If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pregnant, Nursing mothers should limit intake of tuna
From
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...language=print er Federal Warning On Tuna Planned Mercury a Danger To Fetuses, Children By Eric Pianin Washington Post Staff Writer Thursday, December 11, 2003; Page A01 The federal government plans to warn pregnant women, nursing mothers and even those thinking of getting pregnant to limit their consumption of tuna as part of a broad advisory concerning the dangers of eating fish and shellfish with elevated levels of harmful mercury. A draft advisory from the Food and Drug Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency cautions women of childbearing age as well as young children to limit their intake of tuna and other fish and shellfish to 12 ounces a week, the equivalent of two to three modest meals. Among seafood, tuna ranks second only to shrimp in popularity in the United States. The government is also advising consumers to mix the types of fish they eat and not to eat any one kind of fish or shellfish more than once a week. The FDA had previously warned pregnant women against eating shark, swordfish, king mackerel and tilefish because they contain unusually high levels of mercury, but until now the agency has not directly addressed concerns about tuna or issued warnings for so large a segment of the population. The advisory notes that mercury levels in tuna vary, and that tuna steaks and canned albacore tuna generally contain higher levels of mercury than canned light tuna. The document advises pregnant and nursing women: "You can safely include tuna as part of your weekly fish consumption." But David Acheson, the FDA's medical officer in charge of the issue, said in an interview that it is implicit in the draft document that women at risk should eat no more than four to six ounces of tuna once a week. David Burney, executive director of the San Diego-based U.S. Tuna Foundation, said that the industry agrees there is a need to expand the government advisory to include tuna, but that manufacturers fear that environmental and consumer groups will exploit fears to unnecessarily harm the industry. "Every time there's a hearing or a meeting, you get all these incredible accusations flying everywhere, where you have people saying they know people who ate fish who glow in the dark," Burney said. "That's the kind of thing you don't like to see, and you wonder whether people are taking this to heart." StarKist, Bumble Bee and Chicken of the Sea, the three principal U.S. tuna manufacturers, sold about 2.3 billion six-ounce cans of tuna last year. But retail sales have dropped by about 10 percent in the United States in the past decade, to about $1.1 billion a year, in part because of public concern about the effects of mercury, according to industry figures and media reports. Last year, shrimp for the first time overtook tuna in overall sales. Women between 18 and 54 typically make 85 percent of tuna purchases at supermarkets, according to industry figures. More than 80 percent of all tuna sold is used at lunch in various salads. The proposed new guidelines began circulating yesterday at a meeting in Washington of the FDA's Food Advisory Committee and likely will be formally promulgated early next year, according to FDA officials. The advisory is the government's response to mounting public concern about the dangers of mercury pollution in tuna and other popular fish and shellfish. Mercury is a potent neurotoxin that, like lead, can damage the brains and nervous systems of fetuses and young children. Exposure to it from eating contaminated fish can lead to a number of neurological problems, including learning and attention disabilities and mental retardation. Consumer and environmental groups have long complained that the FDA has been slow to respond to the problem of mercury in tuna. Last year, the advisory committee recommended that the FDA warn pregnant women and young children to limit tuna in their diet and offer educational material about which fish are high or low in mercury. Goulda Downer, a Washington nutritionist and a member of the FDA advisory committee, said many of her patients are greatly confused about the risks of eating tuna and other fish caught in the ocean or in inland waters. "People are just so scared," she said. The EPA and the FDA last fall launched a joint effort to draft a new fish-consumption advisory, based on the most recent research on mercury contamination of fish. Officials also conducted focus groups in major cities throughout the country in an effort to come up with the clearest and most helpful wording for the advisory. Sanford Miller, chairman of the advisory panel, said: "The mere fact that the FDA and the EPA have seriously come together to try to resolve the issue is a good sign in itself." Miller, a senior fellow at Virginia Tech's Center for Food and Nutrition Policy, said it is "not an easy thing" for the government to caution women about the potential dangers of mercury-laden fish without totally discouraging them from eating a nutritious food. But some environmentalists charged that the draft advisory is still far too weak and fails to adequately warn women of the high risks of eating even small amounts of tuna and other fish during their pregnancies. "In fact, FDA encourages women to continue to eat types of seafood high in mercury and that would put a woman's baby at risk for neurological damage," said Jane Houlihan, vice president for research at the Environmental Working Group. Recent FDA testing indicated that canned albacore, known as white tuna, contains almost three times as much mercury as canned light tuna. This means that a single six-ounce can of albacore a week could put many women, depending on their size, over the government's safe mercury limit, according to Houlihan's group. © 2003 The Washington Post Company -- It's Tis Herself |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Pregnant, Nursing mothers should limit intake of tuna
Not only did I see your post earlier and see it one the news but my dumb but
