A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » misc.kids » Pregnancy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

For chiros only: Speaking of strictly speaking...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 27th 05, 03:02 PM
Todd Gastaldo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default For chiros only: Speaking of strictly speaking...

FOR CHIROS ONLY: SPEAKING OF STRICTLY SPEAKING...

See the postscript.

Donald M. Petersen, Jr., Editor/Publisher of Dynamic Chiropractic says,

"Strictly speaking, nutrition is not chiropractic."
http://www.chiroweb.com/columnist/petersen/index.html

Donald,

There is scientific evidence that dietary error exists and causes disease
and stops causing disease when adjusted/corrrected.

There is NO scientific evidence that chiropractic's hypothetical
biomechanical error ("vertebral subluxation") exists and causes disease and
stops causing disease when adjusted/corrected.

For Dr. DD Palmer, adjusting/correcting error was definitely chiropractic.

Why would adjusting/correcting dietary error not be part of chiropractic?

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo


PS FOR CHIROS ONLY: SPEAKING OF STRICTLY SPEAKING...

Donald M. Petersen, Jr., Editor/Publisher of Dynamic Chiropractic should be
publishing the fact that MD-obstetricians a 1) routinely closing birth
canals up to 30%; 2) routinely keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to
30% when babies get stuck; and 3) routinely pulling with hands, forceps and
vacuums with birth canals senselessly closed the "extra" up to 30%.

Sometimes MD-obstetricians pull so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny
spinal cords.

Some babies die - some get paralyzed - some "only" have their spines
gruesomely wrenched.

Donald M. Petersen, Jr., Editor/Publisher of Dynamic Chiropractic should
also be publishing the fact that MD-obstetricians are slicing vaginas and
abdomens en masse (episiotomy/c-section) - surgically/fraudulently inferring
they are doing/have done everything possible to open birth canals - even as
they close birth canals up to 30%.

DONALD: Many chiros indicate that birth trauma can cause vertebral
subluxations. Thanks in part to your editorial silence, the chiropractic
profession is missing a golden opportunity to save tiny lives and tiny limbs
and PREVENT more putative vertebral subluxations than DCs will ever be able
to adjust by hand.

Of course, you are not the only silent voice in chiropractic...

See Birth and German 'lay manipulators' (heilpraktikers)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3493

See also: Chiropractic, Pediatrics and Pregnancy
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3471

And see: Chiro exams *at* birth
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3491

And don't miss: Birth and the International Chiropractors Association
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3498

Thanks for reading.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo


This post will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive.
Search
http://groups.google.com for "For chiros only: Speaking of strictly
speaking"


  #2  
Old April 27th 05, 09:25 PM
Joel M. Eichen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
. net...
FOR CHIROS ONLY: SPEAKING OF STRICTLY SPEAKING...


Yo Toddster,

What do chiropodists have to do with opening birth canals 30%?





See the postscript.

Donald M. Petersen, Jr., Editor/Publisher of Dynamic Chiropractic says,

"Strictly speaking, nutrition is not chiropractic."
http://www.chiroweb.com/columnist/petersen/index.html

Donald,

There is scientific evidence that dietary error exists and causes disease
and stops causing disease when adjusted/corrrected.

There is NO scientific evidence that chiropractic's hypothetical
biomechanical error ("vertebral subluxation") exists and causes disease

and
stops causing disease when adjusted/corrected.

For Dr. DD Palmer, adjusting/correcting error was definitely chiropractic.

Why would adjusting/correcting dietary error not be part of chiropractic?

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo


PS FOR CHIROS ONLY: SPEAKING OF STRICTLY SPEAKING...

Donald M. Petersen, Jr., Editor/Publisher of Dynamic Chiropractic should

be
publishing the fact that MD-obstetricians a 1) routinely closing birth
canals up to 30%; 2) routinely keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up

to
30% when babies get stuck; and 3) routinely pulling with hands, forceps

and
vacuums with birth canals senselessly closed the "extra" up to 30%.

Sometimes MD-obstetricians pull so hard they rip spinal nerves out of tiny
spinal cords.

Some babies die - some get paralyzed - some "only" have their spines
gruesomely wrenched.

Donald M. Petersen, Jr., Editor/Publisher of Dynamic Chiropractic should
also be publishing the fact that MD-obstetricians are slicing vaginas and
abdomens en masse (episiotomy/c-section) - surgically/fraudulently

inferring
they are doing/have done everything possible to open birth canals - even

as
they close birth canals up to 30%.

DONALD: Many chiros indicate that birth trauma can cause vertebral
subluxations. Thanks in part to your editorial silence, the chiropractic
profession is missing a golden opportunity to save tiny lives and tiny

limbs
and PREVENT more putative vertebral subluxations than DCs will ever be

able
to adjust by hand.

Of course, you are not the only silent voice in chiropractic...

See Birth and German 'lay manipulators' (heilpraktikers)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3493

See also: Chiropractic, Pediatrics and Pregnancy
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3471

And see: Chiro exams *at* birth
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3491

And don't miss: Birth and the International Chiropractors Association
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3498

Thanks for reading.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo


This post will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive.
Search
http://groups.google.com for "For chiros only: Speaking of strictly
speaking"




  #3  
Old April 28th 05, 06:19 AM
Todd Gastaldo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message
...

"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
. net...
FOR CHIROS ONLY: SPEAKING OF STRICTLY SPEAKING...


Yo Toddster,

What do chiropodists have to do with opening birth canals 30%?


As fetuses, chiropodists (just like everyone else) are used as entering
wedges to open birth canals up to 30% - assuming they are born vaginally and
their mothers aren't placed semisitting or dorsal.

Todd





See the postscript.

Donald M. Petersen, Jr., Editor/Publisher of Dynamic Chiropractic says,

"Strictly speaking, nutrition is not chiropractic."
http://www.chiroweb.com/columnist/petersen/index.html

Donald,

There is scientific evidence that dietary error exists and causes disease
and stops causing disease when adjusted/corrrected.

