Constitutional question about CPS Service Plans and LIBERTYINTEREST

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...3597e2f0a9de4c

RVD Just how many people have tried these
RVD ideas and found them to be less than
RVD fruitful there gregg?

G Did you miss that this is an Amicus Curiae?

DS That's not an answer to Ron's question.

G Do you know what that means, Ron and Dan?

DS That's not an answer to Ron's question.

DS And I do know what it means.

I see you're anxious to explain it.

G Did you miss the list of the parties in support,
G like the Illinois BAR ASSOCIATION?

DS Like so what?

DS And that's not an answer to Ron's question, either.

It was a non sequitor question.

Even if ten million families were rebuffed in court
with these arguments, what is your point?

That great wrongs DO take place in our system
due to the steam roller effect and momentum?

Or is your argument that since it was done that
way, it must be constitutional?

On Apr 20, 4:46 pm, Greegor wrote:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...tive-services/...

RVD Just how many people have tried these
RVD ideas and found them to be less than
RVD fruitful there gregg?

G Did you miss that this is an Amicus Curiae?

DS That's not an answer to Ron's question.

G Do you know what that means, Ron and Dan?

DS That's not an answer to Ron's question.

DS And I do know what it means.

I see you're anxious to explain it.

You asked if I knew what it meant.

I do.

And I said so.

If you want to post an explanation, go ahead.

G Did you miss the list of the parties in support,
G like the Illinois BAR ASSOCIATION?

DS Like so what?

DS And that's not an answer to Ron's question, either.

It was a non sequitor question.

Oh, really?

In what way?

Or did you mean rhetorical?

Even if ten million families were rebuffed in court
with these arguments, what is your point?

This is YOUR thread, dipstick.

What's YOUR point?

That great wrongs DO take place in our system
due to the steam roller effect and momentum?

Is that your point?

Or is your argument that since it was done that
way, it must be constitutional?

You asked me if I knew what amicus curiea was and I said I did.

Are you ODing on stupid pills today, greg?

On Apr 20, 6:09*pm, Dan Sullivan wrote:
On Apr 20, 4:46 pm, Greegor wrote:





http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...tive-services/...

RVD Just how many people have tried these
RVD ideas and found them to be less than
RVD fruitful there gregg?

G Did you miss that this is an Amicus Curiae?

DS That's not an answer to Ron's question.

G Do you know what that means, Ron and Dan?

DS That's not an answer to Ron's question.

DS And I do know what it means.

I see you're anxious to explain it.

You asked if I knew what it meant.

I do.

And I said so.

If you want to post an explanation, go ahead.

G Did you miss the list of the parties in support,
G like the Illinois BAR ASSOCIATION?

DS Like so what?

DS And that's not an answer to Ron's question, either.

It was a non sequitor question.

Oh, really?

In what way?

Or did you mean rhetorical?

Even if ten million families were rebuffed in court
with these arguments, what is your point?

This is YOUR thread, dipstick.

What's YOUR point?

That great wrongs DO take place in our system
due to the steam roller effect and momentum?

Is that your point?

Or is your argument that since it was done that
way, it must be constitutional?

You asked me if I knew what amicus curiea was and I said I did.

Are you ODing on stupid pills today, greg?

This is your whiney way of COMPLAINING
without actually saying anything of substance, right Dan?

On Apr 21, 2:44 am, Greegor wrote:
On Apr 20, 6:09 pm, Dan Sullivan wrote:



On Apr 20, 4:46 pm, Greegor wrote:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...tive-services/...

RVD Just how many people have tried these
RVD ideas and found them to be less than
RVD fruitful there gregg?

G Did you miss that this is an Amicus Curiae?

DS That's not an answer to Ron's question.

G Do you know what that means, Ron and Dan?

DS That's not an answer to Ron's question.

DS And I do know what it means.

I see you're anxious to explain it.

You asked if I knew what it meant.

I do.

And I said so.

If you want to post an explanation, go ahead.

G Did you miss the list of the parties in support,
G like the Illinois BAR ASSOCIATION?

DS Like so what?

DS And that's not an answer to Ron's question, either.

It was a non sequitor question.

Oh, really?

In what way?

Or did you mean rhetorical?

Even if ten million families were rebuffed in court
with these arguments, what is your point?

This is YOUR thread, dipstick.

What's YOUR point?

That great wrongs DO take place in our system
due to the steam roller effect and momentum?

Is that your point?

Or is your argument that since it was done that
way, it must be constitutional?

You asked me if I knew what amicus curiea was and I said I did.

Are you ODing on stupid pills today, greg?

This is your whiney way of COMPLAINING
without actually saying anything of substance, right Dan?

You asked me a single question and I answered it in the affirmative,
greg.

You, OTOH, failed to answer Ron's question.

It's YOU who don't want to say anything of substance, dipstick.

On Apr 21, 2:44 am, Greegor wrote:
On Apr 20, 6:09 pm, Dan Sullivan wrote:



On Apr 20, 4:46 pm, Greegor wrote:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...tive-services/...

RVD Just how many people have tried these
RVD ideas and found them to be less than
RVD fruitful there gregg?

G Did you miss that this is an Amicus Curiae?

DS That's not an answer to Ron's question.

G Do you know what that means, Ron and Dan?

DS That's not an answer to Ron's question.

DS And I do know what it means.

I see you're anxious to explain it.

