Rationalization and vaccination

http://www.whale.to/vaccine/rationalization_h.html

one to explain Bowditch

"john" wrote in message
...
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/rationalization_h.html

one to explain Bowditch


Good topic.
There are so many people who deny they are mind controlled and insist
everything they know is from things they have worked out themselves. Yet
they cannot think for themselves and have to keep referring back to experts
and reliable sources.

http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/brotherhoodpart1.shtml
THE BROTHERHOOD
Part 1: Introduction ,
The Main Manipulating Groups
Introduction
From the moment our senses first register the presence of our parents we are
being shown the way that life apparently is. Through no fault of ours or
theirs, our parents begin the programming process as their views of life,
shaped by their education, employment and the media are imposed on us.
Formal education through schools, colleges and universities continues the
systematic indoctrination where the 'correct' views and interpretations of
science, history and society result in exam passes and the ability to 'get
on' in life. Alternative views and the rejection of establishment education
lead to supposedly lesser jobs and a struggle against economic poverty. Our
entire understanding of the world and current affairs is filtered through
the mass media, interpreted by journalists and so-called experts.

* * *
FACT: 87% of people don't use their rational critical thinking apparatus but
instead rely on peer pressure, experts and reliable sources.

Carole
http://www.conspiracee.com

In article ,
Carole wrote:

FACT: 87% of people don't use their rational critical thinking apparatus but
instead rely on peer pressure, experts and reliable sources.

Gee, 87%? Not 86% or 88%? What a load of crap. The actual number is
probably even higher, but this sort of fictious "precision" is a great
red flag that the whole article is garbage.

-- David Wright :: alphabeta at prodigy.net
These are my opinions only, but they're almost always correct.
"If you can't say something nice, then sit next to me."
-- Alice Roosevelt Longworth

"Carole" wrote in message
...



* * *
FACT: 87% of people don't use their rational critical thinking apparatus
but
instead rely on peer pressure, experts and reliable sources.


Yes, original thinking is rare, most peoples beliefs are given to them, and
most think they thought of them themselves

people like Offit who talks vaccine bull**** like 10,000 vaccines are OK for
children, is probably a victim of MK Ultra, as he seems to believe it

"David Wright" wrote in message
om...
In article ,
Carole wrote:

FACT: 87% of people don't use their rational critical thinking apparatus
but
instead rely on peer pressure, experts and reliable sources.

Gee, 87%? Not 86% or 88%? What a load of crap. The actual number is
probably even higher, but this sort of fictious "precision" is a great
red flag that the whole article is garbage.


Don't make me laugh. Why shouldn't a figure come up precisely if it is based
on facts?
If I average a set of figures, I can get it down to a decimal point.

Conspirators' Hierarchy: The story of the Committee of 300
By Dr John Coleman - a former Intelligence agent of British M16

Opinion-makers have played no-small-part in this war on the United States;
we need to examine the role of the Committee of 300 in bringing-about these
far-reaching changes and how the social-engineers have used
central-systems-analyses to keep public-opinion from expressing anything
other than the policies of the invisible government. How and where did it
all begin?

From documents covering the First World War that I was able to gather and
examine in the War Office in Whitehall, London, it appears that the Royal
Institute for International Affairs was commissioned by the Committee of 300
to do a study of manipulating war-information. This task was given to Lord
Northcliffe and Lord Rothmere and Arnold Toynbee, who was MI6's agent at the
RIIA. Lord Rothmere's family owned a newspaper which was used to support
various government positions, so it was thought that the paper could change
public-perceptions, especially among the ranks of growing opposition to the
war.

The project was housed in Wellington House, named after the Duke of
Wellesly. American specialists drafted to help Lords Rothmere and
Northcliffe included Edward Bernays and Walter Lippmann. The group held
"brain storming" sessions to work-out techniques for mobilizing mass-support
for the war, especially among the working-class people whose sons were
expected to go to the slaughter-fields of Flanders in record-numbers.

Using Lord Rothmere's newspaper, new manipulative techniques were tried-out
and, after a period of about 6 months, it was apparent that they were a
success. What the researchers discovered was that only a very small group of
people understood the process of reasoning and the ability to observe the
problem as opposed to passing an opinion on it. This, said Lord Rothmere,
was the way in which 87% of the British public approached the war, and that
the same principle applied not only to the war, but to every conceivable
problem in society in general.

In this manner, irrationality was elevated to a high level of
public-consciousness. The manipulators then played-upon this to undermine
and distract the public's grasp of reality governing any given situation
and, the more complex the problems of a modern industrial society became,
the easier it became to bring greater and greater distractions to bear, so
that what we ended-up-with was that the absolutely-inconsequential-opinions
of masses of people, created by skilled-manipulators, assumed the position
of scientific-fact.