There is NO scientific evidence that chiropractic's hypothetical
biomechanical error ("vertebral subluxation") exists and causes disease

and
stops causing disease when adjusted/corrected.

For Dr. DD Palmer, adjusting/correcting error was definitely
chiropractic.

Why would adjusting/correcting dietary error not be part of chiropractic?

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo


PS FOR CHIROS ONLY: SPEAKING OF STRICTLY SPEAKING...

Donald M. Petersen, Jr., Editor/Publisher of Dynamic Chiropractic should

be
publishing the fact that MD-obstetricians a 1) routinely closing birth
canals up to 30%; 2) routinely keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up

to
30% when babies get stuck; and 3) routinely pulling with hands, forceps

and
vacuums with birth canals senselessly closed the "extra" up to 30%.

Sometimes MD-obstetricians pull so hard they rip spinal nerves out of
tiny
spinal cords.

Some babies die - some get paralyzed - some "only" have their spines
gruesomely wrenched.

Donald M. Petersen, Jr., Editor/Publisher of Dynamic Chiropractic should
also be publishing the fact that MD-obstetricians are slicing vaginas and
abdomens en masse (episiotomy/c-section) - surgically/fraudulently

inferring
they are doing/have done everything possible to open birth canals - even

as
they close birth canals up to 30%.

DONALD: Many chiros indicate that birth trauma can cause vertebral
subluxations. Thanks in part to your editorial silence, the chiropractic
profession is missing a golden opportunity to save tiny lives and tiny

limbs
and PREVENT more putative vertebral subluxations than DCs will ever be

able
to adjust by hand.

Of course, you are not the only silent voice in chiropractic...

See Birth and German 'lay manipulators' (heilpraktikers)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3493

See also: Chiropractic, Pediatrics and Pregnancy
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3471

And see: Chiro exams *at* birth
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3491

And don't miss: Birth and the International Chiropractors Association
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3498

Thanks for reading.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo


This post will be archived for global access in the Google usenet
archive.
Search
http://groups.google.com for "For chiros only: Speaking of
strictly
speaking"






  #4  
Old April 28th 05, 11:51 AM
Joel M. Eichen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
k.net...

?


As fetuses, chiropodists (just like everyone else) are used as entering
wedges to open birth canals up to 30% - assuming they are born vaginally

and
their mothers aren't placed semisitting or dorsal.

Todd


REPLY

WoW!

Chiropodists entering wedges ........ I think I saw that
on America's Most Wanted .......... they are after that guy in 23 states
.......



  #5  
Old April 28th 05, 12:17 PM
Todd Gastaldo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

OB PERPS

Dentist Joel M. Eichen humorously makes light of massive child abuse by OBs.


"Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message
...

"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
k.net...

?


As fetuses, chiropodists (just like everyone else) are used as entering
wedges to open birth canals up to 30% - assuming they are born vaginally

and
their mothers aren't placed semisitting or dorsal.

Todd


REPLY

WoW!

Chiropodists entering wedges ........ I think I saw that
on America's Most Wanted .......... they are after that guy in 23 states
......


Joel,

It's a classic case of blaming the victim as the birth-canal-closing OB
perps remain at large.

OB perps are also robbing babies of up to 50% of blood volume. See below.

THE FOUR OB LIES

OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was
clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957,
the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic
diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery.

OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO
change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that
their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet.

OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does
semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct
biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same
paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention to
their text...

OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get
stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal open
maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births
are performed with the mother in lithotomy.)

See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983

I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago...
http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html


RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS....

"[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage in
fraud or deception."

"[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are
contrary to the best interests of the patient."

"[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to patients,
colleagues, and the public..."
http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm

AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned.


MASSIVE BABY BLOOD ROBBERY

Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG
indicates that OBs are robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume.

This is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY, according to Dr. Morley:

"ACOG's routine treatment (B138) of these depressed neonates is immediate
cord clamping to obtain cord blood pH studies. The child's only functioning
source of oxygen - the placenta - is amputated together with 30% to 50+% of
its natural blood volume. Total asphyxia is imposed until the lungs
function, and the depressed (asphyxiated, hypovolemic) child starts its
extra-uterine life in hypovolemic shock... B138 was first published in 1993.
Every cesarean section baby, every depressed child, every premie, and every
child born with a neonatal team in
the delivery room has its cord clamped immediately to facilitate the
panicked rush to the resuscitation table. The current epidemic of immediate
cord clamping coincides with an epidemic of autism...For the trial lawyers,
it is essential that the 'true genesis' of cerebral
palsy remains unknown, because that 'true genesis' (B.138) is a standard of
medico-legal care..."
http://www.cordclamping.com/ac***og-cp.htm

In cases where the baby MUST be
resuscitated after birth - I am still wondering why pediatricians have to
sever the baby's access to blood and oxygen and rush baby across the room to
resuscitate. Why can't neonatal resuscitation stations be designed so that
mother and baby can be wheeled underneath (or between) with baby's natural
oxygenation/transfusion device still intact? No one has answered this
question.


My thanks to Canadian Grandmother Donna Young for calling my attention to
the immediate cord clamping mass child abuse.

A GOOD SIGN: Oregon Health & Science University/OHSU - Oregon's only
medical school - stopped promoting immediate cord clamping and
birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery online
after I complained.

OHSU's link to the misinformation is now dead - or rather - one is re-routed
to
www.ohsuwomenshealth.com...

See Birth child abuse: Oregon's only medical school (OHSU)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2986

(If anyone can find a page where OHSU is still promoting immediate cord
clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery, I would like to know
about it.)


PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing
birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women
semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to
30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. ANOTHER PROBLEM: By
immediately clamping cords, OBs are temporarily asphyxiating babies and
robbing them of up to 50%
of their blood volume - see the astonishing quote from Dr. Morley above.

THE SOLUTION:

1. To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%,
simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - BUT BEWARE - some OBs
will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll
them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to
30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB.

