MMR JUDGE FAILED TO DISCLOSE HE WAS BROTHER OF Glaxo SmithKline DIRECTOR AND LANCET BOSS

MMR JUDGE FAILED TO DISCLOSE HE WAS BROTHER OF Glaxo SmithKline DIRECTOR AND
LANCET BOSS

Just three days ago I discovered while going over the records for 2004 that
the judge, Mr Justice Davis (aka Sir Nigel Anthony Lamert Davis), who had
dismissed the appeal over the removal of funding of the MMR litigation by
the Legal Services Commission was the brother of Lancet proprietor (CEO Reed
Elsevier) Crispin (Henry Lamert) Davis who at the time had also recently
become a non-executive director of Glaxo SmithKline. Though this has not
been reported in the media the following press announcement was issued by
the judiciary yesterday afternoon:

"In 2003 Mr Justice Davis's brother was appointed as a Non-Executive
Director of Glaxo SmithKline, a company which was formed as a result of a
merger with Smith Kline Beecham. At the date of the hearing before Davis J,
the possibility of any conflict of interest arising from his brother's
position did not occur to him.

"If he was wrong, any possible remedy must be sought from the Court of
Appeal."

Former litigants should complain without delay to the Office for Judicial
Complaints, focussing on the GSK conflict. Clearly if the judge had said at
the time that his brother was a director of GSK but he intended to hear the
case anyway his decision would have been regarded with a great deal more
scepticism:

http://www.judicialcomplaints.gov.uk/

They should also write without delay to their MPs, and they should contact
anyone they know who was also party to the litigation, and draw their
attention to this notice. It is very important that as many people do this
as soon as possible.

People may like to note the sequence of events:

1) July 2003 Lancet proprietor Crispin Davis become a non-executive director
of MMR manufacturer Glaxo SmithKline

2) February 20, 2004. The Lancet throws Andrew Wakefield to the wolves for
tenuous reasons. He is dragged through the mud by the BBC and Sunday Times
for four days.

3) February 27, 2004. Mr Justice Davis dismisses the litigants appeal for
restitution of funding.

4) June 2004. Crispin Davis knighted by the Blair government.

John Stone

On May 6, 9:39 am, "JOHN" wrote:
MMR JUDGE FAILED TO DISCLOSE HE WAS BROTHER OF Glaxo SmithKline DIRECTOR AND
LANCET BOSS

Just three days ago I discovered while going over the records for 2004 that
the judge, Mr Justice Davis (aka Sir Nigel Anthony Lamert Davis), who had
dismissed the appeal over the removal of funding of the MMR litigation by
the Legal Services Commission was the brother of Lancet proprietor (CEO Reed
Elsevier) Crispin (Henry Lamert) Davis who at the time had also recently
become a non-executive director of Glaxo SmithKline. Though this has not
been reported in the media the following press announcement was issued by
the judiciary yesterday afternoon:

"In 2003 Mr Justice Davis's brother was appointed as a Non-Executive
Director of Glaxo SmithKline, a company which was formed as a result of a
merger with Smith Kline Beecham. At the date of the hearing before Davis J,
the possibility of any conflict of interest arising from his brother's
position did not occur to him.

"If he was wrong, any possible remedy must be sought from the Court of
Appeal."

Former litigants should complain without delay to the Office for Judicial
Complaints, focussing on the GSK conflict. Clearly if the judge had said at
the time that his brother was a director of GSK but he intended to hear the
case anyway his decision would have been regarded with a great deal more
scepticism:

http://www.judicialcomplaints.gov.uk/

They should also write without delay to their MPs, and they should contact
anyone they know who was also party to the litigation, and draw their
attention to this notice. It is very important that as many people do this
as soon as possible.

People may like to note the sequence of events:

1) July 2003 Lancet proprietor Crispin Davis become a non-executive director
of MMR manufacturer Glaxo SmithKline

2) February 20, 2004. The Lancet throws Andrew Wakefield to the wolves for
tenuous reasons. He is dragged through the mud by the BBC and Sunday Times
for four days.

3) February 27, 2004. Mr Justice Davis dismisses the litigants appeal for
restitution of funding.

4) June 2004. Crispin Davis knighted by the Blair government.

John Stone

If accurate this certainly underminds the credibility of that action.
Thanks Vince

completely ignored by the media


"JOHN" wrote in message
...

