How do you spell relief?

.... THIRTY YEARS.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/05/18/li....ap/index.html



--
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what
to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb
contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin (or someone else)

0:- wrote:

... THIRTY YEARS.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/LAW/05/18/li....ap/index.html


And surely this was one of those spoiled children that were never
spanked....0:-



--
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what
to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb
contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin (or someone else)

Lionel Tate is just another of a pattern familiar to every police
officer, prosecutor, criminal-defense lawyer, or judge who's been
working six months. He's the guy - almost invariably a guy - whose
run-ins with the police and courts on felonies began LONG before
whatever incident just got him arrested or now has him on trial, who's
already had many "second" chances from the court system. His rap sheet
keeps including worse offenses as time goes on.

No $4 to park! No $6 admission! http://www.INTERNET-GUN-SHOW.com

wrote:
Lionel Tate is just another of a pattern familiar to every police
officer, prosecutor, criminal-defense lawyer, or judge who's been
working six months. He's the guy - almost invariably a guy - whose
run-ins with the police and courts on felonies began LONG before
whatever incident just got him arrested or now has him on trial, who's
already had many "second" chances from the court system. His rap sheet
keeps including worse offenses as time goes on.

Hence, my subject field topic. 0:-

Far too long overdue, but finally, relief. It's like being constipated
then having a nice big apple.

Things will eventually move along.

0:-


No $4 to park! No $6 admission! http://www.INTERNET-GUN-SHOW.com



--
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what
to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb
contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin (or someone else)

O:- quoted me:
Lionel Tate is just another of a pattern familiar to every police
officer, prosecutor, criminal-defense lawyer, or judge who's been
working six months. He's the guy - almost invariably a guy - whose
run-ins with the police and courts on felonies began LONG before
whatever incident just got him arrested or now has him on trial, who's
already had many "second" chances from the court system. His rap sheet
keeps including worse offenses as time goes on.

and replied:
Hence, my subject field topic. 0:-
Far too long overdue, but finally, relief. It's like being constipated
then having a nice big apple.
Things will eventually move along.

Having both prosecuted and defended many criminals from the
mid-1980s through the end of the 1990s, I can tell you that really is
the prosecutor's attitude in most all cases. He knows he really will
be getting another chance - soon - if he loses this case, so he can
afford to not do an all-out prosecution this time. Guys like the three
college kids in the Duke lacrosse rape case - people who've never been
charged with anything more serious than drunk driving or some other
low-end misdemeanor before, and never will again so the prosecutor
really must win the big case THIS time - are almost nil in the criminal
courts of America.

No $6 admission! http://www.INTERNET-GUN-SHOW.com

wrote:
O:- quoted me:
Lionel Tate is just another of a pattern familiar to every police
officer, prosecutor, criminal-defense lawyer, or judge who's been
working six months. He's the guy - almost invariably a guy - whose
run-ins with the police and courts on felonies began LONG before
whatever incident just got him arrested or now has him on trial, who's
already had many "second" chances from the court system. His rap sheet
keeps including worse offenses as time goes on.

and replied:
Hence, my subject field topic. 0:-
Far too long overdue, but finally, relief. It's like being constipated
then having a nice big apple.
Things will eventually move along.

Having both prosecuted and defended many criminals from the
mid-1980s through the end of the 1990s, I can tell you that really is
the prosecutor's attitude in most all cases. He knows he really will
be getting another chance - soon - if he loses this case, so he can
afford to not do an all-out prosecution this time. Guys like the three
college kids in the Duke lacrosse rape case - people who've never been
charged with anything more serious than drunk driving or some other
low-end misdemeanor before, and never will again so the prosecutor
really must win the big case THIS time - are almost nil in the criminal
courts of America.

Yup, and that's why they are on the front page, and the others ... that
long string of weak or no convictions are off in nowhereland.

Now if only we could wake someone up, or make CCW universal across this
fair land.

Imagine if the prey .. opps, citizens of DC could legally arm themselves
against the thugs.

0:-


No $6 admission! http://www.INTERNET-GUN-SHOW.com



--
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what
to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb
contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin (or someone else)

Is d'geezer going to pull the old firearms sting on somebody again?
Big time gun lover right? Roight!

Greegor wrote:
Is d'geezer going to pull the old firearms sting on somebody again?
Big time gun lover right? Roight!

Could you provide a citation for your claim, Greegor the Whore?




--
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what
to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb
contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin (or someone else)

A citation that proves what I say or proves something
other than what I say, Kane?

Should I quote some sources and then bluff
my way past their complete failure to prove
what I say they prove, Kane?

PLEASE deny you were d'geezer.
It makes the reward ever so much more ..rewarding.

Up the stakes. Deny you were d'geezer.

Greegor wrote:
A citation that proves what I say or proves something
other than what I say, Kane?

I don't know. Do you use citations that you trap yourself with by making
concrete claims? I don't.

I quoted a source. Presuming it correct, I pointed out certain
presumptions, based on that, we could make.

Should I quote some sources and then bluff
my way past their complete failure to prove
what I say they prove, Kane?

Well, how about that the governor made an announcement that Concannon
was only going to bring in money? And made no mention of improvements in
programs? Would that be what you were referring to when you ask if you
would quote and bluff?

PLEASE deny you were d'geezer.

I was not d'geezer.

It makes the reward ever so much more ..rewarding.

What reward?

Up the stakes. Deny you were d'geezer.

I was not d'geezer.

0:-

--
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what
to have for lunch. Liberty is a well armed lamb
contesting the vote." - Benjamin Franklin (or someone else)