2. To allow your baby to have the "extra" up to 50% of blood volume, do not
let the OB or midwife clamp the umbilical cord until it has stopped
pulsating and your baby is pink and breathing and not in need of
resuscitation.

NOTE #1: Allowing the birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30% will not
prevent all episiotomies or c-sections or forceps/vacuum use - but OBs have
no business closing
birth canals the "extra" up to 30% in the first place.

NOTE #2: There are rare cases where the OB must clamp immediately - but they
are indeed rare. OBs are routinely clamping cords immediately - routinely
robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Talk to your OB today.

I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical
students MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious child abuse which sometimes
kills.

Thanks for reading everyone.

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA



  #6  
Old April 28th 05, 02:01 PM
Joel M. Eichen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Who is humorously making light?

I am talking about the chiropodist on America's Most Wanted ....




"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
k.net...
OB PERPS

Dentist Joel M. Eichen humorously makes light of massive child abuse by

OBs.


"Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message
...

"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
k.net...

?


As fetuses, chiropodists (just like everyone else) are used as entering
wedges to open birth canals up to 30% - assuming they are born

vaginally
and
their mothers aren't placed semisitting or dorsal.

Todd


REPLY

WoW!

Chiropodists entering wedges ........ I think I saw that
on America's Most Wanted .......... they are after that guy in 23 states
......


Joel,

It's a classic case of blaming the victim as the birth-canal-closing OB
perps remain at large.

OB perps are also robbing babies of up to 50% of blood volume. See below.

THE FOUR OB LIES

OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was
clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957,
the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic
diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery.

OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO
change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming

that
their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet.

OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does
semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct
biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same
paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention to
their text...

OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get
stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal

open
maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births
are performed with the mother in lithotomy.)

See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983

I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago...
http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html


RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS....

"[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage

in
fraud or deception."

"[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are
contrary to the best interests of the patient."

"[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to

patients,
colleagues, and the public..."
http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm

AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned.


MASSIVE BABY BLOOD ROBBERY

Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG
indicates that OBs are robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume.

This is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY, according to Dr. Morley:

"ACOG's routine treatment (B138) of these depressed neonates is immediate
cord clamping to obtain cord blood pH studies. The child's only

functioning
source of oxygen - the placenta - is amputated together with 30% to 50+%

of
its natural blood volume. Total asphyxia is imposed until the lungs
function, and the depressed (asphyxiated, hypovolemic) child starts its
extra-uterine life in hypovolemic shock... B138 was first published in

1993.
Every cesarean section baby, every depressed child, every premie, and

every
child born with a neonatal team in
the delivery room has its cord clamped immediately to facilitate the
panicked rush to the resuscitation table. The current epidemic of

immediate
cord clamping coincides with an epidemic of autism...For the trial

lawyers,
it is essential that the 'true genesis' of cerebral
palsy remains unknown, because that 'true genesis' (B.138) is a standard

of
medico-legal care..."
http://www.cordclamping.com/ac***og-cp.htm

In cases where the baby MUST be
resuscitated after birth - I am still wondering why pediatricians have to
sever the baby's access to blood and oxygen and rush baby across the room

to
resuscitate. Why can't neonatal resuscitation stations be designed so

that
mother and baby can be wheeled underneath (or between) with baby's natural
oxygenation/transfusion device still intact? No one has answered this
question.


My thanks to Canadian Grandmother Donna Young for calling my attention to
the immediate cord clamping mass child abuse.

A GOOD SIGN: Oregon Health & Science University/OHSU - Oregon's only
medical school - stopped promoting immediate cord clamping and
birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery online
after I complained.

OHSU's link to the misinformation is now dead - or rather - one is

re-routed
to
www.ohsuwomenshealth.com...

See Birth child abuse: Oregon's only medical school (OHSU)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2986

(If anyone can find a page where OHSU is still promoting immediate cord
clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery, I would like to

know
about it.)


PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing
birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women
semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up

to
30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. ANOTHER PROBLEM: By
immediately clamping cords, OBs are temporarily asphyxiating babies and
robbing them of up to 50%
of their blood volume - see the astonishing quote from Dr. Morley above.

THE SOLUTION:

1. To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%,
simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - BUT BEWARE - some

OBs
will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will

roll
them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up

to
30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB.

2. To allow your baby to have the "extra" up to 50% of blood volume, do

not
let the OB or midwife clamp the umbilical cord until it has stopped
pulsating and your baby is pink and breathing and not in need of
resuscitation.

NOTE #1: Allowing the birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30% will not
prevent all episiotomies or c-sections or forceps/vacuum use - but OBs

have
no business closing
birth canals the "extra" up to 30% in the first place.

NOTE #2: There are rare cases where the OB must clamp immediately - but

they
are indeed rare. OBs are routinely clamping cords immediately - routinely
robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Talk to your OB today.

I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical
students MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious child abuse which sometimes
kills.

Thanks for reading everyone.

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA





  #7  
Old April 28th 05, 06:31 PM
Todd Gastaldo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

THE 30% AND CHIROPODY (NOW CALLED PODIATRY)

See below.

"Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message
...
Who is humorously making light?

I am talking about the chiropodist on America's Most Wanted ....


LOL!

And now I am talking about Margaret the chiropodist in "Bob and Margaret"
(Comedy) which airs: Sundays 11:30 PM (Comedy Central):

"Premise: The funny, but everyday dealings of Bob, a neurotic dentist, and
his chiropodist wife, Margaret."
http://tv.zap2it.com/tveditorial/tve_main/1,1002,273|3244|1|,00.html

BTW, I'm pretty sure chiropodists are now called podiatrists.

Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary says:

"Chiropodical...pertaining to chiropody (now called podiatry)."

Incidentally, when I persuaded Dorland's to correct its definition of
chiropractic and include graduates of chiropractic colleges under the
Dorland's definition of doctor, Dorland's took the opportunity to also
include graduates dental and podiatry colleges.

