Why was longterm "Psychiatrist" Stephen Barrett NEVER BOARD CERTIFIED??????????

On 11 Sep 2004 14:37:31 GMT, 5in1Vac (Dr Wilson
Remains On Staff for Jan) wrote:

From: Peter Bowditch

Dr Burzynski

Isn't the subject.


Dr Burzynski IS the subject and he isn't Board Certified.

Cue Ilena to **** & moan that the public has NO protection from Dr Burzynski.


Are you claiming that like Quack Barrett ... Dr. Burzynski has no
valid medical license either?

Are you claiming that Dr. Burzynksi (who I do not know, other than
read that he has been under attack by you Quacks ) like Quack
Barrett, screams for the licenses of real doctors doing research and
trying to figure out the mechanisms of MCS:



http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/q...claration.html


I was shocked that Barrett wrote of the clinical ecologists who
believe in MCS, "most of them should have their licenses revoked."
(See Ex. I to my original declaration.)


~~~~~~

DUMBO GETS MORE ATTENTION ON HERSELF THAN THOSE SHE 'THINKS' SHE'S
PROTECTING THE WORLD FROM !!!


"Ilena Rose" wrote in message
...
On 11 Sep 2004 14:37:31 GMT, 5in1Vac (Dr Wilson
Remains On Staff for Jan) wrote:

From: Peter Bowditch

Dr Burzynski

Isn't the subject.


Dr Burzynski IS the subject and he isn't Board Certified.

Cue Ilena to **** & moan that the public has NO protection from Dr
Burzynski.


Are you claiming that like Quack Barrett ... Dr. Burzynski has no
valid medical license either?

Are you claiming that Dr. Burzynksi (who I do not know, other than
read that he has been under attack by you Quacks ) like Quack
Barrett, screams for the licenses of real doctors doing research and
trying to figure out the mechanisms of MCS:



http://www.humanticsfoundation.com/q...claration.html


I was shocked that Barrett wrote of the clinical ecologists who
believe in MCS, "most of them should have their licenses revoked."
(See Ex. I to my original declaration.)


~~~~~~

In article ,
Ilena Rose wrote:

On 10 Sep 2004 23:29:04 -0700, (Michele)
wrote:

Individual certifications are offered in
geriatric, forensic, child & adolescent, & general psych. I & II.
Some docs have one or two of these certs., while some don't.


Quack Barrett got NONE OF THESE.

Totally irrelevant, as I have explained to you ad nauseum for over three
years:

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...04%40news4-ge1.
srv.hcvlny.cv.net&output=gplain

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...1%40news4.suck
news.com&output=gplain (This one's from 2001, showing that Ilena is
nothing, if not consistent, in her deceptive attacks and insinuations.)

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...3%40host9.news
feeds.com&output=gplain

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...04%40news4.srv.
hcvlny.cv.net&output=gplain

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...092004%40news4.
srv.hcvlny.cv.net&output=gplain (from two days ago)

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...04%40news4.srv.
hcvlny.cv.net&output=gplain

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...4%40news04.eas
t.earthlink.net&output=gplain

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...04%40news4-ge1.
srv.hcvlny.cv.net&output=gplain

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...03%40news4.srv.
hcvlny.cv.net&output=gplain

Sorry to others for the repetition, but, as you can see, I have
explained to Ilena many times why Barrett's lack of Board certification
says absolutely nothing about his competence. She simply doesn't listen
and periodically starts posting the same crap again. I've gotten tired
of typing the same rebuttals to her again and again; so I'll simply save
this and repost the URLs when Ilena makes it necessary.

--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
| inconvenience me with questions?"

In article ,
(Jan) wrote:

From: Orac

I have
explained to Ilena many times why Barrett's lack of Board certification
means nothing with regards to his competence

Your explaining it trying to protect Barrett.

No, I'm explaining it because it's true.

--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
| inconvenience me with questions?"

In article ,
Ilena Rose wrote:

On 10 Sep 2004 23:29:04 -0700, (Michele)
wrote:

Individual certifications are offered in
geriatric, forensic, child & adolescent, & general psych. I & II.
Some docs have one or two of these certs., while some don't.


Quack Barrett got NONE OF THESE.

Which says absolutely nothing about his competence. See:

It has been explained to you many, many times why many physicians of
Barrett's generation didn't pursue Board certification. A few examples
by me going back three and a half years:

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...04%40news4-ge1.
srv.hcvlny.cv.net&output=gplain

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...1%40news4.suck
news.com&output=gplain (This one's from 2001, showing that Ilena is
nothing, if not consistent, in her deceptive attacks and insinuations.)

