If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
No more problems
jerry wrote:
I really don't understand why Judith's post has caused such a fuss. She just raised two facts about foreskins that you can't really argue about. Uhuh.....but she hasn't raised a single one which would mandate compulsory mass circumcision of all newborns. The first was that they smell. This is true. And, um, scrotums, vaginas, assholes, armpits, mouths, feet, etc. could *never* stink, right? Here's an idea: Let's chop off everything which might smell bad if it's not washed properly!!! On the other hand we could invent a special spray for it - just like the special sprays we've invented for the other stinky parts of the human anatomy. The second fact was that foreskins spread diseases like AIDS. My foreskin isn't spreading AIDS, and neither are most other foreskins in the world. Circumcision may/may not have benefits/disadvantages, but there's *NOTHING* that can't be delayed until adulthood - when the *OWNER* of said foreskin can make the decision to chop or not. How hard is that for you to understand...? Which part of the word "wait" are you having trouble with? -- "I think he was taking ****s in the bathtub and covering it with newspapers, like some kind of foul lasagna." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
No more problems
fungus wrote:
My foreskin isn't spreading AIDS, and neither are most other foreskins in the world. There is no question that your foreskin is a source of acute nervous tension. Your sad and pathetic knee jerk responses confirm this. Take a hike stinky. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Be wise, circumcise!! No more problems
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Be wise, circumcise!! No more problems
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
No more problems
Briar Rabbit wrote:
There is no question that your foreskin is a source of acute nervous tension. Your sad and pathetic knee jerk responses confirm this. Take a hike stinky. Now the frantic Mutilation Freaks are claiming foreskins are a source of acute nervous tension, what and see what other Desperate claims they will make... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
No more problems
Briar Rabbit wrote:
fungus wrote: My foreskin isn't spreading AIDS, and neither are most other foreskins in the world. There is no question that your foreskin is a source of acute nervous tension. Your sad and pathetic knee jerk responses confirm this. Take a hike stinky. Foreskin fetishism is one of the most dangerous and maniacal obsessions of its kind, and fungus has it in spades!ehehee He would rather risk AIDS than part with his beloved aardvark snout. That thing must feed on circus peanuts! LOL! If any group is guilty of propaganda, it is the anti-circ ilk! They specialize in outright lies (ie. foreskin has health benefits, circumcision is mutilation and sexual torture, circumcised men are physically & emotionally damaged, etc.), distortions (most of the world is uncircumcised - inferring that outside of the US, you will find a 0% circumcision rate! DOH) & exaggerations (circumcision for an infant is excruciatingly painful). -D, NYC "Christianity has deluged the world with blood & tears - Judaism has caused neither for religion's sake" - MARK TWAIN..."The first American scientist ever awarded the Nobel prize was Jewish" - ALBERT ABRAHAM MICHAELSON".."In New York, even if you're Catholic, you're Jewish. If you live in Butte, Montana, you're going to be Goyish, even if you're Jewish!" ehe - LENNY BRUCE (b. Leonard Alfred Schneider, umpteenth sweet, Jewish NYer).."The extraordinary European Jews who emigrated to New York were enriching the city's intellectual life with an intensity that has probably never been equaled anywhere during a comparable period of time. I was raised largely by these Jews... They were my teachers; they were my employers; they were my friends. They introduced me to a world of books and ideas that I didn't know existed" - MARLON BRANDO (excerpt from "Songs My Mother Taught Me").."The Jew is the emblem of eternity. He who neither slaughter nor torture of thousands of years could destroy, he who neither fire, nor sword, nor Inquisition was able to wipe off the face of the earth. He who was the first to produce the Oracles of God. He who has been for so long the Guardian of Prophecy and has transmitted it to the rest of the world. Such a nation cannot be destroyed. The Jew is as everlasting as Eternity itself" - LEO TOLSTOY |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
No more problems
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:41:02 -0700, darrint68 wrote:
He would rather risk AIDS than part with his beloved aardvark snout Ha ha ha ha ... I just choked on my beverage. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Be wise, circumcise!! No more problems
Of course, Darwin was right. (Try to teach that to the Christian
Fundamentalists in the US!) Wrong!!, what you said that only males without foreskins would survive. Nature takes a long time to evolve corrections and adjustments. Why would the foreskin have been obliged to disappear in your assigned/imagined/perceived time frame? Maybe those with foreskins have to die first for the evolutionary correction to happen -- a good indication is that the carriers of HIV are living up to your expectations of how males will be selected for survival. The appendix no longer functions but it's still present in all humans. But the foreskin has shown indications of what could be considered some attempt at "disappearance" - boys born with no foreskin or very short foreskin. Maybe your lady friend and some other like your and other guys' foreskin, but that's not why nature keeps producing them, as you know it's contrary to evolution and a suggestion that the "theory of use and disuse" could be correct, which it's not at all. And by the way, your foreskin doesn't cover a glands, it covers a glans. Personally, my girlfriend loves a nice clean circumcision behind the glans she plays with on me. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Be wise, circumcise!! No more problems
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 12:11:44 -0700, wrote:
Maybe those with foreskins have to die first for the evolutionary correction to happen Any trait or feature having to do with sex, its pleasure, or its reproductive consequences would much more quickly be dealt with evolutionally (?) than other traits or features. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Be wise, circumcise!! No more problems
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
great problems are opportunities for service -- aspartame (methanol, formaldehyde) toxicity: Rawlings: Murray 2005.10.10 | Rich Murray | Kids Health | 1 | October 10th 05 11:43 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Breastfeeding Past the First Year | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | February 28th 05 05:26 AM |
Babies' Excessive Crying May Signal Later Problems | Roman Bystrianyk | Kids Health | 0 | November 1st 04 05:11 PM |
misc.kids FAQ on Breastfeeding Past the First Year | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | January 16th 04 09:15 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Breastfeeding Past the First Year | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | December 15th 03 09:42 AM |