I see your point, Joel - offering some humor does not necessarily make light
of the mass child abuse being committed by OBs.

Indeed, humorous posts in response to mine could possibly help call
attention to the fact that OBs are routinely closing birth canals up to 30%
and routinely keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies
get stuck - as they pull with hands, forceps or vacuums - sometimes so hard
that spinal nerves are ripped out of tiny spinal cords.

I suspect Amy's joking about OBs not really robbing babies of up to 50% of
their blood volume helped call people's attention to the fact that OBs *are*
really robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume.

Todd

PS For readers who may not be aware (perhaps Joel the dentist is still not
aware): "Chiro" is a term often used by chiropractors when referring to a
chiropractor or to chiropractic. I suppose chiropodists used to use the
same term; but now they are called podiatrists ("pods"?)...


"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
. net...
FOR CHIROS ONLY: SPEAKING OF STRICTLY SPEAKING...


Yo Toddster,

What do chiropodists have to do with opening birth canals 30%?


"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
k.net...
OB PERPS

Dentist Joel M. Eichen humorously makes light of massive child abuse by

OBs.


"Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message
...

"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
k.net...

?


As fetuses, chiropodists (just like everyone else) are used as
entering
wedges to open birth canals up to 30% - assuming they are born

vaginally
and
their mothers aren't placed semisitting or dorsal.

Todd


REPLY

WoW!

Chiropodists entering wedges ........ I think I saw that
on America's Most Wanted .......... they are after that guy in 23
states
......


Joel,

It's a classic case of blaming the victim as the birth-canal-closing OB
perps remain at large.

OB perps are also robbing babies of up to 50% of blood volume. See
below.

THE FOUR OB LIES

OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was
clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in
1957,
the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic
diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery.

OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO
change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming

that
their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet.

OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does
semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct
biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same
paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention
to
their text...

OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get
stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal

open
maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births
are performed with the mother in lithotomy.)

See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983

I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago...
http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html


RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS....

"[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage

in
fraud or deception."

"[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are
contrary to the best interests of the patient."

"[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to

patients,
colleagues, and the public..."
http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm

AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned.


MASSIVE BABY BLOOD ROBBERY

Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG
indicates that OBs are robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume.

This is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY, according to Dr. Morley:

"ACOG's routine treatment (B138) of these depressed neonates is immediate
cord clamping to obtain cord blood pH studies. The child's only

functioning
source of oxygen - the placenta - is amputated together with 30% to 50+%

of
its natural blood volume. Total asphyxia is imposed until the lungs
function, and the depressed (asphyxiated, hypovolemic) child starts its
extra-uterine life in hypovolemic shock... B138 was first published in

1993.
Every cesarean section baby, every depressed child, every premie, and

every
child born with a neonatal team in
the delivery room has its cord clamped immediately to facilitate the
panicked rush to the resuscitation table. The current epidemic of

immediate
cord clamping coincides with an epidemic of autism...For the trial

lawyers,
it is essential that the 'true genesis' of cerebral
palsy remains unknown, because that 'true genesis' (B.138) is a standard

of
medico-legal care..."
http://www.cordclamping.com/ac***og-cp.htm

In cases where the baby MUST be
resuscitated after birth - I am still wondering why pediatricians have to
sever the baby's access to blood and oxygen and rush baby across the room

to
resuscitate. Why can't neonatal resuscitation stations be designed so

that
mother and baby can be wheeled underneath (or between) with baby's
natural
oxygenation/transfusion device still intact? No one has answered this
question.


My thanks to Canadian Grandmother Donna Young for calling my attention to
the immediate cord clamping mass child abuse.

A GOOD SIGN: Oregon Health & Science University/OHSU - Oregon's only
medical school - stopped promoting immediate cord clamping and
birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery online
after I complained.

OHSU's link to the misinformation is now dead - or rather - one is

re-routed
to
www.ohsuwomenshealth.com...

See Birth child abuse: Oregon's only medical school (OHSU)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2986

(If anyone can find a page where OHSU is still promoting immediate cord
clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery, I would like to

know
about it.)


PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing
birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women
semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up

to
30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. ANOTHER PROBLEM: By
immediately clamping cords, OBs are temporarily asphyxiating babies and
robbing them of up to 50%
of their blood volume - see the astonishing quote from Dr. Morley above.

THE SOLUTION:

1. To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%,
simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - BUT BEWARE - some

OBs
will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will

roll
them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up

to
30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB.

2. To allow your baby to have the "extra" up to 50% of blood volume, do

not
let the OB or midwife clamp the umbilical cord until it has stopped
pulsating and your baby is pink and breathing and not in need of
resuscitation.

NOTE #1: Allowing the birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30% will not
prevent all episiotomies or c-sections or forceps/vacuum use - but OBs

have
no business closing
birth canals the "extra" up to 30% in the first place.

NOTE #2: There are rare cases where the OB must clamp immediately - but

they
are indeed rare. OBs are routinely clamping cords immediately -
routinely
robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Talk to your OB
today.

I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical
students MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious child abuse which sometimes
kills.

Thanks for reading everyone.

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA







  #8  
Old April 28th 05, 07:13 PM
Joel M. Eichen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
nk.net...
THE 30% AND CHIROPODY (NOW CALLED PODIATRY)


REPLY

Actually they are different. Chiropodists are only clip and
chip while podiatrists are fully-fledged doctors!

Now which group got caught with the wedge
doing who knows what, I do not know.


Joel



See below.

"Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message
...
Who is humorously making light?

I am talking about the chiropodist on America's Most Wanted ....


LOL!

And now I am talking about Margaret the chiropodist in "Bob and Margaret"
(Comedy) which airs: Sundays 11:30 PM (Comedy Central):

"Premise: The funny, but everyday dealings of Bob, a neurotic dentist, and
his chiropodist wife, Margaret."
http://tv.zap2it.com/tveditorial/tve_main/1,1002,273|3244|1|,00.html

BTW, I'm pretty sure chiropodists are now called podiatrists.

Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary says:

"Chiropodical...pertaining to chiropody (now called podiatry)."

Incidentally, when I persuaded Dorland's to correct its definition of
chiropractic and include graduates of chiropractic colleges under the
Dorland's definition of doctor, Dorland's took the opportunity to also
include graduates dental and podiatry colleges.

I see your point, Joel - offering some humor does not necessarily make

light
of the mass child abuse being committed by OBs.

Indeed, humorous posts in response to mine could possibly help call
attention to the fact that OBs are routinely closing birth canals up to

30%
and routinely keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when

babies
get stuck - as they pull with hands, forceps or vacuums - sometimes so

hard
that spinal nerves are ripped out of tiny spinal cords.

I suspect Amy's joking about OBs not really robbing babies of up to 50% of
their blood volume helped call people's attention to the fact that OBs

*are*
really robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume.

Todd

PS For readers who may not be aware (perhaps Joel the dentist is still not
aware): "Chiro" is a term often used by chiropractors when referring to a
chiropractor or to chiropractic. I suppose chiropodists used to use the
same term; but now they are called podiatrists ("pods"?)...


"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
. net...
FOR CHIROS ONLY: SPEAKING OF STRICTLY SPEAKING...


Yo Toddster,

What do chiropodists have to do with opening birth canals 30%?


"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
k.net...
OB PERPS

Dentist Joel M. Eichen humorously makes light of massive child abuse by

OBs.


"Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message
...

"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
k.net...

?


As fetuses, chiropodists (just like everyone else) are used as
entering
wedges to open birth canals up to 30% - assuming they are born

vaginally
and
their mothers aren't placed semisitting or dorsal.

Todd


REPLY

WoW!

Chiropodists entering wedges ........ I think I saw that
on America's Most Wanted .......... they are after that guy in 23
states
......


Joel,

It's a classic case of blaming the victim as the birth-canal-closing OB
perps remain at large.

OB perps are also robbing babies of up to 50% of blood volume. See
below.

THE FOUR OB LIES

OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was
clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in
1957,
the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that

pelvic
diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery.

OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO
change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming

that
their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet.

OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does
semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct
biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the

same
paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention
to
their text...

OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get
stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal

open
maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum

births
are performed with the mother in lithotomy.)

See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983

I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago...
http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html


RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS....

"[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who

engage
in
fraud or deception."

"[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which

are
contrary to the best interests of the patient."

"[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to

patients,
colleagues, and the public..."
http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm

AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned.


MASSIVE BABY BLOOD ROBBERY

Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG
indicates that OBs are robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood

volume.

This is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY, according to Dr. Morley:

"ACOG's routine treatment (B138) of these depressed neonates is

immediate
cord clamping to obtain cord blood pH studies. The child's only

functioning
source of oxygen - the placenta - is amputated together with 30% to

50+%
of
its natural blood volume. Total asphyxia is imposed until the lungs
function, and the depressed (asphyxiated, hypovolemic) child starts its
extra-uterine life in hypovolemic shock... B138 was first published in

1993.
Every cesarean section baby, every depressed child, every premie, and

every
child born with a neonatal team in
the delivery room has its cord clamped immediately to facilitate the
panicked rush to the resuscitation table. The current epidemic of

immediate
cord clamping coincides with an epidemic of autism...For the trial

lawyers,
it is essential that the 'true genesis' of cerebral
palsy remains unknown, because that 'true genesis' (B.138) is a

standard
of
medico-legal care..."
http://www.cordclamping.com/ac***og-cp.htm

In cases where the baby MUST be
resuscitated after birth - I am still wondering why pediatricians have

to
sever the baby's access to blood and oxygen and rush baby across the

room
to
resuscitate. Why can't neonatal resuscitation stations be designed so

that
mother and baby can be wheeled underneath (or between) with baby's
natural
oxygenation/transfusion device still intact? No one has answered this
question.


My thanks to Canadian Grandmother Donna Young for calling my attention

to
the immediate cord clamping mass child abuse.

A GOOD SIGN: Oregon Health & Science University/OHSU - Oregon's only
medical school - stopped promoting immediate cord clamping and
birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery online
after I complained.

OHSU's link to the misinformation is now dead - or rather - one is

re-routed
to
www.ohsuwomenshealth.com...

See Birth child abuse: Oregon's only medical school (OHSU)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2986

(If anyone can find a page where OHSU is still promoting immediate cord
clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery, I would like to

know
about it.)


PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are

closing
birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women
semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra"

up
to
30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. ANOTHER PROBLEM: By
immediately clamping cords, OBs are temporarily asphyxiating babies and
robbing them of up to 50%
of their blood volume - see the astonishing quote from Dr. Morley

above.

THE SOLUTION:

1. To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%,
simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - BUT BEWARE -

some
OBs
will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will

roll
them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra"

up
to
30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB.

2. To allow your baby to have the "extra" up to 50% of blood volume,

do
not
let the OB or midwife clamp the umbilical cord until it has stopped
pulsating and your baby is pink and breathing and not in need of
resuscitation.

NOTE #1: Allowing the birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30% will

not
prevent all episiotomies or c-sections or forceps/vacuum use - but OBs

have
no business closing
birth canals the "extra" up to 30% in the first place.

NOTE #2: There are rare cases where the OB must clamp immediately - but

they
are indeed rare. OBs are routinely clamping cords immediately -
routinely
robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Talk to your OB
today.

I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical
students MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious child abuse which sometimes
kills.

Thanks for reading everyone.

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA









  #9  
Old April 28th 05, 11:31 PM
Todd Gastaldo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message
...

"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
nk.net...
THE 30% AND CHIROPODY (NOW CALLED PODIATRY)


REPLY

Actually they are different. Chiropodists are only clip and
chip while podiatrists are fully-fledged doctors!

Now which group got caught with the wedge
doing who knows what, I do not know.


I am pretty sure Chiropodists and Podiatrists are the same profession in the
US - I could be wrong though.

