12 Year Old Girl - Dead after Merck's Gardisil Vaccination

http://ilena-rosenthal.blogspot.com

6 days after being vaccinated, 12 year old dead of "myocarditis" and
"ventricular tachicardia"

http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive...AERSDeaths.pdf

Ilena Rose wrote:
http://ilena-rosenthal.blogspot.com

6 days after being vaccinated, 12 year old dead of "myocarditis" and
"ventricular tachicardia"

http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive...AERSDeaths.pdf

The child had a preexisting heart condition.

Show evidence that this death was caused by the vaccine.

Jeff

On Mar 14, 5:27*pm, Jeff wrote:


Show evidence that this death was caused by the vaccine.

Better yet Jeff, show evidence that it was not caused by the vaccine.

"Bee" wrote in message
...
On Mar 14, 5:27 pm, Jeff wrote:


Show evidence that this death was caused by the vaccine.

Better yet Jeff, show evidence that it was not caused by the vaccine.


impossible to prove a negative....

wrote:
"Bee" wrote in message
...
On Mar 14, 5:27 pm, Jeff wrote:

Show evidence that this death was caused by the vaccine.

Better yet Jeff, show evidence that it was not caused by the vaccine.


impossible to prove a negative....

Let's see, we have a child who had a pre-existing heart condition who
died from myocarditis. What were the autopsy findings?

All we have to go on is coincidence.

That's no reason to assume that the vaccine was related to the death,
let along the cause of the death.

There is no reason to think that the death was caused by the vaccine at all.

The VAERS database is designed to alert authorities of *possible*
problem with vaccines.

All Jan is doing is making a mountain out of a non-issue. There isn't
even a mole-hill.

Jeff

On Mar 14, 10:24*pm, Bee wrote:
On Mar 14, 5:27*pm, Jeff wrote:



Show evidence that this death was caused by the vaccine.

Better yet Jeff, show *evidence that it was not caused by the vaccine.

The claim is made that the vaccine caused the death. That has to be
proven.

Proving a negative, as you want, is inpossible, and absurd.

"Bee" wrote in message
...
On Mar 14, 5:27 pm, Jeff wrote:


Show evidence that this death was caused by the vaccine.

Better yet Jeff, show evidence that it was not caused by the vaccine.

Whoah there....

No, it doesn't work that.

Claims do not have to be disproven, they have to be proven. That is
fundamental principle of rational thinking. It's like the whole god debate.
The existence of a god need not be disproven. It needs to proven. Lots of
gods of all flavors have been and are currently proposed to exist. Not a
one of them has been proven to be real.

I can't just proclaim that my arthritic knee is as a result of standing in
the operating room long hours and therefore should enable me to disability
or other such things. No, I would have to prove that that were the case...
not have someone disprove it.

That sort of suggestion [above] is just nonsense and not constructive to
meaningful discussion.

In message _VQCj.23781$TT4.16541@attbi_s22, Skeptic wrote:

Claims do not have to be disproven, they have to be proven. *That is
fundamental principle of rational thinking. *It's like the whole god debate.
The existence of a god need not be disproven. *It needs to proven. *Lots of
gods of all flavors have been and are currently proposed to exist. *Not a
one of them has been proven to be real.

I can't just proclaim that my arthritic knee is as a result of standing in
the operating room long hours and therefore should enable me to disability
or other such things. *No, I would have to prove that that were the case...
not have someone disprove it.

An example is often useful. Since the topic is the rather
serious one of "X resulted in the death of $PERSON" it
seems appropriate to place the straw man of "Ilena
Rosenthal killed $PERSON" before the board.

Since this comes up every time a child dies and there was
a vaccine somewhere nearby in time, the equivalent would
be to have Ilena Rosenthal brought up on charges of
homicide every time anyone dies in her general area. Such
as southern California.

Of course, if she's not at fault there's no harm done, right?

Why do I have this feeling that there are going to be a whole
host of responses totally missing the point here?

Health trivia: 40% of employee work absences are on either
Monday or Friday. Malingerers?

--
| The most important exclamation in science isn't "Eureka!" |
| The most important exclamation is "What the BLEEP?" |
+---------- D. C. Sessions ----------+

"Jeff" wrote in message
news:wbHCj.4969$%Y2.1927@trnddc08...
wrote:
"Bee" wrote in message
...
On Mar 14, 5:27 pm, Jeff wrote:

Show evidence that this death was caused by the vaccine.

Better yet Jeff, show evidence that it was not caused by the vaccine.


impossible to prove a negative....

Let's see, we have a child who had a pre-existing heart condition who died
from myocarditis. What were the autopsy findings?

All we have to go on is coincidence.

That's no reason to assume that the vaccine was related to the death, let
along the cause of the death.

There is no reason to think that the death was caused by the vaccine at
all.

The VAERS database is designed to alert authorities of *possible* problem
with vaccines.

All Jan is doing is making a mountain out of a non-issue. There isn't even
a mole-hill.

Jeff

I beg your pardon. I have not posted in this thread. Get your facts
straight.

"Skeptic"
Claims do not have to be disproven, they have to be proven. That is
fundamental principle of rational thinking. It's like the whole god
debate. The existence of a god need not be disproven. It needs to proven.
Lots of gods of all flavors have been and are currently proposed to exist.
Not a one of them has been proven to be real.

Correct.

I can't just proclaim that my arthritic knee is as a result of standing in
the operating room long hours and therefore should enable me to disability
or other such things.

Incorrect.

M