Vaccination and a bizarre chiropractic silence explained -perhaps...

VACCINATION AND A BIZARRE CHIROPRACTIC SILENCE EXPLAINED - PERHAPS...

(Chiros: See the strange four year delay in Wilk v. AMA discussed below.)

Steven C. Eisen, DC writes:

"[Tedd Koren, DC] decided...to officially link Barrett to the original
conspiracy revealed in Wilk v. AMA...[The] Barrett v. Koren
trial...provide[d]...evidence to show that [Barrett] was linked to the
continued conspiracy against chiropractic."
http://www.bolenreport.net/feature_article_3.htm

OPEN LETTER (archived for global access; see below)

Steven C. Eisen, DC,
Research Coordinator
Foundation for Health Choice
1400 16th Street, NW, Suite 330, Washington, DC* 20036
202-462-8805


Steven,

Tedd Koren, DC and Stephen Barrett, MD are both linked - via their silence -
to a massive spinal manipulation crime of obstetricians (among other MD
crimes discussed below).

The reason for medical silence is obvious.

But the reason for CHIROPRACTIC silence is not so obvious.

It may be due to chiropractic associations being deathly afraid that
chiropractors will finally be prosecuted for their ongoing Medicare
fraudulent billing for adjustment of "correctable"/"documented" vertebral
subluxations when in fact there is no evidence that vertebral subluxations
even exist let alone causing disease and stopping disease when adjusted.

Barrett indicates that back when the Medicare legislation was passed, AMA
attorney Doyl Taylor told him that someone (AMA?) - aware of the fraud -
lobbied Congress to mandate radiation (documentation of vertebral
subluxation on x-ray) prior to all Medicare-reimbursed chiropractic care.
This was intentionally done to "sabotage" chiropractic coverage under
Medicare. See below.

REGARDING VACCINATION AND MORE BIZARRE CHIROPRACTIC SILENCE...

The Foundation for Health Choice asks:

"Do you want the freedom to say no to vaccinations?...Should organized
medicine, the pharmaceutical companies and government agencies refuse to
change this state of affairs, and in fact continue to support it?...Had
enough?...Want to go on the*offensive?...Then join us."
http://www.foundationforhealthchoice.com/

I believe that organized medicine first played on chiropractic fear of
prosecution for the Medicare/x-ray/subluxation fraud back in 1986 when the
fraud was oficially discovered by the Department of Health and Human
Services.

In the last quarter of 1986, ACA Attorney Rosenfeld wrote,

"Chiropractic must join the 'real world' by ceasing opposition to
innoculation..." [Rosenfeld ACA Journal Oct 1986]

The last quarter of 1986 just happened to coincide with a "marked struggle"
by MDs and PharmCo's to cause Congress to give them virtual immunity from
liability for their mass vaccination behavior...[Smith MH. National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensation Act. Pediatrics. 1988;82(2):264-9]

The "last quarter of 1986" ALSO just preceded a key 1987 Congressional
battle
for FUNDING the vaccine injury act...[which MDs and pharmcos had been
working to get passed since 1983.]

Smith [1988] notes that "there were powerful opponents to a mandatory
system" back in 1983...

1983 was when PharmCo's and MDs asked Congress for TOTAL immunity from
liability - for a system wherein families of vaccine-injured and
vaccine-dead children could NOT go to court after being forced through the
regulatory process by the new
system. [Smith 1988:268]

1983 also happened to be the year a new trial was ordered in Wilk v.
AMA...but the new trial did not get underway until four years later - in
1987...see below...

Fast forward to the last quarter of 1986...the MDs and PharmCo's were
on their SECOND try for immunity from vaccination liability...Smith [1988]
wrote:

"The only means of avoiding a complete new beginning of the legislation
again in the 100th Congress was to agree that the funding provisions of the
legislation be omitted from consideration...[and]...taken up the next
year..."

Smith [1988] notes that the 100th Congress convened in January 1987...

1987 (May) just happened to be the moment in time when Judge Susan
Getzendanner decided to convene a non-jury trial in Wilk v. AMA - FOUR YEARS
after a trial
was ordered.

On August 24, 1987 - as Congress was funding the MD's immunity from
vaccine liability program - Judge Getzendanner was ordering the AMA to
publicize in JAMA the AMA's "loss" to the chiropractors. [Wilk v. AMA, 671
F. Supp. 1465]

In December 1987, the vaccine injury act was passed by Congress and signed
by the President.

