If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Too young for flu shot?
"john" wrote in message m... "HCN" wrote in message news:adxAb.45816$_M.209706@attbi_s54... "C Du" wrote in message m... Why the american ped association did not recommend flu shots to kids? I especially concerned since other sources suggested flu shots for kids under 2 and my son is 10 months old and he's in day care. ... 150 years old. "The flu vaccine gets the most-useless-vaccine-of-all-time award. Now the CDC is recommending the vaccine for children under two years old and all adults over 50. Don't fall for it."---Randall Neustaedter OMD http://www.whale.to/v/quotes3.html Considering that the flu vaccine has saved thousands of lives (almost every year, there is a near-perfect match between the influenza viruses and the vaccine -- this year, this is true for 2 of 3 of the viruses in the vaccines), and does appear to provide at least some protection against the influenza viruses going around, the only thing here that is useless is the whaleto site. Apparently the author is too ashamed to put his name on the site, probably because he clearly has no clue about science, medicines or vaccines. http://www.cdc.gov/nip/ http://www.chop.edu/consumer/jsp/mic...e.jsp?id=75918 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Too young for flu shot?
On Sun, 7 Dec 2003 16:33:26 -0500, "Jeff"
wrote: "PF Riley" wrote in message ... The idea that it might be a Good Thing to immunize all children from 6 months to 2 years of age is based on rather weak evidence that influenza is significantly worse in that age group than in older children. In the meantime, we are running out of flu vaccine that could have been given to much better established high-risk groups, such as the elderly and children with asthma. Can you provide evidence that kids from 6 months to two years are able to fend off illness better than older kids? Or that the influenza doesn't hit them hard? Huh? When have I made either such claim? You are confused. I believe that healthy children age 6 months to 2 years ARE at increased risk of morbidity and mortality from influenza. (And even if I didn't believe this, it certainly wouldn't be my responsibility to disprove the notion, just as it's not my duty to prove that homeopathy doesn't work. Do you follow?) However, I will say it again: The evidence that they are SIGNIFICANTLY worse off (i.e., at a risk level comparable to the elderly) is weak. Initial studies were done on all respiratory illnesses, when everyone knows the vast, vast, vast majority of hospitalizations for respiratory illnesses in young children during fall/winter is due to RSV. The ACIP still decided to "encourage" the shot for the younger age group because of subsequent studies that they claim "attempted to separate the effects of respiratory syncytial viruses and influenza viruses on rates of hospitalization among children who do not have high-risk conditions." The way they did this (two studies were cited) was to look at local surveillance data, calculate influenza-to-RSV ratios, and determine the "excess cases" of hospitalizations ASSUMED to be due to influenza. Like I said, weak evidence. It would be nice to see a prospective study of hospitalized children where real virologic data is obtained, but it will probably never happen, now that the ACIP's is changing from "encouraging" the vaccine to "recommending" it for children aged 6 to 24 months. Is this necessarily a Good Thing? Are we better off if we run out of vaccine for 7-year-old asthmatics and 2-year-old left hypoplasts because we used it all up on healthy 1-year-olds? PF |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Too young for flu shot?
"PF Riley" wrote in message ... .. Like I said, weak evidence. It would be nice to see a prospective study of hospitalized children where real virologic data is obtained, but it will probably never happen, now that the ACIP's is changing from "encouraging" the vaccine to "recommending" it for children aged 6 to 24 months. Is this necessarily a Good Thing? Are we better off if we run out of vaccine for 7-year-old asthmatics and 2-year-old left hypoplasts because we used it all up on healthy 1-year-olds? The other problem is that in the first year at least the immunization requires two shots a month apart. This is guaranteed to cause an extra visit to the office to get the second shot since by the time the shot becomes available it is not possible to wait the normal 3 month interval between visits at this age. Even if you can talk the parents into adding another immunization to the first two years the extra trip will be a hard sell. I'm not sure we should be trying without a pretty sound reason. -- CBI, MD |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Too young for flu shot?
On Mon, 08 Dec 2003 02:47:50 GMT, "CBI" wrote:
"PF Riley" wrote in message ... Like I said, weak evidence. It would be nice to see a prospective study of hospitalized children where real virologic data is obtained, but it will probably never happen, now that the ACIP's is changing from "encouraging" the vaccine to "recommending" it for children aged 6 to 24 months. Is this necessarily a Good Thing? Are we better off if we run out of vaccine for 7-year-old asthmatics and 2-year-old left hypoplasts because we used it all up on healthy 1-year-olds? The other problem is that in the first year at least the immunization requires two shots a month apart. This is guaranteed to cause an extra visit to the office to get the second shot since by the time the shot becomes available it is not possible to wait the normal 3 month interval between visits at this age. Even if you can talk the parents into adding another immunization to the first two years the extra trip will be a hard sell. I'm not sure we should be trying without a pretty sound reason. Indeed, and this causes the healthy infants to consume twice as much vaccine. I understand studies are underway to figure out if immunizing with the current strain every 6 months will help. Then give the flu shot at 6 months and 12 months of age, regardless of the season. No extra visits, no confusion caused by adding a seasonal vaccine to the ordinarily age-based schedule, etc. PF |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Too young for flu shot?
"PF Riley" wrote in message ... I understand studies are underway to figure out if immunizing with the current strain every 6 months will help. Then give the flu shot at 6 months and 12 months of age, regardless of the season. No extra visits, no confusion caused by adding a seasonal vaccine to the ordinarily age-based schedule, etc. That's an interesting idea. Of course, it would mean that the shot would have to be available all yr round (and in the right formulations). -- CBIO, MD |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Review: Young Adam (**) | Steve Rhodes | General | 0 | April 17th 04 10:26 PM |
Did you get your kids a flu shot? | Laura E. Brooks | General (moderated) | 30 | December 12th 03 12:10 AM |
Flu shot? "worst flu season in 30 years" | Jill | Pregnancy | 5 | November 27th 03 01:08 AM |
Child and Adolescent Mental Health - New website for discussion and information resource, for parents, young people and professionals | Mike | Kids Health | 0 | September 12th 03 02:18 AM |
first shot for my 2 months old... | Jen | Pregnancy | 7 | August 9th 03 02:07 AM |