A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » misc.kids » Pregnancy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Birth and Golf (Pregnant women, do you or your husband golf?)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 17th 03, 01:30 AM
Todd Gastaldo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Birth and Golf (Pregnant women, do you or your husband golf?)

PREGNANT WOMEN...

SACRAL SWING MECHANICS

Jeffry Blanchard, DC (Doctors for Golf) writes:

"There are three fundamental causes of golf injuries: poor posture, lack of
flexibility and POOR SWING MECHANICS..."
http://www.chiroweb.com/archives/19/26/02.html (emphasis added)

Of course the sacrum is not a golf club but Jeff's verbiage reminded me:

Standard medical delivery positions (semisitting and dorsal) have EXTREMELY
poor sacral "swing mechanics."

Standard medical delivery positions place the woman on her sacrum so it
CAN'T swing back!

Standard medical delivery positions close the birth canal up to 30%!

SQUATTING ALLOWS THE BIRTH CANAL TO OPEN...

Last century, an MD wrote:

"[T]he original obstetric chair [was] squatting." [Holmes, RW discussing
Markoe JW. Posture in obstetrics. JAMA;
(Oct7)1916;67(15):1066]

IMPORTANT NOTE: Squatting is just ONE way to let the sacrum (sacral tip)
swing back so your baby can have the "extra" up to 30%.

Other delivery positions also let the sacrum swing back: side-lying,
kneeling, hands-and-knees, standing...

REMEMBER: If you are on your back/butt you are on your sacrum and your
sacral tip cannot swing back - your birth canal is being senselessly closed.

In addition to closing birth canals up to 30% (by using
semisitting and dorsal delivery), OB/GYNs are gruesomely manipulating most
babies'
spines at birth...

NOTE: ALL spinal manipulation with the birth canal senselessly closed up to
30% is gruesome (is there ANYONE who disagrees with this??)...

MDs are PUSHING on tiny spines with oxytocin/Cytotec and PULLING (with
hands, forceps, vacuum extractors) - with birth canals senselessly
closed up to 30%.

Some babies are dying... OBs are killing an estimated six babies per DAY
with vacuum-assisted spinal
manipulation alone - with birth canals senselessly closed up to 30%...

See USUAL MECHANISM (PS5) in my article, "Pregnant chiro patients: BIZARRE
chiro legislation - babies be damned..."
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2135

UNNECESSARY C-SECTIONS...

MD-obstetricians CAUSE cephalopelvic disproportion (and failure to
progress) - then perform c-sections BEcause of cephalopelvic disproportion
(and failure to progress)!

UNNECESSARY EPISIOTOMIES...

In most births MDs are routinely SLASHING VAGINAS -
surgically/FRAUDULENTLY inferring they are doing everything possible to OPEN
birth canals - even as they CLOSE birth canals - up to 30%!

Interesting factoid: MDs used to tell women they only needed to breastfeed
for six weeks - because that's how long it took for them to be up and around
after having their vaginas slashed!

PREGNANT WOMEN: Allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to
30% - just roll onto your side - or use kneeling or hands-and-knees or stand
or squat - ANYTHING but semisitting or dorsal.

An estimated 4.6% of "healthy" term neonates are born with unexplained brain
bleeds...

WARNINGS:

1. Most MD-obstetricians close the birth canal up to 30%^^^ even as
obstetric experts
acknowledge that closing the birth canal FAR LESS can kill.
2. Some MD-obstetricians will let you "try" "alternative" delivery positions
BUT they will move you back to dorsal or semisitting (close your birth canal
up to 30%!) for the actual delivery!

^^^NOTE: If the pubic arch is narrow, semisitting and dorsal likely close
the birth canal MORE than 30% in some women. According to Williams
Obstetrics [2001]:

"...With increasing narrowing
of the pubic arch, the occiput cannot emerge directly beneath the symphysis
pubis but is forced increasingly farther down...the ischiopubic rami. In
extreme cases, the head must rotate around a line joining the ischial
tuberosities [!] (p. 438)..."

PROOF that MDs know they are closing birth canals:

At my request, the authors of Williams Obstetrics *published*
"my" biomechanics - but they left in their text the "dorsal widens" bald lie
that first called my attention to their text.

FURTHER proof that MDs know they are closing birth canals:

ACOG's shoulder dystocia video purports to show
MDs how to OPEN the birth canal maximally when the shoulders get stuck -
which of course is an indirect admission that MDs are indeed routinely
CLOSING birth canals...

Unfortunately, the ACOG method for opening the birth canal (PROPER
McRoberts) actually keeps it closed...

See IMPROPER McRoberts can save tiny lives and tiny limbs...
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/1308

(ACOG = Amercian College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - the obstetric
trade union to which most MD-obstetricians belong.)

Jeff writes:

"Obviously, chiropractic care is ideally suited to deal with poor
posture..."
http://www.chiroweb.com/archives/19/26/02.html

Strangely, "ideally suited" chiropractic trade unions are silent as this
culture robs children of their innate squatting ability.

Strangely, "ideally suited" chiropractic trade unions are silent as MDs
blame The Great Squat Robbery for their bizarre MD birth practice of closing
birth canals.

Strangely, "ideally suited" chiropractic trade unions are silent about MDs
gruesomely manipulating most babies' spines at birth.

One last matter...

MAINTAIN THE LUMBAR LORDOSIS?

In situations where most humans squat and OBLITERATE the lumbar lordosis,
spinal health experts (including DCs) tell chair-dwellers to MAINTAIN the
lumbar lordosis.

This makes NO sense - JUST like it makes no sense that the chiropractic
trade unions would remain silent about The Great Squat Robbery and the
related massive MD spinal manipulation crime.

PUTTING THE LUMBAR SPINE IN LORDOSIS IS SOMETIMES GOOD...

The ability to put the lumbar spine in lordosis is there - so it must serve
a purpose...

The lordosis reportedly makes the spine into a powerful SPINAL ENGINE for
walking and running according to a prominent spine researcher whose name I
cannot at present recall...

Similarly, Jeffry Blanchard, DC (Doctors for Golf) writes:

"Good golf [swing] posture requires the...lumbar spine to be in
lordosis...."
http://www.chiroweb.com/archives/19/26/02.html

This use of lordosis seems sensible during a golf swing.

PREGNANT WOMEN: If you or your husband play golf - and you are having
problems - one of Jeff's Doctors for Golf might be just the ticket...

Most of Jeff's Doctors for Golf are in California it seems...
http://www.doctorforgolf.com/ (Click on "Find a Doctor")

Thanks for reading,

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo


Copied to:

Jeffry Blanchard, DC
Encinitas, California

DoctorForGolf.com

Copied also to Doctors for Golf trained by Jeff...

Will you guys make sure and tell golfers that their wives and daughters can
offer themselves excellent SACRAL swing mechanics and thereby offer their
babies an "extra" up to 30% of pelvic outlet area?

Thanks in advance...


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Awesome breasts! OBs causing otitis media? (also: 'Osteopathic' v. 'Chiropractic' manipulation) Todd Gastaldo Pregnancy 0 September 17th 03 08:18 PM
PPAC, vaccinations and chiro bouncer Bob (Bob Dubin, Diplomate, American Board of Chiropractic Censorship) Todd Gastaldo Pregnancy 1 September 6th 03 08:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.