On January 1, 1988, under Judge Getzendanner's court order, the AMA
published news of the Getzendanner verdict in JAMA.

Has anyone else wondered why the Wilk v. AMA case was suddenly
resurrected in May 1987 - FOUR YEARS after the new trial was ordered in
1983?

Probably just another coincidence, right?

REMEMBER: the new trial was ordered back in 1983 when MDs and PharmCo's were
making their FIRST attempt at virtual immunity from liability for their mass
vaccination behavior...

DCs AMONG "POWERFUL OPPONENTS"?

According to Smith [1988], "it became evident early in these [1983]
efforts that there were powerful opponents to a mandatory
system...furthermore, Congress made it clear that they simply would not
consider a system that precluded some opportunity to go to court."

What if it **DCs** were among the "powerful opponents" in 1983?

Even if DCs *weren't* "powerful opponents*, who ARE the "powerful
opponents"?

I ask because 81% of DCs *might* just have something in common with
"powerful opponents." (The 81% estimate comes from Haas and Colley [JMPT
1994:585], as in,

"Eighty-one percent [of DCs surveyed] felt that [vaccination] should be
strictly voluntary"...

MASSIVE VACCINATION FRAUD...

Smith [1988] notes: "[R]eporting requirements HAD TO BE ACCEPTED in the
process of negotiations through the years..." (emphasis added)

Smith [1988] also notes: "Congress had DEMANDED the
inclusion of the reaction reporting requirements as a condition of the
legislation. It will give a better epidemiologic store of information
concerning the real facts in vaccine reactions than we have ever had
before."

ARRGGGHHH!...Congress had to DEMAND that MDs
report serious vaccine reactions?

Years later, in 1993, then-FDA Commissioner David Kessler,
MD offered
evidence that physicians were STILL failing to report up to 99% of serious
adverse reactions to MEDICATIONS - and this inspite of the fact that such
reports are "essential" for determining the safety of medications. [Kessler
DA. Introducing MEDWatch: a new approach to reporting medication and device
adverse effects and product problems. JAMA (Jun2)1993;269(21):2765-68]

....I mention the potential 99% failure-to-report rate for MEDICATIONS
because CDC's Vaccination Information Sheets compare safety of medications
(unknown) with safety of vaccinations (unknown).

INTERESTINGLY: The American Chiropractic Association/ACA initially did not
support the Wilk v. AMA lawsuit. The ACA in effect told Dr. Chester Wilk to
go to
hell - because ACA was holding all-important behind-the-scenes talks with
AMA... Dr. Wilk says that his discussions with ACA General Counsel Harry
Rosenfeld were almost "dogfights." [See Wilk. Medicine, Monopolies and
Malice. Garden City Park, NY: Avery 1996]

We must ask ourselves: What *were* ACA and AMA "dialoguing" about in
the 70s and 80s?

What business did ACA's Rosenfeld have exhorting DCs to do what an estimated
81% (perhaps more) of them didn't want to do - end their opposition to
mandatory vaccination? ([NOTE:] When DCs are finally
truly
informed regarding CDC's sordid adverse event reporting behavior
- the percent opposed to
MANDATORY
vaccination will likely be closer to 100%.)

I submit that in October 1986 Mr. Rosenfeld and the ACA were currying favor
with AMA at an extremely critical time in the pharmaceutical industry's
effort to win from Congress immunity from liability for themselves and MDs
for vaccine injuries and deaths.

I submit further that the MD-dominated HHS was not prosecuting obvious DC
health fraud - known about in 1972 and "officially" discovered in 1986 - in
order to
offer DCs a reason to be silent as organized medicine went for immunity
from liability for mass vaccination behavior.

Excerpted from (slight editing/some additions) from:

VACCINATION SUBLUXATION
http://groups.google.com/group/
misc.health.alternative/msg/05d5ea68f816b93e

and from,

PPAC, vaccinations and chiro bouncer Bob (Bob Dubin, Diplomate, American
Board of Chiropractic Censorship)
http://groups.google.com/group/
misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/e393ae3facee79d7


Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA



PS Here's another post, alluded to above, regarding Koren's recent courtroom
victory over Barrett...

