If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Length of time in Pre- labor
For my first it was 48 hours before active labour set in. It started
sometime after midnight on Sunday/Monday and contractions continued at approximately 30 minute intervals thereafter. I had an appointment with my midwife in the afternoon of Wednesday and she immediately twigged what was going on and did an internal (I was already scheduled for a stretch and sweep if things hadnt kicked off by then). She checked me and pronounced that I was already 3cm's stretching to 4. She did a stretch and sweep just to get things really going and by 6pm that night, the contractions were deeply painful and I thought it was time to go to hospital. I had my daughter at 6:10am on Thursday morning after 12 hours in the hospital. I went home at 9am on Friday morning. Now, a question of my own....how long does it last for the second one? Some tell me it'll be quick but the midwife says it could be the same timing again? Also, I had food poisoning a few weeks ago and ended up in hospital with very mild contractions (or monster braxton hicks, we couldnt decide) and they gave me steroids then as a precaution. No-one has been able to tell me if this artificial maturing of the lungs will have any bearing on how early if at all this one will arrive. I am currently 33 weeks pregnant and I would like to go on a coach trip to visit a relative at about 37 weeks...should I be risking this or would it be asking for trouble? Any advice would be welcome. Wookie |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Length of time in Pre- labor
Now, a question of my own....how long does it last for the second one? Some tell me it'll be quick but the midwife says it could be the same timing again? Also, I had food poisoning a few weeks ago and ended up in hospital with very mild contractions (or monster braxton hicks, we couldnt decide) and they gave me steroids then as a precaution. No-one has been able to tell me if this artificial maturing of the lungs will have any bearing on how early if at all this one will arrive. I am currently 33 weeks pregnant and I would like to go on a coach trip to visit a relative at about 37 weeks...should I be risking this or would it be asking for trouble? Any advice would be welcome. Wookie I haven't read anything about the steroids progressing labor. but I most likely would give a call to your midwife prior to a trip. Good luck. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Length of time in Pre- labor
Anna.Nicole.m wrote:
Now, a question of my own....how long does it last for the second one? Some tell me it'll be quick but the midwife says it could be the same timing again? Also, I had food poisoning a few weeks ago and ended up in hospital with very mild contractions (or monster braxton hicks, we couldnt decide) and they gave me steroids then as a precaution. No-one has been able to tell me if this artificial maturing of the lungs will have any bearing on how early if at all this one will arrive. I am currently 33 weeks pregnant and I would like to go on a coach trip to visit a relative at about 37 weeks...should I be risking this or would it be asking for trouble? Any advice would be welcome. Wookie I haven't read anything about the steroids progressing labor. but I most likely would give a call to your midwife prior to a trip. Good luck. Thanks for the encouragement. I've just been googling it myself and all the reports appear to be positive. Still, the question remains, how long was it for the second? Is it, as most stories state, quicker, or is that an old wives tale? Is there a greater chance of delivering early with the second or is it about the same each time. My first was 10 days overdue according to the midwives. Wookie |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Length of time in Pre- labor
My first was 10 days
overdue according to the midwives. Wookie God bless you, 10 days overdue and you went ahead with the next pregnancy. good luck with finding an answer if it will go quicker for you. I'll hope for you that it will :-) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Length of time in Pre- labor
Anna.Nicole.m wrote:
My first was 10 days overdue according to the midwives. Wookie God bless you, 10 days overdue and you went ahead with the next pregnancy. good luck with finding an answer if it will go quicker for you. I'll hope for you that it will :-) On the plus side...at 10 days overdue, her skin was perfect, not wrinkled or cracked at all. The midwives in the delivery unit told me that this was a side effect of being in utero for the extra time. It wasnt so bad appart from the almost constant phone calls from family and friends wanting to know if there was 'any news' yet. They always seemed to call just as I was laying down for a little nap in the afternoon. In the end, I left a message on our answering machine telling everyone that as soon as I knew anything, I'd ring them, but until then...leave me the hell alone. I dont want to go into 'extra time' as my husband wryly put it, but neither do I want to be too early and put her health at risk.... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Length of time in Pre- labor
