A slant on spanking

Doan wrote in message ...
There will be no diaper rash if there is no diaper. Kids do not need
diaper.

No, but carpets do.

On 4 Mar 2004, CBI wrote:

Doan wrote in message ...
There will be no diaper rash if there is no diaper. Kids do not need
diaper.

No, but carpets do.

So carpets are more important than kids???

Doan

In article , Doan says...

On 4 Mar 2004, CBI wrote:

Doan wrote in message
...
There will be no diaper rash if there is no diaper. Kids do not need
diaper.

No, but carpets do.

So carpets are more important than kids???

Doan



::Groooaan::

I did a thread on these "Diaper" posts, and discovered myself in a spanking wars
thread. I usually manage to avoid these.

So I won't post the blindingly obvious answer..and will be gone.

Banty

In article ,
Doan wrote:

On 4 Mar 2004, CBI wrote:

Doan wrote in message
...
There will be no diaper rash if there is no diaper. Kids do not need
diaper.

No, but carpets do.

So carpets are more important than kids???

Doan



Are you really suggesting that we ought to let our kids run around
indoors undiapered? Granted, when one of my kids developed a diaper
rash, I left them undiapered as much as possible, but ALL the time?

Lord, what a lot of time I'd have spent cleaning up -- and I'm not sure
I see what would have been gained.

meh
--
Children won't care how much you know until they know how much you care

On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, dragonlady wrote:

In article ,
Doan wrote:

On 4 Mar 2004, CBI wrote:

Doan wrote in message
...
There will be no diaper rash if there is no diaper. Kids do not need
diaper.

No, but carpets do.

So carpets are more important than kids???

Doan



Are you really suggesting that we ought to let our kids run around
indoors undiapered? Granted, when one of my kids developed a diaper
rash, I left them undiapered as much as possible, but ALL the time?

Of course not! If you've followed this thread, there are certain people
who think that they know more about your kids then you do. They even
have the nerve to call other parents who don't do it their way "ignorant".

Lord, what a lot of time I'd have spent cleaning up -- and I'm not sure
I see what would have been gained.

Exactly! But, hey! C'est pour les enfants! :-)

Doan

meh
--
Children won't care how much you know until they know how much you care

On 4 Mar 2004, Banty wrote:

In article , Doan says...

On 4 Mar 2004, CBI wrote:

Doan wrote in message
...
There will be no diaper rash if there is no diaper. Kids do not need
diaper.

No, but carpets do.

So carpets are more important than kids???

Doan



::Groooaan::

I did a thread on these "Diaper" posts, and discovered myself in a spanking wars
thread. I usually manage to avoid these.

So I won't post the blindingly obvious answer..and will be gone.

Banty

It would have been better if you've posted nothing.

Doan

"dragonlady" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Doan wrote:

On 4 Mar 2004, CBI wrote:

Doan wrote in message
...
There will be no diaper rash if there is no diaper. Kids do not
need
diaper.

No, but carpets do.

So carpets are more important than kids???

Doan



Are you really suggesting that we ought to let our kids run around
indoors undiapered? Granted, when one of my kids developed a diaper
rash, I left them undiapered as much as possible, but ALL the time?



My kids next to never get diaper rash. Is diaper rash a problem for some
even if you clean up the poo quickly?

Lord, what a lot of time I'd have spent cleaning up -- and I'm not sure
I see what would have been gained.


I *think* that he is trying to beat up to argument that:

- there is a potential for spanking to be harmful to a child
- there is no way to know for certain what is a "safe" level of spanking at
which you will certainly not
- therefore it is wisest to avoid spanking

He is saying that because something has the possibility to damage is not a
good reason to avoid it. If a baby is wearing a diaper then there is a risk
of diaper rash. The difference that he fails to see is that diaper rash is
very observable and one can respond to it. The damage done to a child by
hitting is less easily observed, particularly by the parent who is doing the
hitting.

S

meh
--
Children won't care how much you know until they know how much you care