A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » alt.support » Foster Parents
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Foster care board keeps watch over Arizona children



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 30th 04, 07:16 PM
wexwimpy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Foster care board keeps watch over Arizona children

Foster care board keeps watch over Arizona children
Karina Bland
The Arizona Republic
Mar. 29, 2004 12:00 AM

For 25 years, regular Arizona residents have been keeping an eye on
children in foster care, making sure they don't get lost in the
system.

The kids rarely meet their protectors, though the grown-ups know the
most intimate details of their lives.

As members of a Foster Care Review Board, volunteers review cases of
the nearly 7,000 children in foster care statewide every six months.

Ilene Dode of Tempe, a board member from the start, said their job is
to ensure children find safe, permanent homes. They ask tough
questions about whether kids are getting what they need - counseling,
medical care, visits with their folks - and if parents, caseworkers,
foster parents and others involved in the case are on track.

In 1979, Arizona was the second state in the nation to start such a
program, modeled after one in South Carolina.

Then a freshman state senator, Jim Kolbe, pushed through a bill to
have citizen oversight of kids in foster care. It was his first major
piece of legislation.

Now a U.S. congressman, Kolbe said creation of the board still ranks
among his proudest achievements: "It assures that somebody from
outside the system looks at each child's case."

At the time, foster care was a mess.

Foster parents were not paid regularly, said Bill Stanton, director of
dependent children's services for the Arizona Supreme Court, which
runs the Foster Care Review Board. Some kids weren't getting health
care. The state lost track of others.

One boy, placed in a foster home in Casa Grande, went 13 years without
anyone from the state checking on him. In Gila County, a child removed
from his home because of abuse waited seven years before a judge heard
the case. Hearings take place now within five days.

Now, Arizona's Foster Care Review Board is a national model, copied by
Oregon, Michigan, New Mexico, Montana and Utah.

Arizona boasts 87 five-member boards statewide. Kentucky officials
were here this month to see how it works.

In a quiet Gilbert courtroom, Dode flips open the file of a girl, 17.
Next to her is Bruce Brannan of Scottsdale, who also has been on the
board for 25 years.

The girl was deserted by her drug-addict mother and taken in by her
grandmother a year ago.

Board member Charlotte Wright murmurs: "Thank God for grandmothers."

The state plans to return the girl to her mother, but the woman has
not attended court-ordered counseling, parenting classes or drug
testing. No one knows where she is.

The girl is in juvenile detention for her own use of marijuana and
methamphetamine.

Her Child Protective Services caseworker is on the speakerphone, and
board members grill him: "What kind of substance abuse treatment is
she receiving? Is she getting counseling?"

The caseworker wants the girl to go into a residential treatment
center when she's released from jail.

Brannan agrees she can't go back to her mother: "We would be sending
her into an already toxic environment."

The board sides with the caseworker and recommends the girl also get
into an independent living skills program for kids leaving foster
care.

"Let's get her prepared for life on her own," Dode said.

In a day, boards typically review a dozen files. Their recommendations
go to the judges presiding over the cases.

Court of Appeals Judge Maurice Portley, who served as presiding
Juvenile Court judge from 1997 to 2001, found the reports helpful,
alerting him to whether parents and caseworkers were doing what they
should be and if foster parents and children were getting what they
needed.

In a few sheets of paper, he learned what he otherwise would have had
to pack his courtroom to find out.

In 25 years, Dode and Brannan agree that they've seen a dramatic
increase in cases involving substance abuse. In eight out of every 10
cases, parents are hooked on street drugs - crack cocaine,
methamphetamine.

There's less physical abuse than a quarter of a century ago. Brannan,
a construction project manager, credits education programs for that.

Still, the neglect, sexual and emotional abuse is as disturbing.

The worse case for both involved nine children who were sexually
abused by both parents. The two older girls, just 12 and 13, were
forced to work as prostitutes.

Some of the saddest cases are those of older children, abandoned to
the system by parents who can't or won't take care of them. They
finish their growing up in group foster homes, with paid staff instead
of parents, said Dode, president and CEO of Empact-SPC, a behavioral
health center.

The hardest part is sending children home, Dode and Brannan said, even
though they might fare better in a foster home. "It's not always going
to be Ozzie and Harriet, but children should return home if it's
safe," Brannan said.

There are successes: parents who finish drug treatment and get their
kids back, children adopted by foster parents.