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...3%40host9.news
feeds.com&output=gplain

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...04%40news4.srv.
hcvlny.cv.net&output=gplain

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...092004%40news4.
srv.hcvlny.cv.net&output=gplain (from two days ago)

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...04%40news4.srv.
hcvlny.cv.net&output=gplain

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...4%40news04.eas
t.earthlink.net&output=gplain

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...04%40news4-ge1.
srv.hcvlny.cv.net&output=gplain

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...03%40news4.srv.
hcvlny.cv.net&output=gplain

--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
| inconvenience me with questions?"

In article ,
Ilena Rose wrote:

On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 00:39:53 GMT, Orac wrote:


He retired from the practice of psychiatry.

Decades Davey boy ... DECADES after being in "practice" DECADES!

Irrelevant. Recall:

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...04%40news4-ge1.
srv.hcvlny.cv.net&output=gplain

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...1%40news4.suck
news.com&output=gplain (This one's from 2001, showing that Ilena is
nothing, if not consistent, in her deceptive attacks and insinuations.)

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...3%40host9.news
feeds.com&output=gplain

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...04%40news4.srv.
hcvlny.cv.net&output=gplain

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...092004%40news4.
srv.hcvlny.cv.net&output=gplain (from two days ago)

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...04%40news4.srv.
hcvlny.cv.net&output=gplain

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...4%40news04.eas
t.earthlink.net&output=gplain

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...04%40news4-ge1.
srv.hcvlny.cv.net&output=gplain

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...03%40news4.srv.
hcvlny.cv.net&output=gplain

--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
| inconvenience me with questions?"

In article ,
Ilena Rose wrote:

On 11 Sep 2004 14:37:31 GMT, 5in1Vac (Dr Wilson
Remains On Staff for Jan) wrote:

From: Peter Bowditch

Dr Burzynski

Isn't the subject.


Dr Burzynski IS the subject and he isn't Board Certified.

Cue Ilena to **** & moan that the public has NO protection from Dr
Burzynski.


Are you claiming that like Quack Barrett ... Dr. Burzynski has no
valid medical license either?

Not a valid comparison, as explained to you before. Dr. Barrett is
retired from clinical practice and therefore no longer requires a
medical license. Dr. Burzynski is still treating patients and therefore
does require a medical license.


Are you claiming that Dr. Burzynksi (who I do not know, other than
read that he has been under attack by you Quacks ) like Quack
Barrett, screams for the licenses of real doctors doing research and
trying to figure out the mechanisms of MCS:

Uh, this is a strawman that is so distorted that it's kind of hard to
see what your point is...

[Snip]

--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
| inconvenience me with questions?"

On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 19:55:21 GMT, Orac wrote:

It has been explained to you many, many times why many physicians of
Barrett's generation didn't pursue Board certification.


There are all just excuses ...

the only person in the world who benefitted from his failure to pass
the Board Certification or his refusal to be tested is Quack Stephen
Barrett himself.

You muttering continual apologies for this is duly noted.

In article ,
Ilena Rose wrote:

On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 19:55:21 GMT, Orac wrote:

It has been explained to you many, many times why many physicians of
Barrett's generation didn't pursue Board certification.


There are all just excuses ...

No, his lack of Board certification during practice in an era when Board
certification was not mandatory or even that important and his
reasonable decision to let his medical license lapse when he retired
from the practice of medicine are just convenient excuses for you to
attack him personally.


the only person in the world who benefitted from his failure to pass
the Board Certification or his refusal to be tested is Quack Stephen
Barrett himself.

Not at all. See again:

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...04%40news4-ge1.
srv.hcvlny.cv.net&output=gplain

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...1%40news4.suck
news.com&output=gplain (This one's from 2001, showing that Ilena is
nothing, if not consistent, in her deceptive attacks and insinuations.)

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...3%40host9.news
feeds.com&output=gplain

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...04%40news4.srv.
hcvlny.cv.net&output=gplain

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...092004%40news4.
srv.hcvlny.cv.net&output=gplain (from two days ago)

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...04%40news4.srv.
hcvlny.cv.net&output=gplain

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...4%40news04.eas
t.earthlink.net&output=gplain

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...04%40news4-ge1.
srv.hcvlny.cv.net&output=gplain

http://www.google.com/groups?selm=or...03%40news4.srv.
hcvlny.cv.net&output=gplain



You muttering continual apologies for this is duly noted.

Note away as much as you like. Your continual attacks in the face of
actual evidence and common sense are duly noted.

--
Orac |"A statement of fact cannot be insolent."
|
|"If you cannot listen to the answers, why do you
| inconvenience me with questions?"

On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 19:55:21 GMT, Orac wrote:

It has been explained to you many, many times why many physicians of
Barrett's generation didn't pursue Board certification.


There are all just excuses ...

the only person in the world who benefitted from his failure to pass
the Board Certification or his refusal to be tested is Quack Stephen
Barrett himself.

You muttering continual apologies for this is duly noted.