Flu Crimes at the CDC

From: "Mark Sircus Ac., OMD" Subject: IMVA - Flu Crimes at the CDC
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:18:56 -0300


Flu Crimes at the CDC
International Medical Veritas Association




On the 7th of October the BBC started
hitting the public with its yearly dose of hyped flu
propaganda. "The 1918 "Spanish" flu pandemic is
estimated to have infected up to one billion people -
half the world's population at the time. The virus
killed more people than any other single outbreak of
disease, surpassing even the Black Death of the Middle
Ages."[1] One can only wonder at the vaccines in those
early days. Today in England, with the most modern
technology, we have a vaccine plant closing because of
contamination. Imagine during the First World War when
the pharmaceutical companies first started mass
producing the vaccines. At that time refrigeration was
chancier and vaccine manufacturing technology
primitive. Federal regulators said an inspection of
Chiron's flu-vaccine plant in June 2003 turned up
manufacturing problems, meaning they had ample warning
of troubles that over a year later remained
unresolved. John Taylor, the FDA's associate
commissioner for regulatory affairs was correct in
saying, last year, that "Chiron wouldn't necessarily
be able to discover problems, identify the root cause
and take steps to prevent similar issues from arising
again."[2] Why would we assume the early manufactures
of almost 100 years ago would do any better?

Chiron's Fluvirin vaccine was pulled
off the market after the dangerous serratia bacteria
was found in a manufacturing plant that uses the most
up-to-the-minute safeguards. Chiron also uses the
mercury-based preservative thimerosal as a sterilizing
agent in making Fluvirin, to prevent exactly this type
of contamination. Before the 1930s no such powerful
preservative was available. It's not beyond reason or
statistical probability that the vaccines back then
were contaminated or seriously flawed in some way and
provoked the epidemic that killed so many. Dr. Eleanor
McBean, who lived through the 1918 Influenza epidemic,
testified, "As far as I could find out, the flu hit
only the vaccinated. Those who had refused the shots
escaped the flu. My family had refused all the
vaccinations so we remained well all the time. There
was seven times more disease among the vaccinated
soldiers than among the unvaccinated civilians, and
the diseases were those they had been vaccinated
against."[3]

It's quite normal for the medical
establishment to bash the public with improbable
stories of the past and carrot stick them with future
fears saying, "Scientists believe the 1918 virus leapt
to humans by mutating from bird flu, possibly after
passing through pigs, which are able to harbor both
human and avian viruses and thus allow them to swap
genes as the viruses reproduce. For that reason,
experts are deeply concerned that the avian flu that
has broken out in poultry flocks in parts of
south-east Asia may acquire genes that will make it
highly infectious as well as lethal for humans."[4]
This kind of speculation is simply that, speculation,
beliefs without substance, good story line to scare
naïve people with. We can as easily believe that the
vaccines themselves killed hundreds of thousands of
people because the pharmaceutical manufactures had not
developed safeguards or sufficient technology to
assure quality control.

"Influenza kills tens of thousands
every year in this country and requires the
hospitalization of about a quarter-million. In
epidemic years, mortality can be in the millions,"[5]
says Dr. Henry I. Miller, a fellow at the Hoover
Institution and former director of the Office of
Biotechnology, who seems not to have read the CDC's
version[6], which puts 1918 flu deaths at only
500,000, the Asian Flu pandemic of 1957-58 at 70,000
and the Hong Kong Flu pandemic of 1968-69 at 34,000.
Medical authorities, the media and doctors like Miller
tend to have statistical hallucinations this time of
year; but doctor Miller goes on to suggest, "The FDA
should also make it clear that although the labeling
for FluMist, the nasal vaccine, indicates that it is
intended for recipients aged 5 to 49 years, it will
likely also be effective in those younger or older."
FluMist was a disaster last year not only because it
is expensive but because it is dangerous and comes
with warnings that those who use it can become
contagious for up to 21 days to those around them,
because of it's live viruses. Miller, in some kind of
manic need to sure up this year's flu campaign, would
have it stuffed up the noses of babies even though the
FDA has indicated this is not safe.