Having literally stumbled upon so profound a conclusion, the manipulators
put it to one test after another during the war, so that in spite of
hundreds of thousands of the youth of Britain being slaughtered on the
battlefields of France, there was virtually no opposition to the bloody war.
Records of the time show that by 1917, just before the United States entered
the war, 94% of the British working-class bearing the brunt of the war did
not have the faintest idea what they were fighting for, other than the image
created by the media-manipulators that the Germans were a horrible race,
bent upon destroying their monarch and their country, and who had to be
wiped off the face of the earth.

Certainly nothing has changed because, in 1991, we had the exact same
situation created by the news-media which allowed President Bush to
flagrantly violate the Constitution in waging a war-of-genocide against the
nation of Iraq with the full consent of 87% of the American people.

On instructions from President Wilson, or rather Colonel House, the Creel
Commission was created and, as far as can be ascertained, the Creel
Commission was the first organization in the United States to use the RIIA
techniques and methodology for polling and mass-propaganda. The
psychological-warfare experiments perfected at Wellington House were used in
the Second World War with equal success, and have been in continuous use in
the massive psychological-war against the United States which began in 1946.
The methods did not change, only the target. Now it was not German
worker-housing but the middle class of the United States that became the
focus of the attack.

As so often happens, the conspirators could not contain their glee. After WW
I, in 1922 to be precise, Lippmann detailed the work done by the RIIA in a
book he called "PUBLIC OPINION":

"Public opinion deals with indirect, unseen and puzzling facts, and there is
nothing obvious about them. The situations to which public opinion refers
are known only as opinions, pictures inside heads of human+beings, pictures
of themselves, of others, of their needs, purposes and relationships, are
their public-opinions. These pictures which are acted-upon by groups of
people, or by individuals acting in the name of groups are PUBLIC OPINION
with capital letters. The picture inside the head often misleads men in
their dealings with the world outside of their heads."

Carole
http://www.conspiracee.com

"David Wright" wrote in message
om...
In article ,
Carole wrote:

FACT: 87% of people don't use their rational critical thinking apparatus
but
instead rely on peer pressure, experts and reliable sources.

Gee, 87%? Not 86% or 88%? What a load of crap. The actual number is
probably even higher, but this sort of fictious "precision" is a great
red flag that the whole article is garbage.



83.7% of statistics in internet discussions are made up on the spot. ;o)
Rich

"Carole" wrote in message
...

"john" wrote in message
...
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/rationalization_h.html

one to explain Bowditch


Good topic.
There are so many people who deny they are mind controlled and insist
everything they know is from things they have worked out themselves. Yet
they cannot think for themselves and have to keep referring back to
experts
and reliable sources.

Yes, that sounds like John. The only problem is that he does not refer to
reliable sources or reliable experts.

Jeff

"Jeff" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Carole" wrote in message
...

"john" wrote in message
...
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/rationalization_h.html

one to explain Bowditch


Good topic.
There are so many people who deny they are mind controlled and insist
everything they know is from things they have worked out themselves. Yet
they cannot think for themselves and have to keep referring back to
experts
and reliable sources.

Yes, that sounds like John. The only problem is that he does not refer to
reliable sources or reliable experts.

Jeff

http://www.whale.to/vaccine/rationalization_h.html

"Jeff" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Carole" wrote in message
...

"john" wrote in message
...
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/rationalization_h.html

one to explain Bowditch


Good topic.
There are so many people who deny they are mind controlled and insist
everything they know is from things they have worked out themselves. Yet
they cannot think for themselves and have to keep referring back to
experts
and reliable sources.

Yes, that sounds like John. The only problem is that he does not refer to
reliable sources or reliable experts.

Jeff

Oh?

I checked some of them out...

Did you, Jeff?

I thought not.

BTW, where can we find yours?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Miller

http://www.carlaemery.com/

http://www.whale.to/c/cantwell_alan.html

http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/continuum/article3.htm

http://www.vernoncoleman.com/

http://www.whale.to/vaccine/ruesch.html

"Jan Drew" wrote in message
. com...

"Jeff" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Carole" wrote in message
...

"john" wrote in message
...
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/rationalization_h.html

one to explain Bowditch


Good topic.
There are so many people who deny they are mind controlled and insist
everything they know is from things they have worked out themselves. Yet
they cannot think for themselves and have to keep referring back to
experts
and reliable sources.

Yes, that sounds like John. The only problem is that he does not refer to
reliable sources or reliable experts.

Jeff

Oh?

I checked some of them out...

Did you, Jeff?

I thought not.

BTW, where can we find yours?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Miller

http://www.carlaemery.com/

http://www.whale.to/c/cantwell_alan.html

http://www.virusmyth.net/aids/continuum/article3.htm

http://www.vernoncoleman.com/

http://www.whale.to/vaccine/ruesch.html

If these are the sources to which John refers, you made my point.

Thanks.

Jeff