MMR JUDGE FAILED TO DISCLOSE HE WAS BROTHER OF Glaxo SmithKline DIRECTOR
AND LANCET BOSS

Just three days ago I discovered while going over the records for 2004
that the judge, Mr Justice Davis (aka Sir Nigel Anthony Lamert Davis), who
had dismissed the appeal over the removal of funding of the MMR litigation
by the Legal Services Commission was the brother of Lancet proprietor (CEO
Reed Elsevier) Crispin (Henry Lamert) Davis who at the time had also
recently become a non-executive director of Glaxo SmithKline. Though this
has not been reported in the media the following press announcement was
issued by the judiciary yesterday afternoon:

"In 2003 Mr Justice Davis's brother was appointed as a Non-Executive
Director of Glaxo SmithKline, a company which was formed as a result of a
merger with Smith Kline Beecham. At the date of the hearing before Davis
J, the possibility of any conflict of interest arising from his brother's
position did not occur to him.

"If he was wrong, any possible remedy must be sought from the Court of
Appeal."

Former litigants should complain without delay to the Office for Judicial
Complaints, focussing on the GSK conflict. Clearly if the judge had said
at the time that his brother was a director of GSK but he intended to hear
the case anyway his decision would have been regarded with a great deal
more scepticism:

http://www.judicialcomplaints.gov.uk/

They should also write without delay to their MPs, and they should contact
anyone they know who was also party to the litigation, and draw their
attention to this notice. It is very important that as many people do this
as soon as possible.

People may like to note the sequence of events:

1) July 2003 Lancet proprietor Crispin Davis become a non-executive
director of MMR manufacturer Glaxo SmithKline

2) February 20, 2004. The Lancet throws Andrew Wakefield to the wolves for
tenuous reasons. He is dragged through the mud by the BBC and Sunday Times
for four days.

3) February 27, 2004. Mr Justice Davis dismisses the litigants appeal for
restitution of funding.

4) June 2004. Crispin Davis knighted by the Blair government.

John Stone

On May 19, 4:27 pm, "JOHN" wrote:
completely ignored by the media

"JOHN" wrote in message

...





MMR JUDGE FAILED TO DISCLOSE HE WAS BROTHER OF Glaxo SmithKline DIRECTOR
AND LANCET BOSS

Just three days ago I discovered while going over the records for 2004
that the judge, Mr Justice Davis (aka Sir Nigel Anthony Lamert Davis), who
had dismissed the appeal over the removal of funding of the MMR litigation
by the Legal Services Commission was the brother of Lancet proprietor (CEO
Reed Elsevier) Crispin (Henry Lamert) Davis who at the time had also
recently become a non-executive director of Glaxo SmithKline. Though this
has not been reported in the media the following press announcement was
issued by the judiciary yesterday afternoon:

"In 2003 Mr Justice Davis's brother was appointed as a Non-Executive
Director of Glaxo SmithKline, a company which was formed as a result of a
merger with Smith Kline Beecham. At the date of the hearing before Davis
J, the possibility of any conflict of interest arising from his brother's
position did not occur to him.

"If he was wrong, any possible remedy must be sought from the Court of
Appeal."

Former litigants should complain without delay to the Office for Judicial
Complaints, focussing on the GSK conflict. Clearly if the judge had said
at the time that his brother was a director of GSK but he intended to hear
the case anyway his decision would have been regarded with a great deal
more scepticism:

http://www.judicialcomplaints.gov.uk/

They should also write without delay to their MPs, and they should contact
anyone they know who was also party to the litigation, and draw their
attention to this notice. It is very important that as many people do this
as soon as possible.

People may like to note the sequence of events:

1) July 2003 Lancet proprietor Crispin Davis become a non-executive
director of MMR manufacturer Glaxo SmithKline

2) February 20, 2004. The Lancet throws Andrew Wakefield to the wolves for
tenuous reasons. He is dragged through the mud by the BBC and Sunday Times
for four days.

3) February 27, 2004. Mr Justice Davis dismisses the litigants appeal for
restitution of funding.

4) June 2004. Crispin Davis knighted by the Blair government.

John Stone- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

While the media will occasionally blat out a story, they know who
their daddy is...and they won't tick him off too much. The only
really remotely honest show I've found on TV is on PBS called "Now".
Originally run by Bill Moyers. Now by Broncaccio.

Chris


Chris

Johnny, it still does not prove causality. Your buddy Wakefield caused
injury and misery with his purchased lies.

