If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The F Crime is a DENTAL crime: Dr. Bassin's silence
ATTENTION: Scott Marshall, Staff Writer, North County Times, (San Diego
County, California) via . ATTENTION: Oregon Atty Gen'l Hardy Myers via THE F CRIME...CDC and state attorney generals are dragging their feet... CDC's Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry/ATSDR "work[s] with states...to prevent exposure to hazardous substances from waste sites.‹ (http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/DRO/r1.html); and "Fluoridation" is the injection of the hazardous substances hydrofluorosilicic acid, arsenic and lead - derived from waste sites (phosphate fertilizer pollution scrubbers) - into America's water supply. (Some municipalities are using "pure" poison - sodium fluoride.) THE KICKER: The fluoride poison works TOPICALLY (if at all) - it doesn't even need to be in the water ? i.e. - people who want the poison for their teeth can brush with fluoridated/poisoned toothpaste. (Fluoridated toothpaste is indeed poisoned. There is a fluoride poison warning on every label. To read the warning, go to www.aquasafe.us.) THE F CRIME IS A **DENTAL** CRIME: DR. BASSIN'S SILENCE To my knowledge, Paul Connett, PhD has not yet remarked upon DR. BASSIN'S SILENCE at Harvard dental school... Paul EXCLAIMS though about other dental silence in his FAN Bulletin #365 for Oct. 4, 2005: "[T]he first dental school...to add a toxicology department...sacked the chairman (Dr. Phyllis Mullenix)...[S]he found that fluoride interfered with the mental development of rats...[and]...was told her work was no longer relevant to dentistry!" Why the Connett silence about DR. BASSIN'S SILENCE? It's interesting that Dr. Connett's son Michael was the fellow responsible for the Wall Street Journal recently publicizing the FOUR-YEAR-OLD Bassin fluoride/bone cancer thesis... See below. A DENTIST ACCESSORY TO THE F CRIME... Dr. Connett writes of a David Nelson, DDS who "pretended to be...a federal employee at the CDC...when he was confronted..." Dr. Connett quotes a news article wherein it was reported that David Nelson, DDS had this exchange with a member of the Milpitas City Council: "You didn't tell me what the impact of fluorosis is on the health of the person," Esteves said. "Absolutely none," Nelson said. "It's a cosmetic defect, period. It doesn't make the tooth any softer, it doesn't unfortunately make it any harder, but it is a cosmetic effect and does not indicate a systemic effect to the patient or the person." Dr. Connett remarks: Says who, Dr. Nelson? Dr. Connett asks his readers: Could you imagine Nelson being cross-examined under oath? [Dr. Connett's imagined cross-examination] "Dr. Nelson, what is the mechanism whereby fluoride causes dental fluorosis? .... Now that is a systemic effect is it not?"...Yes..."Then what makes you certain that fluoride will not have systemic effects in other tissues in the body - like the developing brains or bones of young children? Are you aware of the work of Alarcon-Herrera et al. (2001) from Mexico (these authors showed that as the severity of dental fluoroisis increased so did their frequency of bone fractures)? Are you aware of the work of Xiang (2003, 2005) from China (this work showed a lowering of IQ in children which correlates with fluoride levels in the water and in their plasma)? Dr. Connett remarks: By this time, I think Nelson would be spluttering and those examining him would realize what they should have known all along, namely that dentists have no right to speak authoritatively on any other tissue but teeth. Most dental schools give no training in general medicine; biochemistry, toxicology or epidemiology, so why do we allow them to dictate to us on one of the most reckless health policies ever devised? Indeed, the first dental school (the Forsyth Dental Institute) to add a toxicology department to its disciplines sacked the chairman (Dr. Phyllis Mullenix) when she found that fluoride interfered with the mental development of rats. She was told her work was no longer relevant to dentistry! Dr. Connett concludes: Nelson does what every good foot soldier does who supports fluoridation, he cites the CDC's infamous (and most embarrassing if any one should take the time to read the CDC (1999) report on which it is based - see http://www.fluorideAction.net/CDC.htm) quote that water fluoridation is "among the 10 most important public health accomplishments in the last 100 years" but he