A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » misc.kids » Pregnancy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

'Floppy babies' and AASP (and MD Manipulation Under Anesthesia)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 27th 03, 07:38 PM
Todd Gastaldo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default 'Floppy babies' and AASP (and MD Manipulation Under Anesthesia)


"FLOPPY BABIES" AND AASP (MD MANIPULATION UNDER ANESTHESIA) See below.

AASP = American Academy of Spine Physicians (neurosurgeons and chiropractic
physicians)


To be removed, send a BLANK email to . I will delete
you immediately.

AASP Member EDWARD E. CREMATA, DC - per your request you are removed - this
is my last email to you.

Ed, I usually don't remark when someone asks to be removed.

I couldn't resist though when I visited your website and saw you advertising
your Manipulation Under Anesthesia/MUA expertise...

OPEN LETTER (archived for global access***)

EDWARD E. CREMATA, DC
Member
American Academy of Spine Physicians/AASP
38069 Martha Ave., St. 200
Fremont, CA 94536
510 796 2225


AASP Member Ed,

You claim you "were the first to bring...Manipulation Under Anesthesia
(MUA)...to the Fremont area."
http://www.northfremonthealth.org/doctorsoffice.shtml

Please change your web page. Fremont area MD-obstetricians were doing
Manipulation Under Anesthesia (MUA) LONG before you started.

You say you "work closely" with MDs...
http://www.northfremonthealth.org/doctorsoffice.shtml

Since you are an AASP member spine physician...

And since "American Academy of Spine Physicians [AASP]...neurosurgeons and
chiropractic physicians...[when] alert[ed to] situations which may
compromise the
best interest of the patient and SHALL MAKE EVERY EFFORT to improve those
conditions.
http://www.spinephysicians.org/dr4coe.cfm (emphasis added)

Do any of the hospitals where you administer MUA have materinity
departments?

Why NOT make every effort to stop MDs from closing birth canals on the
tiniest chiropractic patients?

(My apologies if you are making efforts. I assumed you weren't when I
received your request for removal - but then again - I requested - and you
sent - a blank email. Please email me and tell me about any efforts you are
making to save tiny lives and tiny limbs and PREVENT more putative vertebral
subluxations than DCs will ever be able to adjust - under anesthesia - or
otherwise.)

Hopefully you will at least ask the MDs with whom you "work closely" to work
to stop MD-obstetricians from senselessly closing birth canals and
performing GRISLY Manipulation Under Anesthesia (MUA).

Hopefully you will also ask them: Do FLOPPY BABIES still occur following
epidural anesthesia, as in,

"[i]n 1974, Scanlon et al. reported that infants whose mothers received
epidural lidocaine or mepivicaine during labor...had lower scores for
habituation and muscle tone...In other words, the infants were alert but
floppy..." [Chestnut DH. Obstetric Anesthesia: Principles and Practice.
St. Louis:Mosby 1994:480]

GOOD NEWS ED! Mattingly et al. [2003] report that most anesthetic and
analgesic agents are "well tolerated by the fetus if judiciously
administered," as in,

"Most anesthetic and analgesic agents in current use traverse the placental
barrier in varying degrees, but are well tolerated by the fetus if
judiciously administered...[i]n some instances, administration of general
anesthesia is unavoidable. Neonatal respiratory depression with low Apgar
scores, and umbilical arterial and venous pH associated with general
anesthesia, is often transient. A properly administered anesthetic, whether
regional or general, has no significant adverse fetal or neonatal effects."
--Mattingly J, D'Alessio J, Ramanathan J. Paediatr Drugs. 2003;5(9):615-27.
PubMed abstract

BUT I'M WONDERING...

In what percent of births do anesthetic and analgesic agents NOT get
"properly/judiciously administered." (?)

Remember Ed... MD-obstetricians are the *most prolific* administrators of
Manipulation Under Anesthesia (MUA)...

What percent of the time do MDs (or nurse anesthetists) make a mistake?

MD LIES FOR REPLIES...

Don't forget Ed: You might get MD lies for replies... MDs are committing
OBVIOUS CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE (senselessly closing birth canals) which
sometimes escalates to criminally negligent homicide...

MDs themselves indirectly admit they are closing birth canals as they
indirectly admit that closing birth canals FAR LESS than 30% can KILL.

See below my PROOFS that MDs know they are closing birth canals...

First though my usual advice for pregnant women (feel free to print it out
and give it to pregnant patients Ed)...

PREGNANT WOMEN: You can allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to
30% - just roll onto your side - or use kneeling or hands-and-knees or stand
or squat - ANYTHING but semisitting or dorsal.

WARNINGS:

1. Most MD-obstetricians close the birth canal up to 30%^^^ even as they
acknowledge that closing the birth canal FAR LESS can kill.
2. Some MD-obstetricians will let you "try" "alternative" delivery positions
BUT they will move you back to dorsal or semisitting (close your birth canal
up to 30%!) for the actual delivery!