The CDC estimated that from 1990 to 1999,
an average of approximately 92
influenza-related deaths occurred each
year among children less than 5 years of age.[7]

It is clear, at least to naturopathic
doctors, that people and young children die from the
flu not because of the virus itself but because they
are already sick, are bearing heavy toxic burdens, and
have severely compromised immune systems. Allopathic
doctors like Miller forget the most basic principles
of health and disease because they do not care to look
into the realities of the patients they treat. They do
not want to take the time to understand weaknesses in
patients because they are eating too much sugar, are
malnourished, are getting inadequate rest or if they
are suffering from intense emotional trauma. The flu
salesmen doctors and the CDC multiply the danger and
risk of viruses because without exaggerated stories
flu vaccines just would not sell for the virus is not
dangerous in and of itself. The CDC deals with
disease, not health. They would not stop and think
that patients who exercise would be better protected
from the dangers of flu then from patients who took
vaccines.

Jeffrey A. Woods, PhD., and graduate
student Tom Lowder at the Physical Fitness Laboratory,
Department of Kinesiology, University of Illinois,
Urbana recently said just this, reporting that four
consecutive days of moderate exercise in mice after
they were infected with influenza protects them from
dying, compared with mice that didn't exercise. Woods
and Lowder are reporting this October of 2004 their
findings at the American Physiological Society's 2004
Intersociety Meeting, showing that 20-week-old mice
that had exercised had significantly (p=0.008) higher
survival rates (18 of 22) versus HCC of the same age
(10 of 22). When all EX mice (47) were compared with
all HCC mice (48), EX had twice the survival rate, 59%
vs. 29.4% (p=0.003). They reported that none of the
variables (food/water intake, random activity or
symptom severity) proved to be reliable at predicting
mortality.

The CDC states that 135 children died
during the 2003-2004 flu season.
59 of these children had received their
flu shots.[8]

It's just too much for the CDC to
suggest that patients exercise and eat right. They
would rather promote vaccines that contain dangerous
chemicals and inject that in babies than promote
health. Dr. Hugh Fundenburg, one of the most quoted
biologist of our time, says that if an individual has
5 consecutive flu shots his/her chance of developing
Alzheimer's Disease is 10 times greater than if they
had 1, two or no shots.[9] What it will do to babies
given year after year is anyone's guess and that is
exactly what it is, a guess, an experiment, for no one
knows, for there have been no tests. Clearly no
longitudinal study has been made with babies on the
effect of giving annual flu shots starting from six
months of age. With an already heavy childhood
immunization schedule in place, and with children
carrying heavy burdens of toxins, including mercury
administered through other vaccines, it's a crap shoot
gamble on what will happen to the children under the
CDC's rule with the addition of the flu vaccine that
contains thimerosal. Of course experimenting with
children or anyone else is against the laws of
humanity and certainly a serious breach of medical
ethics.



The addition of the flu vaccine into
the childhood immunization schedule, loaded as it is
with nasty chemicals like mercury, aluminum and even
formaldehyde, reveals the CDC's true colors as a
terrorist organization whose prime target is children.
If not medical terrorists we would have to see them as
medically ignorant, or even worse, medically insane.
Medical terrorists fit the bill more correctly because
of their well known conflicts of interests with the
major pharmaceutical companies, meaning too many
people in the medical establishment benefit directly
or indirectly from pharmaceutical profits. The entire
vaccine department at the CDC should be faced with
Nuremberg Trials for they are breaking the Nuremberg
Code by administering the flu vaccine to six month old
babies starting this year, and every year
thereafter.[10] If eminent doctors warn against the
serious effect of consecutive flu shots to adults,
imagine a newborn baby getting one each year. What
will happen to them after ten or twenty consecutive
years of receiving a vaccine to protect them from a
virus that good nutrition, vitamin C and exercise
would protect them from?



The best news in medicine this year
ends up being the Chiron story. Approximately fifty
million people and children will be spared 25
micrograms of mercury in the form of thimerosal this
year. That's fifty million less crimes against
humanity. That's fifty million less assaults on the
nervous system for certainly thimerosal is nerve toxic
even at concentrations well below 25 micrograms. Dr.
Julie L. Gerberding, director of the Centers for
Disease Control, speaking to congressional
representatives, said that, at best, the preservative
may be eliminated from the vaccine by 2009.[11] Can we
hope for similar disasters at the Chiron plant for the
next five years in a row? After all, by the CDC's own
admission, the vaccine for the flu is not effective
against the flu. With 59 out of the 135 flu deaths
this past year stemming from vaccinated children, a
case could be made to include the vaccine itself in
the etiology of influenza death. Many good doctors
like Harold Buttram have made excellent cases about
how injections like this one diminish immune strength
and resistance[12] in children and adults alike. This
is not what anyone needs when entering yet another flu
season.