ChocolateChip_Wookie wrote: On the plus side...at 10 days overdue, her skin was perfect, not wrinkled or cracked at all. The midwives in the delivery unit told me that this was a side effect of being in utero for the extra time. It wasnt so bad appart from the almost constant phone calls from family and friends wanting to know if there was 'any news' yet. They always seemed to call just as I was laying down for a little nap in the afternoon. In the end, I left a message on our answering machine telling everyone that as soon as I knew anything, I'd ring them, but until then...leave me the hell alone. I dont want to go into 'extra time' as my husband wryly put it, but neither do I want to be too early and put her health at risk.... LOL I like the phone message, My midwife told me that if she had it her way she'd put all mommies on rest so that they delivered overdue, that the babies seem healthier, breast feed better, and are typically more content. Less colic less fussiness and a notable decrease in startle reflex. honestly other then the bouts of contractions and cramping I have had an easy pregnancy. I don't have a lot of the aches and pains of pregnancy. If the contractions and cramping would stop I wouldn't mind carrying this baby for 4.5 more weeks. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Length of time in Pre- labor
"Anna.Nicole.m" wrote in message ps.com... ChocolateChip_Wookie wrote: On the plus side...at 10 days overdue, her skin was perfect, not wrinkled or cracked at all. The midwives in the delivery unit told me that this was a side effect of being in utero for the extra time. It wasnt so bad appart from the almost constant phone calls from family and friends wanting to know if there was 'any news' yet. They always seemed to call just as I was laying down for a little nap in the afternoon. In the end, I left a message on our answering machine telling everyone that as soon as I knew anything, I'd ring them, but until then...leave me the hell alone. I dont want to go into 'extra time' as my husband wryly put it, but neither do I want to be too early and put her health at risk.... LOL I like the phone message, My midwife told me that if she had it her way she'd put all mommies on rest so that they delivered overdue, that the babies seem healthier, breast feed better, and are typically more content. Less colic less fussiness and a notable decrease in startle reflex. That seems to me to be a slightly strange comment. I don't think putting most people on rest would have a significant change in dates. I'm skeptical that being post dates would effect colic, can you produce research to show this? And is there any problem with a strong startle reflex, other than with associated problems that it is one of the signs? There are associated problems with post-dates, although I don't think as many as sometimes the pro-induction people talk about. Debbie honestly other then the bouts of contractions and cramping I have had an easy pregnancy. I don't have a lot of the aches and pains of pregnancy. If the contractions and cramping would stop I wouldn't mind carrying this baby for 4.5 more weeks. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Length of time in Pre- labor
Anna.Nicole.m wrote:
ChocolateChip_Wookie wrote: On the plus side...at 10 days overdue, her skin was perfect, not wrinkled or cracked at all. The midwives in the delivery unit told me that this was a side effect of being in utero for the extra time. It wasnt so bad appart from the almost constant phone calls from family and friends wanting to know if there was 'any news' yet. They always seemed to call just as I was laying down for a little nap in the afternoon. In the end, I left a message on our answering machine telling everyone that as soon as I knew anything, I'd ring them, but until then...leave me the hell alone. I dont want to go into 'extra time' as my husband wryly put it, but neither do I want to be too early and put her health at risk.... LOL I like the phone message, My midwife told me that if she had it her way she'd put all mommies on rest so that they delivered overdue, that the babies seem healthier, breast feed better, and are typically more content. Less colic less fussiness and a notable decrease in startle reflex. honestly other then the bouts of contractions and cramping I have had an easy pregnancy. I don't have a lot of the aches and pains of pregnancy. If the contractions and cramping would stop I wouldn't mind carrying this baby for 4.5 more weeks. Well, I did temper the language somewhat, but the poor postman got the wrong end of my tongue one morning. Prior to the birth of my daughter I had had nothing what so ever to do with babies, I hadnt even held one. My ignorance was so extreme that when my husband remarked during her first bath that her hair might fall out, I was shocked and horrified. I too had a relatively easy pregnancy the first time around but this time, I've had everything it seems. First of all, I had running kidney infections and at least 4 courses of anti-biotics, then I developed SPD which has worsened to the extent that I now use a support belt and crutches, a ruptured disc, food poisoning occassioning early labour and lately slightly elevated blood pressure. To be honest, I cant wait to get this one over with even though I promised myself I would *enjoy* this one as it is probably my last. From my own experience though, my daughter does *seem* to be a contented child and this has not changed since she was a small baby. She latched onto