If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Who has the ultimate right to choose?
My comments were implicitly directed at illegitimate births, but I
should have spelled this out. You say that "just because a woman CAN make a choice to abort while a man cannot does not necessarily make it a unilateral choice." Would you apply the same logic to men? Just because a man CAN make a choice to walk away from an unwanted pregnancy, while a woman cannot, does not necessarily make it a unilateral choice? "Beverly" wrote in message news On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 11:09:31 GMT, "Kenneth S." wrote: But so long as women made unilateral choices, they should bear the sole responsibility for their own choices. I agree with the statement as written; however, just because a woman CAN make a choice to abort while a man cannot does not necessarily make it a unilateral choice. Children born within a marriage are often a choice made by both, although not always. Conversely, children born out of wedlock may be a choice made by both parents, but I would strongly advise any woman in this situation to make her own decisions based upon her own circumstances. My eldest's father wanted me to abort. We were not married. I made my decision to keep my baby and took sole responsibility for my decision. I never asked his father for anything. My younger two children were a product of my marriage to my ex husband. We made the decision together to have children before they were conceived. While I may have made the decision to divorce, it was based upon HIS decision to molest. If I really ever had a choice, I'd have chosen that he never do what he did. I don't feel bad asking that he bear some responsibility toward our children. That said, I STILL see providing for my children as something *I* must do. Women who DEPEND upon child support are only setting themselves and their children up. Both households should have a responsible parent, but the only parent we can MAKE responsible is ourselves. Beverly |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Who has the ultimate right to choose?
"Kenneth S." wrote in message news:L9pSh.467$Z66.141@trnddc06... My experience has been that people who use the kind of offensive language that Elizabeth uses below are not amenable to logic. However, for the benefit of others I will point out that the current situation in the U.S. is grotesquely skewed in favor of women. Women have a range of post-conception reproductive choices, and significant efforts are being made to enlarge those choices. A woman is able to choose unilaterally to have an abortion, to have the child but to take advantage of newborn dropoff laws, to put the child up for adoption, or to keep the child -- and bill the father, via "child support," for the choice she has made. Meantime, no effort is spared to deny men the choice that Nature has given them -- that of walking away from unwanted pregnancies. Furthermore, the suggestion that men can fix the problem by getting custody is of course disingenuous. As a practical matter, custody decisions are made, not by laws or by judges, but by mothers. If they want custody, they get it. There are many people, including me, who think that, as a moral matter, women should never have been given some of their present post-conception choices, notably infanticide through the repellent partial birth abortion procedure. But so long as women made unilateral choices, they should bear the sole responsibility for their own choices. Gee, what a novel concept. Ya think? "elizabeth" wrote in message oups.com... On Apr 4, 10:34 am, "Chris" wrote: "CafeWriter" wrote in message snip I've had enough. For all the men who got women pregnant and decided to become deadbeat fathers, Men don't decide to become fathers; women make that decision; unless, of course, your definition of fatherhood begins at conception. Men are free to get vasectomies before sex, they are free to use condoms. Women can't get vasectomies nor decide to use condoms, that's the man's choice. So you don't have as many choices as women, too bad. If women had a method as cheap, safe, and effective as vasectomy, that could be as easily reversed, if they could store ova just by having an orgasm the way men can store sperm . .. well, there wouldn't be many abortions at all. But because most men feel entitled to sexual access, and feel that it's not their problem if the woman gets pregnant, abortion will be needed, far more often than it should. you are not worth it. Shame on you. That's why if a father does not pay child support or help the mother out, then he is not truly a father that his child would know but rather a man who doesn't love his child. Not paying cash to a child's mother says NOTHING about not loving said child. Bull****. Letting your child live in poverty means you are the sort of heartless asshole who should be castrated, because we don't need more irresponsible assholes breeding children that the rest of society must support. In fact, that's very sociopathic, not caring about your own offspring. Maybe you realize your mother made the wrong choice on abortion, and thus, don't want your offspring to have a chance? Now geez that's probably part of the reason why some women chose abortions; they already knew that the men that got them pregnant wouldn't help them out. Did you purposely decide to not answer my above question, or did you simply overlook it? So what's your beef, mad about paying child support? Well, why not get custody and make her pay you? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Who has the ultimate right to choose?