The British Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists, 53 Welbeck Street,
London W1M 7HE
Telephone: 0207 486 3381 - Fax: 0207 935 6359 has this to say:

"Chiropodists and Podiatrists....Nowadays, the recognised schools are all
departments of universities, or colleges of higher education, and issue BSc
degrees in podiatry,...After graduation you will find there are almost
limitless opportunities for postgraduate study and advancement. Several
polytechnics have been running post-registration BSc degrees in chiropody
for some years..."

"The profession is in the process of changing its title from Chiropody to
Podiatry, to indicate the advances that have been made, and are still being
made, in the professional scope of practice, and to use the title that is
recognised in most other countries with similar level of education."
http://www.ca.courses-careers.com/chiropody.htm

Todd



See below.

"Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message
...
Who is humorously making light?

I am talking about the chiropodist on America's Most Wanted ....


LOL!

And now I am talking about Margaret the chiropodist in "Bob and Margaret"
(Comedy) which airs: Sundays 11:30 PM (Comedy Central):

"Premise: The funny, but everyday dealings of Bob, a neurotic dentist,
and
his chiropodist wife, Margaret."
http://tv.zap2it.com/tveditorial/tve_main/1,1002,273|3244|1|,00.html

BTW, I'm pretty sure chiropodists are now called podiatrists.

Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary says:

"Chiropodical...pertaining to chiropody (now called podiatry)."

Incidentally, when I persuaded Dorland's to correct its definition of
chiropractic and include graduates of chiropractic colleges under the
Dorland's definition of doctor, Dorland's took the opportunity to also
include graduates dental and podiatry colleges.

I see your point, Joel - offering some humor does not necessarily make

light
of the mass child abuse being committed by OBs.

Indeed, humorous posts in response to mine could possibly help call
attention to the fact that OBs are routinely closing birth canals up to

30%
and routinely keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when

babies
get stuck - as they pull with hands, forceps or vacuums - sometimes so

hard
that spinal nerves are ripped out of tiny spinal cords.

I suspect Amy's joking about OBs not really robbing babies of up to 50%
of
their blood volume helped call people's attention to the fact that OBs

*are*
really robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume.

Todd

PS For readers who may not be aware (perhaps Joel the dentist is still
not
aware): "Chiro" is a term often used by chiropractors when referring to
a
chiropractor or to chiropractic. I suppose chiropodists used to use the
same term; but now they are called podiatrists ("pods"?)...


"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
. net...
FOR CHIROS ONLY: SPEAKING OF STRICTLY SPEAKING...

Yo Toddster,

What do chiropodists have to do with opening birth canals 30%?


"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
k.net...
OB PERPS

Dentist Joel M. Eichen humorously makes light of massive child abuse
by
OBs.


"Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message
...

"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
k.net...

?


As fetuses, chiropodists (just like everyone else) are used as
entering
wedges to open birth canals up to 30% - assuming they are born
vaginally
and
their mothers aren't placed semisitting or dorsal.

Todd


REPLY

WoW!

Chiropodists entering wedges ........ I think I saw that
on America's Most Wanted .......... they are after that guy in 23
states
......


Joel,

It's a classic case of blaming the victim as the birth-canal-closing
OB
perps remain at large.

OB perps are also robbing babies of up to 50% of blood volume. See
below.

THE FOUR OB LIES

OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was
clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in
1957,
the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that

pelvic
diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery.

OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO
change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming
that
their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet.

OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so
does
semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct
biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the

same
paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my
attention
to
their text...

OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies
get
stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth
canal
open
maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum

births
are performed with the mother in lithotomy.)

See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983

I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago...
http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html


RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS....

"[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who

engage
in
fraud or deception."

"[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which

are
contrary to the best interests of the patient."

"[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to
patients,
colleagues, and the public..."
http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm

AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be
damned.


MASSIVE BABY BLOOD ROBBERY

Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG
indicates that OBs are robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood

volume.

This is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY, according to Dr. Morley:

"ACOG's routine treatment (B138) of these depressed neonates is

immediate
cord clamping to obtain cord blood pH studies. The child's only
functioning
source of oxygen - the placenta - is amputated together with 30% to

50+%
of
its natural blood volume. Total asphyxia is imposed until the lungs
function, and the depressed (asphyxiated, hypovolemic) child starts
its
extra-uterine life in hypovolemic shock... B138 was first published in
1993.
Every cesarean section baby, every depressed child, every premie, and
every
child born with a neonatal team in
the delivery room has its cord clamped immediately to facilitate the
panicked rush to the resuscitation table. The current epidemic of
immediate
cord clamping coincides with an epidemic of autism...For the trial
lawyers,
it is essential that the 'true genesis' of cerebral
palsy remains unknown, because that 'true genesis' (B.138) is a

standard
of
medico-legal care..."
http://www.cordclamping.com/ac***og-cp.htm

In cases where the baby MUST be
resuscitated after birth - I am still wondering why pediatricians have

to
sever the baby's access to blood and oxygen and rush baby across the

room
to
resuscitate. Why can't neonatal resuscitation stations be designed so
that
mother and baby can be wheeled underneath (or between) with baby's
natural
oxygenation/transfusion device still intact? No one has answered this
question.


My thanks to Canadian Grandmother Donna Young for calling my attention

to
the immediate cord clamping mass child abuse.

A GOOD SIGN: Oregon Health & Science University/OHSU - Oregon's only
medical school - stopped promoting immediate cord clamping and
birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery online
after I complained.

OHSU's link to the misinformation is now dead - or rather - one is
re-routed
to
www.ohsuwomenshealth.com...

See Birth child abuse: Oregon's only medical school (OHSU)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2986

(If anyone can find a page where OHSU is still promoting immediate
cord
clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery, I would like to
know
about it.)


PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are

closing
birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women
semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra"

up
to
30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. ANOTHER PROBLEM: By
immediately clamping cords, OBs are temporarily asphyxiating babies
and
robbing them of up to 50%
of their blood volume - see the astonishing quote from Dr. Morley

above.