Mark Sircus Ac., OMD
Executive Director
International Medical Veritas Association
http://www.imva.info
http://www.worldpsychology.net

Press Return for Unsubscribe and Paste
Unsubscribe in the Subject Area

[1] BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/h...th/3719990.stm
Published: 2004/10/07 05:02:24 GMT

[2] Wall Street Journal Online.
http://online.wsj.com/public/health

[3] McBean, Eleanor. Swine Flu Expose.
1977 http://www.whale.to/a/mcbean2.html

[4] BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/h...th/3719990.stm
Published: 2004/10/07 05:02:24 GMT

[5] San Francisco Chronicle. Federal
vaccine policy needs a booster. Henry I. Miller.
October 8, 2004


http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...TL&type=health

[6] CDC -
http://www.cdc.gov/flu/avian/gen-info/pandemics.htm

[7] CDC -
http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/qa/0304season.htm

[8] CDC - op.cit.

[9] Dr. Fudenberg's comments are from his
speech at the NVIC International Vaccine Conference,
Arlington VA September, 1997.

[10] Fisher, BL. Medical doctors
operating America's forced vaccination system both in
military and civilian life would do well to review the
proceedings of The Doctor's Trial at Nuremberg after
World War II where medical doctors were tried for
crimes against humanity. Whenever medical doctors
force medical interventions carrying a risk of injury
or death upon individuals without their voluntary
informed consent, they are violating the spirit and
letter of the Nuremberg Code, which serves as a
guideline for the ethical
practice of modern medicine.

[11] The Hartford Courant. Getting Vaccine
Changed Frustrates Congress. October 6, 2004

[12] Buttram, Harold. Vaccinations and
Immune Malfuntion. PA: The Randolph Society Inc, 1987.

"john" wrote in message
...

(Garbage deleted).

John, doing your stupidity shill stuff again.

Repeating the same lies over and over again doesn't make them true.

(Of course, repeating the same fear-mongoring lies might get Bush elected.)

Jeff

Jeff wrote:

John,
Repeating the same lies over and over again doesn't make them true.

Jeff

Someone else who can't read! Here is the post by John again which
clearly says that it Mark Sircus, not John who wrote this:

From: "Mark Sircus Ac., OMD" Subject: IMVA - Flu Crimes at the CDC
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:18:56 -0300

Flu Crimes at the CDC
International Medical Veritas Association

On the 7th of October the BBC started
hitting the public with its yearly dose of hyped flu
propaganda. "The 1918 "Spanish" flu pandemic is
estimated to have infected up to one billion people -
half the world's population at the time. The virus
killed more people than any other single outbreak of
disease, surpassing even the Black Death of the Middle
Ages."[1] One can only wonder at the vaccines in those
early days. Today in England, with the most modern
technology, we have a vaccine plant closing because of
contamination. Imagine during the First World War when
the pharmaceutical companies first started mass
producing the vaccines. At that time refrigeration was
chancier and vaccine manufacturing technology
primitive. Federal regulators said an inspection of
Chiron's flu-vaccine plant in June 2003 turned up
manufacturing problems, meaning they had ample warning
of troubles that over a year later remained
unresolved. John Taylor, the FDA's associate
commissioner for regulatory affairs was correct in
saying, last year, that "Chiron wouldn't necessarily
be able to discover problems, identify the root cause
and take steps to prevent similar issues from arising
again."[2] Why would we assume the early manufactures
of almost 100 years ago would do any better?

Chiron's Fluvirin vaccine was pulled
off the market after the dangerous serratia bacteria
was found in a manufacturing plant that uses the most
up-to-the-minute safeguards. Chiron also uses the
mercury-based preservative thimerosal as a sterilizing
agent in making Fluvirin, to prevent exactly this type
of contamination. Before the 1930s no such powerful
preservative was available. It's not beyond reason or
statistical probability that the vaccines back then
were contaminated or seriously flawed in some way and
provoked the epidemic that killed so many. Dr. Eleanor
McBean, who lived through the 1918 Influenza epidemic,
testified, "As far as I could find out, the flu hit
only the vaccinated. Those who had refused the shots
escaped the flu. My family had refused all the
vaccinations so we remained well all the time. There
was seven times more disease among the vaccinated
soldiers than among the unvaccinated civilians, and
the diseases were those they had been vaccinated
against."[3]

