If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Men have ticking of 'biological clock' too
Men have ticking of 'biological clock' too
Researchers at Bristol and Brunel Universities have found that the older a man is, the longer it may take his partner to conceive, irrespective of her age. The study shows that the odds on conceiving in up to six months of trying decrease by 2% for every year that the man is over the age of 24 and the chances of conception within 12 months decrease by 3% for every year. Additionally, women with partners five or more years older than themselves, have less chance of conception in under a year than those whose partners are of a similar age, or younger. The study, published in the journal 'Human Reproduction', says that as men get older, their sperm swim more slowly, reducing the chance of fertilising an egg LOL well DP and I proved that wrong.. took us only one cycle.. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Men have ticking of 'biological clock' too
E wrote:
wrote in message ... Men have ticking of 'biological clock' too Researchers at Bristol and Brunel Universities have found that the older a man is, the longer it may take his partner to conceive, irrespective of her age. The study shows that the odds on conceiving in up to six months of trying decrease by 2% for every year that the man is over the age of 24 and the chances of conception within 12 months decrease by 3% for every year. Additionally, women with partners five or more years older than themselves, have less chance of conception in under a year than those whose partners are of a similar age, or younger. The study, published in the journal 'Human Reproduction', says that as men get older, their sperm swim more slowly, reducing the chance of fertilising an egg LOL well DP and I proved that wrong.. took us only one cycle.. us too - he's 40, I'm 42 - took only one or two cycles - we weren't really "trying" but if anything happened, we were happy. All we seem to have to do is give birth control a dirty look g. Our last child was conceived in one cycle when I was 38 and my husband was 44. We were prepared for it take a bit longer than in the past (#1 was conceived on the second cycle; #2 is a minipill baby) given our ages, but apparently, we're still young in the gamete department. -- Be well, Barbara (Julian [7/22/97], Aurora [7/19/99], and Vernon's [3/2/02] mom) See us at http://photos.yahoo.com/guavaln This week's special at the English Language Butcher Shop: "How a seller can improve their home's value" -- newspaper headline What does it all mean? I have *no* idea. But it's my life and I like it. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Men have ticking of 'biological clock' too
"Circe" wrote in message news:KLFRa.11300$u51.8208@fed1read05... E wrote: wrote in message ... Men have ticking of 'biological clock' too Researchers at Bristol and Brunel Universities have found that the older a man is, the longer it may take his partner to conceive, irrespective of her age. The study shows that the odds on conceiving in up to six months of trying decrease by 2% for every year that the man is over the age of 24 and the chances of conception within 12 months decrease by 3% for every year. Additionally, women with partners five or more years older than themselves, have less chance of conception in under a year than those whose partners are of a similar age, or younger. The study, published in the journal 'Human Reproduction', says that as men get older, their sperm swim more slowly, reducing the chance of fertilising an egg LOL well DP and I proved that wrong.. took us only one cycle.. us too - he's 40, I'm 42 - took only one or two cycles - we weren't really "trying" but if anything happened, we were happy. All we seem to have to do is give birth control a dirty look g. Our last child was conceived in one cycle when I was 38 and my husband was 44. We were prepared for it take a bit longer than in the past (#1 was conceived on the second cycle; #2 is a minipill baby) given our ages, but apparently, we're still young in the gamete department. -- Be well, Barbara (Julian [7/22/97], Aurora [7/19/99], and Vernon's [3/2/02] mom) See us at http://photos.yahoo.com/guavaln This week's special at the English Language Butcher Shop: "How a seller can improve their home's value" -- newspaper headline What does it all mean? I have *no* idea. But it's my life and I like it. yup - it's been so long for me, given my age, I figured it would take a while too. time to go in for an iud I think... by the time it shouldn't work any more/be taken out, hopefully we won't have to worry about bc anymore. Edith nak |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|