Put away the knife!: Research Finds Gel May Help Prevent AIDS

* Research Finds Gel May Help Prevent AIDS
Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...103101242.html

* Companies to develop AIDS defense for women
Reuters.uk
http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/news...OBICIDE-DC.XML

* Vaginal gel may help HIV prevention
United Press International (UPI)
http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/view.ph...1-060654-8054r

The moral of this story?:

Be wise, don't circumcise! ;-)

Don't be hasty, leave it tasty (intact)! ;-)

SPERMACIDE VERSION OF HIV VAGINAL GEL?

See the very end of this post.

First this...

Be wse, don't circumcise?

ROUTINE INFANT CIRCUMCISION AND THE SHAKY HIV/AIDS HYPOTHESIS...

in article , Taylor at
wrote on 11/1/05 1:16 AM:

* Research Finds Gel May Help Prevent AIDS
Washington Post
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...AR200510310124
2.html

* Companies to develop AIDS defense for women
Reuters.uk
http://today.reuters.co.uk/news/news...&storyID=2005-
10-31T170009Z_01_SIB161149_RTRIDST_0_HEALTH-AIDS-MICROBICIDE-DC.XML

* Vaginal gel may help HIV prevention
United Press International (UPI)
http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/view.ph...1-060654-8054r

The moral of this story?:

Be wise, don't circumcise! ;-)

snip

ROUTINE INFANT CIRCUMCISION AND THE SHAKY HIV/AIDS HYPOTHESIS...

I used to blindly believe in the shaky HIV/AIDS hypothesis - then I observed
American MDs embracing it to stay out of prison.

(American medicine's most frequent surgical behavior is the obviously
illegal mass ripping and slicing of infant penises. The mass infant torture
is still often performed with no anesthetic; but even if anesthetic is used,
one cannot anesthetize child abuse.)

BILLIONS OF DOLLARS WORTH OF INFANT SCREAMS AGO...

In late 1987, I exposed American medicine's phony "babies can't feel pain"
neurology, noting that there were no medical indications for the mass infant
penis ripping and slicing. (There are STILL no medical indications.)

I petitioned Congress for a religious exemption from the child abuse laws
for the ancient Jewish religious ritual that leaves most of the foreskin on
the penis.

In Jan 1988 (Pediatrics), American MDs came out against ALL religious
exemptions.

In Feb. 1988 (Pediatrics), American MDs called for anonymity of PERPETRATORS
of child abuse.

In March 1988, American MDs ignored their own Scientific Board and suddenly
- by voice vote - decided their mass infant penis ripping and slicing
prevented transmission of HIV/AIDS. (California Medical Association
Resolution 305-88.)

Like most criminals - American MDs will do anything - even torturing infants
and lying about it - to stay out of prison.

How shaky is the HIV/AIDS hypothesis?

VERY shaky.

See James P. Hogan's Kicking the Sacred Cow: Questioning the Unquestionable
and Thinking the Impermissible [July 2004]...
http://www.duesberg.com/viewpoints/a...esy-hogan.html

Regardless whether the HIV/AIDS hypothesis is shaky...

There is no need to rip and slice INFANT penises to prevent it...

See African HIV hysteria and American baby penises...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/4009

The mass infant torture should have ended billions of dollars' worth of
infant screams ago - back in 1987 when I exposed the phony "babies can't
feel pain" neurology.

Ending the infant screams NOW (finally) will save an estimated $400 million
per year and PRESERVE the surgery as a CHOICE American males can make for
themselves in adulthood.

The ONLY "medical indication" for routine infant circumcision is to keep
American MDs out of prison.

Thanks for reading.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA


PS My bet is that the HIV vaginal gel will come in a spermacide version
which will be very popular. HIV/AIDS - if it is nothing else - is a way to
slow population growth. HIV/AIDS hysteria may be the most conservative
means possible of taming Harvard ant expert EO Wilson's "voracious human
biomass"...

Don't be hasty, leave it tasty (intact)!

My g/f describes this kind of "tasty" as "like eating a piece of ****".
She had one uncircumcised guy and said that's all she needed.

Your diatribe doesn't sound like something that comes from a "doctor".
Are you related to the former director of FEMA by any chance?

