If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Kent and his ""real world friend Mike""
I have it on good authority that on Mon, 3 Dec 2007 09:47:35 -0800
(PST), Greegor wrote: Your ""mutual real world friend named Mike"" is pulling your leg. It's possible. He could be flat out lying too. Your employment status isn't something I worry about. You could be the CEO of a Fortune 500 Company, or bankrupt, living in your parent's den, or something in between. It's really none of my business. Long ago somebody in the hyena pack came up with some kind of record about a guy with the same first and last name as mine who worked at Best Buy in this area and had a liquor problem. I wasn't told of any drinking problems. Only that you work for Best Buy. But it wasn't me. I have never worked at Best Buy in my life. I never liked liquor and never had a drinking problem. Since no mention was made of alcohol, I didn't presume you did. Last year Firemonkey falsely accused me of infecting her computer with two different virus's something like 6 months apart. Supposedly one of them said "Best Buy" somewhere inside of it. I think this is the one that was set up to report to a Canadian cable internet address. I didn't know a virus included an IP. One of the two virii she claimed I had "arranged" was supposedly transmitted by way of a JPEG file I had linked to at an address something like photobucket. That would be a good trick. Getting an JPG file to transmit a virus. Both of the virii mentioned were old and well documented. One of them is only able to infect Windows XP SP0 or SP1 and no other operating system. Apparently Firemonkey was surfing the internet withOUT a valid updated and active antivirus program, and withOUT any Firewall program. ACK! Note to EVERYONE: Get a firewall (hardware preferred, but even Zone Alarm is better than nothing) and a virus scanner. There are many free ones that work as well as the commercial programs. And update your OS patches! Despite abyssmally poor technical knowledge, Firemonkey strongly asserted my guilt. I questioned the accusations on the grounds that a person genuinely attempting to infect somebody else's computer would not use such old and well known virii. I explained that basically EVERY program would recognize old ones like those. Every scanner would. If she wasn't using one, then she would be vulnerable. I ridiculed Firemonkey for being so stupid as to surf the internet without the most basic security precautions, yet blaming me specifically, and with no logical proof. One of the two virii is documented as commonly contracted from PORN SITES. I also ridiculed her for accusing me of spying on her using a virus that reports to a CANADIAN cable internet address! The virus may have originated from a programmer in Canada, but I know of no virus that contains the originating IP. Then as she was new to Firewall's and watching closely, she had the usual amazement about all of the background pings that any internet user receives. Every computer on-line gets a lot of background stuff sent to them. The first time I got Zone Alarm with my Win Me machine, I was a bit curious and nervous. I thought everyone on-line must be trying to get into my computer. That was the nervous part. Why would anyone care enough about me to want access to my machine? That was the curious part. She complained that I was pinging her a lot. It took her MONTHS to accept that pings can actually fake the origin IP address. If the IPs always traced to you, it would be far more probable that it was you. You aren't important enough to clone. At one point she accused me of pinging her from my address but was not aware that my dynamic IP address had CHANGED due to a big lightning strike and 6 hour power outage. Whoever was putting out the fake pings (if anybody!) failed to take that into account. Firemonkey posted my address and phone number publicly in the newsgroups and incited people to "visit me" or call me up to complain. Shortly an "anonymous poster" with a familiar style made other threats involving my address and phone number. A very stupid thing to do. Unless it's being done to prove something specific that requires posting it, there is NO reason to do it. Ever. Isn't it just a little bit obvious that your ""real world friend Mike"" was just another tactic in your little fishing expedition? What fishing expedition? I pointed out it's none of my business. I also stated I wanted you to feel perfectly comfortable NOT telling me either way, as was your right. I was curious, as I also pointed out, but that's all. This new discovery of yours about Best Buy is more like old fish! It's not my discovery. It's something I was told by someone we both know. And his real life name is Mike. Actually Michael, but you get the idea. -- "It's attached to a thing called a "WIFE" Betty." Kenneth Robert Pangborn showing how he views his wife as an object and NOT a human being. Message-ID: KLf2j.31312$9h.4837@trnddc07 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Kent and his ""real world friend Mike""