cannot even report the CDC correctly. The article states: "Nelson cited U.S. Centers for Disease Control reports that estimate up to 24 percent of American children exhibit conditions of fluorosis." However, the recent CDC (2005) report indicates the figure is 30%, and has risen over 9 % since the late 1980s. END Dr. Connett's Oct. 4, 2005 FAN Bulletin #365: No honors for Nelson! THE POWA PETITION... I join Dr. Connett in encouraging everyone to sign the Protect Our Water Alliance petition... http://www.powalliance.org/petition/index.html I think it WONDERFUL that eleven EPA unions representing 7,000 EPA scientists and lawyers and other EPA professionals are asking that Congress immediately stop fluoridation. I also think it wonderful that people can join EPA in asking Congress to immediately stop fluoridation. Like Dr. Connett, I encourage people to sign the POWA petition... http://www.powalliance.org/petition/index.html BUT... STRANGELY... Regarding the POWA Petition, the EPA petitioning Congress and the sudden revelation of the existence of the Harvard bone cancer/fluoride cover-up... They all came AFTER my insistence that fluoridation without consent is a CRIME. AN INTERESTING COINCIDENCE... It is an interesting coincidence that the son of Paul Connett, PhD played a key role: Indeed, Dr. Connett credits his son Michael Connett for the recent Wall Street Journal coverage of the apparent four year cover-up of Dr. Elise Bassin's *Harvard PhD thesis: "Had not a member of the Fluoride Action Network (my son in fact) gone to the rare books section of the Harvard Library, and copied the relevant chapter of Bassin's thesis, the public-at-large would never have heard of this work (see WSJ, B1, July 22, 2005)." FORGET Harvard's alleged cover-up guy Chester Douglass - why did DR. ELISE BASSIN remain silent for four years? Did Elise not understand the import of her own thesis?! After all, once her thesis was discovered (by Michael Connett), it suddenly stimulated eleven EPA unions (Hirzy et al.) to write to Congress that: "...millions of young boys continue to be exposed unwittingly to the elevated risk of a fatal bone cancer." http://nteu280.org/Issues/Fluoride/f...epa.a.2005.htm What WAS Elise Bassin thinking for four years?! Was she threatened that she would be ruined if she said anything? *(Did anyone else see Paul Newman in The Verdict? *A nurse was forced to change a chart when a patient died. *She quit nursing ? but came back as Newman's star witness in the case.) OR... What if Harvard FRAUDULENTLY issued Elise Bassin her PhD KNOWING that her *PhD thesis was fatally flawed? *This too would tend to keep one silent about one's thesis... PAUL CONNETT PhD wrote in his Fluoride Action Network/FAN CAMPAIGN Bulletin #261: "[W]e have to use ALL our skills to convince people that even one child should not be sacrificed..." (emphasis added) Paul Connett, PhD ASKS (repeatedly) in his famous "50 REASONS" essay if it is right to medicate without consent.... Yet Paul Connett, PhD can't manage to say a peep about how the common law doctrine of informed consent indicates that it is a CRIME to medicate without consent?! Why are the newspapers silent about this bizarre behavior of the ostensible leader of the movement to stop the mass poisoning? Paul Connett, PhD (and one of his allies) recently quoted a bizarre appellate decision in a bizarre case in Escondido California that proposed that PURE poison be used to medicate without consent... I recently wrote an OPEN LETTER to a newspaper reporter about that appellate decision. I never received a reply - yet the poisoning continues - so I reproduce my OPEN LETTER here - and again email the reporter, Scott Marshall... OPEN LETTER (archived for global access; search at http://groups.google.com) Scott Marshall Staff Writer North County Times (San Diego County, California) Scott, Fluoridation is the injection of hazardous substances/poisons (hydrofluorosilicic acid, arsenic and lead) into public drinking water. If you haven't already, I hope you'll consider publicizing Jeff Green's critique of Judge Judy Haller's Escondido appellate decision. (You can email Jeff at .) Jeff suggests that the Escondido appellate decision is a "whack job on the issues" and writes: "...the Court...leap[t] to the conclusion that Constitutional protections do not apply to substances added to water because there is a legislative scheme to assure you are not harmed...then, AS MATTER OF LAW...the court concluded] that hydrofluosilicic acid is safe because the elaborate [legislative] scheme to prevent harm says so." There are HUGE HOLES in the "legislative scheme to prevent harm." Same goes for the various judicial schemes. See the Florida Supreme Court's obvious faucet fraud in the recent QUILES decision, URL below. Thanks for reading. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon USA Copied to Jeff Green via PS Scott, in addition to publicizing Jeff Green's critique, please also publicize the Protect Our Water Alliance/POWA petition. Thousands of people nationwide are asking Congress to immediately stop fluoridation...with California residents in the lead. http://www.powalliance.org/petition/index.html Please consider signing the POWA petition yourself. *You can sign anonymously. USENETTERS: *Please consider including the following comment if/when you sign: ATTENTION CONGRESS: CDC's Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry/ATSDR "work[s] with states...to prevent exposure to hazardous substances from waste sites.‹ (http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/DRO/r1.html); and "Fluoridation" is the injection of the hazardous substances hydrofluorosilicic acid, arsenic and lead - derived from waste sites (phosphate fertilizer pollution scrubbers) - into America's water supply. (Some municipalities are using "pure" poison - sodium fluoride.) THE KICKER: The fluoride poison works TOPICALLY (if at all) - it doesn't even need to be in the water ? i.e. - people who want the poison for their teeth can brush with fluoridated/poisoned toothpaste. (Fluoridated toothpaste is indeed poisoned. There is a fluoride poison warning on every label. To read the warning, go to www.aquasafe.us.) A FEW LAST COMMENTS FOR SCOTT MARSHALL... The California Supreme Court indicated in its 1993 THOR decision not only that administration of medicine without consent is a battery; but also that administration of GOOD medicine without consent is also a battery: "The common law has long recognized this principle: A physician who performs any medical procedure without the patient's consent commits a battery irrespective of the skill or care used." [Thor at 5659] I mention THOR because you mentioned "mass medicating the entire community" in your August 18, 2005 article: "[Attorney Norm Blumenthal] argued, however, that the city is 'mass medicating the entire community' with a substance that has not been approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration and that the hydrofluorosilic acid contains lead and arsenic at levels that will cause cancer." http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2005...ries/21_26_258.... txt Attorney Blumenthal should have mentioned that even if the FDA found that the poisons arsenic and lead (in another poison, hydrofluorosilicic acid) was GOOD medicine - it would still be mass battery for the City of Escondido to be "mass medicating" with these poisons. Interestingly, the Florida Supreme Court in effect got around the battery issue in the QUILES decision by rubberstamping the notion that Florida cities are fluoridating FAUCETS - not bloodstreams. See Florida fluoride is for faucets - not people! http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2667 JUDGE JUDY (HALLER'S) BLOW JOB The Florida QUILES decision - with its obvious faucet fraud - was probably one of the decisions that Judge Judy was referring to when she wrote (as you quoted her) that courts across the country have "uniformly upheld the constitutionality of adding fluoride to the public water supply." Judge Judy's comment reminds of that movie where Woody Allen played a sperm. (I think the movie was titled "Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sex.") Woody worked out constantly to be the fittest sperm. *When it came time for the ejaculation, he RAN down the penile urethra... When he got to the end and saw that there was a mouth, he ran back, shouting to all the other sperm cells: "Go back! *It's a blow job!" Judge Judy's Escondido decision is a blow job. Neither judges nor other municipal therapists have any right to mass medicate without consent - it's obvious mass battery - the fact that three poisons are being called medications is immaterial (see THOR above). Again the KICKER: The fluoride poison works TOPICALLY (if at all) - it doesn't even need to be in the water ? i.e. - people who want the poison for their teeth can brush with fluoridated/poisoned toothpaste. (Fluoridated toothpaste is indeed poisoned. There is a fluoride