If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#81
|
|||
|
|||
The Embry study: What it actually said.
Oops, more LIES from ignoranus kane0! I have consistenly argue that the only "expert" regard their own children are the parents themselveS. But if you gonna believe somebody just because they have a Ph.D. after their name, them you have to believe Dr. Dobson. Right, Kane? ;-) AFfromDreamLand On 26 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: ..snip.. In past posts doan't has presented Dr. James Dobson as the "expert," over Straus and others. Not only has Dobson never created a word of reasearch, but he's not even a social science academic. A 'child development' degree and a hatred of children barely disquised by his occasional cautionary butt covering for his real agenda for and beliefs about children. So, doan't, you still want to defend this man and present him as the "expert?" http://www.nospank.net/welsh11.htm PREACHER OR BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST: DR. DOBSON NEEDS TO MAKE UP HIS MIND By Ralph S. Welsh, Ph.D., ABPP SOURCE: Connecticut Psychologist, Newsletter of the Connecticut Psychological Association, Winter, 2006, Vol. 59, Number 4, page 6. In my opinion, psychologist and presidential advisor, the Rev. Dr. James Dobson is a very dangerous man. I have been following his career for many years, from the time in the late 60s while I was teaching at Fairfield University and doing research on the relationship between physical discipline and delinquency. His odd little book, Dare to Discipline caught my eye, and I was astounded to later find that it eventually became a runaway best seller. Unfortunately, it launched his career as a darling of the far right.... ...more at: http://www.nospank.net/welsh11.htm 0:- |
#82
|
|||
|
|||
The Embry study: What it actually said.
Hahaha! Another stupid response from ignoranus kane0! AFfromDreamLand On 26 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: Oh what a tangled web we weaved... ;-) No, not "we," you. What, no "LOL!?" Allow me. LOL! 0:- AFfromDreamLand On 26 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On Sat, 25 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: You meant the one you gave to Alina, my sock puppet? ;-) No, I gave her a perfectly good copy of the same one I have. I did not include, and haven't referred to the long cumberson appendix. More is there that substantiates what I've said, but I've stuck strictly with the first 78 pages. So Alina turned out to be not my "sock puppet" as you claimed. Only you and I know the real answer to that. Why don't you round her up and have her come here and comment. I can't seem to find her. Surely you can. 0:- LOL! You can't find her but you CAN sent her the Embry study? Wow! You are amazing! I sent it long ago. I can't find her now. That was the point. Wow! You are an amazing liar. Are you saying now that you were WRONG? Only you and I know the answer to that, stupid. LOL! I think everybody know that you are STUPID! Anyone that would use all inclusives to describe something where it's impossible can't be too bright. "Everybody" Doan? I think you OWED not only ME but Alina also, A BIG APOLOGY! Nope, you owe this entire newsgroup an apology, a great big apology, but then you have been a perennial fake and fraud. We don't expect you to get honest now. You've been a constant liar and group thug since your first posts here. Hahaha! What happened to "LOL!?" Doan Doan't ignoranus kane0! Doan't you wish. 0:- |
#83
|
|||
|
|||
The Embry study: What it actually said.
Doan wrote:
Oops, more LIES from ignoranus kane0! I have consistenly argue that the only "expert" regard their own children are the parents themselveS. Even the abusive ones? But if you gonna believe somebody just because they have a Ph.D. after their name, them you have to believe Dr. Dobson. Right, Kane? ;-) I don't believe someone because of their degrees or lack. Do you? I suppose YOU could believe Dobson, as you obviously did when you presented him as the expert. Having done no research though and writing a book with vicious child abusing suggestions and advice in it qualifies him in your mind as "expert," and doing to his children what he did because he's the expert. How about those parents that had their kids hung up in church naked and whipped by the congregation. Experts? Still don't want to debate the Embry study, eh? 0:- AFfromDreamLand On 26 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: ..snip.. In past posts doan't has presented Dr. James Dobson as the "expert," over Straus and others. Not only has Dobson never created a word of reasearch, but he's not even a social science academic. A 'child development' degree and a hatred of children barely disquised by his occasional cautionary butt covering for his real agenda for and beliefs about children. So, doan't, you still want to defend this man and present him as the "expert?" http://www.nospank.net/welsh11.htm PREACHER OR BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST: DR. DOBSON NEEDS TO MAKE UP HIS MIND By Ralph S. Welsh, Ph.D., ABPP SOURCE: Connecticut Psychologist, Newsletter of the Connecticut Psychological Association, Winter, 2006, Vol. 59, Number 4, page 6. In my opinion, psychologist and presidential advisor, the Rev. Dr. James Dobson is a very dangerous man. I have been following his career for many years, from the time in the late 60s while I was teaching at Fairfield University and doing research on the relationship between physical discipline and delinquency. His odd little book, Dare to Discipline caught my eye, and I was astounded to later find that it eventually became a runaway best seller. Unfortunately, it launched his career as a darling of the far right.... ...more at: http://www.nospank.net/welsh11.htm 0:- -- "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin |
#84
|
|||
|
|||
The Embry study: What it actually said.