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Mon, 03 Dec 2007, Kent Wills wrote: I have it on good authority that on Mon, 3 Dec 2007 09:47:35 -0800 (PST), Greegor wrote: Your ""mutual real world friend named Mike"" is pulling your leg. It's possible. He could be flat out lying too. Your employment status isn't something I worry about. You could be the CEO of a Fortune 500 Company, or bankrupt, living in your parent's den, or something in between. It's really none of my business. Long ago somebody in the hyena pack came up with some kind of record about a guy with the same first and last name as mine who worked at Best Buy in this area and had a liquor problem. I wasn't told of any drinking problems. Only that you work for Best Buy. I checked with a few Best Buy stores in his known area, and he doesn't seem to work there. http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com "...beating [some kids] into a bloody pulp is the ONLY thing that would get through to them." -Ken Pangborn -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: N/A iQA/AwUBR1TNOabdsu4taRc6EQKLOACgjyYPYte3vkLdB9Teyv8A1g 9Tw9wAnRFk RdGiEQecCfXARG++mHMzPql4 =WxAA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Kent and his ""real world friend Mike""
I have it on good authority that on Mon, 3 Dec 2007 21:38:07 -0800
(PST), Greegor wrote: [snip of items for which I have no comment] This new discovery of yours about Best Buy is more like old fish! It's not my discovery. It's something I was told by someone we both know. And his real life name is Mike. Actually Michael, but you get the idea. What happened to the "real world" part from before? Real world, real life. You need to argue semantics? The fact is, you and I both know the same guy. BTW, he claimed you asked about me and that he told you he didn't know anyone by the name Kent Wills. That probably isn't what he told you verbatim, but I'm sure it's close. Did you just word it poorly, Kent? No. Real world or real life. They mean the same thing in the context given. -- Kent Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons... for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Kent and his ""real world friend Mike""
I have it on good authority that on Tue, 4 Dec 2007 18:28:17 -0800
(PST), Greegor wrote: On Dec 4, 4:47 pm, Kent Wills wrote: I have it on good authority that on Mon, 3 Dec 2007 21:38:07 -0800 (PST), Greegor wrote: [snip of items for which I have no comment] This new discovery of yours about Best Buy is more like old fish! It's not my discovery. It's something I was told by someone we both know. And his real life name is Mike. Actually Michael, but you get the idea. What happened to the "real world" part from before? Real world, real life. You need to argue semantics? The fact is, you and I both know the same guy. BTW, he claimed you asked about me and that he told you he didn't know anyone by the name Kent Wills. That probably isn't what he told you verbatim, but I'm sure it's close. Why would I think that this nonexistant "Mike" knows you? Please offer proof that he is fictional. Where does this alleged person allegedly know me from? So now he is real? I can't ask a nonexistant person about you. Please prove he is fictional. Did they communicate this by way of e-mail Kent? So now he is real? Did you just word it poorly, Kent? No. Real world or real life. They mean the same thing in the context given. -- Kent Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons... for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Kent and his ""real world friend Mike""
I have it on good authority that on Wed, 5 Dec 2007 10:13:46 -0800
(PST), Greegor wrote: On Dec 4, 10:11 pm, Kent Wills wrote: I have it on good authority that on Tue, 4 Dec 2007 18:28:17 -0800 (PST), Greegor wrote: On Dec 4, 4:47 pm, Kent Wills wrote: I have it on good authority that on Mon, 3 Dec 2007 21:38:07 -0800 (PST), Greegor wrote: [snip of items for which I have no comment] This new discovery of yours about Best Buy is more like old fish! It's not my discovery. It's something I was told by someone we both know. And his real life name is Mike. Actually Michael, but you get the idea. What happened to the "real world" part from before? Real world, real life. You need to argue semantics? The fact is, you and I both know the same guy. You assert this as fact, with no proof. Ah, the theme of ascps. Supported with great vigor by you. In fact, your assertions indicate it's fiction. Not so. But if it makes you feel better to believe that, it does me no harm. BTW, he claimed you asked about me and that he told you he didn't know anyone by the name Kent Wills. That probably isn't what he