still bought 2 cans of Tuna today after the fact. I just realized that right now when I read through this thread again. I am such an idiot. LOL.....well I don't think a little will hurt, do you? Crystal 37 weeks 6 days & counting!!! "Elana Kehoe" wrote in message ... From http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...language=print er Federal Warning On Tuna Planned Mercury a Danger To Fetuses, Children By Eric Pianin Washington Post Staff Writer Thursday, December 11, 2003; Page A01 The federal government plans to warn pregnant women, nursing mothers and even those thinking of getting pregnant to limit their consumption of tuna as part of a broad advisory concerning the dangers of eating fish and shellfish with elevated levels of harmful mercury. A draft advisory from the Food and Drug Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency cautions women of childbearing age as well as young children to limit their intake of tuna and other fish and shellfish to 12 ounces a week, the equivalent of two to three modest meals. Among seafood, tuna ranks second only to shrimp in popularity in the United States. The government is also advising consumers to mix the types of fish they eat and not to eat any one kind of fish or shellfish more than once a week. The FDA had previously warned pregnant women against eating shark, swordfish, king mackerel and tilefish because they contain unusually high levels of mercury, but until now the agency has not directly addressed concerns about tuna or issued warnings for so large a segment of the population. The advisory notes that mercury levels in tuna vary, and that tuna steaks and canned albacore tuna generally contain higher levels of mercury than canned light tuna. The document advises pregnant and nursing women: "You can safely include tuna as part of your weekly fish consumption." But David Acheson, the FDA's medical officer in charge of the issue, said in an interview that it is implicit in the draft document that women at risk should eat no more than four to six ounces of tuna once a week. David Burney, executive director of the San Diego-based U.S. Tuna Foundation, said that the industry agrees there is a need to expand the government advisory to include tuna, but that manufacturers fear that environmental and consumer groups will exploit fears to unnecessarily harm the industry. "Every time there's a hearing or a meeting, you get all these incredible accusations flying everywhere, where you have people saying they know people who ate fish who glow in the dark," Burney said. "That's the kind of thing you don't like to see, and you wonder whether people are taking this to heart." StarKist, Bumble Bee and Chicken of the Sea, the three principal U.S. tuna manufacturers, sold about 2.3 billion six-ounce cans of tuna last year. But retail sales have dropped by about 10 percent in the United States in the past decade, to about $1.1 billion a year, in part because of public concern about the effects of mercury, according to industry figures and media reports. Last year, shrimp for the first time overtook tuna in overall sales. Women between 18 and 54 typically make 85 percent of tuna purchases at supermarkets, according to industry figures. More than 80 percent of all tuna sold is used at lunch in various salads. The proposed new guidelines began circulating yesterday at a meeting in Washington of the FDA's Food Advisory Committee and likely will be formally promulgated early next year, according to FDA officials. The advisory is the government's response to mounting public concern about the dangers of mercury pollution in tuna and other popular fish and shellfish. Mercury is a potent neurotoxin that, like lead, can damage the brains and nervous systems of fetuses and young children. Exposure to it from eating contaminated fish can lead to a number of neurological problems, including learning and attention disabilities and mental retardation. Consumer and environmental groups have long complained that the FDA has been slow to respond to the problem of mercury in tuna. Last year, the advisory committee recommended that the FDA warn pregnant women and young children to limit tuna in their diet and offer educational material about which fish are high or low in mercury. Goulda Downer, a Washington nutritionist and a member of the FDA advisory committee, said many of her patients are greatly confused about the risks of eating tuna and other fish caught in the ocean or in inland waters. "People are just so scared," she said. The EPA and the FDA last fall launched a joint effort to draft a new fish-consumption advisory, based on the most recent research on mercury contamination of fish. Officials also conducted focus groups in major cities throughout the country in an effort to come up with the clearest and most helpful wording for the advisory. Sanford Miller, chairman of the advisory panel, said: "The mere fact that the FDA and the EPA have seriously come together to try to resolve the issue is a good sign in itself." Miller, a senior fellow at Virginia Tech's Center for Food and Nutrition Policy, said it is "not an easy thing" for the government to caution women about the potential dangers of mercury-laden fish without totally discouraging them from eating a nutritious food. But some environmentalists charged that the draft advisory is still far too weak and fails to adequately warn women of the high risks of eating even small amounts of tuna and other fish during their pregnancies. "In fact, FDA encourages women to continue to eat types of seafood high in mercury and that would put a woman's baby at risk for neurological damage," said Jane Houlihan, vice president for research at the Environmental Working Group. Recent FDA testing indicated that canned albacore, known as white tuna, contains almost three times as much mercury as canned light tuna. This means that a single six-ounce can of albacore a week could put many women, depending on their size, over the government's safe mercury limit, according to Houlihan's group. © 2003 The Washington Post Company -- It's Tis Herself |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Pregnant, Nursing mothers should limit intake of tuna
limit their intake of tuna and other fish and
shellfish to 12 ounces a week ============================== Geez, that's two cans a week . . . here I've been eating two cans a day! Yah, lots of that mercury is generated from burning coal in power plants for electricity. We burn lots of it here in Texas . . . There's been efforts in Texas to get coal power plants here to put more efficient scrubbers on their smokestacks, but the industry managed to get exemptions for any plant built before 1972, which is almost all of them, so despite all the fancy laws they say they're passing to fix the problem, they really haven't done anything, and I doubt they will anytime soon. Ugh. --Tock |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Pregnant, Nursing mothers should limit intake of tuna
(Elana Kehoe) wrote in message ...