----------
From: Todd Gastaldo
Newsgroups: misc.kids.pregnancy, misc.health.alternative, sci.med
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 16:39:07 -0700
Cc: , ,
, , ,
, , ,
, , ,
, , ,
, ,
, , ,
, , ,
, ,
, ,
, , ,
, , ,
, ,

Subject: N. Mexico babies, x-rays and - 'Quackbuster' Barrett loses to a
chiropractor?

N. MEXICO BABIES, X-RAYS AND - "QUACKBUSTER" BARRETT LOSES TO A
CHIROPRACTOR?

Tedd Koren, DC reportedly beat "Quackbuster" Steve Barrett, MD in court.

See the very end of this post.

Oddly, Koren and Barrett are both ignoring massive spinal manipulation
quackery - by the most prolific manipulators of children's spines - MDs.


REGARDING BABIES...

PREGNANT WOMEN: You can help prevent spinal manipulation quackery by MDs.
Just roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or use some other
"alternative" delivery position. Talk to your OB or midwife today.

Please forward this email to your chiropractor.

Your chiropractor may wish to start informing pregnant women that
obstetricians are closing birth canals up to 30% - and that it is easy for
women to allow their birth canals to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%.

With birth canals senselessly closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30%,
obstetricians are pulling with hands, forceps and vacuums - sometimes
pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords.

Note: Bizarrely, California chiropractors MAY be forbidden from educating
pregnant women about this - or so I was informed years ago by a man calling
himself Michael Schroeder, attorney for the California Board of Chiropractic
Examiners. Schroeder is an honorary member of the California Chiropractic
Association - and friend of BOB DUBIN, DC - who is now with the New Mexico
Chiropractic Association.

See the end of this post.


REGARDING N. MEXICO BABIES AND X-RAYS...

Attn: NEW MEXICO Board of Chiropractic Examiners Chairwoman Dr. Leslie
Schmidt - via NMBCE members Dr. Bill Doggett and Dr. Michael Plaman and Dr.
Guruchander Khalsa:

Is it legal in New Mexico for DCs to inform pregnant women that
obstetricians are closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30%?

ALSO: Is the New Mexico Board of Chiropractic Examiners doing anything to
end the x-ray fraud? See the CHIRO COMEDY HEALTH CRIME discussed in my
Open Letter to Gene Veno below?


Gene Veno, President of the Foundation for Chiropractic Progress says to
chiropractors:

"[F]ederal rules...require you to practice one way and then advise you to
practice another."
Dynamic Chiropractic
November 7, 2005, Volume 23, Issue 23
http://www.chiroweb.com/archives/23/23/05.html (Accessed Oct. 13, 2005)

OPEN LETTER (archived for global access; see below)

Gene Veno
President
Foundation for Chiropractic Progress


Gene,

Hmmmm....

Federal rules require chiropractors to practice one way and then advise them
to practice another...

You aren't by any chance referring to CHIRO COMEDY HEALTH CRIME - the fact
that federal Medicare rules/laws forbid chiropractors from submitting
fraudulent bills even as federal Medicare rules/laws require chiropractors -
if they wish to be paid - to fraudulently claim on their bills that they
have identified correctable, disease-causing vertebral subluxations?

It's a sordidly hilarious comedy: Congress' first Medicare law required
Medicare patients be subjected to ionizing radiation before their spinal
adjustments. Then in 1997, Congress acknowledged that it is illegal to
mandate radiation of chiropractic patients prior to treatment - but Congress
kept the radiation mandate for two years - because the Congressional Budget
Office determined that if the radiation mandate were removed too soon - too
many people would go to chiropractors and it would cost the government too
much! The American Chiropractic Association (Mike Pedigo, DC was president)
silently went along with the radiation gag! LOL! (It *is* sort of funny,
after all!)

See Radiation is NOT a tool of managed care!
http://groups.google.com/group/
sci.med/msg/9930156e31bd2fe7?

Also sort of funny: The Medicare ionizing radiation mandate for documenting
vertebral subluxations is now optional - but the mandatory Medicare fraud is
not: Chiropractors still must document having identified correctable,
disease-causing vertebral subluxations before treating Medicare patients -
even though there is NO scientific evidence that vertebral subluxations
cause disease and stop causing disease when adjusted.

The kicker: There never was any such evidence - and the chiropractic
profession TOLD Congress this way back in 1973.