told you verbatim, but I'm sure it's close. Verbatim as in outside of internet? Verbatim as in that's probably not word for word what he told you. I wasn't there, so I can't know what he said, verbatim. Why would I think that this nonexistant "Mike" knows you? Please offer proof that he is fictional. Your non-answer is just that. You state Mike is nonexistent. If this is so, prove it. I'm waiting. Where does this alleged person allegedly know me from? So now he is real? I don't think so. I think it's a fiction. What you think doesn't effect the reality that Mike is real. And if he's fictional, why did you ask him about me? Or will you claim that was made up as well? I can't ask a nonexistant person about you. Please prove he is fictional. Yet you can't even say how this person supposedly knows me. I can. That I elect not to should not be interpreted as an inability. Did they communicate this by way of e-mail Kent? So now he is real? It's YOUR ASSERTION you have failed to prove. I've made assertion as to his being real or fictional? YOU made the implication that Mike is fictional. Did you just word it poorly, Kent? No. Real world or real life. They mean the same thing in the context given. Meaningless if it's a deception on your part, a fiction. Since it's not a deception on my part, you are accepting Mike is real. Whew. You made that far more difficult than needed. It's unlikely that we have any friends in common, especially outside of cyber space. As I pointed out, calling Mike a friend is over stating it a bit. As such, your claim is valid, though not in the way you present. We both know him. He and I don't hang out together (the distance makes that quite impossible), but we do communicate. From what you've alleged, the person makes false claims about my employment situation. Then you should take it up with Mike. On the other hand you could admit that you're unemployed and have been for years. That you're still cadging off Lisa with the promise of a big win against the state of Iowa. How's that going, BTW? Simple curiosity on my part. How is it that this supposed person supposedly came in contact with ME, supposedly? I didn't think to ask. But how many Mikes do you know in real life? How did you meet them? One of them will be the Mike in question, so you should already know the answer. How is it that this supposed person supposedly came in contact with YOU, supposedly? We met. Do you hunt pheasant together or what? If you want to believe that, it's fine with me. If you want to believe we go white water rafting, that's fine as well. You can think we're working together on a screen play, if you so desire. The possibilities are really endless. Whatever you want imagine we will have NO effect on my life, so I'm not going to worry about it. -- Kent Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons... for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Kent and his ""real world friend Mike""
I have it on good authority that on Thu, 6 Dec 2007 10:11:26 -0800
(PST), Greegor wrote: [...] Verbatim as in outside of internet? Verbatim as in that's probably not word for word what he told you. I wasn't there, so I can't know what he said, verbatim. Why would I think that this nonexistant "Mike" knows you? Please offer proof that he is fictional. Your non-answer is just that. You state Mike is nonexistent. If this is so, prove it. I'm waiting. Wouldn't it be kind of mean to prove that your invisible friend doesn't exist? If he's fictional, you should be able to prove this. I'm still waiting. Where does this alleged person allegedly know me from? So now he is real? I don't think so. I think it's a fiction. What you think doesn't effect the reality that Mike is real. And if he's fictional, why did you ask him about me? How did I encounter your imaginary friend to ask this question? You tell me. I wasn't there, so I can't know. And I didn't think to ask him what was going on at the time. Why don't you tell me, and when I ask, I'll see if the storys match? Were we both riding pink elephants at the time Kent? That you are a Log Cabin Republican is none of my business. Or will you claim that was made up as well? Hey, it's YOUR imaginary friend! Should I humor you or not? If he's fictional, you should be able to prove this. I'm still waiting... I can't ask a nonexistant person about you. Please prove he is fictional. Why would the burden of proof be on me? You made the claim that he's fictional. As such, it befalls you to prove your claim. Avoiding the question may work for you, but it's failing to impress anyone with cognitive reasoning skills. Yet you can't even say how this person supposedly knows me. I can. That I elect not to should not be interpreted as an inability. I don't take "should not" advice from somebody whom I do not trust. I don't trust you, so of course I DO interpret it as an inability. You