Most Misandrists are Cruel to Boy Children

1. http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/maggiewu/family.html

"Although Allen will always won for fighting with toys, if one is
crying, it will be Allen. With our strict rule, Allen dare not to hurt
his little sister, but Jenny may play rough sometimes. I remember one
time, I heard Allen was screaming. When I looked at them, I saw Jenny
was seizing Allen's hair in her hand tightly, while Allen tried to
pulled his head. It hurt him more."

--Huanmei Wu

Typical misandrist family. I feel so sorry for Allen. Allen is 3.
Jenny is 1. The average girl under 14 is no weaker, nicer, or quieter
the the average boy under 14 at or near the same age. The strength of
a 3-year-old is only slightly more than a 1-year-old. In fact, science
has already proven that little girls are stronger, more aggressive,
and more energetic than little boys.

This is so gender bias. If they were both members of the same gender
than neither one would be treated better or worse than the other. If
you were to switch their ages, you would still find the girl being
treated better than the boy -- especially by the father.


If the above isn't cold-hearted enough. Check out:

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/...828476733.html

What kind of misandrists scumbags are they. Charging a 4-year-old with
a crime only adults and teenagers are capable of. I blame both the
police and the girl's mother. The girl's mother is a sick pervert and
so are other people who condemn the innocent little boy. Why the
%!$#%! did she defame the helpless little boy as a rapist?! Why did
the people support her? Any adult or teenager who openly condemns a
little boy for rape is committing as vile an act as an adult or
teenager who rapes a child.

Is this world ever going to change? I notice in most societies,
females are treated better than males. Historically also females were
treated better than males in almost every culture on this planet and
still are.



I do realize that adult women on average:

1. Are physically weaker than adult men

2. Less violent (esp. with children) than adult men

3. Can get pregnant whereas men can't

4. Are more emotional than adult men

I therefore understand why adult women need more protection than adult
men. I also understand why children (including boys!) need more
protection against adult men than against adult women. However,
applying the same qualities to pre-adolescent children is just
sickening.

Most people think that the "girls can hit boys but boys can't hit
girls" rule will make boys respect girls. Okay, maybe in the short run
and out of fear. However, let my strike you all with the fact treating
boys unfairly can and usually does cause boys to develop hatred for
girls. Since little boys are too scared to express this hatred, they
try to hold it in. The major drawback is, the boy will eventually vent
his repressed rage out, most likely during his teen and/or adult
years, on girls. He knows the consequences of his actions, however,
his anger toward - and jealousy of - girls, overrides his fear of the
resulting ramifications. As a result male-to-female violence hasn't
decreased much despite stiff social condemnation of it. The younger
the boy is when he is abused - via gender discrimination against males
- the younger his potential female victim(s) will be. Due to strict
social condemnation, male-to-female violence often occur in private.
That still has not decreased its occurance.

If you really want to stop male-to-female violence you gotta treat
boys equally as girls. Boys need to be [and know that they are]
socially accepted as equals with girls. This will give them a respect
for females from their hearts. "Heart-based" respect is much more
effective than the "fear-based" respect. If only society would
recognize such facts, then most probably, male-to-female violence
would decrease by approx 90%.

It is important to realize than gender discrimination against males is
perperated by females as well as *other* males.

Gender discrimination against males usually takes place by the abuse
of boy children and otherwise weaker males. Girls are socially allowed
to play with "boy toys". Boys are not socially allowed to play with
"girl toys". If they do, they face a dramatically increased risk of
violence from society. Once again, this is gender discimination
against boys and totally unfair. Remember this gender discrimination
can give boys hatred toward girls.

Sexual abuse of boys is not perperatrated by homosexuals. All men who
molest boys are 100% heterosexual and homophobic. NAMBLA's pedophiles
are as much attracted to girls as they are to boys. Due to gender
discrimination against males, they molest boys. Yes, they are
heterosexual pedos and that is why they molest boys under 12. Show
NAMBLA's followers an unclean picture of a teenage boy or adult man
and I guarantee, they will puke in homophobia. NAMBLA and other
boy-molesters are heterosexual (attracted to femininity and females)
and homophobic (disturbed by masculinity especially from other males).
NAMBLA men are themselves masculine, however, their ever-present
feminization of boys indicated they are heterosexual. This is a lot
like prison rape.

Misandrists are more likely to abuse boys (be it physically, sexually,
neglect, verbal, emotional, etc.) than any other group. Misandrists
often look for boys who are fighting with girls. They then accuse
those defenseless boys of sexual violence, brutalize those boys and
side with those ever-exploitative girls.


Real gay men:

1. Are masculine
2. Are attracted to other masculine ADULT men
3. Find pedophilia uninteresting and sickening (after all they are
attracted to masculinity - bet you anything the common boy under 12 is
no more masculine than the common girl under 12 - so why would a gay
man even look at that boy?)


Effeminate men are not gay. Effeminate men are obviously hetero and
are attracted to women. In fact, they have a stronger desire to be
with women than ordinary or masculine men.