It's quite normal for the medical
establishment to bash the public with improbable
stories of the past and carrot stick them with future
fears saying, "Scientists believe the 1918 virus leapt
to humans by mutating from bird flu, possibly after
passing through pigs, which are able to harbor both
human and avian viruses and thus allow them to swap
genes as the viruses reproduce. For that reason,
experts are deeply concerned that the avian flu that
has broken out in poultry flocks in parts of
south-east Asia may acquire genes that will make it
highly infectious as well as lethal for humans."[4]
This kind of speculation is simply that, speculation,
beliefs without substance, good story line to scare
naïve people with. We can as easily believe that the
vaccines themselves killed hundreds of thousands of
people because the pharmaceutical manufactures had not
developed safeguards or sufficient technology to
assure quality control.

"Influenza kills tens of thousands
every year in this country and requires the
hospitalization of about a quarter-million. In
epidemic years, mortality can be in the millions,"[5]
says Dr. Henry I. Miller, a fellow at the Hoover
Institution and former director of the Office of
Biotechnology, who seems not to have read the CDC's
version[6], which puts 1918 flu deaths at only
500,000, the Asian Flu pandemic of 1957-58 at 70,000
and the Hong Kong Flu pandemic of 1968-69 at 34,000.
Medical authorities, the media and doctors like Miller
tend to have statistical hallucinations this time of
year; but doctor Miller goes on to suggest, "The FDA
should also make it clear that although the labeling
for FluMist, the nasal vaccine, indicates that it is
intended for recipients aged 5 to 49 years, it will
likely also be effective in those younger or older."
FluMist was a disaster last year not only because it
is expensive but because it is dangerous and comes
with warnings that those who use it can become
contagious for up to 21 days to those around them,
because of it's live viruses. Miller, in some kind of
manic need to sure up this year's flu campaign, would
have it stuffed up the noses of babies even though the
FDA has indicated this is not safe.

The CDC estimated that from 1990 to 1999,
an average of approximately 92
influenza-related deaths occurred each
year among children less than 5 years of age.[7]

It is clear, at least to naturopathic
doctors, that people and young children die from the
flu not because of the virus itself but because they
are already sick, are bearing heavy toxic burdens, and
have severely compromised immune systems. Allopathic
doctors like Miller forget the most basic principles
of health and disease because they do not care to look
into the realities of the patients they treat. They do
not want to take the time to understand weaknesses in
patients because they are eating too much sugar, are
malnourished, are getting inadequate rest or if they
are suffering from intense emotional trauma. The flu
salesmen doctors and the CDC multiply the danger and
risk of viruses because without exaggerated stories
flu vaccines just would not sell for the virus is not
dangerous in and of itself. The CDC deals with
disease, not health. They would not stop and think
that patients who exercise would be better protected
from the dangers of flu then from patients who took
vaccines.

Jeffrey A. Woods, PhD., and graduate
student Tom Lowder at the Physical Fitness Laboratory,
Department of Kinesiology, University of Illinois,
Urbana recently said just this, reporting that four
consecutive days of moderate exercise in mice after
they were infected with influenza protects them from
dying, compared with mice that didn't exercise. Woods
and Lowder are reporting this October of 2004 their
findings at the American Physiological Society's 2004
Intersociety Meeting, showing that 20-week-old mice
that had exercised had significantly (p=0.008) higher
survival rates (18 of 22) versus HCC of the same age
(10 of 22). When all EX mice (47) were compared with
all HCC mice (48), EX had twice the survival rate, 59%
vs. 29.4% (p=0.003). They reported that none of the
variables (food/water intake, random activity or
symptom severity) proved to be reliable at predicting
mortality.