See Chiro x-ray fraud (also: Why Dr. Gastaldo is unlicensed -
voluntarily...)
http://groups.google.com/group
misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/9e0c34fe3be2efe3?

I suspect it was "Quackbusters" (Steve Barrett, MD et al? The AMA?) who
lobbied and got the obviously illegal radiation mandate passed by Congress.

AMA member Stephen Barrett reported in 1995 that AMA attorney Doyl Taylor
told him that when it appeared that chiropractic reimbursement under
Medicare was inevitable, "subluxation demonstrated to exist on x-ray"
language was inserted to "sabotage" chiropractic. [Magner, Barrett (ghost).
Chiropractic: The
Victim's Perspective. Amherst, NY: Prometheus 1995:3_] *See also
http://www.chirobase.org/02Research/oig.html)

Fortunately, Congress' obviously illegal radiation mandate accorded with the
then (still?)-accepted practice of x-raying the spines of elderly persons
before applying high velocity/low amplitude thrusts...While there is
radiation fraud - it can serve an important purpose if there is
radiographically demonstrable gross pathology in the spine.

Something far worse than possibly beneficial Medicare radiation fraud is
going on in medicine...

MDs GET AWAY WITH FAR WORSE HEALTH CRIME...

Simple biomechanics [Gastaldo TD. Birth. 1992;19(4):230-1] require
obstetricians to allow birth canals to open an "extra" up to 30%; yet
obstetric texts advise obstetricians to, in effect, CLOSE birth canals the
"extra" up to 30%.

Worse, when babies get stuck, an American College of Obstetricians and
Gynecologists/ACOG video in effect advises obstetricians to KEEP birth
canals closed the "extra" up to 30%.

Obstetricians are lying to cover-up.

For the Four OB Lies (they are whoppers)...

See Dents in babies' skulls...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3897

UNNECESSARY SPINAL MANIPULATION

It's a massive spinal manipulation crime. As obstetricians keep birth
canals closed the "extra" up to 30%, they pull with hands, forceps and
vacuums - sometimes pulling so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny
spinal cords.

Some babies die - some get paralyzed - most "only" have their spines
gruesomely wrenched. (Any estimated 4.6% of "health" term babies are born
with unexplained brain bleeds.)

ALL spinal manipulation is gruesome with the birth canal closed the "extra"
up to 30%.

UNNECESSARY EPISIOTOMIES/UNNECESSARY C-SECTIONS

There is also the matter of obstetricians slicing vaginas and abdomens en
masse (episiotomy/c-section) - surgically/fraudulently inferring they are
doing/have done everything possible to open birth canals - even as they keep
birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30%.

To be sure, compelling obstetricians to allow birth canals to open the
"extra" up to 30% is not going to prevent all episiotomies, c-sections and
forceps deliveries - it's just that obstetricians have no business keeping
birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30%.

The kicker is that obstetricians are telling obvious lies to cover-up.

Again, for the Four OB Lies (they are whoppers)...

See Dents in babies' skulls...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3897

MORE OBSTETRIC CRIME

Obstetricians are immediately clamping umbilical cords - temporarily
asphyxiating babies - cutting off umbilical cord oxygen - forcing babies to
breathe with their lungs before they are ready - and in the process robbing
babies of up to 50% of their blood volume.

Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG indicates the
massive blood robbery happens to EVERY CESAREAN BABY - and in most "cord
blood banking" births....

See Water birth and breathing without lungs...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3936


HOW MDs GET AWAY WITH THESE (AND OTHER) MASSIVE CRIMES...

Law enforcement officers (attorney generals) look the other way - and as
Steve B. Harris, MD once boasted:

"Without enforcement, there is no
law. Without law, there is no crime. *These are elementary principles. Get
an adult to explain them to you."
http://groups.google.com/group/misc....866f3384801ae9

THE SAD FACT IS...

Chiropractors are competing with a massive criminal enterprise
euphemistically known as medical "science."

Gene, you said to chiropractors:

"...Just because you have a license to practice does not guarantee your
practice is free from governmental intrusion."

Yes, but chiropractic's main economic competitors ARE free from governmental
intrusion in an important respect: Law enforcement is ignoring obvious MD
lies and letting MDs commit obvious massive (sometimes fatal) crimes against
mothers and babies.