poison warning on every label. To read the warning, go to www.aquasafe.us.) END Gastaldo's Open Letter to Reporter Scott Marshall I say again... PAUL CONNETT PhD wrote in his Fluoride Action Network/FAN CAMPAIGN Bulletin #261: "[W]e have to use ALL our skills to convince people that even one child should not be sacrificed..." (emphasis added) Paul Connett, PhD ASKS (repeatedly) in his famous "50 REASONS" essay if it is right to medicate without consent.... Yet Paul Connett, PhD can't manage to say a peep about how the common law doctrine of informed consent indicates that it is a CRIME to medicate without consent?! Newspaper reporters are also silent. Thanks for reading, everyone. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon USA Copied to: Oregon Atty General Hardy Myers via . Atty Gen'l Hardy, on another matter... I want to thank you if you are responsible for getting Dr. Morley's temporary baby asphyxiation child abuse experiment off the web. "[T]he umbilical cord [is] immediately closed between finger and thumb...The [fetal heart rate/FHR] will decelerate quickly to about 60 bpm...the color will change from purple-pink (normal at birth) to pallid blue (vaso-constriction and asphyxia.)...Few midwives or obstetricians will be able to observe, without interference, a deep, prolonged FHR deceleration on a non-breathing newborn for a period of 60 seconds.* Common sense will soon release the finger and thumb." http://www.cordclamping.com/acog-cp.htm --LINK DOESN'T WORK - perhaps because I asked Atty Gen'l Hardy to take it off the web - or better - get it labelled as child abuse. For further details - and an incredible story of a baby who was born and breathed only with his umbilical cord for 9 minutes... See Water birth and breathing without lungs... http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3936 ATTY GEN'L HARDY MYERS: What - if anything - are you doing to stop the PERMANENT umbilical cord oxygen asphyxiation and massive baby blood robbery that characterizes American medicine's most frequent surgical behavior - umbilical cord clamping? READERS: Be advised: Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG indicates that the asphyxiation/massive baby blood robbery is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY - and to most babies subjected to "cord blood banking." The asphyxiation/baby blood robbery is EASILY prevented. PREGNANT WOMEN:* It is SIMPLE to make sure your baby gets the "extra" up to 50% of blood volume.* Talk to your obstetrician or midwife today.* Tell them you do not want your baby's umbilical cord clamped until it has stopped pulsating and your baby is pink and breathing and not in need of resuscitation. What a BIZARRE culture we live in! The citizens "legally" have their water poisoned and babies "legally" are asphyxiated and robbed of massive amounts of blood - by trusted cultural authorities! Steve B. Harris, MD arrogantly notes the key to the ongoing massive crimes... "Without enforcement, there is no law. Without law, there is no crime. *These are elementary principles. Get an adult to explain them to you." http://groups.google.com/group/ misc.kids.pregnancy/msg/28866f3384801ae9 Dr. Paul Connett is helping law enforcement look the other way as America's water supply is poisoned. I am glad that Dr. Paul Connett's son Michael dug out the FOUR YEAR-OLD Bassin thesis (see above) - but I think the timing - and Dr. Connett's silence about DR. BASSIN'S SILENCE for four years - are highly suspect. Nonetheless, I join Dr. Connett in encouraging everyone to sign the Protect Our Water Alliance petition... http://www.powalliance.org/petition/index.html This post will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "The F Crime is a DENTAL crime: Dr. Bassin's silence" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A dentist's child abuse crime (also: Pregnant citizens: URGENT) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 1 | September 7th 05 11:00 PM |
Fluoride chemotherapy crime: Are municipal chemotherapists immunefrom prosecution? | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | September 3rd 05 12:16 AM |
Poor kids' dentists: 'Dental Therapists' | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 2 | August 3rd 05 11:13 PM |
The Disneyland DA and The Fluoride Deception: Did UCLA coerce dental student silence? | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | June 26th 04 03:54 PM |
Kids should work... | Doan | Spanking | 33 | December 10th 03 08:05 PM |