^^^NOTE: If the pubic arch is narrow, semisitting and dorsal likely close
the birth canal MORE than 30% in some women. According to Williams
Obstetrics [2001]:

"...With increasing narrowing
of the pubic arch, the occiput cannot emerge directly beneath the symphysis
pubis but is forced increasingly farther down...the ischiopubic rami. In
extreme cases, the head must rotate around a line joining the ischial
tuberosities [!] (p. 438)..."

PROOF that MDs know they are closing birth canals:

At my request, the authors of Williams Obstetrics *published*
"my" biomechanics - but they left in their text the "dorsal widens" bald lie
that first called my attention to their text.

Here are the biomechanics that were added at my request to Williams
Obstetrics:

"It should be noted...that the increase in the diameter of the
pelvic outlet occurs *only* if the sacrum is allowed to rotate
posteriorly..."
[1993:285, *italics* in original]

OBVIOUS NEGLIGENCE: The authors of Williams Obstetrics left in their text
(in the same paragraph!) the "dorsal widens" bald lie that first called my
attention to their text. For a discussion of other obvious obstetric
negligence - and how the 30% figure was radiographically derived - see
http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/part2ftc.html. My thanks to Prof. Dr. Moyses
Paciornik, MD, Curitiba, Brazil, for calling my attention to this
chiropractic emergency. See the Paciornik and Gastaldo letters in Birth
[1992;19:230]

FURTHER proof that MDs know they are closing birth canals:

ACOG's shoulder dystocia video purports to show
MDs how to OPEN the birth canal maximally when the shoulders get stuck -
which of course is an indirect admission that MDs are indeed routinely
CLOSING birth canals...

Unfortunately, the ACOG method for opening the birth canal (PROPER
McRoberts) actually keeps it closed...

See IMPROPER McRoberts can save tiny lives and tiny limbs...
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/1308

(ACOG = Amercian College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists - the obstetric
trade union to which most MD-obstetricians belong.)

The massive MD crime is obvious.


PARDONS FOR MDs...

As always, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. MDs are just
academic prime cuts forced through this culture's most powerful mental
meatgrinder - medical school.


WHAT'S THAT ED? You don't believe MDs would lie about Manipulation Under
Anesthesia (MUA)?

Here is Marsden Wagner, M.D., perinatal
epidemiologist and consultant to the World Health Organization saying in
1997 in effect that MDs *are* lying about Manipulation Under Anesthesia
(MUA)...

Writes WHO Consultant Marsden:

"There is...an epidemic of epidural use in this country now. Women are
being lied to and told that this is safe. The data contradicts this.
Epidural causes somewhere between 4 and 10 times as much forceps or
vacuum births and causes between 2 and 4 times as many cesareans. Since
forceps, vacuum births, and cesareans all carry significant risks for
both the woman and the baby, these are not benign procedures.

[2003 UPDATE: Keep in mind Ed: MDs are closing birth canals up to 30% and
killing an estimated six babies per DAY with vacuum-assisted spinal
manipulation alone - I say again - with birth canals senselessly closed up
to 30%. See USUAL MECHANISM (PS5) in my article, "Pregnant chiro patients:
BIZARRE
chiro legislation - babies be damned..."
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2135]

WHO Consultant Marsden continues...

" Every year
women die just from the epidural procedure itself. The epidural is a
very tricky procedure and one that can be life-threatening if the tiniest
slip is made.

"The American public does not know that women die from epidural
anesthesia. One of the biggest problems in the United States is that the
medical profession has stonewalled the information on pregnancy and
birth. It is very difficult for the pubic to get true information...

"...Will American obstetricians willingly change? I'll answer this by
asking another question. Why should they? They have all the money and
power. I wrote in Pursuing the Birth Machine [1994], 'The American
College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, for the most part, has been passive
in the face of the epidemic of cesarean births. The conservative and
self-serving stance of this organization is illustrated by an
extraordinary statement made recently by the former president of this
College: 'Home birth is child abuse in its earliest form.'" [Wagner M
quoted in Gaskin IM. Interview with Marsden Wagner author of Pursuing the
Birth Machine [ACE Graphics 1994]. Birth Gazette 1995;11(4):6-12. Birth
Gazette is avaible at the OHSU medical library.]

For further quotes pertaining to MD Manipulation Under Anesthesia (MUA)...

See my 1997 usenet article, "Dr. Uthman's trade (medicine) is a grisly
trade"
Newsgroups: sci.med.pharmacy, misc.health.alternative, sci.med.nutrition,
sci.med, alt.folklore.herbs
Date: 1997/09/06
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...40gte1.gte.net

(Google URLs are long - make sure to cut and paste the whole thing.)



Sorry to belabor the point Ed...