JOHN wrote:
completely ignored by the media


"JOHN" wrote in message
...
MMR JUDGE FAILED TO DISCLOSE HE WAS BROTHER OF Glaxo SmithKline DIRECTOR
AND LANCET BOSS

Just three days ago I discovered while going over the records for 2004
that the judge, Mr Justice Davis (aka Sir Nigel Anthony Lamert Davis), who
had dismissed the appeal over the removal of funding of the MMR litigation
by the Legal Services Commission was the brother of Lancet proprietor (CEO
Reed Elsevier) Crispin (Henry Lamert) Davis who at the time had also
recently become a non-executive director of Glaxo SmithKline. Though this
has not been reported in the media the following press announcement was
issued by the judiciary yesterday afternoon:

"In 2003 Mr Justice Davis's brother was appointed as a Non-Executive
Director of Glaxo SmithKline, a company which was formed as a result of a
merger with Smith Kline Beecham. At the date of the hearing before Davis
J, the possibility of any conflict of interest arising from his brother's
position did not occur to him.

"If he was wrong, any possible remedy must be sought from the Court of
Appeal."

Former litigants should complain without delay to the Office for Judicial
Complaints, focussing on the GSK conflict. Clearly if the judge had said
at the time that his brother was a director of GSK but he intended to hear
the case anyway his decision would have been regarded with a great deal
more scepticism:

http://www.judicialcomplaints.gov.uk/

They should also write without delay to their MPs, and they should contact
anyone they know who was also party to the litigation, and draw their
attention to this notice. It is very important that as many people do this
as soon as possible.

People may like to note the sequence of events:

1) July 2003 Lancet proprietor Crispin Davis become a non-executive
director of MMR manufacturer Glaxo SmithKline

2) February 20, 2004. The Lancet throws Andrew Wakefield to the wolves for
tenuous reasons. He is dragged through the mud by the BBC and Sunday Times
for four days.

3) February 27, 2004. Mr Justice Davis dismisses the litigants appeal for
restitution of funding.

4) June 2004. Crispin Davis knighted by the Blair government.

John Stone

While the media will occasionally blat out a story, they know who
their daddy is...and they won't tick him off too much. The only
really remotely honest show I've found on TV is on PBS called "Now".


Is this the reason the Bush Administration has been trying to stop
funding PBS?


On May 21, 4:39 pm, mainframetech wrote:
On May 19, 4:27 pm, "JOHN" wrote:





completely ignored by the media

"JOHN" wrote in message

...

MMR JUDGE FAILED TO DISCLOSE HE WAS BROTHER OF Glaxo SmithKline DIRECTOR
AND LANCET BOSS

Just three days ago I discovered while going over the records for 2004
that the judge, Mr Justice Davis (aka Sir Nigel Anthony Lamert Davis), who
had dismissed the appeal over the removal of funding of the MMR litigation
by the Legal Services Commission was the brother of Lancet proprietor (CEO
Reed Elsevier) Crispin (Henry Lamert) Davis who at the time had also
recently become a non-executive director of Glaxo SmithKline. Though this
has not been reported in the media the following press announcement was
issued by the judiciary yesterday afternoon:

"In 2003 Mr Justice Davis's brother was appointed as a Non-Executive
Director of Glaxo SmithKline, a company which was formed as a result of a
merger with Smith Kline Beecham. At the date of the hearing before Davis
J, the possibility of any conflict of interest arising from his brother's
position did not occur to him.

"If he was wrong, any possible remedy must be sought from the Court of
Appeal."

Former litigants should complain without delay to the Office for Judicial
Complaints, focussing on the GSK conflict. Clearly if the judge had said
at the time that his brother was a director of GSK but he intended to hear
the case anyway his decision would have been regarded with a great deal
more scepticism:

http://www.judicialcomplaints.gov.uk/

They should also write without delay to their MPs, and they should contact
anyone they know who was also party to the litigation, and draw their
attention to this notice. It is very important that as many people do this
as soon as possible.

People may like to note the sequence of events:

1) July 2003 Lancet proprietor Crispin Davis become a non-executive
director of MMR manufacturer Glaxo SmithKline

2) February 20, 2004. The Lancet throws Andrew Wakefield to the wolves for
tenuous reasons. He is dragged through the mud by the BBC and Sunday Times
for four days.

3) February 27, 2004. Mr Justice Davis dismisses the litigants appeal for
restitution of funding.

4) June 2004. Crispin Davis knighted by the Blair government.

John Stone- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

While the media will occasionally blat out a story, they know who
their daddy is...and they won't tick him off too much. The only
really remotely honest show I've found on TV is on PBS called "Now".
Originally run by Bill Moyers. Now by Broncaccio.

Chris

Chris- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Kevysmom wrote:
While the media will occasionally blat out a story, they know who
their daddy is...and they won't tick him off too much. The only
really remotely honest show I've found on TV is on PBS called "Now".


Is this the reason the Bush Administration has been trying to stop
funding PBS?

PBS and NPR tend to be rather liberal. I guess it is not a very
conservative idea to pay for quality broadcasting, as the members of the
individual NPR and PBS stations do.

Jeff