On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:56:02 -0700, "teachrmama"
wrote: "elizabeth" wrote in message roups.com... On Apr 8, 7:37 pm, "Gini" wrote: And you know this how? Come to think of it, I don't know any women who have died from a tubal. Heh, perhaps I'm running with a different crowd. OK, we're using Gina Knows Proof. The only cases that matter are the women Gina Knows. I know of women who have died and have had very, very serious complications from pills and IUDs. Um--after they died from their tubals, they STILL had very, very serious complications from pills and IUDs?? That really IS bad!! Are you really stupid? Or do you think everyone else is? Women have died from complications from a tubal. Women have had complications from pills, and IUDS, decided on a tubal and died. Liz is correct, any man that doesn't want to father a child and be a real daddy, should get his cords clipped. Far safer than a tubal for a woman. Any man that doesn't want to get a STD, needs to use a condom, unless he has absolute faith in his partner. The father of any child should support that child, even if he has to be put in a slave labor condition. Men can prevent pregnancy in the woman he is taking pleasure from. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Who has the ultimate right to choose?
On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:58:05 -0700, "teachrmama"
wrote: "Gini" wrote in message news:qwiSh.933$Lm.323@trndny05... "elizabeth" wrote On Apr 8, 7:37 pm, "Gini" wrote: "elizabeth" wrote On Apr 8, 7:21 pm, "Gini" wrote: "elizabeth" wrote ................. Letting your child live in poverty means you are the sort of heartless asshole who should be castrated, because we don't need more irresponsible assholes breeding children that the rest of society must support. == Indeed. Sterilize all welfare women of childbearing age. As long as you sterilize all the men impregnating them, fine. == G So, how is it that a man would impregnate a sterilized woman? == .......................... no man has ever died from a vasectomy. == And you know this how? Come to think of it, I don't know any women who have died from a tubal. Heh, perhaps I'm running with a different crowd. And more research . . .. Intraoperative complications such as: Unintended, unplanned major surgery or laparotomy due to a problem during the tubal ligation procedure, This complication occurs at a rate of approximately 0.9 per 100 tubal ligation procedures. Blood transfusions A life-threatening event Death Postoperative complications include those that occur intraoperatively, as well as: Febrile morbidity Rehospitalization Death caused by a complication that occurs up to 42 days of your tubal ligation surgery. == You weren't paying attention, hon. Complications (which are extremely rare) do not equal *death from a tubal.* Nice try, though. You are quite entertaining tonight. Now, about the man who impregnates a sterile woman....? With all the complications that can happen to women who don't want children, maybe they could just stop offering it to every man who asks. Surely chastity is still a choice! Chastity is indeed a choice. But not widely popular, taking your self out for movie, dinner and dancing. Course there are always other women. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Who has the ultimate right to choose?
"elizabeth" wrote in message oups.com... On Apr 4, 10:34 am, "Chris" wrote: "CafeWriter" wrote in message snip I've had enough. For all the men who got women pregnant and decided to become deadbeat fathers, Men don't decide to become fathers; women make that decision; unless, of course, your definition of fatherhood begins at conception. Men are free to get vasectomies before sex, they are free to use condoms. Women can't get vasectomies nor decide to use condoms, that's the man's choice. So you don't have as many choices as women, too bad. If women had a method as cheap, safe, and effective as vasectomy, that could be as easily reversed, if they could store ova just by having an orgasm the way men can store sperm . .. well, there wouldn't be many abortions at all. But because most men feel entitled to sexual access, and feel that it's not their problem if the woman gets pregnant, abortion will be needed, far more often than it should. Whether the above is all true, all false, or somewhere in between, STILL the fact remains that WOMEN, not men make such choice. (see below) you are not worth it. Shame on you. That's why if a father does not pay child support or help the mother out, then he is not truly a father that his child would know but rather a man who doesn't love his child. Not paying cash to a child's mother says NOTHING about not loving said child. Bull****. Letting your child live in poverty means you are the sort of heartless asshole who should be castrated, because we don't need more irresponsible assholes breeding children that the rest of society must support. Tell that to all the women who are doing so. In fact, that's very sociopathic, not caring about your own offspring. Maybe you realize your mother made the wrong choice on abortion, Thank you for confirming my claim that it is indeed the WOMAN, not the man, who makes such choice. and thus, don't want your offspring to have a chance? Now geez that's probably part of the reason why some women chose abortions; they already knew that the men that got them pregnant wouldn't help them out. Did you purposely decide to not answer my above question, or did you simply overlook it? So what's your beef, mad about paying child support? Do you always answer a question with a question? Well, why not get custody and make her pay you? |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Who has the ultimate right to choose?