the breast within minutes of being born and we never had a problem with feeding until I had to go back into hospital 6 weeks later for further *repairs* and my milk emptied. I never recovered the situation and had to go to the bottle because she was starting to starve. After having various arguments with the breast nazis who seemed to believe that I was deliberately starving the baby, I finally went completely to bottles. Dont get me wrong, I'm totally 100% behind breast feeding as a natural way to nourish your child but sometimes, you just have to admit defeat despite your best efforts. In my case, I later found out that the anti-biotics they were giving me to supress infections in the woundsite also inhibited cell division and therefore were stopping the production of milk. The health visitors never took this into account and I later found out that they had flagged my daughter's file as being in danger! Anyway, she went from strength to strength and is now a happy flourishing 2.5 year old. I dont know how much truth there is in what your midwife said but since they see thousands of women every year, they would have the most up to date knowledge, even if it is circumstantial. Personally, I have always felt that they rely too much on their charts and just because a baby is *overdue* by their clocks, it doesnt mean that it really is overdue as such. Their calculating wheel is based on an average of gestation and is not precise, so when my midwife started mewling on about induction at just 1 week over, I told her that I wouldnt even consider it until at least week 2 or 3. Babies come when they are done and just because your little wheel says it should be today, doesnt mean that it's late. Just that your calculations are off by a week or two. Wookie |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Length of time in Pre- labor
That seems to me to be a slightly strange comment. I don't think putting most people on rest would have a significant change in dates. I'm skeptical that being post dates would effect colic, can you produce research to show this? And is there any problem with a strong startle reflex, other than with associated problems that it is one of the signs? There are associated problems with post-dates, although I don't think as many as sometimes the pro-induction people talk about. I can only imagine that the midwife has observed that post-date babies appear to be healthier than pre-date babies. Perhaps this is because (as I said in the other post) their calculators are based on averages of gestation and what they consider to be overdue, is in fact right on time and therefore *done* as it were. I have never seen colic, my daughter didnt seem to suffer from it though as I said in my other post, I was very ignorant when she was born and it may have occurred but I did not recognise it. As for the startle reflex, my daughter certainly had that as well as her father who regularly tipped me out of bed *searching* for Little_Wookie under my pillow, for some unfathomable reason. We never did get to the bottom of it, but it went on for months almost every night. If he wasnt searching under my pillow, it was down the side of the bed etc. He doesnt have any sleep walk tendancies though I do (just OT, he told me that I once frisked him for some keys, *found* them, told him not to hide them in future and promptly went back to sleep). Who knows. Certainly the midwives told me that her skin was nice and smooth, not mottled, cracked or wrinkled. She seemed to feed easily enough (though with the above caveats about being completely in the dark about babies), she was always contented and slept well from 6 weeks onwards. She is a good weight, slim and active and now an enquiring energetic toddler. Perhaps I was just blessed. Something had to go right after the trauma of her birth.... Wookie |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Length of time in Pre- labor
That seems to me to be a slightly strange comment. I don't think putting
most people on rest would have a significant change in dates. I'm skeptical that being post dates would effect colic, can you produce research to show this? And is there any problem with a strong startle reflex, other than with associated problems that it is one of the signs? There are associated problems with post-dates, although I don't think as many as sometimes the pro-induction people talk about. Debbie I'm fairly confident it was an off the cuff remark. And what I said above was as things she saw in her experience. She hasn't put anyone on rest nor would she, she was just making a comment from her personal experience. at the positive outcomes of mommies going late |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sleep and older children | Sue | General | 480 | May 10th 06 11:39 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Breastfeeding Past the First Year | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | December 29th 04 05:26 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Breastfeeding Past the First Year | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | November 28th 04 05:16 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Breastfeeding Past the First Year | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | October 29th 04 05:23 AM |
How Children REALLY React To Control | Chris | General | 444 | July 20th 04 07:14 PM |