"Those are big victories," Brannan said.
Foster care board keeps watch over Arizona children
advertisement

Karina Bland
The Arizona Republic
Mar. 29, 2004 12:00 AM


For 25 years, regular Arizona residents have been keeping an eye on
children in foster care, making sure they don't get lost in the
system.

The kids rarely meet their protectors, though the grown-ups know the
most intimate details of their lives.

As members of a Foster Care Review Board, volunteers review cases of
the nearly 7,000 children in foster care statewide every six months.

Ilene Dode of Tempe, a board member from the start, said their job is
to ensure children find safe, permanent homes. They ask tough
questions about whether kids are getting what they need - counseling,
medical care, visits with their folks - and if parents, caseworkers,
foster parents and others involved in the case are on track.

In 1979, Arizona was the second state in the nation to start such a
program, modeled after one in South Carolina.

Then a freshman state senator, Jim Kolbe, pushed through a bill to
have citizen oversight of kids in foster care. It was his first major
piece of legislation.

Now a U.S. congressman, Kolbe said creation of the board still ranks
among his proudest achievements: "It assures that somebody from
outside the system looks at each child's case."

At the time, foster care was a mess.

Foster parents were not paid regularly, said Bill Stanton, director of
dependent children's services for the Arizona Supreme Court, which
runs the Foster Care Review Board. Some kids weren't getting health
care. The state lost track of others.

One boy, placed in a foster home in Casa Grande, went 13 years without
anyone from the state checking on him. In Gila County, a child removed
from his home because of abuse waited seven years before a judge heard
the case. Hearings take place now within five days.

Now, Arizona's Foster Care Review Board is a national model, copied by
Oregon, Michigan, New Mexico, Montana and Utah.

Arizona boasts 87 five-member boards statewide. Kentucky officials
were here this month to see how it works.

In a quiet Gilbert courtroom, Dode flips open the file of a girl, 17.
Next to her is Bruce Brannan of Scottsdale, who also has been on the
board for 25 years.

The girl was deserted by her drug-addict mother and taken in by her
grandmother a year ago.

Board member Charlotte Wright murmurs: "Thank God for grandmothers."

The state plans to return the girl to her mother, but the woman has
not attended court-ordered counseling, parenting classes or drug
testing. No one knows where she is.

The girl is in juvenile detention for her own use of marijuana and
methamphetamine.

Her Child Protective Services caseworker is on the speakerphone, and
board members grill him: "What kind of substance abuse treatment is
she receiving? Is she getting counseling?"

The caseworker wants the girl to go into a residential treatment
center when she's released from jail.

Brannan agrees she can't go back to her mother: "We would be sending
her into an already toxic environment."

The board sides with the caseworker and recommends the girl also get
into an independent living skills program for kids leaving foster
care.

"Let's get her prepared for life on her own," Dode said.

In a day, boards typically review a dozen files. Their recommendations
go to the judges presiding over the cases.

Court of Appeals Judge Maurice Portley, who served as presiding
Juvenile Court judge from 1997 to 2001, found the reports helpful,
alerting him to whether parents and caseworkers were doing what they
should be and if foster parents and children were getting what they
needed.

In a few sheets of paper, he learned what he otherwise would have had
to pack his courtroom to find out.

In 25 years, Dode and Brannan agree that they've seen a dramatic
increase in cases involving substance abuse. In eight out of every 10
cases, parents are hooked on street drugs - crack cocaine,
methamphetamine.

There's less physical abuse than a quarter of a century ago. Brannan,
a construction project manager, credits education programs for that.

Still, the neglect, sexual and emotional abuse is as disturbing.

The worse case for both involved nine children who were sexually
abused by both parents. The two older girls, just 12 and 13, were
forced to work as prostitutes.

Some of the saddest cases are those of older children, abandoned to
the system by parents who can't or won't take care of them. They
finish their growing up in group foster homes, with paid staff instead
of parents, said Dode, president and CEO of Empact-SPC, a behavioral
health center.

The hardest part is sending children home, Dode and Brannan said, even
though they might fare better in a foster home. "It's not always going
to be Ozzie and Harriet, but children should return home if it's
safe," Brannan said.

There are successes: parents who finish drug treatment and get their
kids back, children adopted by foster parents.

"Those are big victories," Brannan said.Foster care board keeps watch
over Arizona children
advertisement

Karina Bland
The Arizona Republic
Mar. 29, 2004 12:00 AM


For 25 years, regular Arizona residents have been keeping an eye on
children in foster care, making sure they don't get lost in the
system.

