A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » misc.kids » General
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The entire vaccine program is based on massive fraud



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 27th 11, 11:24 AM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids,misc.kids.health,sci.med
john[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 822
Default The entire vaccine program is based on massive fraud

"The entire vaccine program is based on massive fraud."

Big Pharma Vilified Researcher for Threatening Vaccine Program

By Russell L. Blaylock, M.D.

Thursday, January 13, 2011 10:52 AM

http://www.newsmaxhealth.com/health_...13/371064.html

I find it ironic that the media, the British government, and leaders in
medical academia jumped on board attacking and destroying Dr. Andrew
Wakefield's reputation based on "fraud" charges related to a study he
conducted about the link between the measles vaccine and autism.

It is ironic for a number of reasons. How can the British government, itself
drowning in deception at every level, dare accuse anyone of fraud?

The panel assembled by the government and academia to judge Wakefield,
ironically, dares to speak of fraud, yet their main complaint is that his
findings "might endanger the 'sacrosanct' vaccine program," not that his
principal findings were wrong. In fact, several independent researchers
found the same measles vaccine-related colitis that he described.

A recently released charge by the BMJ editors is that Wakefield was poised
to get huge profits from a product stemming from his research results. I am
not here to defend Wakefield, rather, I demonstrate the double standard
regularly practiced by his vocal critics.

Virtually every paper published on drugs, such as statins, is authored by
individuals having financial links to as many as three to four
pharmaceutical companies each. The same is true of papers published by major
journals extolling vaccine efficacy and safety. They know these papers
violate every ethical principle known, yet they are published in some of the
most prestigious journals.

Abundant evidence has shown that these very same people destroy the
reputations of anyone producing evidence, no matter how well researched and
of the highest ethical standards, if it in any way endangers this vaccine
program. It is ironic that these accusers speak of "blatant fraud," when
virtually all of the vaccine safety evidence they use abundantly is
fraudulent by careful design.

Scare Tactics

Ironically, even their outcry of the effect of Wakefield's paper is
deceitful. They scream that it caused vaccine rates to fall below the 80
percent level needed for "herd immunity," when they know that no one has
ever proven his paper was the cause.

A growing number of British have suffered from vaccine complications, and
they are rightly concerned about vaccine safety. When there was a small
outbreak of measles in this country, as few as 300 cases, they screamed it
was an epidemic and millions were at risk of dying. In fact, in similar
outbreaks studies found that 90 percent of the affected children had been
fully or partially vaccinated, and most had mild infections.

When I grew up there was no measles vaccine and everyone in my class got the
measles and no one died or suffered serious harm. To imply our society is at
risk of millions of deaths should vaccine rates drop is a blatant lie used
to scare parents into over-vaccinating their children. They use the same
scare tactics based on manipulated data to terrify the elderly into getting
a flu shot every year.

Even this year, after we witnessed a 20-fold increase in miscarriages and
stillbirths among women vaccinated with the H1N1 vaccine last year, public
heath officials are strongly suggesting that pregnant women be vaccinated
with both the H1N1 and seasonal flu vaccines. Dr. Garry Goldman, who has
done a comprehensive analysis of this event, calls the government's actions
"an act of willful misconduct." (Go here to read his report.)

Manipulating 'Safety' Studies

Anyone analyzing the "vaccine safety studies" done by vaccine makers and
vaccine proponents can see that they were purposely designed to show safety
by omitting people in the study who truly reflected the population being
vaccinated and who were, by all standards of science, at risk of harm by the
vaccines.

They do studies that use as placebo controls people injected with a vaccine
adjuvant. Placebos are supposed to be completely inert. The evidence shows
that the greatest danger from vaccines is from the vaccine adjuvant - so,
how can they use adjuvant-injected people as controls? Yet, all of their
studies used such vaccinated controls - this is blatantly manipulated, and
they know it.

The studies that are quoted endlessly by these elite members of academia and
government agencies and used to close the door on the vaccine connection to
neurodevelopmental problems are purposefully designed so as to suggest no
link between vaccines and any complication.

This falsified research is protected by academia, the media, and government
agencies. Yet, they have the audacity to stand in judgment of Wakefield.
This is not to say that Wakefield should be free of scrutiny - all
researchers should be carefully scrutinized for bias.

Yet, why is there no open disclosure as to the connections between the rabid
media, the investigating panel, the Lancet and BMJ journal editors, reporter
Brian Deer, the British government, and the manufacturers of vaccines? When
one examines these articles professing to prove the lack of a connection
between vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders, it is shocking to see
that virtually all of the authors have extensive financial connections to
the pharmaceutical vaccine makers.

These same companies advertise heavily on all of the major media outlets and
the media understands very well that reports endangering vaccine sales can
mean a huge loss of advertising revenue. This constitutes deception on a
grand scale - and it is practiced every day in this country and the UK.

So, why is Wakefield being attacked and his reputation ruined - especially
for an article written 13 years ago? For several reasons, all of which
involved the makers of vaccines. Vaccines generate tens of billions of
dollars in revenue for pharmaceutical manufacturers every year.