The CDC states that 135 children died
during the 2003-2004 flu season.
59 of these children had received their
flu shots.[8]

It's just too much for the CDC to
suggest that patients exercise and eat right. They
would rather promote vaccines that contain dangerous
chemicals and inject that in babies than promote
health. Dr. Hugh Fundenburg, one of the most quoted
biologist of our time, says that if an individual has
5 consecutive flu shots his/her chance of developing
Alzheimer's Disease is 10 times greater than if they
had 1, two or no shots.[9] What it will do to babies
given year after year is anyone's guess and that is
exactly what it is, a guess, an experiment, for no one
knows, for there have been no tests. Clearly no
longitudinal study has been made with babies on the
effect of giving annual flu shots starting from six
months of age. With an already heavy childhood
immunization schedule in place, and with children
carrying heavy burdens of toxins, including mercury
administered through other vaccines, it's a crap shoot
gamble on what will happen to the children under the
CDC's rule with the addition of the flu vaccine that
contains thimerosal. Of course experimenting with
children or anyone else is against the laws of
humanity and certainly a serious breach of medical
ethics.



The addition of the flu vaccine into
the childhood immunization schedule, loaded as it is
with nasty chemicals like mercury, aluminum and even
formaldehyde, reveals the CDC's true colors as a
terrorist organization whose prime target is children.
If not medical terrorists we would have to see them as
medically ignorant, or even worse, medically insane.
Medical terrorists fit the bill more correctly because
of their well known conflicts of interests with the
major pharmaceutical companies, meaning too many
people in the medical establishment benefit directly
or indirectly from pharmaceutical profits. The entire
vaccine department at the CDC should be faced with
Nuremberg Trials for they are breaking the Nuremberg
Code by administering the flu vaccine to six month old
babies starting this year, and every year
thereafter.[10] If eminent doctors warn against the
serious effect of consecutive flu shots to adults,
imagine a newborn baby getting one each year. What
will happen to them after ten or twenty consecutive
years of receiving a vaccine to protect them from a
virus that good nutrition, vitamin C and exercise
would protect them from?



The best news in medicine this year
ends up being the Chiron story. Approximately fifty
million people and children will be spared 25
micrograms of mercury in the form of thimerosal this
year. That's fifty million less crimes against
humanity. That's fifty million less assaults on the
nervous system for certainly thimerosal is nerve toxic
even at concentrations well below 25 micrograms. Dr.
Julie L. Gerberding, director of the Centers for
Disease Control, speaking to congressional
representatives, said that, at best, the preservative
may be eliminated from the vaccine by 2009.[11] Can we
hope for similar disasters at the Chiron plant for the
next five years in a row? After all, by the CDC's own
admission, the vaccine for the flu is not effective
against the flu. With 59 out of the 135 flu deaths
this past year stemming from vaccinated children, a
case could be made to include the vaccine itself in
the etiology of influenza death. Many good doctors
like Harold Buttram have made excellent cases about
how injections like this one diminish immune strength
and resistance[12] in children and adults alike. This
is not what anyone needs when entering yet another flu
season.



Mark Sircus Ac., OMD
Executive Director
International Medical Veritas Association
http://www.imva.info
http://www.worldpsychology.net

Press Return for Unsubscribe and Paste
Unsubscribe in the Subject Area

[1] BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/h...th/3719990.stm
Published: 2004/10/07 05:02:24 GMT

[2] Wall Street Journal Online.
http://online.wsj.com/public/health

[3] McBean, Eleanor. Swine Flu Expose.
1977 http://www.whale.to/a/mcbean2.html

[4] BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/h...th/3719990.stm
Published: 2004/10/07 05:02:24 GMT

[5] San Francisco Chronicle. Federal
vaccine policy needs a booster. Henry I. Miller.
October 8, 2004


http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...TL&type=health

[6] CDC -
http://www.cdc.gov/flu/avian/gen-info/pandemics.htm

[7] CDC -
http://www.cdc.gov/flu/about/qa/0304season.htm

[8] CDC - op.cit.

[9] Dr. Fudenberg's comments are from his
speech at the NVIC International Vaccine Conference,
Arlington VA September, 1997.

[10] Fisher, BL. Medical doctors
operating America's forced vaccination system both in
military and civilian life would do well to review the
proceedings of The Doctor's Trial at Nuremberg after
World War II where medical doctors were tried for
crimes against humanity. Whenever medical doctors
force medical interventions carrying a risk of injury
or death upon individuals without their voluntary
informed consent, they are violating the spirit and
letter of the Nuremberg Code, which serves as a
guideline for the ethical
practice of modern medicine.

[11] The Hartford Courant. Getting Vaccine
Changed Frustrates Congress. October 6, 2004

[12] Buttram, Harold. Vaccinations and
Immune Malfuntion. PA: The Randolph Society Inc, 1987.