The kids rarely meet their protectors, though the grown-ups know the
most intimate details of their lives.

As members of a Foster Care Review Board, volunteers review cases of
the nearly 7,000 children in foster care statewide every six months.

Ilene Dode of Tempe, a board member from the start, said their job is
to ensure children find safe, permanent homes. They ask tough
questions about whether kids are getting what they need - counseling,
medical care, visits with their folks - and if parents, caseworkers,
foster parents and others involved in the case are on track.

In 1979, Arizona was the second state in the nation to start such a
program, modeled after one in South Carolina.

Then a freshman state senator, Jim Kolbe, pushed through a bill to
have citizen oversight of kids in foster care. It was his first major
piece of legislation.

Now a U.S. congressman, Kolbe said creation of the board still ranks
among his proudest achievements: "It assures that somebody from
outside the system looks at each child's case."

At the time, foster care was a mess.

Foster parents were not paid regularly, said Bill Stanton, director of
dependent children's services for the Arizona Supreme Court, which
runs the Foster Care Review Board. Some kids weren't getting health
care. The state lost track of others.

One boy, placed in a foster home in Casa Grande, went 13 years without
anyone from the state checking on him. In Gila County, a child removed
from his home because of abuse waited seven years before a judge heard
the case. Hearings take place now within five days.

Now, Arizona's Foster Care Review Board is a national model, copied by
Oregon, Michigan, New Mexico, Montana and Utah.

Arizona boasts 87 five-member boards statewide. Kentucky officials
were here this month to see how it works.

In a quiet Gilbert courtroom, Dode flips open the file of a girl, 17.
Next to her is Bruce Brannan of Scottsdale, who also has been on the
board for 25 years.

The girl was deserted by her drug-addict mother and taken in by her
grandmother a year ago.

Board member Charlotte Wright murmurs: "Thank God for grandmothers."

The state plans to return the girl to her mother, but the woman has
not attended court-ordered counseling, parenting classes or drug
testing. No one knows where she is.

The girl is in juvenile detention for her own use of marijuana and
methamphetamine.

Her Child Protective Services caseworker is on the speakerphone, and
board members grill him: "What kind of substance abuse treatment is
she receiving? Is she getting counseling?"

The caseworker wants the girl to go into a residential treatment
center when she's released from jail.

Brannan agrees she can't go back to her mother: "We would be sending
her into an already toxic environment."

The board sides with the caseworker and recommends the girl also get
into an independent living skills program for kids leaving foster
care.

"Let's get her prepared for life on her own," Dode said.

In a day, boards typically review a dozen files. Their recommendations
go to the judges presiding over the cases.

Court of Appeals Judge Maurice Portley, who served as presiding
Juvenile Court judge from 1997 to 2001, found the reports helpful,
alerting him to whether parents and caseworkers were doing what they
should be and if foster parents and children were getting what they
needed.

In a few sheets of paper, he learned what he otherwise would have had
to pack his courtroom to find out.

In 25 years, Dode and Brannan agree that they've seen a dramatic
increase in cases involving substance abuse. In eight out of every 10
cases, parents are hooked on street drugs - crack cocaine,
methamphetamine.

There's less physical abuse than a quarter of a century ago. Brannan,
a construction project manager, credits education programs for that.

Still, the neglect, sexual and emotional abuse is as disturbing.

The worse case for both involved nine children who were sexually
abused by both parents. The two older girls, just 12 and 13, were
forced to work as prostitutes.

Some of the saddest cases are those of older children, abandoned to
the system by parents who can't or won't take care of them. They
finish their growing up in group foster homes, with paid staff instead
of parents, said Dode, president and CEO of Empact-SPC, a behavioral
health center.

The hardest part is sending children home, Dode and Brannan said, even
though they might fare better in a foster home. "It's not always going
to be Ozzie and Harriet, but children should return home if it's
safe," Brannan said.

There are successes: parents who finish drug treatment and get their
kids back, children adopted by foster parents.

"Those are big victories," Brannan said.
Foster care board keeps watch over Arizona children
advertisement

Karina Bland
The Arizona Republic
Mar. 29, 2004 12:00 AM


For 25 years, regular Arizona residents have been keeping an eye on
children in foster care, making sure they don't get lost in the
system.

The kids rarely meet their protectors, though the grown-ups know the
most intimate details of their lives.

As members of a Foster Care Review Board, volunteers review cases of
the nearly 7,000 children in foster care statewide every six months.