The H1N1 vaccine alone generated $1.5 billion in addition to the $1 billion
generated by the seasonal flu vaccine, neither of which has been shown to be
either effective or safe. You have been told this safety and efficacy has
been scientifically shown, when this is a shocking, provable lie.

Silencing the Dissenters

By careful manipulation of the media, the pharmaceutical companies have
created the illusion that the entire link between vaccines and
neurodevelopmental brain damage is hinged solely on Wakefield's article,
implying there is no other evidence suggesting a powerful link.

Nothing could be further from the truth. I have written seven peer-reviewed
articles and co-authored a recent ebook that makes a powerful scientific
case for such a link. A growing number of researchers have also supplied
hard data from very carefully done research that strongly suggest a link.

The defenders of vaccine policy used in the United States and the UK have
used poorly done, obviously manipulated studies to make their case. If we
use the same judgmental standards they used against Wakefield, they would be
seen to be guilty of gross misconduct and, most importantly, of endangering
the public at large.

Now, by destroying Wakefield's reputation and accusing him of "crimes
against humanity," they hope to silence any further research in this area.
It has the ring of old Soviet-style intimidation and the fear tactics the
KGB used against dissidents.

The Case Against Vaccines

The truth is that the Wakefield article's main theme was that they found
bowel inflammation (colitis) in a small number of children vaccinated with
the live measles vaccine and that the inflammation was caused by the measles
virus from the vaccine itself.

He only proposed, almost in passing, that there might be a link between such
bowel inflammation and autism, which is perfectly reasonable, ethical, and
supported by other neuroscience research. I can cite hundreds of reputable
articles in the medical literature that make similar proposals about
less-controversial issues and are never questioned because they do not
endanger pharmaceutical company profits.

The truth is that the case against the present vaccine schedule is very
powerful and built on the findings of some of the most prestigious
researchers in the world. The problem is the media and academia are so
controlled by the pharmaceutical giants that the general public has no idea
that this research even exists.

It is now known in the research world that questioning vaccine safety is a
career killer. Researchers who dare to do so have been fired, denied
research grants, their articles are rejected by the more "prestigious"
science journals, and they are no longer invited to speak at national
meetings. The atmosphere of fear is pervasive - all generated by the
pharmaceutical giants and their minions.

By destroying reputations and stopping further research,
pharmaceutical-controlled vaccine proponents hope to have a national law
mandating all people receive every vaccine recommended by the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, which is under the absolute control of the
vaccine manufacturers.

The data demonstrates that millions of people are seriously injured and
thousands die as a result of vaccine complications every year. In many cases
the damage caused by the vaccines exceed the risk of the disease being
vaccinated against - such as is the case with the chickenpox, tetanus,
measles, mumps, hepatitis B, and HPV vaccines.

The United States is the most over-vaccinated country in the world and
evidence is growing that we are trading an "illusion of protection" by
vaccines for a massive increase in vaccine-related chronic diseases.

The entire vaccine program is based on massive fraud. The so-called H1N1
"pandemic" is a case in point. Even the World Health Organization declared
there was a "huge amount" of uncertainty in the seriousness of the
"pandemic," which turned out to be far less deadly than initially feared.

The WHO admitted it mishandled the so-called pandemic and failed to convey
its uncertainty to the public. Yet the CDC, the media, medical academia, and
the pharmaceutical vaccine manufacturers all participated in this deception.

It is time to wake up and call for some accountability; otherwise the
vaccine program will never be safe.

2011 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Blaylock: Big Pharma Vilified Researcher for Threatening Vaccine Program


  #2  
Old January 27th 11, 12:54 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids,misc.kids.health,sci.med
dr_jeff
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 293
Default The entire vaccine program is based on massive fraud

On 1/27/11 5:24 AM, john wrote:
"The entire vaccine program is based on massive fraud."

Big Pharma Vilified Researcher for Threatening Vaccine Program

By Russell L. Blaylock, M.D.

Thursday, January 13, 2011 10:52 AM

http://www.newsmaxhealth.com/health_...13/371064.html

I find it ironic that the media, the British government, and leaders in
medical academia jumped on board attacking and destroying Dr. Andrew
Wakefield's reputation based on "fraud" charges related to a study he
conducted about the link between the measles vaccine and autism.


Why? The guy lied, made up data, and had clear conflicts of interest and
a financial gain plan that he didn't disclose.

It is ironic for a number of reasons. How can the British government, itself
drowning in deception at every level, dare accuse anyone of fraud?

The panel assembled by the government and academia to judge Wakefield,
ironically, dares to speak of fraud, yet their main complaint is that his
findings "might endanger the 'sacrosanct' vaccine program," not that his
principal findings were wrong.


So it is ok to make up data to back your company? Get real. The guy made
up data! He was doing it so that he could sell his measles vaccine. The
guy is scumbag who caused measles outbreaks resulting in death.

In fact, several independent researchers
found the same measles vaccine-related colitis that he described.