NOTE: Chiropractic is free from governmental intrusion in regard to IT'S
ongoing crime - and that may be the reason for the bizarre silence of
chiropractors regarding the massive spinal manipulation crime of MDs.

Gene, you also wrote:

"Be very careful to understand that your scope of practice in your
respective state is as valuable, if not more valuable, than your individual
license to practice."

Well said!

I stopped paying for (voluntarily forfeited) my chiropractic license after I
was told^^^ that telling women that obstetricians are closing birth canals
the "extra" up to 30% is outside the scope of chiropractic practice in
California.

^^^I was told this years ago by a man calling himself Michael Schroeder,
attorney for the California Board of Chiropractic Examiners. Years later, I
was SUED by a man calling himself Michael Schroeder who was once an attorney
for the California Board of Chiropractic Examiners. More on this below.

ATTENTION CALIFORNIA CHIROPRACTORS:

IS it outside the scope of chiropractic in California to tell pregnant women
that obstetricians are closing birth canals up to 30%?

It's been two years - I've asked the Board a few times - no answer yet...

See Birth Danger: Cal Chiro Bd - SIMPLE QUESTION
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3526

FINALLY GENE...

WHY THE SILENCE...

You wrote:

"By now, I am sure you are getting the picture that you cannot practice
these days without national and state representation, to ensure that your
right to practice is protected on all levels."

Ummmm Gene... In addition to the California Board of Chiropractic Examiners
remaining silent, prominent people at national and state chiropractic
associations have also remained silent. (The names Bob Dubin, DC and James
Edwards, DC spring to mind. I will copy them at
and )

National and state chiropractic associations are making NO protest about the
obvious, massive spinal manipulation crime of MDs.

Nor are national and state chiropractic associations making any protest that
the California State Board of Chiropractic Examiners won't answer my SIMPLE
QUESTION.

You yourself have been silent. Or maybe you just didn't receive or read my
previous emails?

Gene, if you ever get an answer to my SIMPLE QUESTION from the Calif. Chiro
Bd. of Examiners (or any other chiro board), I hope you'll share it with me
- preferably publicly.

Since you are interested in chiropractic progress, consider this:

Chiropractic is missing out on a GOLDEN opportunity to save tiny lives and
tiny limbs and PREVENT more vertebral subluxations than DCs will ever be
able to adjust by hand. (See the massive spinal manipulation crime of MDs
discussed above.)

REMEMBER GENE: Preventing vertebral subluxations is included in the
STANDARDS of the Council on Chiropractic Education/CCE, as in,

Health promotion is "inclusive of
subluxation prevention" [CCE Standards, p. 56 or 66 (pdf version)]

I recently noted this subluxation prevention fact for CCE President Joseph
Brimhall, DC....

See Babies, CCE and upper cervical chiropractic...
http://groups.google.com/group/
misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/53e7391731c561c6

CCE Pres. Brimhall never got back to me.

I will cc him again via:

Thanks for reading Gene.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA


Copied to:

NEW MEXICO CHIROPRACTIC ASSOCIATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS
2005-2006


Executive Committee
President
Dr. Susan M. Bright
1504 St. Francis Dr.
Santa Fe, NM 87505
Office: 505-984-1222
Fax: 505-984-1376


Vice President
Dr. Harold Steinberg
1400 Maclovia St., Ste. 1
Santa Fe, NM 87505
Office: 505-473-0057
Fax: 505-473-7974


Treasurer
Dr. Susan Hilliker
P. O. Box 1687
Taos, NM 87571
Office: 505-758-3050


Secretary
Dr. Robert Woodruff
2904 Montclaire, NE
Albuquerque, NM 87110
Office: 505-865-3333
Fax: 505-865-3840


Past President
Dr. Michael Pendleton
7520 Montgomery, NE, #E-9
Albuquerque, NM 87109
Office: 505-888-6800
Fax: 505-888-6812


Executive Director
Jaeni Aarden
10700 Academy Rd., NE, #817
Albuquerque, NM 87111
Office: 505-280-0689
Fax: 505-828-1128



Board of Directors

Central Dist. Directors
Dr. David Peer
7520 Montgomery, NE, #E-9
Albuquerque, NM 87109
Office: 505-888-6800
Fax: 505-888-6812