Ilene Dode of Tempe, a board member from the start, said their job is
to ensure children find safe, permanent homes. They ask tough
questions about whether kids are getting what they need - counseling,
medical care, visits with their folks - and if parents, caseworkers,
foster parents and others involved in the case are on track.

In 1979, Arizona was the second state in the nation to start such a
program, modeled after one in South Carolina.

Then a freshman state senator, Jim Kolbe, pushed through a bill to
have citizen oversight of kids in foster care. It was his first major
piece of legislation.

Now a U.S. congressman, Kolbe said creation of the board still ranks
among his proudest achievements: "It assures that somebody from
outside the system looks at each child's case."

At the time, foster care was a mess.

Foster parents were not paid regularly, said Bill Stanton, director of
dependent children's services for the Arizona Supreme Court, which
runs the Foster Care Review Board. Some kids weren't getting health
care. The state lost track of others.

One boy, placed in a foster home in Casa Grande, went 13 years without
anyone from the state checking on him. In Gila County, a child removed
from his home because of abuse waited seven years before a judge heard
the case. Hearings take place now within five days.

Now, Arizona's Foster Care Review Board is a national model, copied by
Oregon, Michigan, New Mexico, Montana and Utah.

Arizona boasts 87 five-member boards statewide. Kentucky officials
were here this month to see how it works.

In a quiet Gilbert courtroom, Dode flips open the file of a girl, 17.
Next to her is Bruce Brannan of Scottsdale, who also has been on the
board for 25 years.

The girl was deserted by her drug-addict mother and taken in by her
grandmother a year ago.

Board member Charlotte Wright murmurs: "Thank God for grandmothers."

The state plans to return the girl to her mother, but the woman has
not attended court-ordered counseling, parenting classes or drug
testing. No one knows where she is.

The girl is in juvenile detention for her own use of marijuana and
methamphetamine.

Her Child Protective Services caseworker is on the speakerphone, and
board members grill him: "What kind of substance abuse treatment is
she receiving? Is she getting counseling?"

The caseworker wants the girl to go into a residential treatment
center when she's released from jail.

Brannan agrees she can't go back to her mother: "We would be sending
her into an already toxic environment."

The board sides with the caseworker and recommends the girl also get
into an independent living skills program for kids leaving foster
care.

"Let's get her prepared for life on her own," Dode said.

In a day, boards typically review a dozen files. Their recommendations
go to the judges presiding over the cases.

Court of Appeals Judge Maurice Portley, who served as presiding
Juvenile Court judge from 1997 to 2001, found the reports helpful,
alerting him to whether parents and caseworkers were doing what they
should be and if foster parents and children were getting what they
needed.

In a few sheets of paper, he learned what he otherwise would have had
to pack his courtroom to find out.

In 25 years, Dode and Brannan agree that they've seen a dramatic
increase in cases involving substance abuse. In eight out of every 10
cases, parents are hooked on street drugs - crack cocaine,
methamphetamine.

There's less physical abuse than a quarter of a century ago. Brannan,
a construction project manager, credits education programs for that.

Still, the neglect, sexual and emotional abuse is as disturbing.

The worse case for both involved nine children who were sexually
abused by both parents. The two older girls, just 12 and 13, were
forced to work as prostitutes.

Some of the saddest cases are those of older children, abandoned to
the system by parents who can't or won't take care of them. They
finish their growing up in group foster homes, with paid staff instead
of parents, said Dode, president and CEO of Empact-SPC, a behavioral
health center.

The hardest part is sending children home, Dode and Brannan said, even
though they might fare better in a foster home. "It's not always going
to be Ozzie and Harriet, but children should return home if it's
safe," Brannan said.

There are successes: parents who finish drug treatment and get their
kids back, children adopted by foster parents.

"Those are big victories," Brannan said.
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepu...erboard29.html

Defend your civil liberties! Get information at http://www.aclu.org, become a member at http://www.aclu.org/join and get active at http://www.aclu.org/action.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Assessing Foster Care From the Inside wexwimpy Foster Parents 0 March 9th 04 04:46 PM
Human Costs of Foster Ca Pew Commission Releases wexwimpy Foster Parents 0 February 19th 04 05:03 PM
HALF OF KIDS IN FOSTER CARE NEEDLESSLY Malev Foster Parents 0 December 12th 03 04:53 PM
NJ DYFS cw's violated state law-Not interviewing all family members Fern5827 Foster Parents 0 November 11th 03 04:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.