But you *are* an AASP spine physician, and,

"American Academy of Spine Physicians [AASP]...[are] LEADERS in the fields
of chiropractic and neurosurgery...[who] educate each other, their patients
and
the public...specifically promote the benefits of addressing the FULL
spectrum
of spinal disorders..."
http://www.spinephysicians.org/dr4vision.cfm (emphasis added)

"AASP goals and Objectives include...timely information about spinecare,
particularly the benefits of PREVENTION, early diagnosis, timely
intervention and conservative options...encourag[ing] research in all phases
of spinecare...[and]...disseminat[ing] information about conservative and
cooperative spinecare to the health care profession and the public."
http://www.spinephysicians.org/dr4goals.cfm (emphasis added)


Speaking of "spinecare PREVENTION"...

As I noted in "Cytotec birth violence and AASP (URL below)...

MDs have blamed The Great Squat Robbery for their bizarre birth practice.

See Gardosi et al.'s 1989 Lancet "randomised controlled trial of
squatting" - where nobody squatted...

Stopping MDs from closing birth canals up to 30% could help stop Western
culture from robbing children of a fundamental human rest posture that just
happens to double - if it isn't robbed - as a fundamental human DELIVERY
posture - one that happens to OPEN the birth canal up to 30%...

Obstetric ramifications aside, Western culture is robbing children of a way
to take a rest on their feet!

See Sarah Key's huge balls (also: Kids can SQUAT motionless for
hours)...
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2084

AASP spine physicians...

According to a Dynamic Chiropractic article about AASP,

"Chiropractors, Neurosurgeons Join Forces...The focus on spine care will
increase greatly in the future. There is a growing patient interest in
cooperative and conservative spine care. Some speak of an "epidemic" of
spine issues in the coming decades. Rapid growth of the elderly population,
due to increased longevity and the aging of baby boomers, will lead to an
increased prevalence of spinal problems and related disability. Spine
physicians must prepare to meet the growing demand. Members of the AASP will
help to shape the future of spine care in this challenging environment."
http://www.chiroweb.com/dynamic/temp/join_forces.html

Hopefully chiropractic physicians and neurosurgeons will CHIROPRACTICALLY
ADJUST the external environment that has "spine experts" bizarrely telling
chair-dwellers to "maintain the lordosis" in circumstances where most humans
on the planet OBLITERATE the lumbar lordosis!

See Lina's failed back surgery (Can we rehab squatting ability?) (Squatting
NOT necessary at birth!)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2221


Ed, assuming you haven't yet done so - please MAKE EVERY EFFORT, as in,

"American Academy of Spine Physicians [AASP]...neurosurgeons and
chiropractic physicians...[when] alert[ed to] situations which may
compromise the
best interest of the patient and SHALL MAKE EVERY EFFORT to improve those
conditions.
http://www.spinephysicians.org/dr4coe.cfm (emphasis added)


There is an EASY effort you might make...

As I noted in "Cytotec birth violence and AASP" (mentioned above)...
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2220

ATTENTION AASP spine physicians: PLEASE educate the public via the Food and
Drug Administration...

Tell FDA to warn pregnant women that obstetric tables (as commonly used by
MD; w/stirrups for example) close the birth canal and cause gruesome spinal
manipulation of babies.

Filing FDA Medical Device Reports online is EASY - it only takes a few
minutes...

See FDA MDR: Obstetric tables (also: Pregnancy low back pain/Lordex Spine
Institute)
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2186

Finally Ed, according to Dynamic Chiropractic,

"Aside from academy activities, members of the AASP are encouraged to be
active in their national and local professional associations."
http://www.chiroweb.com/dynamic/temp/join_forces.html

AASP spine physicians, please DO get active in your national and local
professional associations!

Ask ALL neurosurgeon and chiropractic physician associations to be active in
protesting MDs closing birth canals and gruesomely manipulating most babies'
spines!


Thanks for reading, Ed,

You have been removed.

Your friend,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo


***This Open Letter will be instantly archived for global access at...
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2222

Within 24 hours it
will be in the google archive. Search
http://groups.google.com for "'Floppy babies' and AASP (MD Manipulation
Under Anesthesia)"


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cytotec birth violence and AASP (also: Dubin: 'Prescribing drugs off label is fraud') Todd Gastaldo Pregnancy 9 October 29th 03 12:52 PM
Vaccination is NOT immunization/Breastfeeding *is* immunization! Todd Gastaldo Pregnancy 30 October 6th 03 09:16 PM
Feds (Motsiopoulos/CMS/PPAC/Pres Bush) to help babies? Todd Gastaldo Pregnancy 2 September 25th 03 11:27 PM
Yale Med and non-spinal chiropractic (surgery prevention) for mothers and babies Todd Gastaldo Pregnancy 0 September 25th 03 05:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.