A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » misc.kids » Kids Health
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Rationalization and vaccination



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old May 16th 06, 11:25 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,sci.med,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rationalization and vaccination


"Jeff" wrote in message
k.net...

"Jan Drew" wrote in message
. com...

"Jeff" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Carole" wrote in message
...

"john" wrote in message
...
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/rationalization_h.html

one to explain Bowditch


Good topic.
There are so many people who deny they are mind controlled and insist
everything they know is from things they have worked out themselves.
Yet
they cannot think for themselves and have to keep referring back to
experts
and reliable sources.

Yes, that sounds like John. The only problem is that he does not refer
to reliable sources or reliable experts.

Jeff


Oh?

I checked some of them out...

Did you, Jeff?

I thought not.

BTW, where can we find yours?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Miller

http://www.carlaemery.com/

http://www.whale.to/c/cantwell_alan.html

http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/continuum/article3.htm

http://www.vernoncoleman.com/

http://www.whale.to/vaccine/ruesch.html


If these are the sources to which John refers, you made my point.

Thanks.

Jeff


You just made mine, you didn't have time to read a single one.

Remain in your close minded brain washed world, Jeff.


  #12  
Old May 17th 06, 03:15 AM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,sci.med,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rationalization and vaccination

In article , john wrote:

"Carole" wrote in message
...



* * *
FACT: 87% of people don't use their rational critical thinking apparatus
but
instead rely on peer pressure, experts and reliable sources.


Yes, original thinking is rare, most peoples beliefs are given to them, and
most think they thought of them themselves


And john believes everything he reads as long as it has "alternative"
stuck to it. Such originality.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"If you can't say something nice, then sit next to me."
-- Alice Roosevelt Longworth

  #13  
Old May 17th 06, 03:12 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,sci.med,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rationalization and vaccination

Jeff wrote:
Yes, that sounds like John. The only problem is that he does not refer to
reliable sources or reliable experts.

Jeff


So, then, you're saying that the CDC is not a reliable source? Google
whale.to for the phrase "cdc.gov" and you'll find 110 references to
that site.

Is the FDA not reliable? Google says whale.to references fda.gov 36
times.

Maybe pubmed isn't good enough for you? 85 references to nih.gov.

How about the British Medical Journal? 322 references to BMJ.

The Journal of the American Medical Association is probably a bunch of
quacks, huh? 254 references to JAMA.

Puh-leeze.

Max.

  #14  
Old May 17th 06, 10:31 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,sci.med,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rationalization and vaccination


"Max C." wrote in message
ups.com...
Jeff wrote:
Yes, that sounds like John. The only problem is that he does not refer to
reliable sources or reliable experts.

Jeff


So, then, you're saying that the CDC is not a reliable source? Google
whale.to for the phrase "cdc.gov" and you'll find 110 references to
that site.

Is the FDA not reliable? Google says whale.to references fda.gov 36
times.

Maybe pubmed isn't good enough for you? 85 references to nih.gov.

How about the British Medical Journal? 322 references to BMJ.

The Journal of the American Medical Association is probably a bunch of
quacks, huh? 254 references to JAMA.

Puh-leeze.

Max.


No, I am saying that the whale is not, as a whole, a reliable source. The
author has no clue about medicine or science. She fails to put her name on
the site. The vast majority of sources on the whale are unreliable.

Jeff


  #15  
Old May 17th 06, 10:47 PM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,sci.med,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rationalization and vaccination

Jeff wrote:

No, I am saying that the whale is not, as a whole, a reliable source. The
author has no clue about medicine or science. She fails to put her name on
the site. The vast majority of sources on the whale are unreliable.

Jeff


Well, I came up with 807 references to reliable sources found on
whale.to in under 3 minutes, as shown above. So, I would think that if
the "vast majority" of references on the site are unreliable, you need
to get busy showing a number of unreliable sources that is vastly
greater than 807.

You have a lot of work to do.

Max.

  #16  
Old May 18th 06, 08:31 AM posted to misc.health.alternative,misc.kids.health,sci.med,uk.people.health
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Rationalization and vaccination


"Jeff" wrote in message
.net...


No, I am saying that the whale is not, as a whole, a reliable source. The
author has no clue about medicine or science. She fails to put her name on
the site. The vast majority of sources on the whale are unreliable.

Jeff


LOL. Have you given me a sex change Jeff? Do you know lots of women called
John?

and since you don't use your surname it is rather hypocrytical don't you
think?

http://www.whale.to/m/putz.html



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.