"WCAP" wrote in message
...
Jeff wrote:

John,
Repeating the same lies over and over again doesn't make them true.

Jeff

Someone else who can't read! Here is the post by John again which
clearly says that it Mark Sircus, not John who wrote this:

Whether or not he wrote it, he is posting it.

So he is repeating the same lies.

Jeff

Grabage deleted

In article ,
john wrote:


From: "Mark Sircus Ac., OMD" Subject: IMVA - Flu Crimes at the CDC
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 16:18:56 -0300

An acupuncturist with an OMD. There's a combination that doesn't fill
me with hope about getting accurate information.

Flu Crimes at the CDC
International Medical Veritas Association

Gee, the "International Medical Veritas Association." What an
impressive-sounding title. But who the hell are they? Their web site
is full of high-minded, albeit windy, nonsense, but they appear to be
the usual anti-vac crowd. Quackwatch has them on their "questionable
organizations" list.

On the 7th of October the BBC started
hitting the public with its yearly dose of hyped flu
propaganda. "The 1918 "Spanish" flu pandemic is
estimated to have infected up to one billion people -
half the world's population at the time. The virus
killed more people than any other single outbreak of
disease, surpassing even the Black Death of the Middle
Ages."[1] One can only wonder at the vaccines in those
early days.

There really weren't a lot of them. Even JAMA in 1918 admitted that
the vaccine available at the time didn't work. The whole field was
brand new back then and they really didn't know what they were doing.
Viruses weren't isolated until well after 1918, so even the nature of
the infectious agent was purely speculative at the time.

See
http://www.stanford.edu/group/virus/...uresponse.html

for an interesting discussion that contains actual facts, unlike this
OMD's pathetic mixture of speculation and error.

remaining mutton-headed conflation of all vaccines into one pot
snipped

John Taylor, the FDA's associate
commissioner for regulatory affairs was correct in
saying, last year, that "Chiron wouldn't necessarily
be able to discover problems, identify the root cause
and take steps to prevent similar issues from arising
again."[2] Why would we assume the early manufactures
of almost 100 years ago would do any better?

Well, there's nothing magical about sterilization and keeping one's
plant clean. However, it probably *is* true that the vaccines
available in 1918 didn't work very well. That has absolutely nothing
to do with how they're made today, nearly 90 years later.

Chiron's Fluvirin vaccine was pulled
off the market after the dangerous serratia bacteria
was found in a manufacturing plant that uses the most
up-to-the-minute safeguards. Chiron also uses the
mercury-based preservative thimerosal as a sterilizing
agent in making Fluvirin, to prevent exactly this type
of contamination. Before the 1930s no such powerful
preservative was available. It's not beyond reason or
statistical probability that the vaccines back then
were contaminated or seriously flawed in some way and
provoked the epidemic that killed so many.

In fact, thimerosal was first added to vaccines to address that very
problem.

Dr. Eleanor McBean, who lived through the 1918 Influenza epidemic,
testified, "As far as I could find out, the flu hit only the
vaccinated. Those who had refused the shots escaped the flu. My
family had refused all the vaccinations so we remained well all the
time. There was seven times more disease among the vaccinated
soldiers than among the unvaccinated civilians, and the diseases were
those they had been vaccinated against."[3]

McBean, whom John-boy is also fond of quoting, has written an
incredibly inaccurate and biased history of the 1918 epidemic, which I
have evsiscerated elsewhere.

It's quite normal for the medical
establishment to bash the public with improbable
stories of the past and carrot stick them with future
fears saying, "Scientists believe the 1918 virus leapt
to humans by mutating from bird flu, possibly after
passing through pigs, which are able to harbor both
human and avian viruses and thus allow them to swap
genes as the viruses reproduce. For that reason,
experts are deeply concerned that the avian flu that
has broken out in poultry flocks in parts of
south-east Asia may acquire genes that will make it
highly infectious as well as lethal for humans."[4]
This kind of speculation is simply that, speculation,
beliefs without substance, good story line to scare
naïve people with.

A typical assertion from an ignoramus like Sircus. As a matter of
fact, this is exactly how the flu mutates each year; it moves through
pigs, and from them to humans, and is spread by birds (via their
droppings).

We can as easily believe that the vaccines themselves killed hundreds
of thousands of people because the pharmaceutical manufactures had not
developed safeguards or sufficient technology to assure quality
control.