Dr. Bob Dubin
03 Homesteads Road, Suite E
Placitas, NM 87043
505-771-3933


Dr. Norman Dawson
12932 Granite Avenue, NE
Albuquerque, NM 87112
505-275-0422


* *
East Central District Director

Dr. Bill Smith
1400 S. Ave. D, #A
Portales, NM 88130
Office: 505-356-4440
Fax: 505-356-4433


North Central District Directors
Dr. Michael Crawford
#11 Calle Medico, Ste. 3
Santa Fe, NM 87505
Office: 505-983-3037
Fax: 505-982-3737


Dr. Susan Pisano
208 Camino Rio
Santa Fe, NM 87505
Office: 505-982-0288


Northeast District Director
Dr. Monty McGowen
1800 Hospital Drive
Raton, NM 87740
Office: 505-445-0222
Fax: 505-445-0222


Northwest District Director

Dr. Andy Sandoval
4251 E. Main St., #F
Farmington, NM 87402
Office: 505-325-3355
Fax: 505-325-4479


South Central District Directors
Dr. Douglas Patrick
1301 Oregon Ave.
Alamogordo, NM 88310
Office: 505-437-0667
Fax: 505-437-0083


Southeast District Director
Dr. Kendall Boyd
P. O. Box 113
Jal, NM 88252
Office: 505-395-2311
Fax: 505-395-2750


* *
Southwest District Director
Dr. John Rogers
1205 N. West Street
Silver City, NM 88061
Office: 505-538-2558
Fax 505-538-3996


* *
West Central District Director
Dr. Wayne Goforth
108 Hill Street
Gallup, NM 87301
Office: 505-722-9002
Fax: 505-722-7031


* *
Committee Chairs
ACA Liaison
Nat'l Legislative Affairs
Dr. Bill Doggett
3500 Comanche, NE, Suite I
Albuquerque, NM 87107
Office: 505-884-0771
Fax: 505-884-0776

www.sunbear.cc

*

COCSA Committee
Dr. John A. Rogers
1205 N. West Street
Silver City, NM 88061
Office: 505-538-2558
Fax: 505-538-3996


Convention Committee
Dr. Michael Pendleton
7520 Montgomery, NE, E-9
Albuquerque, NM 87109
Office: 505-888-6800
Fax: 505-888-6812

Education Committee
Dr. Ben Markham
5200 Eubank, NE, Suite B-1
Albuquerque, NM 87111
Office: 505-237-1050
Fax: 505-237-0113

*

Ethics/Bylaws Committee
Dr. Elaine Adams
7007 Wyoming, NE, E-1
Albuquerque, NM 87109
Office: 505-822-0306
Fax: 505-822-0316
dradams@lifetime
chiropractic.com

* Insurance Relations
Dr. Robert E. Byrd
7611 Indian School Rd., NE
Albuquerque, NM 87110
Office: 505-268-0808
Fax: 505-278-2458
Legislative
Dr. Stephen Perlstein
Dr. Sherry Gaber
2019 Galisteo St., Ste. M6
Santa Fe, NM 87505
Office: 505-984-0006
Fax: 505-995-0884

Medicare
Dr. Gretchen Peterson
Dr. James M. Barber, Alt.
3701 Eubank, NE, #24
Albuquerque, NM 87111
Office: 505-299-4446
Fax: 505-275-8505


Membership/Pub. Relations
Dr. Bob Dubin
5 Cerrito Rojo Road
Placitas, NM 87043
Office: 505-771-9833


Peer Review
Dr. David Peer
7520 Montgomery, NE, #E-9
Albuquerque, NM 87109
Office: 505-888-6800
Fax: 505-888-6812


Scholarship
Dr. Kevin Atchley
8004 Pennsylvania Cr., NE
Albuquerque, NM 87110
Office: 505-265-5651
Fax: 505-268-0820

Scholarship Information

Worker's Compensation
Dr. George Simmons
10401 Montgomery Pkwy., NE
Albuquerque, NM 87111
Office: 505-299-7077
Fax: 505-292-6369

NMCA Members on
NMCA Member Delegate to Congress of Chiropractic State Associations
Dr. John Rogers
1205 N. West Street
Silver City, NM 88061
Office: 505-538-2558
Fax 505-538-3996


NMCA Attorney
Angela M. Martinez, Esq.
Law Office of Angela M. Martinez
10131 Coors Rd. I-2 PMB #715
Albuquerque, NM 87114
Office: 505-710-6725
Fax: 505-890-4517


"QUACKBUSTER" LOSES TO CHIROPRACTOR...