From http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...language=print er Federal Warning On Tuna Planned Mercury a Danger To Fetuses, Children I think what is most troubling is that the FDA stopped testing fish for mercury in 1998 and has since relied on the fish industry to police itself. National Fisheries Institute president Dick Gutting says that, overall, the industry's tests show that mercury is not a problem. Cheers, Ned |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Pregnant, Nursing mothers should limit intake of tuna
(Ned Flanders) wrote in message . com...
(Elana Kehoe) wrote in message ... From http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp...language=print er I think what is most troubling is that the FDA stopped testing fish for mercury in 1998 and has since relied on the fish industry to Personally, I live in an urban neighborhood a couple miles from some major interstate highways. Does anyone know whether the amount of "bad" mercury I'd get from eating tuna is actually significant compared with the mouth I get from breathing city air?y |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Pregnant, Nursing mothers should limit intake of tuna
A.L. Bell wrote:
.... Personally, I live in an urban neighborhood a couple miles from some major interstate highways. Does anyone know whether the amount of "bad" mercury I'd get from eating tuna is actually significant compared with the mouth I get from breathing city air?y I would worry more about lead. For many decades lead was a routine additive to gasoline. As a result, all major highways and most other roads have significantly high (even toxic) levels of lead spread all around them. Take some soil samples around your property and test them for lead. Anthony |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Pregnant, Nursing mothers should limit intake of tuna
seyshell wrote:
Federal Warning On Tuna Planned Mercury a Danger To Fetuses, Children this should be qualified as being a north american report. in australia various brands have been investigated for the levels of mercury, and many generic brands actually are quiet safe, with extremely low levels of mercury. however as in all things, moderation is the key. I've noticed that Aussie products in general are better quality than American. I attribute this to the fact that most things in America seem to be made in china, korea and other countries like that. Ben -- Cheap long distance calling using Onesuite (http://www.onesuite.com). 2.5 cents/min anywhere in the U.S., to Canada or the U.K. Use promotional code 038664643 for 20 free minutes. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Pregnant, Nursing mothers should limit intake of tuna
In article , Ben
wrote: in australia various brands have been investigated for the levels of mercury, and many generic brands actually are quiet safe, with extremely low levels of mercury. however as in all things, moderation is the key. I've noticed that Aussie products in general are better quality than American. I attribute this to the fact that most things in America seem to be made in china, korea and other countries like that. In this case it is simply that we have thrown less mercury into our fisheries, and that would only be because of our smaller population. Don't worry, plenty of our commodities are made in SE Asia, but our food is mostly our own. I also found out recentlt that our transportation system is very good and therefore our fresh food is closer to being fresh when we buy it than perhaps it is in North America. -- Chookie -- Sydney, Australia (Replace "foulspambegone" with "optushome" to reply) "Jeez; if only those Ancient Greek storytellers had known about the astonishing creature that is the *Usenet hydra*: you cut off one head, and *a stupider one* grows back..." -- MJ, cam.misc |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Pregnant, Nursing mothers should limit intake of tuna
Chookie wrote:
In article , Ben wrote: in australia various brands have been investigated for the levels of mercury, and many generic brands actually are quiet safe, with extremely low levels of mercury. however as in all things, moderation is the key. I've noticed that Aussie products in general are better quality than American. I attribute this to the fact that most things in America seem to be made in china, korea and other countries like that. In this case it is simply that we have thrown less mercury into our fisheries, and that would only be because of our smaller population. Don't worry, plenty of our commodities are made in SE Asia, but our food is mostly our own. I also found out recentlt that our transportation system is very good and therefore our fresh food is closer to being fresh when we buy it than perhaps it is in North America. In MElbourne, the fruit was quite cheap and good quality in comparison to Maryland, USA which is expensive and of lesser quality. Each place has its positives and negatives though. Public transport here is far superior to Melbourne (D.C. metro system) though Baltimore totally sucks. regards, Ben -- Cheap long distance calling using Onesuite (http://www.onesuite.com). 2.5 cents/min anywhere in the U.S., to Canada or the U.K. Use promotional code 038664643 for 20 free minutes. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Happy Birthmother's Day! | SuperEeyore | General | 5 | May 9th 04 12:38 AM |
Happy Birthmother's Day! | SuperEeyore | Pregnancy | 5 | May 9th 04 12:38 AM |
Getting pregnant while nursing | Kari | Pregnancy | 12 | February 11th 04 02:20 AM |
Pregnant, Nursing mothers should limit intake of tuna | Elana Kehoe | General | 10 | December 19th 03 12:05 AM |
pregnant..nursing a 14 mo...miserable...tired | BABYGINAVIE | Breastfeeding | 10 | September 2nd 03 08:51 PM |