Actually, he may have described, but it wasn't there.
http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c1127.full

rest of copyrighted garbage deleted
  #3  
Old January 27th 11, 07:26 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids,misc.kids.health,sci.med
Peter Parry
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 176
Default The entire vaccine program is based on massive fraud

On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:24:40 -0000, "john" wrote:



It is ironic for a number of reasons. How can the British government, itself
drowning in deception at every level, dare accuse anyone of fraud?


It didn't.

The panel assembled by the government and academia to judge Wakefield,
ironically, dares to speak of fraud, yet their main complaint is that his
findings "might endanger the 'sacrosanct' vaccine program," not that his
principal findings were wrong.


The disciplinary board wasn't set up to establish if his findings were
right or wrong - something they made clear from the beginning.

However, many others had quite independently discovered his findings
were not merely wrong but fraudulent.

In fact, several independent researchers
found the same measles vaccine-related colitis that he described.


Only if they had samples tested by Unigenetics, the laboratory set up
by Wakefield to carry out tests for the court case he was supporting.

A recently released charge by the BMJ editors is that Wakefield was poised
to get huge profits from a product stemming from his research results.


He was. The criticism however was not that he was hoping to profit
but that he hid this from his fellow researchers and the publishers of
his paper.

Virtually every paper published on drugs, such as statins, is authored by
individuals having financial links to as many as three to four
pharmaceutical companies each.


And the authors declare their interest - Wakefield didn't and tried to
hide it.

A growing number of British have suffered from vaccine complications,


There are? We must have missed it, where are the figures to show that
statement is true?

they are rightly concerned about vaccine safety.


The reverse actually, although there are still the serial nutters like
JABS around they have largely lost what little support they had and
vaccination rates in the UK are returning to their pre-Wakefield
levels.

Even this year, after we witnessed a 20-fold increase in miscarriages and
stillbirths among women vaccinated with the H1N1 vaccine last year,


No we didn't.

This falsified research is protected by academia, the media, and government
agencies. Yet, they have the audacity to stand in judgment of Wakefield.


Wakefield wasn't just biased, he lied, he invented data and when he
didn't get the results he wanted from an independent laboratory he
went to his tame one which produced what he ordered.

Yet, why is there no open disclosure as to the connections between the rabid
media, the investigating panel, the Lancet and BMJ journal editors, reporter
Brian Deer, the British government, and the manufacturers of vaccines?


There is, it just doesn't suit rabid conspiracy theorists because it
doesn't align with their preconceptions.

When
one examines these articles professing to prove the lack of a connection
between vaccines and neurodevelopmental disorders, it is shocking to see
that virtually all of the authors have extensive financial connections to
the pharmaceutical vaccine makers.


No they don't, and where they do the authors declare the interest,
unlike Wakefield.

These same companies advertise heavily on all of the major media outlets and
the media understands very well that reports endangering vaccine sales can
mean a huge loss of advertising revenue.


In the UK drug companies are not allowed to advertise prescription
only medicines to the public. There are no vaccination advertisements
by drug companies. What loss of revenue would occur?

So, why is Wakefield being attacked and his reputation ruined


Because he was a fraud. An out and out fraud.

By careful manipulation of the media, the pharmaceutical companies have
created the illusion that the entire link between vaccines and
neurodevelopmental brain damage is hinged solely on Wakefield's article,
implying there is no other evidence suggesting a powerful link.


Probably because there isn't any such link.

The truth is that the Wakefield article's main theme was that they found
bowel inflammation (colitis) in a small number of children vaccinated with
the live measles vaccine and that the inflammation was caused by the measles
virus from the vaccine itself.


The fundamental flaw of course was that it subsequently became clear
that they DIDN'T find any live measles vaccine in the guts of the
children examined. Wakefield knew this for two years before the
information became public.



He only proposed, almost in passing, that there might be a link between such
bowel inflammation and autism,


He proposed a link between MMR and autism, a link his paper did not
establish even on his manipulated results. As subsequently became
clear his business plan relied upon people accepting this wholly
unsubstantiated claim.

Don't you find it rather odd that Wakefield, before publishing the
Lancet paper, employed a personal PR representative? He is probably
the only medical researcher in the UK ever to have done so.

The truth is that the case against the present vaccine schedule is very
powerful and built on the findings of some of the most prestigious
researchers in the world.


Geir and Geir?


  #4  
Old March 2nd 11, 07:18 AM
King XII King XII is offline
Banned
 
First recorded activity by ParentingBanter: Mar 2011
Posts: 8
Default

Its and awesome and marvelous post, an outstanding work done
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Copenhagen Police Investigating Autism Vaccine Researcher Dr. Poul Thorsen for Fraud john[_5_] Kids Health 0 March 17th 10 07:44 PM
3 The biggest health fraud in History - Vaccine Rights Rally Albany NY 9-29-09 john[_5_] Kids Health 0 October 15th 09 01:00 PM
Massive Brazilian Vaccination Raises Suspicions of Covert Sterilization Program JOHN Pregnancy 2 August 27th 08 03:22 AM
Massive Brazilian Vaccination Raises Suspicions of Covert Sterilization Program JOHN Kids Health 2 August 27th 08 03:22 AM
Medicaid birth fraud (it's massive) Todd Gastaldo Pregnancy 0 April 20th 04 09:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2018 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.