THE SOLUTION:

1. To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%,
simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - BUT BEWARE -

some
OBs
will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but
will
roll
them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra"

up
to
30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB.

2. To allow your baby to have the "extra" up to 50% of blood volume,

do
not
let the OB or midwife clamp the umbilical cord until it has stopped
pulsating and your baby is pink and breathing and not in need of
resuscitation.

NOTE #1: Allowing the birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30% will

not
prevent all episiotomies or c-sections or forceps/vacuum use - but OBs
have
no business closing
birth canals the "extra" up to 30% in the first place.

NOTE #2: There are rare cases where the OB must clamp immediately -
but
they
are indeed rare. OBs are routinely clamping cords immediately -
routinely
robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Talk to your OB
today.

I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical
students MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious child abuse which
sometimes
kills.

Thanks for reading everyone.

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA











  #10  
Old April 29th 05, 12:14 AM
Joel M. Eichen
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

http://www.footdoc.ca/www.FootDoc.ca...20Medicine.htm


excerpted

...


Is a Podiatrist the same as a Chiropodist?

A U.S.-trained podiatrist is not a chiropodist, no. But in some parts of
Canada, the use of these words is a little more confusing than that, and
requires some explanation to fully understand it.

The term "chiropodist" and the profession of chiropody is British in origin.
It has been traditionally used to describe an individual who treats feet in
various ways, and up until the 1950's and earlier, there were chiropodists
in both the U.S. (where Abraham Lincoln had a chiropodist) and Canada based
on that British standard.

With the advancements in medicine, however, it gradually became evident in
the U.S. that the level of education received by chiropodists was inadequate
to allow practitioners to practice in a comprehensive way. Hence, in the
1950's, the profession of chiropody was abandoned in the U.S., and podiatric
medicine, with its much lengthier training, developed. This is known as the
"Doctor of Podiatric Medicine" standard.

Because of these changes, the term "chiropody" or "chiropodist" has not
existed in the United States for about 50 years now. So there is little
confusion between the terms "chiropodist" and "podiatrist" in the U.S.

The situation in parts of Canada is not so clear-cut.

Provinces with "Doctors of Podiatric Medicine"
While chiropody was being abandoned and podiatric medicine was being born in
the United States, Canada was caught somewhat between the influence of its
British heritage and the influence of the United States' changing standard.
As all the schools of podiatric medicine were (and still are) located in the
United States, however, provinces like Ontario, British Columbia and Alberta
quickly adopted the U.S.-based podiatric standard. Quebec adopted the U.S.
standard sometime later.

In these locations, the term "podiatrist" has the same meaning as in the
United States.

In those provinces where chiropodists of one sort or another continue to
practice makes things much more confusing.

Chiropodists in Ontario
While Ontario also accepted the U.S. standard, and there are quite a few
podiatrists practicing in that province, Ontario has also added a new level
of chiropody training into the mix. While it had been a 2-year program,
current licensing requirements for this group in Ontario involves a 3-year
course after high school, leading to a "Diploma of Chiropody". The "Diploma
of Chiropody" or "DCh" designation is accepted in Ontario, but is not
recognized in other locations. Those with a DCh following their name are
known as "chiropodists". They are not called "podiatrists" because that
would confuse them with the "Doctors of Podiatric Medicine" who already
practice in Ontario.

Chiropodists in New Brunswick
Chiropodists also practice in New Brunswick. Because there is no podiatric
(meaning "Doctor of Podiatric Medicine") organization in the province, these
practitioners use the title "podiatrist" even though they have no degree in
the field.

In fact, some chiropodists who practice there may have as little as a 2-year
educational program after high school, yet have begun calling themselves
"D.P.", or Doctor of Podiatry. This despite the fact that they have earned
no doctorate in podiatric medicine. And this despite the fact that there is
no "D.P." degree offered anywhere in the world.

British-trained practitioners in Saskatchewan and Manitoba
While U.S.-trained podiatrists are licensed in Saskatchewan and Manitoba,
too, these provinces are unique in Canada in that they continuing to follow
the British standard as the minimum requirement to practice there.






"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
.net...

"Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message
...

"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
nk.net...
THE 30% AND CHIROPODY (NOW CALLED PODIATRY)


REPLY

Actually they are different. Chiropodists are only clip and
chip while podiatrists are fully-fledged doctors!

Now which group got caught with the wedge
doing who knows what, I do not know.


I am pretty sure Chiropodists and Podiatrists are the same profession in

the
US - I could be wrong though.

The British Society of Chiropodists and Podiatrists, 53 Welbeck Street,
London W1M 7HE
Telephone: 0207 486 3381 - Fax: 0207 935 6359 has this to say:

"Chiropodists and Podiatrists....Nowadays, the recognised schools are all
departments of universities, or colleges of higher education, and issue

BSc
degrees in podiatry,...After graduation you will find there are almost
limitless opportunities for postgraduate study and advancement. Several
polytechnics have been running post-registration BSc degrees in chiropody
for some years..."

"The profession is in the process of changing its title from Chiropody to
Podiatry, to indicate the advances that have been made, and are still

being
made, in the professional scope of practice, and to use the title that is
recognised in most other countries with similar level of education."
http://www.ca.courses-careers.com/chiropody.htm

Todd



See below.

"Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message
...
Who is humorously making light?

I am talking about the chiropodist on America's Most Wanted ....


LOL!

And now I am talking about Margaret the chiropodist in "Bob and

Margaret"
(Comedy) which airs: Sundays 11:30 PM (Comedy Central):

"Premise: The funny, but everyday dealings of Bob, a neurotic dentist,
and
his chiropodist wife, Margaret."
http://tv.zap2it.com/tveditorial/tve_main/1,1002,273|3244|1|,00.html

BTW, I'm pretty sure chiropodists are now called podiatrists.

Dorland's Illustrated Medical Dictionary says:

"Chiropodical...pertaining to chiropody (now called podiatry)."

