If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL PUBLISHES FALSE CLAIMS ABOUT MMR DOCTOR
http://www.box.net/shared/zks6g0ekub
[2010 April pdf] BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL PUBLISHES FALSE CLAIMS ABOUT MMR DOCTOR "It is extraordinary that a journal like the BMJ should have reduced itself to this sort of tabloid medicine from an entirely unqualified and biased source. The egregious errors in Deer's report should cause embarrassment to the BMJ's editors. In a relentless and misguided effort to distract attention from vaccine safety issues, agenda-driven journalism has once again made a mockery of medicine." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL PUBLISHES FALSE CLAIMS ABOUT MMR DOCTOR
john wrote:
http://www.box.net/shared/zks6g0ekub [2010 April pdf] BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL PUBLISHES FALSE CLAIMS ABOUT MMR DOCTOR "It is extraordinary that a journal like the BMJ should have reduced itself to this sort of tabloid medicine from an entirely unqualified and biased source. The egregious errors in Deer's report should cause embarrassment to the BMJ's editors. In a relentless and misguided effort to distract attention from vaccine safety issues, agenda-driven journalism has once again made a mockery of medicine." Wakefield lost his license, in part because of inappropriate tests done on kids and lying about conflicts of interest. And, now you believe Wakefield the liar? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL PUBLISHES FALSE CLAIMS ABOUT MMR DOCTOR
On Sat, 17 Apr 2010 08:24:16 +0100, "john" wrote:
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL PUBLISHES FALSE CLAIMS ABOUT MMR DOCTOR Claims the "Autism File" magazine whose "scientific advisors" include Andrew Wakefield and his publicist "Dotty Stotty" aka Carol Stott. The BMJ article can be read at :- http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/340/apr15_2/c1127 a related editorial is at http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/340/apr15_2/c1807 and offers a somewhat different view of the claims made in the Autism File article. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
More lies from Brian Deer
That header should read : More lies from Brian Deer
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
More lies from Brian Deer
In message , john wrote:
That header should read : More lies from Brian Deer How's that libel suit going? You know, the one that Wakefield filed against Deer in the UK's plaintiff-friendly courts. -- | The brighter the stupid burns, the more | | chance that someone will see the light. | +- D. C. Sessions -+ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
More lies from Brian Deer
"D. C. Sessions" wrote in message ... In message , john wrote: That header should read : More lies from Brian Deer How's that libel suit going? You know, the one that Wakefield filed against Deer in the UK's plaintiff-friendly courts. No idea, something to look forward too. He will be doing that now, now the GMC farrago is over |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
More lies from Brian Deer
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 18:36:46 +0100, "john" wrote:
No idea, something to look forward too. He will be doing that now, now the GMC farrago is over He has already tried it once without success, what makes you think he will do better if he tries again? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
More lies from Brian Deer
In message , john wrote:
"D. C. Sessions" wrote in message ... In message , john wrote: That header should read : More lies from Brian Deer How's that libel suit going? You know, the one that Wakefield filed against Deer in the UK's plaintiff-friendly courts. No idea, something to look forward too. He will be doing that now, now the GMC farrago is over Nice historical revisionism there, Scudamore. The GMC proceedings were *after* Wakefield paid Deer to settle the suit that Wakefield filed, plus Deer's legal bills. However, since you're so sure that Wakefield will refile that claim I'm willing to make this interesting. How about five hundred pounds on whether he refiles in two years or less? You're pretty sure of yourself, so it should be easy money. -- | The brighter the stupid burns, the more | | chance that someone will see the light. | +- D. C. Sessions -+ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
More lies from Brian Deer
"D. C. Sessions" wrote in message ... In message , john wrote: "D. C. Sessions" wrote in message ... In message , john wrote: That header should read : More lies from Brian Deer How's that libel suit going? You know, the one that Wakefield filed against Deer in the UK's plaintiff-friendly courts. No idea, something to look forward too. He will be doing that now, now the GMC farrago is over Nice historical revisionism there, Scudamore. The GMC proceedings were *after* Wakefield paid Deer to settle the suit that Wakefield filed, plus Deer's legal bills. However, since you're so sure that Wakefield will refile that claim I'm willing to make this interesting. How about five hundred pounds on whether he refiles in two years or less? You're pretty sure of yourself, so it should be easy money. Wakefield dropped that claim as Deer wanted all his documents that related to the gmc case and he didn't want to let him have them for obvious reasons. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
More lies from Brian Deer
In message , john wrote:
"D. C. Sessions" wrote in message ... In message , john wrote: "D. C. Sessions" wrote in message ... In message , john wrote: That header should read : More lies from Brian Deer How's that libel suit going? You know, the one that Wakefield filed against Deer in the UK's plaintiff-friendly courts. No idea, something to look forward too. He will be doing that now, now the GMC farrago is over Nice historical revisionism there, Scudamore. The GMC proceedings were *after* Wakefield paid Deer to settle the suit that Wakefield filed, plus Deer's legal bills. However, since you're so sure that Wakefield will refile that claim I'm willing to make this interesting. How about five hundred pounds on whether he refiles in two years or less? You're pretty sure of yourself, so it should be easy money. Wakefield dropped that claim as Deer wanted all his documents that related to the gmc case and he didn't want to let him have them for obvious reasons. Lawyer: "Your Honor, I object!" Judge: "Why?" Lawyer: "Because it's devastating to my case!" -- | The brighter the stupid burns, the more | | chance that someone will see the light. | +- D. C. Sessions -+ |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Merck Mouth, Myrl Jeffcoat, claims Gardasil can "Return them to Health" ... FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE | Ilena Rose | Kids Health | 0 | September 13th 08 03:28 PM |
Merck Mouth, Myrl Jeffcoat, claims Gardasil can "Return them to Health" ... FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE | Ilena Rose | Kids Health | 0 | September 11th 08 09:59 PM |
Merck Mouth, Myrl Jeffcoat, claims Gardasil can "Return them to Health" ... FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE | Ilena Rose | Kids Health | 4 | May 31st 08 07:18 PM |
No more free lunches!!!!!!!!! British Medical Journal | Kevysmom | Kids Health | 1 | June 17th 06 03:07 AM |
British Medical Journal Retracts Part of Its Prozac Story | Mark Probert | Kids Health | 2 | January 31st 05 10:35 PM |