CAUSAL study into a CORRELATIONAL only one?


Doan


Still winging it, I see.

STill showing YOUR STUPIDITY, I see!

0:+]




On Sat, 24 Feb 2007, David J. Hughes wrote:

0:-] wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 18:32:33 -0600, "David J. Hughes"
wrote:


0:-] wrote:

On 22 Feb 2007 16:32:17 -0800, "Greegor" wrote:



Is this a SPANKING issue?
Why was it posted ONLY to alt.parenting.spanking ???


Oh, maybe because spanking is falling into more and more disfavor,
with less of it going on.

And:

"The youngest teenagers (presumably those raised with the most modern
attitudes) show the biggest declines of all. Over the last 30 years,
rape arrest rates have fallen by 80% among Californians under age 15,
much larger than the 25% drop among residents age 40 and older."

The claim that "youth is running wild," has been around since it was
popular to claim it in ancient Rome.

The truth is the less corporal punishment the less youth crime, Greg.

Correlation does not imply causation..


Oddly you are wrong. In fact, correlation is one of the contributing
parts of findings of causation, but this is a popular comment to make,
and you made it.

The statement "correlation does not imply causation" is inarguably true.
Likewise, the statement "Correlation suggests a link to causation" is
equally true.
You stated "The truth is the less corporal punishment the less youth crime".
This is true, but you statement suggests causation, without support.
Had you stated "There is good evidence that the less corporal punishment
the less youth crime", particularly with citations of the evidence, I
would have had no reason to post.

I intentionally used a mixture of possible, arguable and ridiculous true
correllations to point out the validity of the the statement
"Correlation does not imply causation."

Correlations, statistically examined reach the point of being accepted
as cause in many instances.

"Lies, damned lies and statistics" g.
Statistical evidence can support a hypothesis, but can never prove it.
At best, it can support the statement "this may be true by the best
evidence we have avaialble at this time."
Note, please, that my disagreement is not with your position, but rather
with how you presented your position.
Anytime anyone presents anything as the absolute TRUTH, I feel the need
to put one hand on my wallet and look for the nearest exit.



Premise: there is less youth crime currently than formerly.
It is equally valid to say:


No, actually it's not. There must be some logical reasonable
connections or connection.


The less corporal punishment the less youth crime


Violent crime, and other crime, has been causaly linked to childhood
"trauma." Trauma is what cp is about, and it's intent.


The more internet porn the less youth crime


The might actually be a connection. It should be examined.


The greater the violence in video games the less youth crime


Nope. This one has not been examined. Nice try though.


This one could be argued on the structure of the studies conducted.
"Self fulfilling prophecies" are one of the major stumbling blocks in
any such study.


The higher the average planetary temperature the less youth crime


RIDICULOUS.


Almost certainly.


The higher the atmospheric concentration of CO2 the less youth crime

Equally ridiculous as the previous.

The higher the median family income the less youth crime
The greater the availability of consensual sex acts the less youth crime


All ridiculous, because there is no logical connection by correlation.


Both these last two are arguable, particularly since you were using sex
crimes as the primary focus of your post.
Logical connections are the reduction in financial and sexual needs to
prompt criminal action.

You must show a track of violence to crime.

Nonsense. Criminal behavior exists in persons who have never been the
victim of violence, and victims of the most horrific violence have
become upright, law abiding individuals.

The violence/crime connection is a factor, but not an absolute.

Spanking is a violent
act,and even the users would agree to that, but fight the use of the
language.

The point of CP is to cause PAIN. Causing pain is violent.

Causing injury MAY be violent. Pain is frequently an unfortunate side
effect of beneficial behavior.
Causing pain is not necessarily violent. Deflowering one's virgin wife
in the marriage bed can very painful, but that is not the intent.
Please examine your language use for clarity.
Emotionally laden terms tend to hamper meaningful discussions.


The trends have followed each other very closely.

It used to be, for instance, that while toddlers were spanked (they
still are) it tended to continue on into older age groups as well.

It no longer does.

Read up. Get educated. Learn the truth...or are you afraid you'll lose
all your biases?

R R R R R R RRRRRRRRRRRRR R R ....

Kane




You are to be commended. You did a great job, repeating like a parrot,
the claim of "correlation is not causation."

"Correlation does not imply causation" is not the same as "correlation
is not causation."
If you must parrot, please do so correctly. G


Problem is correlation is a very useful tool, IF it's used correctly.


Agreed.

Thanks for bringing this up.

I've said it before, though, and I will again.

Kane



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
C-section madness? (also: 'completely shocked' Nan, the rape expert) Todd Gastaldo Pregnancy 0 January 11th 07 01:58 AM
This one doesn't confuse beating ... 0:-> Spanking 136 December 25th 06 09:44 AM
CT Minister SUES Cops who busted him for SPANKING! Greegor Foster Parents 132 December 25th 06 09:44 AM
The right to abandon your child (aka - Roe v. Wade for Men) Dusty Child Support 384 March 26th 06 02:42 AM
{ACS} THE RIGHT TO RAPE {Hungry Guy} (M/F Mpov Mdom Fsub slow nc rape cons rom caution) Hungry Guy Child Support 0 March 25th 06 01:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.