Incidentally, when I persuaded Dorland's to correct its definition of
chiropractic and include graduates of chiropractic colleges under the
Dorland's definition of doctor, Dorland's took the opportunity to also
include graduates dental and podiatry colleges.

I see your point, Joel - offering some humor does not necessarily make

light
of the mass child abuse being committed by OBs.

Indeed, humorous posts in response to mine could possibly help call
attention to the fact that OBs are routinely closing birth canals up to

30%
and routinely keeping birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when

babies
get stuck - as they pull with hands, forceps or vacuums - sometimes so

hard
that spinal nerves are ripped out of tiny spinal cords.

I suspect Amy's joking about OBs not really robbing babies of up to 50%
of
their blood volume helped call people's attention to the fact that OBs

*are*
really robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume.

Todd

PS For readers who may not be aware (perhaps Joel the dentist is still
not
aware): "Chiro" is a term often used by chiropractors when referring

to
a
chiropractor or to chiropractic. I suppose chiropodists used to use

the
same term; but now they are called podiatrists ("pods"?)...


"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
. net...
FOR CHIROS ONLY: SPEAKING OF STRICTLY SPEAKING...

Yo Toddster,

What do chiropodists have to do with opening birth canals 30%?


"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
k.net...
OB PERPS

Dentist Joel M. Eichen humorously makes light of massive child abuse
by
OBs.


"Joel M. Eichen" wrote in message
...

"Todd Gastaldo" wrote in message
k.net...

?


As fetuses, chiropodists (just like everyone else) are used as
entering
wedges to open birth canals up to 30% - assuming they are born
vaginally
and
their mothers aren't placed semisitting or dorsal.

Todd


REPLY

WoW!

Chiropodists entering wedges ........ I think I saw that
on America's Most Wanted .......... they are after that guy in 23
states
......


Joel,

It's a classic case of blaming the victim as the birth-canal-closing
OB
perps remain at large.

OB perps are also robbing babies of up to 50% of blood volume. See
below.

THE FOUR OB LIES

OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was
clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in
1957,
the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that

pelvic
diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery.

OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO
change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously

claiming
that
their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet.

OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so
does
semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct
biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the

same
paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my
attention
to
their text...

OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies
get
stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth
canal
open
maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum

births
are performed with the mother in lithotomy.)

See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS...
http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2983

I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years

ago...
http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/*part2ftc.html


RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS....

"[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who

engage
in
fraud or deception."

"[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which

are
contrary to the best interests of the patient."

"[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to
patients,
colleagues, and the public..."
http://www.psych.org/psych_pra*ct/et...ions53101*.cfm

AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be
damned.


MASSIVE BABY BLOOD ROBBERY

Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG
indicates that OBs are robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood

volume.

This is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY, according to Dr. Morley:

"ACOG's routine treatment (B138) of these depressed neonates is

immediate
cord clamping to obtain cord blood pH studies. The child's only
functioning
source of oxygen - the placenta - is amputated together with 30% to

50+%
of
its natural blood volume. Total asphyxia is imposed until the lungs
function, and the depressed (asphyxiated, hypovolemic) child starts
its
extra-uterine life in hypovolemic shock... B138 was first published

in
1993.
Every cesarean section baby, every depressed child, every premie,

and
every
child born with a neonatal team in
the delivery room has its cord clamped immediately to facilitate the
panicked rush to the resuscitation table. The current epidemic of
immediate
cord clamping coincides with an epidemic of autism...For the trial
lawyers,
it is essential that the 'true genesis' of cerebral
palsy remains unknown, because that 'true genesis' (B.138) is a

standard
of
medico-legal care..."
http://www.cordclamping.com/ac***og-cp.htm

In cases where the baby MUST be
resuscitated after birth - I am still wondering why pediatricians

have
to
sever the baby's access to blood and oxygen and rush baby across the

room
to
resuscitate. Why can't neonatal resuscitation stations be designed

so
that
mother and baby can be wheeled underneath (or between) with baby's
natural
oxygenation/transfusion device still intact? No one has answered

this
question.


My thanks to Canadian Grandmother Donna Young for calling my

attention
to
the immediate cord clamping mass child abuse.

A GOOD SIGN: Oregon Health & Science University/OHSU - Oregon's

only
medical school - stopped promoting immediate cord clamping and
birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery online
after I complained.

OHSU's link to the misinformation is now dead - or rather - one is
re-routed
to
www.ohsuwomenshealth.com...

See Birth child abuse: Oregon's only medical school (OHSU)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com*/grou...t/message/2986

(If anyone can find a page where OHSU is still promoting immediate
cord
clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisitting delivery, I would like

to
know
about it.)


PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are

closing
birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women
semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the

"extra"
up
to
30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. ANOTHER PROBLEM:

By
immediately clamping cords, OBs are temporarily asphyxiating babies
and
robbing them of up to 50%
of their blood volume - see the astonishing quote from Dr. Morley

above.

THE SOLUTION:

1. To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%,
simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - BUT BEWARE -

some
OBs
will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but
will
roll
them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the

"extra"
up
to
30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB.

2. To allow your baby to have the "extra" up to 50% of blood

volume,
do
not
let the OB or midwife clamp the umbilical cord until it has stopped
pulsating and your baby is pink and breathing and not in need of
resuscitation.

NOTE #1: Allowing the birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30%

will
not
prevent all episiotomies or c-sections or forceps/vacuum use - but

OBs
have
no business closing
birth canals the "extra" up to 30% in the first place.

NOTE #2: There are rare cases where the OB must clamp immediately -
but
they
are indeed rare. OBs are routinely clamping cords immediately -
routinely
robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Talk to your OB
today.

I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical
students MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious child abuse which
sometimes
kills.

Thanks for reading everyone.

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon
USA













 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Birth stuff (also: Dr. Mal is part of God - chiropractically speaking) Todd Gastaldo Pregnancy 0 February 21st 05 06:55 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.