If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Why Medical Authorities Went to Such Extremes to Silence Dr. Andrew Wakefield
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Why Medical Authorities Went to Such Extremes to Silence Dr. Andrew Wakefield
On Sun, 11 Apr 2010 10:57:39 +0100, "john" wrote:
http://articles.mercola.c Mercola advertizes for Ryke Geerd Hamer on the account of who and his copycats go hundreds of dead. http://www.ariplex.com/ama/ama_ham2.htm .. -- Gott läßt Israeliten 12000 Bewohner von Ai umbringen (Das Buch Josua, Kap. 8) *** http://www.reimbibel.de *** "Sein Kriegsgott sprach zu Josua: * Bereite einen Hinterhalt 'Nun geht es weiter, ist doch klar. * und mach die Leut von Ai kalt.'" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
mumps
Mumps in this country, in the U.S. the CDC did a study. When Maurice Hillerman went from Merck, the head of vaccines at Merck went to the CDC… I have a mumps vaccine; I would like you to use it. They did a study and they said there is no need. Mumps is a trivial disease in children; we do not need this vaccine. Exactly the same happened in the UK. The Department of Health, the Medicines Control Agency, the regulators in the UK said, this is a trivial disease in children. We do not need a mumps vaccine. But it got in. ....So you have effectively taken a trivial disease and by vaccinating, you have turned it into a more dangerous disease. Now, they are in a real mess. They are in a real mess because one dose of MMR doesn't prevent it. Two doses of MMR don't prevent it; three doses. You are creating a population that is dependent upon reboosting with vaccines for the rest of their lives to avoid this complication, a man-made complication.....There was incompetence. They were incompetent. They were so zealous. So urgently needed to get this vaccine into the market that they ignored the potential problems and now we have a big, big problem. Mumps vaccine is a dangerous vaccine. It does not work. [2010 April] Dr. Mercola Interviews Dr. Andrew Wakefield |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
mumps
john wrote:
Mumps in this country, in the U.S. the CDC did a study. When Maurice Hillerman went from Merck, the head of vaccines at Merck went to the CDC… I have a mumps vaccine; I would like you to use it. They did a study and they said there is no need. Mumps is a trivial disease in children; we do not need this vaccine. Exactly the same happened in the UK. The Department of Health, the Medicines Control Agency, the regulators in the UK said, this is a trivial disease in children. We do not need a mumps vaccine. But it got in. ....So you have effectively taken a trivial disease and by vaccinating, you have turned it into a more dangerous disease. Now, they are in a real mess. They are in a real mess because one dose of MMR doesn't prevent it. Two doses of MMR don't prevent it; three doses. You are creating a population that is dependent upon reboosting with vaccines for the rest of their lives to avoid this complication, a man-made complication.....There was incompetence. They were incompetent. They were so zealous. So urgently needed to get this vaccine into the market that they ignored the potential problems and now we have a big, big problem. Mumps vaccine is a dangerous vaccine. It does not work. [2010 April] Dr. Mercola Interviews Dr. Andrew Wakefield Dr. Mercola and Dr. Wakefield? Two quacks. You have the wrong newsgroup. THis is sci.med. Wakefield and Mercola have nothing to do with either science or medicine. Both are quacks. Jeff |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
mumps
"dr_jeff" wrote in message Dr. Mercola and Dr. Wakefield? Two quacks. You have the wrong newsgroup. THis is sci.med. Wakefield and Mercola have nothing to do with either science or medicine. Both are quacks. Jeff We all know who the real quacks are http://whale.to/p/quacks.html |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Hepatitis B vax
Coming down to the issue of giving it (Hepatitis B vax) on day one of life,
there are several issues that surround that. The first is when we did this primate study giving that hepatitis B vaccine on day one. We looked for the safety studies of that policy. What had been done to establish the safety of giving it on day one? Not just giving it on day one but giving it on day one to every infant whether they were born at 24 weeks or 30 weeks or 36 weeks or 40 weeks, whatever their gestational…their birth weight was, whether they were 10 lbs or 3 lbs or 2 lbs, they were getting the same shot at day one as a matter of policy. Safety studies… We couldn't find them. And that was really shocking, really shocking. How could this be? If you're going to make a case for it, if you're going to do it, your'e going to make it a matter of policy for every kid in the country then you'e got to be absolutely certain that you got the safety set that is right because if not, you may produce insidious problems, minor degrees of damage which you don't pick up straight away but are catastrophic |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Hepatitis B vax
john wrote:
Coming down to the issue of giving it (Hepatitis B vax) on day one of life, there are several issues that surround that. The first is when we did this primate study giving that hepatitis B vaccine on day one. We looked for the safety studies of that policy. What had been done to establish the safety of giving it on day one? Not just giving it on day one but giving it on day one to every infant whether they were born at 24 weeks or 30 weeks or 36 weeks or 40 weeks, whatever their gestational…their birth weight was, whether they were 10 lbs or 3 lbs or 2 lbs, they were getting the same shot at day one as a matter of policy. Safety studies… We couldn't find them. And that was really shocking, really shocking. How could this be? If you're going to make a case for it, if you're going to do it, your'e going to make it a matter of policy for every kid in the country then you'e got to be absolutely certain that you got the safety set that is right because if not, you may produce insidious problems, minor degrees of damage which you don't pick up straight away but are catastrophic I didn't know you did studies. Who funded you? Where is it published? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Hepatitis B vax
"john" wrote in message ... Coming down to the issue of giving it (Hepatitis B vax) on day one of life, there are several issues that surround that. The first is when we did this primate study giving that hepatitis B vaccine on day one. We looked for the safety studies of that policy. What had been done to establish the safety of giving it on day one? Not just giving it on day one but giving it on day one to every infant whether they were born at 24 weeks or 30 weeks or 36 weeks or 40 weeks, whatever their gestational.their birth weight was, whether they were 10 lbs or 3 lbs or 2 lbs, they were getting the same shot at day one as a matter of policy. Safety studies. We couldn't find them. And that was really shocking, really shocking. How could this be? If you're going to make a case for it, if you're going to do it, your'e going to make it a matter of policy for every kid in the country then you'e got to be absolutely certain that you got the safety set that is right because if not, you may produce insidious problems, minor degrees of damage which you don't pick up straight away but are catastrophic Sorry... who are you? Where and why did you look for such studies? And what is the basis for any concerns you may have? I would refer you to the following website for some useful (and genuine) information, as well as further links: http://www.quackwatch.org/03HealthPr...mu/immu10.html |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
mumps
"john" wrote in message ... Mumps in this country, in the U.S. the CDC did a study. When Maurice Hillerman went from Merck, the head of vaccines at Merck went to the CDC. I have a mumps vaccine; I would like you to use it. They did a study and they said there is no need. Mumps is a trivial disease in children; we do not need this vaccine. Exactly the same happened in the UK. The Department of Health, the Medicines Control Agency, the regulators in the UK said, this is a trivial disease in children. We do not need a mumps vaccine. But it got in. ....So you have effectively taken a trivial disease and by vaccinating, you have turned it into a more dangerous disease. Now, they are in a real mess. They are in a real mess because one dose of MMR doesn't prevent it. Two doses of MMR don't prevent it; three doses. You are creating a population that is dependent upon reboosting with vaccines for the rest of their lives to avoid this complication, a man-made complication.....There was incompetence. They were incompetent. They were so zealous. So urgently needed to get this vaccine into the market that they ignored the potential problems and now we have a big, big problem. Mumps vaccine is a dangerous vaccine. It does not work. [2010 April] Dr. Mercola Interviews Dr. Andrew Wakefield Mercola? Ah. The guy who champions "cures" that are not based on any kind of scientific research. The guy that makes a fortune out of the promotion and marketing of various unproven products. The guy who, according to David Gumpert, "is selling health-care products and services, and is calling upon an unfortunate tradition made famous by the old-time snake oil salesmen of the 1800s" and who uses "every trick of traditional and Internet direct marketing to grow his business." As for Dr Andrew Wakefield... The former surgeon and researcher best known for his discredited work regarding the MMR vaccine. In fact, he even stated that "We did not prove an association between measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine and the syndrome described." Further studies completely failed to either confirm or reproduce his findings. And this is before you even start to consider the conflicts of interest. Wakefield has no medical license in the USA, and is unlicensed in the UK. So I'm sure you'll forgive me if I'm somewhat sceptical about the purpose/reason for your post. Check out http://www.quackwatch.org/03HealthPr...mu/autism.html for further, decent information. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Hepatitis B vax
"Stephen Wilson" I would refer you to the following website for some useful (and genuine) information, as well as further links: http://www.quackwatch.org/03HealthPr...mu/immu10.html RAOFL! That AMA front, yawn |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Video transcripts: Dr Andrew Wakefield - In His own words | john[_5_] | General | 3 | March 5th 11 06:46 AM |
Statement from Dr. Andrew Wakefield Regarding GMC Hearing Sanctions | john[_5_] | General | 2 | April 5th 10 05:47 PM |
Andrew Wakefield, Scientific Censorship | john[_5_] | Kids Health | 3 | February 7th 10 11:51 PM |
Parents and Professionals in support of Dr Andrew Wakefield | JOHN | Kids Health | 19 | March 9th 08 08:56 PM |
Andrew Wakefield & MMR Controversy | Sheri Nakken RN, MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath | Kids Health | 37 | October 22nd 06 03:54 AM |