As noted above...

In 1995, AMA member and "Quackbuster" Stephen Barrett, MD reported that AMA
attorney Doyl Taylor told him that when it appeared that chiropractic
reimbursement under Medicare was inevitable, "subluxation demonstrated to
exist on x-ray" language was inserted to "sabotage" chiropractic. [Magner,
Barrett (ghost).
Chiropractic: The
Victim's Perspective. Amherst, NY: Prometheus 1995:3_] *See also
http://www.chirobase.org/02Research/oig.html)

Now in 2005, "Quackbuster" Barrett recently lost a court case to Tedd Koren,
DC...
http://www.bolenreport.net/feature_article.htm

The funny thing is - both "Quackbuster" Barrett and Tedd Koren, DC are
silent about the massive criminal quackery of obstetricians.

Silence on both sides of the health care aisle is something to ponder as
babies sometimes DIE from spinal manipulation - as obstetricians manipulate
their spines with birth canals senselessly closed the "extra" up to 30%.

BACK TO THE X-RAY FRAUD...

In 2002, I quoted from a 2001 newsletter by Tedd Koren, DC:

"Dr. Winterstein of National College of Chiropractic...states as a
'fact' that,

'We have not yet demonstrated, through scientific evidence, that spinal
subluxation is a causative agent in human disease or dis-ease, nor that we
can actually 'correct' subluxation...This fundamental concept of
chiropractic has not been scientifically
tested." (p. 10)

Dr. Koren then wrote:

"big snip...No one has ever seen a subluxation. It is quite possible no
one ever will...big snip"
--Tedd Koren, DC
What is a Subluxation?
http://www.korenpublications.com/newsletters/index.htm (Click on May 2001,
as soon as Dr. Koren puts it up.)




TWO COINCIDENCES...

1. Tedd Koren, DC has two MD brothers - one an obstetrician. (I should note
that two of my brothers are MDs - but we are estranged - with both of them
refusing so far to speak out about the massive obstetric crimes. Then
again, perhaps neither of them have seen my emails. I doubt it.)

2. Bob Dubin, DC, mentioned above, said he persuaded Michael Schroeder,
formerly attorney for the California Board, not to sue other DCs when he
(Schroeder) sued me.

It turned out Schroeder's lawsuit was a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public
Participation/SLAPP - an illegal attempt to deny me my First Amendment right
to petition for redress of grievances caused by Schroeder in his role as a
public official - attorney for the California Board of Chiropractic
Examiners.

California DCs used to attend births - indeed - at one time attending a
birth was a requirement for chiropractic licensure in California.

Schroeder was working for the Caliifornia Chiropractic Association during
the bizarre case against California's last chiropractic obstetrician, Laura
Flores, DC, PhD. (Dr. Flores' patients did not sue - district attorneys sued
- and she beat them - but ultimately - IIRC - the chiropractic board took
her license.)

After Dr. Flores was out of the way, Schroeder wrote a regulation (Rule 302)
that prohibited California DCs from so much as severing umbilical cords and
then jumped to the California Board of Chiropractic Examiners to defend Rule
302 from 10 MD-obstetricians who were ostensibly attacking Rule 302 - but
who - I suspect - were getting Rule 302 judicially rubberstamped.

MD-obstetricians were then - and are still - committing a massive baby
asphxiation/baby blood robbery crime (mentioned above) and they did NOT need
chiropractors to be able to testify as experts - or so I say.

Dubin - who said he persuaded Schroeder to sue only me - moved from
California to New Mexico - which is why I have cc'd Dubin and his fellow New
Mexico Chiropractic Association members (listed above).

I think it is time - finally - for chiropractic boards to speak out and stop
both the ongoing Medicare radiation fraud AND (especially) the ongoing
spinal manipulation crime of MDs.

Hopefully the New Mexico Chiropractic Board will lead the way - with Dubin
and other New Mexico Chiropractic Association members publicly encouraging
such action.

As usual, I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical students,
MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious felonies.

Thanks for reading everyone.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA



This Open Letter to Gene Veno will be archived for global access in the
Google usenet archive.

Search http://groups.google.com for "[New Mexico b]abies, x-rays and -
'Quackbuster' Barrett loses to a chiropractor?"