"Beverly" wrote in message news On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 11:09:31 GMT, "Kenneth S." wrote: But so long as women made unilateral choices, they should bear the sole responsibility for their own choices. I agree with the statement as written; however, just because a woman CAN make a choice to abort while a man cannot does not necessarily make it a unilateral choice. Children born within a marriage are often a choice made by both, I sense a SLIGHT contradiction in the above statements. although not always. Conversely, children born out of wedlock may be a choice made by both parents, Contradiction repeated. but I would strongly advise any woman in this situation to make her own decisions based upon her own circumstances. They ALWAYS make their own decision. My eldest's father wanted me to abort. We were not married. I made my decision to keep my baby and took sole responsibility for my decision. I never asked his father for anything. My younger two children were a product of my marriage to my ex husband. We made the decision together to have children before they were conceived. There's that pesky contradiction again, unless such "children" exist at the time of conception. While I may have made the decision to divorce, it was based upon HIS decision to molest. If I really ever had a choice, I'd have chosen that he never do what he did. I don't feel bad asking that he bear some responsibility toward our children. Translation: I don't feel bad forcing him to hand me free cash. That said, I STILL see providing for my children as something *I* must do. Women who DEPEND upon child support are only setting themselves and their children up. Both households should have a responsible parent, but the only parent we can MAKE responsible is ourselves. Beverly |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Who has the ultimate right to choose?
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 13:26:30 GMT, "Kenneth S."
wrote: My comments were implicitly directed at illegitimate births, but I should have spelled this out. You say that "just because a woman CAN make a choice to abort while a man cannot does not necessarily make it a unilateral choice." Would you apply the same logic to men? Just because a man CAN make a choice to walk away from an unwanted pregnancy, while a woman cannot, does not necessarily make it a unilateral choice? But a woman CAN walk away from an unwanted pregnancy and, unfortunately, men most often CAN'T. I don't agree with this, by the way. I think men should be able to walk away UNLESS they were part of the decision that affirmed having and keeping the baby. "Beverly" wrote in message news On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 11:09:31 GMT, "Kenneth S." wrote: But so long as women made unilateral choices, they should bear the sole responsibility for their own choices. I agree with the statement as written; however, just because a woman CAN make a choice to abort while a man cannot does not necessarily make it a unilateral choice. Children born within a marriage are often a choice made by both, although not always. Conversely, children born out of wedlock may be a choice made by both parents, but I would strongly advise any woman in this situation to make her own decisions based upon her own circumstances. My eldest's father wanted me to abort. We were not married. I made my decision to keep my baby and took sole responsibility for my decision. I never asked his father for anything. My younger two children were a product of my marriage to my ex husband. We made the decision together to have children before they were conceived. While I may have made the decision to divorce, it was based upon HIS decision to molest. If I really ever had a choice, I'd have chosen that he never do what he did. I don't feel bad asking that he bear some responsibility toward our children. That said, I STILL see providing for my children as something *I* must do. Women who DEPEND upon child support are only setting themselves and their children up. Both households should have a responsible parent, but the only parent we can MAKE responsible is ourselves. Beverly Beverly |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Who has the ultimate right to choose?
"Robert" wrote in message ... On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:56:02 -0700, "teachrmama" wrote: "elizabeth" wrote in message groups.com... On Apr 8, 7:37 pm, "Gini" wrote: And you know this how? Come to think of it, I don't know any women who have died from a tubal. Heh, perhaps I'm running with a different crowd. OK, we're using Gina Knows Proof. The only cases that matter are the women Gina Knows. I know of women who have died and have had very, very serious complications from pills and IUDs. Um--after they died from their tubals, they STILL had very, very serious complications from pills and IUDs?? That really IS bad!! Are you really stupid? Or do you think everyone else is? Women have died from complications from a tubal. Women have had complications from pills, and IUDS, decided on a tubal and died. Liz is correct, any man that doesn't want to father a child and be a real daddy, should get his cords clipped. Far safer than a tubal for a woman. Any man that doesn't want to get a STD, needs to use a condom, unless he has absolute faith in his partner. The father of any child should support that child, even if he has to be put in a slave labor condition. Men can prevent pregnancy in the woman he is taking pleasure from. Ohm grow up! What a fool. Any woman who cannot support a child should keep her panties on and herlegs together. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Who has the ultimate right to choose?
