If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Sheriff Swanson! 'Greentown's miracle baby' is slipping...
"Tori M." wrote in message ... Although I don't think that early cord cutting caused my daughter immediate harm, I'm 100% certain it caused her anemia during her first year. Why? Because all we had to do to fix the anemia was supplement iron for 1 month. She was never anemic again. So obviously something happened that kept her from getting a full, normal supply of iron. Maybe the fact that the cord was clamped against my will within seconds of her birth? Jenrose Dont you think this would be more common then? The cord was clamped almost right after Bonnie was born and she has never been anemic.. Most (I wont say all because I can not confirm that) of the other babies I know of have not been anemic.. I would think if there was an epidemic of anemic children running arround then they would look back to the common cord clamping and stop. It depends partly on the position of the baby and whether there is a contraction in process when the clamp is applied. My daughter was higher than my uterus and I pushed her out at the end of a contraction. There is no *other* good explanation for her anemia that I've heard, especially when it was so easily corrected at 1 year with supplementation which we never had to repeat past 1 month. Obviously her diet was sufficent to maintain her iron levels, but not build them (and the bulk of her nutrition was still coming from breastmilk at 1 year.) Jenrose |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Sheriff Swanson! 'Greentown's miracle baby' is slipping...
"Jenrose" wrote in message . ..
We had planned to have a delayed cord cutting, but my midwives recommended against it since I am RH- and my husband is RH+ (and our daughter is also +). All the more reason to leave the cord alone! They didn't do an early cord cutting - it was cut more than 5 minutes after her birth, though I don't have an exact time. But my understanding is that delayed cutting can cause problems in our case because it increases the likelihood of our blood mixing, and allowing my antibodies into her bloodstream. I know that jaundice is also more common in + babies of negative mothers as well. I'm not all that familiar with this stuff though. I do know that I had a fabulous home birth, and my daughter was handled in the gentlest way - I really have no complaints. And she was healthy and never had any anemia (and she had blood test at 18 months to check it). Cathy Weeks Mommy to Kivi Alexis 12/01 |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Sheriff Swanson! 'Greentown's miracle baby' is slipping...
"Cathy Weeks" wrote in message om... We had planned to have a delayed cord cutting, but my midwives recommended against it since I am RH- and my husband is RH+ (and our daughter is also +). However, they did not cut and clamp until my daughter was breathing on her own and pinked up. And, she still wound up with jaundice (though not a serious case of it, and a few hours in a sunny window took care of it). With my third baby we chose to delay cord cutting, and I'm RH-, hubby's RH+ (all three kids positive, too). Of the three, he was the only one who didn't get jaundiced. My first was born in the hospital, and the cord was cut pretty quick, and she was the most jaundiced. The second was born at home. The cord wasn't cut immediately like it was in the hospital, but I don't think we waited for the cord to stop pulsing. She was mildly jaundiced, and it cleared up pretty quickly. Just my lil' anecdote... -- Joy Rose 1-30-99 Iris 2-28-01 Spencer 3-12-03 |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Sheriff Swanson! 'Greentown's miracle baby' is slipping...
"Cathy Weeks" wrote in message om... "Jenrose" wrote in message . .. We had planned to have a delayed cord cutting, but my midwives recommended against it since I am RH- and my husband is RH+ (and our daughter is also +). All the more reason to leave the cord alone! They didn't do an early cord cutting - it was cut more than 5 minutes after her birth, though I don't have an exact time. But my understanding is that delayed cutting can cause problems in our case because it increases the likelihood of our blood mixing, Nonsense. Clamping the cord at all stops the placenta from pumping the blood *away* from your body...where's it going to go? Clamp it, and you've got a bunch of baby blood unable to flow away from the placenta. Any messing with the placenta (tugging, pulling at the cord, vigorous massage before it's delivered) is more likely to cause problems than just leaving it alone. I believe Michel Odent talks about cord clamping in his book Birth Reborn--his observation was that only the baby's side should ever be clamped, that the maternal side should be allowed to drain freely if the cord was being cut promptly, because clamping the maternal side made the placenta take longer to deliver. To reduce risks of blood mixing, I believe the ideal is to leave it all alone and let the placenta deliver with minimal interference. Jenrose |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
misc.kids FAQ on the Pregnancy AFP Screen and the Triple Screen | [email protected] | Pregnancy | 0 | June 28th 04 07:41 PM |
misc.kids FAQ on Prenatal Testing - Overview and Personal Stories | [email protected] | Pregnancy | 1 | April 17th 04 12:52 PM |
Baby Shower update (long) | Shena Delian O'Brien | Pregnancy | 10 | March 9th 04 05:10 AM |