have several inabilities. Your interpretations rarely match reality. Did they communicate this by way of e-mail Kent? So now he is real? It's YOUR ASSERTION you have failed to prove. I've made assertion as to his being real or fictional? YOU made the implication that Mike is fictional. Why would it have to be an "implication"? It was an implication. Your evasiveness would make it a logical presumption even if you were not a liar. I'm waiting for you to prove he's fictional. You've taken to claiming he is. Prove it. You seem bound and determined to convince yourself I made him up. The reason for this could be nearly anything, but I think it's because you know he's real and fear what else he may tell. He might have some valid dirt on you that you'd rather keep quiet. I don't KNOW this is the reason, of course, but it would make a lot of sense. Did you just word it poorly, Kent? No. Real world or real life. They mean the same thing in the context given. Meaningless if it's a deception on your part, a fiction. Since it's not a deception on my part, you are accepting Mike is real. Since it IS a deception on your part, your story is BS. If so, you'll be able to prove it. Let the readers see the proof. Whew. You made that far more difficult than needed. Are you claiming victorious retreat? You accepted that he was real. Now you're waffling. It's unlikely that we have any friends in common, especially outside of cyber space. As I pointed out, calling Mike a friend is over stating it a bit. It would be YOUR "overstatement". Akin to "worded poorly" isn't it? I stated that calling his a friend would be over stating it. Only you could see that as meaning anything more. As such, your claim is valid, though not in the way you present. You decide what is valid and what isn't? How convenient for you! How accurate, you mean. We both know him. He and I don't hang out together (the distance makes that quite impossible), but we do communicate. Most would call what you do bull ****. Call it what you want. The truth remains the truth. From what you've alleged, the person makes false claims about my employment situation. Then you should take it up with Mike. He was out riding pink elephants when I called. How delusional, exactly, are you? On the other hand you could admit that you're unemployed and have been for years. Why would I say that? You were for a very long time. Promising to repay Lisa once your k00k s00t against the State of Iowa came through. Odd that you've yet to file. And after so many years. The SOL will expire soon, if it hasn't already, so you best get on the ball. That you're still cadging off Lisa with the promise of a big win against the state of Iowa. You mean like Deuce Bigelow? (grin) Don't know of any suit with anyone named Deuce Bigelow. It didn't make the local news. I can't find anything on-line about such a suit. How's that going, BTW? Simple curiosity on my part. Of course. So, how's that law suit going? You'd think by now you would have done something. Like file. How is it that this supposed person supposedly came in contact with ME, supposedly? I didn't think to ask. But how many Mikes do you know in real life? How did you meet them? One of them will be the Mike in question, so you should already know the answer. Ergo this is all just mental masturbation you foisted. If it makes your life a little easier to pretend someone you know in real life is actually fictional, so be it. How is it that this supposed person supposedly came in contact with YOU, supposedly? We met. Earlier you said you two couldn't hang out because of distance. You presume we've always lived so far apart. Is English a fourth or fifth language for you? Trouble keeping your masturbatory story straight? That you fantasize about me masturbating is something best kept to yourself. Do you hunt pheasant together or what? If you want to believe that, it's fine with me. If you want to believe we go white water rafting, that's fine as well. You can think we're working together on a screen play, if you so desire. The possibilities are really endless. Whatever you want imagine we will have NO effect on my life, so I'm not going to worry about it. Generally this sort of protestation indicates the opposite of what it says on the face of it. Only in your mind. Another indication that this "real world friend Mike" story is pure Kent Wills masturbatory fiction. If believing such makes your life a little more comfortable, that's fine. It does me no harm. -- Kent Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons... for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Kent and his ""real world friend Mike""
I have it on good authority that on Thu, 6 Dec 2007 20:47:58 -0800
