If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
California Child Support
Hello again all,
I have a question. "Sam" pays $700 a month in child support to "Betty". Betty pays her second husband "John" $600 a month for another child she had with him. Betty quits work or doesn't pay her support to John. I believe John can get the state (California) to take $600 our of the support Sam pays Betty and have it go to him. Does anyone have any experience in this?? I know this scenario is hard to believe but I know someone that will be in this situation very shortly. Can John collect support (thru the county) from Sam and skip good 'ole Betty? Thanks in advance. Big RJ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
California Child Support
"Big RJ" wrote in message m... Hello again all, I have a question. "Sam" pays $700 a month in child support to "Betty". Betty pays her second husband "John" $600 a month for another child she had with him. Betty quits work or doesn't pay her support to John. I believe John can get the state (California) to take $600 our of the support Sam pays Betty and have it go to him. Does anyone have any experience in this?? I know this scenario is hard to believe but I know someone that will be in this situation very shortly. Can John collect support (thru the county) from Sam and skip good 'ole Betty? No. Sam is not responsible for Betty and John's child. Thanks in advance. Big RJ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
California Child Support
"Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... "Big RJ" wrote in message m... Hello again all, I have a question. "Sam" pays $700 a month in child support to "Betty". Betty pays her second husband "John" $600 a month for another child she had with him. Betty quits work or doesn't pay her support to John. I believe John can get the state (California) to take $600 our of the support Sam pays Betty and have it go to him. Does anyone have any experience in this?? I know this scenario is hard to believe but I know someone that will be in this situation very shortly. Can John collect support (thru the county) from Sam and skip good 'ole Betty? No. Sam is not responsible for Betty and John's child. Thanks in advance. Big RJ I know that, but the income from Sam to Betty is income for Betty. I think they can take that and give it to John. I even believe the state gets double to bonus for "collecting" child support twice. Big |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
California Child Support
"Big RJ" wrote in message . com... "Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... "Big RJ" wrote in message m... Hello again all, I have a question. "Sam" pays $700 a month in child support to "Betty". Betty pays her second husband "John" $600 a month for another child she had with him. Betty quits work or doesn't pay her support to John. I believe John can get the state (California) to take $600 our of the support Sam pays Betty and have it go to him. Does anyone have any experience in this?? I know this scenario is hard to believe but I know someone that will be in this situation very shortly. Can John collect support (thru the county) from Sam and skip good 'ole Betty? No. Sam is not responsible for Betty and John's child. Thanks in advance. Big RJ I know that, but the income from Sam to Betty is income for Betty. I think they can take that and give it to John. I even believe the state gets double to bonus for "collecting" child support twice. No. The state will not collect from Sam to pay Betty's child support. There's no court order mandating that Sam pay Betty's child support. There's no judge that *would* order Sam to pay Betty's child support (as far as I'm aware). Ain't gonna happen. Big |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
California Child Support
I don't think that the state would get Sam to pay directly to John,
however, I have seen in many posts where the income shares model is used that child support received by a CP is used as income to her. Therefore, technically, because she has that 700USD in support, she would have to turn 600USD of it to John. Leaving her child with 100USD...Not sure what states this can be done in, but I have read it a few times... Moon Shyne wrote: "Big RJ" wrote in message . com... "Moon Shyne" wrote in message ... "Big RJ" wrote in message m... Hello again all, I have a question. "Sam" pays $700 a month in child support to "Betty". Betty pays her second husband "John" $600 a month for another child she had with him. Betty quits work or doesn't pay her support to John. I believe John can get the state (California) to take $600 our of the support Sam pays Betty and have it go to him. Does anyone have any experience in this?? I know this scenario is hard to believe but I know someone that will be in this situation very shortly. Can John collect support (thru the county) from Sam and skip good 'ole Betty? No. Sam is not responsible for Betty and John's child. Thanks in advance. Big RJ I know that, but the income from Sam to Betty is income for Betty. I think they can take that and give it to John. I even believe the state gets double to bonus for "collecting" child support twice. No. The state will not collect from Sam to pay Betty's child support. There's no court order mandating that Sam pay Betty's child support. There's no judge that *would* order Sam to pay Betty's child support (as far as I'm aware). Ain't gonna happen. Big |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
California Child Support
Big RJ wrote: Hello again all, I have a question. "Sam" pays $700 a month in child support to "Betty". Betty pays her second husband "John" $600 a month for another child she had with him. Betty quits work or doesn't pay her support to John. I believe John can get the state (California) to take $600 our of the support Sam pays Betty and have it go to him. Does anyone have any experience in this?? I know this scenario is hard to believe but I know someone that will be in this situation very shortly. Can John collect support (thru the county) from Sam and skip good 'ole Betty? Thanks in advance. Big RJ without knowing for *sure*, I'm going to say no, too. Since CS income is not used either *for* or *against* you when applying for loans, credit, or as collections against a bad debt, I doubt this will apply in this case, too. another thought- if she is not working- this may increase her need for the CS she is collecting? as usual, just my 2¢ LL |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NJ: Ruling on indigent parents reversed | Dusty | Child Support | 1 | March 13th 06 11:32 PM |
CA: AB 2440 will allow CSE to target anyone who associates with parents owing child support | Dusty | Child Support | 2 | March 2nd 06 08:52 AM |
| | Kids should work... | Kane | Spanking | 12 | December 10th 03 03:30 AM |
Kids should work. | ChrisScaife | Spanking | 16 | December 7th 03 05:27 AM |
Kids should work. | ChrisScaife | Foster Parents | 16 | December 7th 03 05:27 AM |