If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Rationalization and vaccination
"Jeff" wrote in message k.net... "Jan Drew" wrote in message . com... "Jeff" wrote in message nk.net... "Carole" wrote in message ... "john" wrote in message ... http://www.whale.to/vaccine/rationalization_h.html one to explain Bowditch Good topic. There are so many people who deny they are mind controlled and insist everything they know is from things they have worked out themselves. Yet they cannot think for themselves and have to keep referring back to experts and reliable sources. Yes, that sounds like John. The only problem is that he does not refer to reliable sources or reliable experts. Jeff Oh? I checked some of them out... Did you, Jeff? I thought not. BTW, where can we find yours? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Miller http://www.carlaemery.com/ http://www.whale.to/c/cantwell_alan.html http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/continuum/article3.htm http://www.vernoncoleman.com/ http://www.whale.to/vaccine/ruesch.html If these are the sources to which John refers, you made my point. Thanks. Jeff You just made mine, you didn't have time to read a single one. Remain in your close minded brain washed world, Jeff. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Rationalization and vaccination
In article , john wrote:
"Carole" wrote in message ... * * * FACT: 87% of people don't use their rational critical thinking apparatus but instead rely on peer pressure, experts and reliable sources. Yes, original thinking is rare, most peoples beliefs are given to them, and most think they thought of them themselves And john believes everything he reads as long as it has "alternative" stuck to it. Such originality. -- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct. "If you can't say something nice, then sit next to me." -- Alice Roosevelt Longworth |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Rationalization and vaccination
Jeff wrote:
Yes, that sounds like John. The only problem is that he does not refer to reliable sources or reliable experts. Jeff So, then, you're saying that the CDC is not a reliable source? Google whale.to for the phrase "cdc.gov" and you'll find 110 references to that site. Is the FDA not reliable? Google says whale.to references fda.gov 36 times. Maybe pubmed isn't good enough for you? 85 references to nih.gov. How about the British Medical Journal? 322 references to BMJ. The Journal of the American Medical Association is probably a bunch of quacks, huh? 254 references to JAMA. Puh-leeze. Max. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Rationalization and vaccination
"Max C." wrote in message ups.com... Jeff wrote: Yes, that sounds like John. The only problem is that he does not refer to reliable sources or reliable experts. Jeff So, then, you're saying that the CDC is not a reliable source? Google whale.to for the phrase "cdc.gov" and you'll find 110 references to that site. Is the FDA not reliable? Google says whale.to references fda.gov 36 times. Maybe pubmed isn't good enough for you? 85 references to nih.gov. How about the British Medical Journal? 322 references to BMJ. The Journal of the American Medical Association is probably a bunch of quacks, huh? 254 references to JAMA. Puh-leeze. Max. No, I am saying that the whale is not, as a whole, a reliable source. The author has no clue about medicine or science. She fails to put her name on the site. The vast majority of sources on the whale are unreliable. Jeff |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Rationalization and vaccination
Jeff wrote:
No, I am saying that the whale is not, as a whole, a reliable source. The author has no clue about medicine or science. She fails to put her name on the site. The vast majority of sources on the whale are unreliable. Jeff Well, I came up with 807 references to reliable sources found on whale.to in under 3 minutes, as shown above. So, I would think that if the "vast majority" of references on the site are unreliable, you need to get busy showing a number of unreliable sources that is vastly greater than 807. You have a lot of work to do. Max. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Rationalization and vaccination
"Jeff" wrote in message .net... No, I am saying that the whale is not, as a whole, a reliable source. The author has no clue about medicine or science. She fails to put her name on the site. The vast majority of sources on the whale are unreliable. Jeff LOL. Have you given me a sex change Jeff? Do you know lots of women called John? and since you don't use your surname it is rather hypocrytical don't you think? http://www.whale.to/m/putz.html |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|