"Robert" wrote in message ... On Sun, 8 Apr 2007 20:58:05 -0700, "teachrmama" wrote: "Gini" wrote in message news:qwiSh.933$Lm.323@trndny05... "elizabeth" wrote On Apr 8, 7:37 pm, "Gini" wrote: "elizabeth" wrote On Apr 8, 7:21 pm, "Gini" wrote: "elizabeth" wrote ................. Letting your child live in poverty means you are the sort of heartless asshole who should be castrated, because we don't need more irresponsible assholes breeding children that the rest of society must support. == Indeed. Sterilize all welfare women of childbearing age. As long as you sterilize all the men impregnating them, fine. == G So, how is it that a man would impregnate a sterilized woman? == .......................... no man has ever died from a vasectomy. == And you know this how? Come to think of it, I don't know any women who have died from a tubal. Heh, perhaps I'm running with a different crowd. And more research . . .. Intraoperative complications such as: Unintended, unplanned major surgery or laparotomy due to a problem during the tubal ligation procedure, This complication occurs at a rate of approximately 0.9 per 100 tubal ligation procedures. Blood transfusions A life-threatening event Death Postoperative complications include those that occur intraoperatively, as well as: Febrile morbidity Rehospitalization Death caused by a complication that occurs up to 42 days of your tubal ligation surgery. == You weren't paying attention, hon. Complications (which are extremely rare) do not equal *death from a tubal.* Nice try, though. You are quite entertaining tonight. Now, about the man who impregnates a sterile woman....? With all the complications that can happen to women who don't want children, maybe they could just stop offering it to every man who asks. Surely chastity is still a choice! Chastity is indeed a choice. But not widely popular, taking your self out for movie, dinner and dancing. Course there are always other women. Surely you are not saying that letting a man screw you is the price of dinner and a movie. Eeeeew! What kind of scummy crowd do you run with? |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Who has the ultimate right to choose?
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007 15:48:14 -0700, "Chris" wrote:
"Beverly" wrote in message news On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 11:09:31 GMT, "Kenneth S." wrote: But so long as women made unilateral choices, they should bear the sole responsibility for their own choices. I agree with the statement as written; however, just because a woman CAN make a choice to abort while a man cannot does not necessarily make it a unilateral choice. Children born within a marriage are often a choice made by both, I sense a SLIGHT contradiction in the above statements. although not always. Conversely, children born out of wedlock may be a choice made by both parents, Contradiction repeated. but I would strongly advise any woman in this situation to make her own decisions based upon her own circumstances. They ALWAYS make their own decision. I needed my husband's signature for a tubal ligation. I am under the understanding that I would have needed his signature for an abortion as well. My eldest's father wanted me to abort. We were not married. I made my decision to keep my baby and took sole responsibility for my decision. I never asked his father for anything. My younger two children were a product of my marriage to my ex husband. We made the decision together to have children before they were conceived. There's that pesky contradiction again, unless such "children" exist at the time of conception. You don't believe that couples plan for children and work together at getting the woman pregnant to achieve this goal? While I may have made the decision to divorce, it was based upon HIS decision to molest. If I really ever had a choice, I'd have chosen that he never do what he did. I don't feel bad asking that he bear some responsibility toward our children. Translation: I don't feel bad forcing him to hand me free cash. That said, I STILL see providing for my children as something *I* must do. Women who DEPEND upon child support are only setting themselves and their children up. Both households should have a responsible parent, but the only parent we can MAKE responsible is ourselves. Beverly Beverly |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
World Ultimate Fighting | [email protected] | General | 0 | February 28th 07 07:34 AM |
Ultimate Mom's Day out! | [email protected] | General | 0 | September 4th 06 04:16 PM |
FA: Ultimate Breastfeeding Book of Answers | miamisean | Breastfeeding | 0 | July 8th 06 10:57 PM |
Bird flu: The Ultimate Chicken Joke | john | Kids Health | 19 | February 21st 06 06:29 PM |
found the ultimate use for my changing table... | oregonchick | Pregnancy | 4 | August 29th 05 08:50 PM |