(PST), Greegor wrote: KW If he's fictional, you should be able to prove this. KW I'm still waiting. You make up a BS story loaded with vaguaries and then pretend that the burden of proof is on me? You made the claim. It befalls you to prove it. -- Kent Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons... for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Kent and his ""real world friend Mike""
I have it on good authority that on Fri, 7 Dec 2007 15:36:19 -0800
(PST), Greegor wrote: KW If he's fictional, you should be able to prove this. KW I'm still waiting. G You make up a BS story loaded with vaguaries G and then pretend that the burden of proof is on me? KW You made the claim. It befalls you to prove it. You made the claim that we had a friend named Mike in common in the real world. The only information you obtained from this supposed contact was WRONG and had been raised before in the ascps newsgroup. The only information I *mentioned* in the group was in regards to your employment. And when you mentioned he was pulling my leg, I pointed out that he may well be lying to me. You have never substantiated the dubious story. You have been evasive. It really looks like you flat out lied. If I tell you that which you already know, I would "out" him. Since he's a male, you'll not try to abuse him in any fashion (you ONLY prey upon weaker females), but you might try to make his life difficult in some manner. Your attempt to shift the burden of proof indicates deception as well. No shift. It does NOT befall me to prove he is fictional. YOU alone made that claim. As such, the burden befalls you to prove it. Either do so or admit you can't. Dragon's teeth! -- Kent Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons... for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Kent and his ""real world friend Mike""
I have it on good authority that on Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:53:15 -0600,
"Michael©" wrote: On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 23:36:19 GMT, Greegor etched into the walls of alt.support.child-protective-services: KW If he's fictional, you should be able to prove this. KW I'm still waiting. G You make up a BS story loaded with vaguaries G and then pretend that the burden of proof is on me? KW You made the claim. It befalls you to prove it. You made the claim that we had a friend named Mike in common in the real world. The only information you obtained from this supposed contact was WRONG and had been raised before in the ascps newsgroup. You have never substantiated the dubious story. You have been evasive. It really looks like you flat out lied. Your attempt to shift the burden of proof indicates deception as well. Christ, goddamn Greg, can you be any more polite! LOL He's a liar and a ****ing sloppy ****. Rather a lot of misogynist rhetoric in your posts. Give that we are to presume, according to you, that you do not mean what you post, then you are posting for effect. But what is the effect you're after? Therein lies the real question. Am I to compare myself to a vagina? I am honored, to say the least. Women's bodies and their reproductive parts are somewhat fascinating to most, if not all, heterosexual males. And it's quite impossible, unless one happens to be a homosexual, to be turn off by them, or be insulted by the use them by evolutionary throwbacks who use them as a means of insult. "Have a nice night with your blow-up spic wife." "Michael©" showing that he HATES me because my wife is Hispanic in alt.support.child-protective-services. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Kent and his ""real world friend Mike""
"Greegor" wrote in message ... KW If he's fictional, you should be able to prove this. KW I'm still waiting. G You make up a BS story loaded with vaguaries G and then pretend that the burden of proof is on me? KW You made the claim. It befalls you to prove it. You made the claim that we had a friend named Mike in common in the real world. The only information you obtained from this supposed contact was WRONG and had been raised before in the ascps newsgroup. Haven't you noticed Kent's imaginary friends yet? Like the imaginary CANADIAN DUDE that used MILLIONS and MILLIONS of internet sites in Holguin. ALL OVER THE PLACE!! Bwahahahahahahaha! PAY NO ATTENTION TO THAT MAN BEHIND THE CURTAIN!! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1997 video MSBP ""expert"" Prof Savid Southall shuts down interview! | Greegor | Foster Parents | 19 | September 15th 07 11:45 PM |
COVER BLOWN: "Capital Resources Institute" is the name of a right wing "family values" org who want violence to be allowed against certain kids | zeez[_2_] | Solutions | 1 | August 23rd 07 03:39 AM |
Surgeons "maimed" brain damaged child to "convenience" caregivers, health advocate charges | Jan Drew | General | 0 | January 15th 07 07:43 PM |
Surgeons "maimed" brain damaged child to "convenience" caregivers, health advocate charges | Jan Drew | Kids Health | 0 | January 15th 07 07:43 PM |