A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » misc.kids » Kids Health
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Nano Particles used in Untested H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccines



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 20th 09, 07:20 AM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,sci.med.nursing,uk.sci.med.nursing
john[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 822
Default Nano Particles used in Untested H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccines

" At this point in time, when two of the approved vaccines planned to be
mass distributed in Germany and elsewhere contain nanoparticles, failure of
the relevant responsible public health and epidemiology officials to order
an immediate emergency freeze on distribution of any vaccine containing
nanoparticles can only be considered tantamount to criminal negligence.
Hopefully the responsible authorities will react in time to avert a possible
human health catastrophe orders of magnitude worse than the worst case of
Swine Flu reported to date."




Nano Particles used in Untested H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccines


http://blogs.healthfreedomalliance.o...-flu-vaccines/




Vaccines which have been approved by the responsible government authorities
for vaccination against the alleged H1N1 Influenza A Swine Flu have been
found to contain nano particles. Vaccine makers have been experimenting with
nanoparticles as a way to "turbo charge" vaccines for several years. Now it
has come out that the vaccines approved for use in Germany and other
European countries contain nanoparticles in a form that reportedly attacks
healthy cells and can be deadly.
In 2007 researchers at the Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)
announced in an article in the journal, Nature Biotechnology, that they had
developed a "nanoparticle that can deliver vaccines more effectively, with
fewer side effects, and at a fraction of the cost of current vaccine
technologies." The article went on to describe the effects of their
breakthrough: "At a mere 25 nanometers, these particles are so tiny that
once injected, they flow through the skin's extracellular matrix, making a
beeline to the lymph nodes. Within minutes, they've reached a concentration
of DCs thousands of times greater than in the skin. The immune response can
then be extremely strong and effective." 1

There is only one small problem with vaccines containing nanoparticles*they
can be deadly and at the least cause severe irreparable health damage.

Nanoparticles, promoted in the mass media as the new wonder revolution of
science, are particles that have been produced vastly smaller than deadly
asbestos particles which caused severe lung damage and death before being
outlawed. Particles at a nano size, (nm = 0,000000001 Meter) fuse together
with the membranes of our body cell membranes and, according to recent
studies in China and Japan, continuously destroy cells once introduced into
the body. Once they interact with the body's cellular structure, they cannot
be removed. Modern medicine euphemistically terms the phenomenon, a
continuing infectious reaction.

Since the asbestos scandal, it has been established that particles in size a
millionth of a meter, because of their enormous attractive force, penetrate
all cells, destroying all those they come into contact with. Nanoparticles
are far smaller than asbestos fibers.

Beijing Tests confirm deadly effects on humans

The fact that WHO, the European Medicines Evaluation Agency, the German
Robert Koch Institute and other health bodies today would permit the
population to be injected with largely untested novel vaccines containing
nanoparticles says more about the powerful pharma lobby in Euiropean
politics than it does about the sanity or moral integrity of the civil
servants responsible for health of the general public.

The September 2009 issue of the respected European Respiratory Journal, made
public on 19 August, and available since 21 August online, contains a
peer-reviewed article with the title, "Exposure to nanoparticles is related
to pleural effusion, pulmonary fibrosis and granuloma."

The article describes tests carried out in 2008 at the elite Beijing
Chaoyang Hospital on seven young women. All seven, ages 18-47 had been
exposed to nanoparticles for 5-13 months in their common workplace. All were
admitted to the hospital with shortness of breath and pleural effusions, or
excessive fluids surrounding the lungs, inhibiting breathing. None of the
seven had ever smoked and none were in any special risk group. Doctors
carefully tested for every possibility and confirmed that the lung problems
had a common origin*regular inhalation of nanoparticles in their factory.
They had been exposed to Polyacrylat nanoparticles.

The tests confirmed the nanoparticles had set off a "super-meltdown"
reaction in the patients. Despite all heroic efforts of doctors, two of the
seven died from the lung complications. 2

In their report, the scientists concluded something so alarming it is
necessary to quote at length:

"Immunological tests, examinations of bacteriology, virology and tumour
markers, bronchoscopy, internal thoracoscopy and video-assisted thoracic
surgery were performed. Surveys of the workplace, clinical observations and
examinations of the patients were conducted. Polyacrylate, consisting of
nanoparticles, was confirmed in the workplace. Pathological examinations of
patients' lung tissue displayed nonspecific pulmonary inflammation,
pulmonary fibrosis and foreign-body granulomas of pleura. Using transmission
electron microscopy, nanoparticles were observed to lodge in the cytoplasm
and caryoplasm of pulmonary epithelial and mesothelial cells, but are also
located in the chest fluid. These cases arouse concern that long-term
exposure to some nanoparticles without protective measures may be related to
serious damage to human lungs."3

To date Animal studies and in vitro experiments show that nanoparticles can
result in lung damage and other toxicity in animals, but no reports on the
clinical toxicity in humans due to nanoparticles prior to the Beijing study
had been made.

The Beijing Chaoyang Hospital study has now conclusively confirmed that
nanoparticles cause lung damage and other toxicity in humans as well. At
this point in time, when two of the approved vaccines planned to be mass
distributed in Germany and elsewhere contain nanoparticles, failure of the
relevant responsible public health and epidemiology officials to order an
immediate emergency freeze on distribution of any vaccine containing
nanoparticles can only be considered tantamount to criminal negligence.
Hopefully the responsible authorities will react in time to avert a possible
human health catastrophe orders of magnitude worse than the worst case of
Swine Flu reported to date.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=15092


Comments
One Response to "Nano Particles used in Untested H1N1 Swine Flu Vaccines"
1.. Gary E. Andrews on September 19th, 2009 8:04 am

2.. It sounds like the victims of nanoparticle poisoning would display
much the same symptoms as they will with influenza disease. None are likely
to have the electron-microscopic autopsy that would reveal the difference.
We live in an age of low-quality decision-making by 'leaders' who are
instudious about the cause and effect of their decisions, in government, in
commerce, in 'leading' their own lives. We, the people, are totally at the
mercy of these mis-leaders who trust too much, push for profit over safety,
ignore science, serve greed and even serve fascist agendas. Because of our
global interconnectedness, the decisions of one group which has risen to
power through deception and subterfuge, such as WHO, the US Government or
any other, a pharmaceutical or food company, can affect the safety and
health security of any and all other humans on planet Earth. Thanks for
keeping an eye on them. Good luck to us. These threats to survival exceed
all others. Man, these men, and women, are the most likely force to succeed
in extermination of the human race


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pandemic promoters in public health, media, have yet to prove existence of novel H1N1 swine flu strain Peter Bowditch Kids Health 3 August 30th 09 11:02 PM
Diseased African Monkeys Used to Make Swine Flu Vaccines; PrivateMilitary Contractor Holds Key Patents Jeff Kids Health 0 August 11th 09 10:14 PM
SQUALENE (in a h1n1 vax) john[_5_] Kids Health 3 August 10th 09 11:39 AM
Diseased African Monkeys Used to Make Swine Flu Vaccines; Private Military Contractor Holds Key Patents john[_5_] Kids Health 2 August 9th 09 07:37 PM
Vaccines : Untested, Unsafe and Unnecessary. [email protected] Kids Health 2 January 12th 07 02:16 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.