Ian wrote:
Don't be hasty, leave it tasty (intact)!


My g/f describes this kind of "tasty" as "like eating a piece of ****".
She had one uncircumcised guy and said that's all she needed.

Let's just hope she never gets ahold of a filthy cirumcised penis-she
may turn into a lesbian then,...

Ian wrote:
Don't be hasty, leave it tasty (intact)!


My g/f describes this kind of "tasty" as "like eating a piece of ****".
She had one uncircumcised guy and said that's all she needed.


And if a lady had one circumcised guy and said it was like licking a
worn out leather glove, she'd say: Never again.

Mike M wrote:

Ian wrote:

Don't be hasty, leave it tasty (intact)!



My g/f describes this kind of "tasty" as "like eating a piece of ****".
She had one uncircumcised guy and said that's all she needed.

Let's just hope she never gets ahold of a filthy cirumcised penis-she
may turn into a lesbian then,...

The human lips has more bacteria on it then the human male foreskin. So
to help reduce HIV/AIDS transmissions, the possibility of removing the
lips should also be tested in Africa as part of a study. ;-)

Taylor wrote:



Ian wrote:

Don't be hasty, leave it tasty (intact)!



My g/f describes this kind of "tasty" as "like eating a piece of ****".
She had one uncircumcised guy and said that's all she needed.


And if a lady had one circumcised guy and said it was like licking a
worn out leather glove, she'd say: Never again.


How could she ever say that?

Taylor wrote:



Mike M wrote:

Ian wrote:

Don't be hasty, leave it tasty (intact)!




My g/f describes this kind of "tasty" as "like eating a piece of ****".
She had one uncircumcised guy and said that's all she needed.

Let's just hope she never gets ahold of a filthy cirumcised penis-she
may turn into a lesbian then,...


The human lips has more bacteria on it then the human male foreskin.


You have some data on this? Or are you pulling it out of your ass as per
usual?


So
to help reduce HIV/AIDS transmissions, the possibility of removing the
lips should also be tested in Africa as part of a study. ;-)


Not funny, indeed very very silly.

You are desperately attempting to defect attention from the real dog in
this:

===================================
Association between the intact foreskin and inferior standards of : a
cross-sectional study.

O'Farrell N, Quigley M, Fox P.

Pasteur Suite, Ealing Hospital, Uxbridge Rd, London UB1 3HW, UK;
Department of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene
and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.

This study was undertaken to determine whether non-circumcised men have
inferior standards of genital hygiene behaviour, as measured by reported
washing of the whole penis, compared with circumcised men.

Male attenders at a sexually transmitted infections (STI) clinic at
Ealing Hospital, London had routine STI tests and examinations performed
and were asked about the frequency and thoroughness of genital washing.

One hundred and fifty non-circumcised and 75 circumcised men were
enrolled. Not always washing the whole penis, including retracting the
foreskin in non-circumcised men every time they washed (defined as
inferior genital hygiene behaviour) was more common in non-circumcised
(26%) than circumcised men (4%) (crude odds ratio = 8.43, 95% confidence
interval: 2.51-28.3, P0.001) and those with balanitis (42% and 5%,
P=0.036).

Circumcised men were more likely than non-circumcised men to wash the
genital area more than once a day (37% and 19%, P=0.011). Studies
investigating the relationship between male circumcision status and
other outcomes, for example HIV infection, should include assessment of
genital hygiene.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/q...191&query_hl=1

But the girls don't say "never again" after having a cut guy Taylor -
do they? They say that after making the mistake of trying a man with a
filthy and useless piece of smegmatic, redundant skin - you know, the
stuff which you so disgustingly describe as "Tasty" The rubbish which
you write is a disgrace to which ever stone you crawled from beneath,
but why should I be surprised? after all most of the skin freaks who
post here and on boards where foreskins are worshipped, are little more
than rabid, sexually inadequate, ignorant, pathetic little people, for
whom masturbation must be the nearest they get to any sexual
experience. Let's face it, any girl who wants her man to have a
foreskin has never tried it the right way - with a circumcised man!! or
so most of the women of my acquaintance say.