If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The Religious Question
http://www.religioustolerance.org/spankin3.htm
-- "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin (or someone else) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The Religious Question
What is the Religious question?
Why is an ATHEIST posing the ""Religious Quastion""? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The Religious Question
Greegor wrote:
What is the Religious question? Why is an ATHEIST posing the ""Religious Quastion""? Atheists are now denied constitutionally guaranteed rights? Or are you asking in the moral and ethical sense? Do religious commentators commonly express views on atheism? My understanding is that they do, and I wouldn't think to question their right to do so. After all, defending one's position by questioning that of others is normal discursive debate and argument. You didn't know that, did you, Greg? By the way, when you quote me, try not to misspell what you think I said. Thanks. Oh, I nearly forgot. Did you want people to think something in particular about me, and atheist, bringing up the Religious Question in relation to spanking? Is that supposed to be off limits to me as one? 0:- -- "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin (or someone else) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The Religious Question
Kane wrote
Atheists are now denied constitutionally guaranteed rights? Goes to your motives and bias. People should know that you are expressing your personally motivated bias, rather than impartial reason. You knee jerk for your pet issues, Kane! Race, gays, caseworkers, atheism... Yet you claim you're a conservative. What a HOOT! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The Religious Question
Didn't the NAZI's have a Religious Question?
Greegor wrote: Kane wrote Atheists are now denied constitutionally guaranteed rights? Goes to your motives and bias. People should know that you are expressing your personally motivated bias, rather than impartial reason. You knee jerk for your pet issues, Kane! Race, gays, caseworkers, atheism... Yet you claim you're a conservative. What a HOOT! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The Religious Question
Greegor wrote:
Didn't the NAZI's have a Religious Question? Didn't the Russians? How about the Japanese? South Africans? Bengalis? English? Or, we can presume that every person that has some interest in common with some evil folks are themselves thereby evil. So, tell us, Greegor, what are your interests? 0:- Greegor wrote: Kane wrote Atheists are now denied constitutionally guaranteed rights? Goes to your motives and bias. Not an answer to my question, but then that's how liars avoid being exposed. People should know that you are expressing your personally motivated bias, rather than impartial reason. And you? Pray tell, Greg, who expresses their opinion without bias? You knee jerk for your pet issues, Kane! One idiot's "kneejerk" is an advocate's issue of concern. Race, gays, caseworkers, atheism... And self centered, weak egoed men that move in with single mothers and displace the love and care for that women's child. Yet you claim you're a conservative. What a HOOT! You mistake "cause" for viewpoint. So tell me, what proof have you that a conservative is not interested in race, homosexual issues, government workers, and atheism? And do the ranks of conservatives include no atheists? No blacks? No homosexuals? You have such a narrow fundamentalist view of the world, child. Why is that I wonder. 0:- -- "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin (or someone else) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
The Religious Question
Kane wrote
Or, we can presume that every person that has some interest in common with some evil folks are themselves thereby evil. You're describing one of your own tactics. You are an atheist but, Like a cult leader, you paint all opponents with the broadest brush possible. You lump all of your opponents into one LABEL, even asking people to speak for or defend others. If any of your opponents leaves you rave about them long after they are gone, vainly scoring yourself a win. Reconstructionists, Fundamentalists, etc. you are eager to vilify or ad hom any opponent, smearing with the broadest brush possible. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
The Religious Question
Greegor wrote: Kane wrote Or, we can presume that every person that has some interest in common with some evil folks are themselves thereby evil. You're describing one of your own tactics. You are an atheist but, Like a cult leader, you paint all opponents with the broadest brush possible. You lump all of your opponents into one LABEL, even asking people to speak for or defend others. You ask people to speak for defend others all the time, Greg. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
The Religious Question
Greegor wrote:
Kane wrote Or, we can presume that every person that has some interest in common with some evil folks are themselves thereby evil. You're describing one of your own tactics. On the contrary. I do the exact opposite. I refuse to lump all homosexuals, for instance, into the category of higher potential child molester. I refuse to presume that the majority of foster parents are child abusers at a higher rate than a population that isn't even available for counting their abuses of their children. You are an atheist but, That has nothing to do with the issues under discussion, and IS of course, YOUR attempt to lump me into a category. Like a cult leader, There is nothing in my posting that would suggest I'm anything like a cult leader. I do see it in some of the posters here though. You suck up to one and he pats your little ass regularly. you paint all opponents with the broadest brush possible. Meaningless hyperbole. What do you mean by "broadest brush possible?" I refuse to do that Greg, unlike YOU. It's YOU that claims that CPS is unrelentingly evil and all caseworkers are somehow flawed. Isn't that so? You lump all of your opponents into one LABEL, even asking people to speak for or defend others. Non sequitur. Your second phrase does not connect to the one preceding. And I do not lump them into a category they have not earned. For instance, notice that in conversations with Doug I mention his obvious intelligence, and your clearly displayed stupidity and ignorance. That alone shows I don't "lump" my opponents, unless you think one of you isn't? If any of your opponents leaves you rave about them long after they are gone, vainly scoring yourself a win. I don't play win lose, Greg, but you obviously do. You were ranting about Sherman after she was gone, and interestingly enough, you did so about Dan when he had been absent from the newsgroup for a time. You have different standards for me than for yourself then? Reconstructionists, Fundamentalists, etc. Yes, some of them are very dangerous indeed. I avoid naming names among them most of the time because I consider people that believe in stonings and enslaving others very dangerous indeed. you are eager to vilify or ad hom any opponent, smearing with the broadest brush possible. Well, now I have a brush in each hand. And interestingly my intent and I succeed often, is to ISOLATE and identify very different people with different intents. I admit to painting Dan with a broad brush though. One that clearly labels him a winner with CPS defeats again and again, and I paint you with the brush in my other hand....as a loser, with CPS, one very unfortunate time. Dan can see his kids any time he wants. And of course all those families he's helped HAVE THEIR CHILDREN HOME. So I admit to admiring his skill....painting him with a broad brush. R R R R R And you, loser? I dip that other brush in your **** and paint your face with it. And the other losers you hang with. 0:- |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
The Religious Question
Michael© wrote: "0:-" wrote in news:4v- : ....snip. .. Dan can see his kids any time he wants. And of course all those families he's helped HAVE THEIR CHILDREN HOME. So I admit to admiring his skill....painting him with a broad brush. R R R R R Such high praise, Kane, Simple recognition of success. Nothing we could call "high praise." yet you make these statements as if they are fact Ah, the old, "as if" clause. Greg likes to use "seems like." 0:- without providing any supporting evidence in this medium we are in. Yep. I let the posters that have read other posters here that are people he has helped provide the evidence. And Doug, of course. Ever read his post pointout that Dan's tactics are successful ones? You request it of others, yet exempt yourself from the same? Nope. My demands of others (I don't care for the wimp word "request") related to published research and data. This is not one of those instances. What we have is what can be gathered in this medium, the statements of others. YOU may wish to call Dan's statements into question, but then you have Doug's, and those families that have reported Dan's success here in their cases. Are they all liars? Have you forgotten? They apparently ****ed YOU off enough to inspire you to create a bogus website that denied others the chance to respond to your lies in that website. You used it to make personal attacks that could not be answered ON SITE, by those you attacked. Did YOU provide proof in this medium then? I must have missed it. Refresh my memory. Thanks. 0:- ........snip..... |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How Children REALLY React To Control | Chris | General | 444 | July 20th 04 07:14 PM |
Gov. Bush encouraging religious groups to provide government services | wexwimpy | Foster Parents | 0 | February 10th 04 06:33 PM |
Kids should work... | bobb | General | 108 | December 15th 03 03:23 PM |
And again he strikes........ Doan strikes ...... again! was Kids should work... | Kane | General | 2 | December 6th 03 03:28 AM |
And again he strikes........ Doan strikes ...... again! was Kids should work... | Kane | Spanking | 2 | December 6th 03 03:28 AM |