If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Tri-phasic BBT and negative HPT
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 09:51:40 -0500, SMK wrote:
Have you had normal 28 day cycles aftre your m/c? I've had one AF after the m/c, this was my second. The cycle after the m/c was about 28 days, starting the count from the day my BBT dropped (which it usually does on CD1). My impression was that it definitely was an implantation error this time, judging from other symptoms. But then again, I also have a very vivid imaginations. Whatever, I am OK with it now, and we'll just keep on trying. -- -- I mommy to DS (17m) mommy to a tiny angel (Oct 2003) guardian of DH (33) TTC #2.5 War doesn't decide who's right, only who's left |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Tri-phasic BBT and negative HPT
Ilse Witch wrote in message ...
It was quite a blast (in the negative sense) to learn that a tri-phasic BBT doesn't imply pregnancy. What a disappointment Ilse. In my many many readings of TCOYF I interpreted the triphasic to be only a strong *indication* of possible pregnancy and then definite of course if the high temps span 18 days. Sometimes also there is the slow rising temp, where maybe what looked like a jump is actually just a natural rise, but I think you are an experienced enough temp-er to recognize that. It is so annoying that just when you think you know what 'typical' is for your cycle something new and weird happens. It always makes me doubt the reliability of my cycles/my body, and I think suffering a loss compounds those doubts. Good luck Elle |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Tri-phasic BBT and negative HPT
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 13:50:30 -0800, Elle wrote:
Ilse Witch wrote in message ... It was quite a blast (in the negative sense) to learn that a tri-phasic BBT doesn't imply pregnancy. What a disappointment Ilse. In my many many readings of TCOYF I interpreted the triphasic to be only a strong *indication* of possible pregnancy and then definite of course if the high temps span 18 days. Thanks Elle. Yes, when reading back that is what it says, but it could be interpreted either way. And being an optimist... It is so annoying that just when you think you know what 'typical' is for your cycle something new and weird happens. It always makes me doubt the reliability of my cycles/my body, and I think suffering a loss compounds those doubts. True enough. But I do start to develop a sort of gut feeling about what is going on. I think my body is actually more reliable than I give it credit for, it's the thermometer that I sometimes seriously doubt... -- -- I mommy to DS (17m) mommy to a tiny angel (Oct 2003) guardian of DH (33) TTC #2.5 War doesn't decide who's right, only who's left |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|