Lavoone takes CA$H to foster. Needs to denigrate family

Lavoone aka LaVonne aka LaMoron has to denigrate family consequences since she
needs the money she derives from fostering.

Course her foster kid ran away from her home.

Lavonne would say anything if you dangled enough CA$H in front of her.

Pathetic that she would sacrifice family intergrity and sell her soul in terms
of family's LIBERTY INTEREST IN PARENTING THEIR CHILDREN AS THEY SEE FIT, for a
few sheckles.

She has to heed the party line.

Morally bankrupt.

On 03 Aug 2004 14:04:54 GMT, (Fern5827) wrote:

Lavoone aka LaVonne aka LaMoron

Let me see now, where have I read that before? R R R R R R R R

has to denigrate family consequences since she
needs the money she derives from fostering.

There doesn't seem to be a logical connection. Please point out for us
the one you see.

My understanding is she is not a foster parent. You are getting into
deep **** here, stupid boy.

Course her foster kid ran away from her home.

Children run away from home. What is it about foster homes that should
be able to prevent that? They are supposed to duplicate the conditions
of a good bio home as much as possible.

We could say about millions of families, "Course" (sic) their child
ran away from home. I did. I was one adventurous kid. Made my first
dash at 3 I'm told, and again in my teens. The sheriff got tired of my
parents calling them to find me and said, "Lady, that kid and his
horse and dog know that part of the Sierras so well we call HIM when
someone is lost up there." It wasn't about quality of homelife, or my
parents.

Your message is lost in your medium. Which seems to generally be true
for most of your crowd.

Lavonne would say anything if you dangled enough CA$H in front of
her.

Patent nonsense. And of course a libelous piece of garbage.

Pathetic that she would sacrifice family intergrity and sell her soul
in terms
of family's LIBERTY INTEREST IN PARENTING THEIR CHILDREN AS THEY SEE
FIT, for a
few sheckles.

I've never seen foster parents make any money from fostering. And
certainly if they did I'd say they worked for it beyond anything YOU
could do. If you know otherwise please post your proof.

As for liberty interests...I've never seen her claim that parents do
not have the right to raise their children as they see fit.....while
not abusing, torturing, raping, killing, or neglecting them to death.

She's rather clear on that.

You seem not to be.

She has to heed the party line.

Which party would that be? The KILLCPS party? Or the protect children
from brutal ignorant dangerous parents party?

Most parents are great parents, and many are even okay, but LaVonne
and myself and others here aren't talking about them. We are talking
about you.

Morally bankrupt.

I've never seen you sign off more honestly before.

Are you legally changing your name to Mr. Morally Bankrupt, then?

Have you found Jesus?

Kane