Except that if this were really the case, we'd have expected to see
many other vast world-wide epidemics, all due to vaccines. The flu
killed huge numbers of people in countries like India where
vaccination was basically nonexistent.

The CDC estimated that from 1990 to 1999,
an average of approximately 92
influenza-related deaths occurred each
year among children less than 5 years of age.[7]

Gee, and that's hardly worth worrying about -- unless you happen to be
the parent of one of those children.

It is clear, at least to naturopathic
doctors, that people and young children die from the
flu not because of the virus itself but because they
are already sick, are bearing heavy toxic burdens, and
have severely compromised immune systems.

They must put something in the water at naturopathic schools, if such
folderol becomes "clear" to them.

Allopathic
doctors like Miller forget the most basic principles
of health and disease because they do not care to look
into the realities of the patients they treat. They do
not want to take the time to understand weaknesses in
patients because they are eating too much sugar, are
malnourished, are getting inadequate rest or if they
are suffering from intense emotional trauma.

And we know this how? Not by rigorous double-blind studies from
naturopaths, that's for sure. Classical naturopathic teachings have
no idea how the immune system even works.

Jeffrey A. Woods, PhD., and graduate
student Tom Lowder at the Physical Fitness Laboratory,
Department of Kinesiology, University of Illinois,
Urbana recently said just this, reporting that four
consecutive days of moderate exercise in mice after
they were infected with influenza protects them from
dying, compared with mice that didn't exercise. Woods
and Lowder are reporting this October of 2004 their
findings at the American Physiological Society's 2004
Intersociety Meeting, showing that 20-week-old mice
that had exercised had significantly (p=0.008) higher
survival rates (18 of 22) versus HCC of the same age
(10 of 22). When all EX mice (47) were compared with
all HCC mice (48), EX had twice the survival rate, 59%
vs. 29.4% (p=0.003). They reported that none of the
variables (food/water intake, random activity or
symptom severity) proved to be reliable at predicting
mortality.

Gee, and none of those people are naturopaths. How surprising.

The CDC states that 135 children died
during the 2003-2004 flu season.
59 of these children had received their
flu shots.[8]

Yep. Last year's shot wasn't very effective.

It's just too much for the CDC to
suggest that patients exercise and eat right.

Since when does *any* doctor not suggest this? The hard part is
getting people to do it.

They
would rather promote vaccines that contain dangerous
chemicals and inject that in babies than promote
health. Dr. Hugh Fundenburg, one of the most quoted
biologist of our time, says that if an individual has
5 consecutive flu shots his/her chance of developing
Alzheimer's Disease is 10 times greater than if they
had 1, two or no shots.[9]

Anti-vacs are so fond of this quote. But Fudenberg hasn't published
any evidcence that I can find, and I think the whole thing is a con.

What it will do to babies
given year after year is anyone's guess and that is
exactly what it is, a guess, an experiment, for no one
knows, for there have been no tests. Clearly no
longitudinal study has been made with babies on the
effect of giving annual flu shots starting from six
months of age. With an already heavy childhood
immunization schedule in place, and with children
carrying heavy burdens of toxins, including mercury
administered through other vaccines, it's a crap shoot
gamble on what will happen to the children under the
CDC's rule with the addition of the flu vaccine that
contains thimerosal.

Of course, none of the other vaccines children will get are likely to
contain any thimerosal, so the total burden they're receiving is much
lower than a decade ago. The notion that this schedule is *heavy* is
also stupid -- unless you're in a plastic bubble, you're exposed to
many, many infectious agents every day via food, air, and water. You
can't avoid it. So the immune system is always working.

Of course experimenting with children or anyone else is against the
laws of humanity and certainly a serious breach of medical ethics.

Except that's not what's being done. Personally, I think advising
people to avoid something that could be life-saving is against the
"laws of humanity," or would be if there were such a thing.

The addition of the flu vaccine into the childhood
immunization schedule, loaded as it is with nasty chemicals like
mercury, aluminum and even formaldehyde, reveals the CDC's true
colors as a terrorist organization whose prime target is children.

This kind of idiotic blither isn't even worthy of a response, and
since the rest of the article is of a piece with it, I'll end here.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"If I have not seen as far as others, it is because giants
were standing on my shoulders." (Hal Abelson, MIT)