Doan wrote:
Hahaha! Another stupid response from ignoranus kane0! Nope, just one you don't like and can't respond to with any credible commentary. We know that when you label it and the author as 'STUPID.' And you are a coward. 0:- AFfromDreamLand On 26 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: Oh what a tangled web we weaved... ;-) No, not "we," you. What, no "LOL!?" Allow me. LOL! 0:- AFfromDreamLand On 26 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On Sat, 25 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On Wed, 22 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: You meant the one you gave to Alina, my sock puppet? ;-) No, I gave her a perfectly good copy of the same one I have. I did not include, and haven't referred to the long cumberson appendix. More is there that substantiates what I've said, but I've stuck strictly with the first 78 pages. So Alina turned out to be not my "sock puppet" as you claimed. Only you and I know the real answer to that. Why don't you round her up and have her come here and comment. I can't seem to find her. Surely you can. 0:- LOL! You can't find her but you CAN sent her the Embry study? Wow! You are amazing! I sent it long ago. I can't find her now. That was the point. Wow! You are an amazing liar. Are you saying now that you were WRONG? Only you and I know the answer to that, stupid. LOL! I think everybody know that you are STUPID! Anyone that would use all inclusives to describe something where it's impossible can't be too bright. "Everybody" Doan? I think you OWED not only ME but Alina also, A BIG APOLOGY! Nope, you owe this entire newsgroup an apology, a great big apology, but then you have been a perennial fake and fraud. We don't expect you to get honest now. You've been a constant liar and group thug since your first posts here. Hahaha! What happened to "LOL!?" Doan Doan't ignoranus kane0! Doan't you wish. 0:- -- "Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin |
#85
|
|||
|
|||
The Embry study: What it actually said.
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: Oops, more LIES from ignoranus kane0! I have consistenly argue that the only "expert" regard their own children are the parents themselveS. Even the abusive ones? We already have child-abuse laws to deal with them. But if you gonna believe somebody just because they have a Ph.D. after their name, them you have to believe Dr. Dobson. Right, Kane? ;-) I don't believe someone because of their degrees or lack. Do you? I have already said only the parents are the "expert", STUPID! AFfromdreamland |
#86
|
|||
|
|||
The Embry study: What it actually said.
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: Hahaha! Another stupid response from ignoranus kane0! Nope, just one you don't like and can't respond to with any credible commentary. We know that when you label it and the author as 'STUPID.' I am not a LIAR like you! And you are a coward. And you are STUPID! ;-) AFfromDreamLand |
#87
|
|||
|
|||
The Embry study: What it actually said.
|
#88
|
|||
|
|||
The Embry study: What it actually said.
|
#89
|
|||
|
|||
The Embry study: What it actually said.
Hey! Kane told the truth for a change! ;-) AFfromDreamLand On Sun, 26 Feb 2006, 0:- wrote: |
#90
|
|||
|
|||
The Embry study: What it actually said.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Classic Droan was R R R R, should I DOUBLE DARE HIM? ..was... LaVonne | Kane | Spanking | 0 | April 17th 04 07:13 PM |
Kids should work... | Doan | Spanking | 33 | December 10th 03 08:05 PM |
Kids should work. | LaVonne Carlson | General | 22 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
Kids should work. | ChrisScaife | Spanking | 16 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
Kids should work... | Doan | Foster Parents | 31 | December 7th 03 03:01 AM |