You asked if I knew what it meant.

I do.

And I said so.

If you want to post an explanation, go ahead.

G Did you miss the list of the parties in support,
G like the Illinois BAR ASSOCIATION?

DS Like so what?

DS And that's not an answer to Ron's question, either.

It was a non sequitor question.

Oh, really?

In what way?

Or did you mean rhetorical?

Even if ten million families were rebuffed in court
with these arguments, what is your point?

This is YOUR thread, dipstick.

What's YOUR point?

That great wrongs DO take place in our system
due to the steam roller effect and momentum?

Is that your point?

Or is your argument that since it was done that
way, it must be constitutional?

You asked me if I knew what amicus curiea was and I said I did.

Are you ODing on stupid pills today, greg?

This is your whiney way of COMPLAINING
without actually saying anything of substance, right Dan?

On Apr 22, 7:31*am, Dan Sullivan wrote:
On Apr 21, 2:44 am, Greegor wrote:



On Apr 20, 6:09 pm, Dan Sullivan wrote:

On Apr 20, 4:46 pm, Greegor wrote:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...tive-services/....

RVD Just how many people have tried these
RVD ideas and found them to be less than
RVD fruitful there gregg?

G Did you miss that this is an Amicus Curiae?

DS That's not an answer to Ron's question.

G Do you know what that means, Ron and Dan?

DS That's not an answer to Ron's question.

DS And I do know what it means.

I see you're anxious to explain it.

You asked if I knew what it meant.

I do.

And I said so.

If you want to post an explanation, go ahead.

G Did you miss the list of the parties in support,
G like the Illinois BAR ASSOCIATION?

DS Like so what?

DS And that's not an answer to Ron's question, either.

It was a non sequitor question.

Oh, really?

In what way?

Or did you mean rhetorical?

Even if ten million families were rebuffed in court
with these arguments, what is your point?

This is YOUR thread, dipstick.

What's YOUR point?

That great wrongs DO take place in our system
due to the steam roller effect and momentum?

Is that your point?

Or is your argument that since it was done that
way, it must be constitutional?

You asked me if I knew what amicus curiea was and I said I did.

Are you ODing on stupid pills today, greg?

G This is your whiney way of COMPLAINING
G without actually saying anything of substance, right Dan?

DS subject: piggy said you were trying to catch
me in something, greg. Give up, did you?

What would I catch you at, Dan? g

On Apr 22, 2:29 pm, Greegor wrote:
On Apr 22, 7:31 am, Dan Sullivan wrote:



On Apr 21, 2:44 am, Greegor wrote:

On Apr 20, 6:09 pm, Dan Sullivan wrote:

On Apr 20, 4:46 pm, Greegor wrote:

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.s...tive-services/...

RVD Just how many people have tried these
RVD ideas and found them to be less than
RVD fruitful there gregg?

G Did you miss that this is an Amicus Curiae?

DS That's not an answer to Ron's question.

G Do you know what that means, Ron and Dan?

DS That's not an answer to Ron's question.

DS And I do know what it means.

I see you're anxious to explain it.

You asked if I knew what it meant.

I do.

And I said so.

If you want to post an explanation, go ahead.

G Did you miss the list of the parties in support,
G like the Illinois BAR ASSOCIATION?

DS Like so what?

DS And that's not an answer to Ron's question, either.

It was a non sequitor question.

Oh, really?

In what way?

Or did you mean rhetorical?

Even if ten million families were rebuffed in court
with these arguments, what is your point?

This is YOUR thread, dipstick.

What's YOUR point?

That great wrongs DO take place in our system
due to the steam roller effect and momentum?

Is that your point?

Or is your argument that since it was done that
way, it must be constitutional?

You asked me if I knew what amicus curiea was and I said I did.

Are you ODing on stupid pills today, greg?

G This is your whiney way of COMPLAINING
G without actually saying anything of substance, right Dan?

DS subject: piggy said you were trying to catch
me in something, greg. Give up, did you?

What would I catch you at, Dan? g

I don't have any idea what's in your feeble mind, greg.

G This is your whiney way of COMPLAINING
G without actually saying anything of substance, right Dan?

DS subject: piggy said you were trying to catch
DS * * * * me in something, greg. Give up, did you?

G What would I catch you at, Dan? * g

G I don't have any idea what's in your feeble mind, greg.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsyNNKb4wLg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GS1Dj-EnGI

On Apr 22, 5:38 pm, Greegor wrote:
G This is your whiney way of COMPLAINING
G without actually saying anything of substance, right Dan?

DS subject: piggy said you were trying to catch
DS me in something, greg. Give up, did you?

G What would I catch you at, Dan? g

G I don't have any idea what's in your feeble mind, greg.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsyNN...?v=6GS1Dj-EnGI

Of course you live your pathetic life vicariously on youtube!

Where else?

Not in the real world.

G This is your whiney way of COMPLAINING
G without actually saying anything of substance, right Dan?

DS subject: piggy said you were trying to catch
DS * * * * me in something, greg. Give up, did you?

G What would I catch you at, Dan? * g

DS I don't have any idea what's in your feeble mind, greg.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsyNNKb4wLg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6GS1Dj-EnGI

DS Of course you live your pathetic life vicariously on youtube!
DS Where else?
DS Not in the real world.

Dan Sullivan posting history

http://groups.google.com/groups/prof...vA1U01ExQS2_8A