If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
So what??!!!
"0tterbot" wrote in
: you've just got a big steaming issue with public schools just because you do. it's irrational, frankly. just because i don't send Boo to public school locally doesn't mean i don't take an interest in how they spend my tax dollars currently, the school board is considering removing recess, as it's non-academic & wastes time the teachers could use to prepare the little robots for the NCLB testing ... while at the same time decrying the poor attention span of the students... ok, so my town has the 4th lowest paid teachers in the state & i'm sure they do the best they can under the circumstances (and i'll note that pretty much every USAian here that says they have good schools lives in or very near an urban center), but you CANNOT properly educate a child by teaching ONLY literacy & math. you can't just teach to the test and drop art, music, physical education, science(!), geography, social studies/history... so, yes, there may be good school systems in areas where the parents have enough money to support all those extra programs, but meanwhile the gap between good schools & poor schools, and by extention rich children and poor children, gets wider & wider. *that* is my main objection to the way public schools are run. it's not just one's own kids one needs to learn. it's EVERY kid. the feeling i get is that so long as one's own school district is adequate, it really doesn't matter what happens elsewhere. now, perhaps there are good public schools out there... good heavens!!!!! Hollis had a good system, but i was only there the last 4 months of my senior year... & i may be biased because they had to get me a private tutor for German & kludge out something for me in art because i was in year 4 & they only offered 2 years (i basicly ended up assisting the teacher). they had to fiddle with the English Lit. i think it was replaced by Humanities because that was the best they had, & i ended up in a Trig class, rather than AlegbraII (which was an improvement). oh, and the entire graduating class was 72, compared to 745 in my old school... so no biology classes with 75 students in that school (how the hell they think they can teach biology (a hands-on science) to an auditorium of bored kids is beyond me. that, unfortunately, was one of the classes where i knew more than the teacher...) i wish them the very best towards surviving Bush's edukashun plans. did you know bush has 100% nothing to do with my or my children's public education, nor anyone else's in this country? and regardless of his efforts in his own country, it's still just brainless to keep chanting "public school sucks" when clearly innumerable u.s. kids graduate from public school perfectly well educated for the most part (it would appear). you cannot use bush to back your own bias. i have to live here. of course i'm biased. this country already imports a lot of top scientists & doctors. wonder why? i don't. it's a simple fact that illiterate or near-illiterate ex-private school kids exist in droves. yeah, i worked for a college that was mainly foreign students who couldn't get into any other college on merit, but this one took anyone that would pay tuition. sad, really. lee -- Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear. - Thomas Jefferson |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
So what??!!!
"0tterbot" wrote in
: "Nickki1414 via FamilyKB.com" u29182@uwe wrote in message news:696c060bf2120@uwe... Look i go to a great school. And i am one of the smartest kids at my school and `when it comes to history you had better bet that i can find any country on a map. I know of countries that most people don't. Like Wales or Uzbekastan!!!! wales? kylie (for that matter, uzbekistan? but wales? please show me a person who has never, ever heard of wales.) have you ever been to the US? i can assure you there are many people here that have never heard of Wales... OTOH, how much difference is there between Welsh Gaelic & Irish or Scottish Gaelic? lee -- Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear. - Thomas Jefferson |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
So what??!!!
Nickki1414 via FamilyKB.com wrote:
deja.blues wrote: Am I the only one who looks at "Nikki's" posts, and thinks - "Why are you all feeding the troll?" [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] not trying to disturb this site. Fine I will learn to act mature on this site. Happy?? I have some advice for you. Get away from familykb.com, none of the people you are interacting with on this thread are on that site. Get a newsreader (Outlook Express is fine) and learn how to subscribe to newsgroups, or go to www.groups.google.com and look up misc.kids or another group that interests you , there are a million of them. whether you're interested in cats, cooking, fashion, or German art cinema. Look I would do that, but I don't along with anyone around my age. Thanks though. I was told that I am welcome here as long as I mature. So, that's what I am doing. By the way the only good reason I can up with is that I don't have a life. You would almost certainly get along with *someone* of your age, just not must of the ones that you know. For instance, you said you are learning Welsh (or interested in learning Welsh). Maybe you could find a pen-pal who is in Wales, who can help you learn. The amazing thing about the internet is that no matter how obscure your interest is, there is probably a web-site about it: or if there isn't and you start one, other people will find it. Did you know that the Lord of the Rings was a development from Tolkein's interest in language? -- Penny Gaines UK mum to three |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
So what??!!!
Chookie wrote in
: Perhaps I shouldn't tell you this, but they were telling those stories about American school students back when I was in high school (well, what you'd probably think of as middle school) back in the early 1980s -- except then, they couldn't find Washington DC. it's unfortunately true though. i was doing hiring in the 80s & it was quite eye-opening how little many applicants knew. this was long before i had a kid & i wasn't considering having any at the time, so was less likely to rant about poor education i really wouldn't *be* bashing public education if they actually put the education back in I'm surprised, though, that the budget cuts have been able to go as far as mk discussion indicates. Our public education is provided by State governments here, but although we have a Basic Skills Test that is run in Year 3 and Year 5, we haven't had anything like the 'curriculum crunch' that your schools have had. I suspect it is because the amount of time spent in each curriculum area is largely set by state regulation. Also, the state government regulates private schools, to ensure their curriculum is to standard, so you lan similar things wherever you are. the states set standards here, but a good chunk of the state education budget comes from the Federal government, which, unfortunately, means that the states have to go along with Federal standards. this might be a good thing for those few states who might have lower standards than the Federal, but for states that had higher standards & now have to back off on those to fufill the new Federal maths & literacy standards, it's doing a huge disservice to the kids. if i had control of education, i'd put more funding into additional teachers & smaller class sizes, especially in K through 6. it's unfair to both teacher *and* student to have classes larger than 15-18 kids (in my ideal school i'd also make these multi-grade classes with more than one teacher...). more teachers/smaller classes would mean that kids with different learning styles could be grouped with more like kids, which makes it easier on the teacher too. i'd make sure teachers were paid well enough that taking additional continuing education wouldn't be a hardship for them (NCLB says that teachers need to get Master's degrees, but doesn't pay for that education. an average teacher in my state makes slightly less than US $40,000/year. unless one is willing to go into debt to keep a low-paying job...) the state does dictate, to some degree, what private schools must teach here also. Boo's school exceeds the state standards. i have to say, i don't understand why people seem to think that layering even more bureaucracy on public education is going to improve things. all it does is funnel money off to administration that would be far better actually spent on educating. since Boo *is* in a private school, i can see even more clearly how money is wasted in the public schools here. of course, it's not just the bureaucracy, it's also the lack of real public involvement... i pay taxes to support the town school. i exercise my right to go annoy the school board at thier meetings lee -- Question with boldness even the existence of god; because if there be one, he must more approve the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear. - Thomas Jefferson |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
So what??!!!
0tterbot wrote:
Look i go to a great school. And i am one of the smartest kids at my school and `when it comes to history you had better bet that i can find any country on a map. I know of countries that most people don't. Like Wales or Uzbekastan!!!! wales? kylie (for that matter, uzbekistan? but wales? please show me a person who has never, ever heard of wales.) Kids at my school -- Message posted via FamilyKB.com http://www.familykb.com/Uwe/Forums.a...nting/200611/1 |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
So what??!!!
Chookie wrote: In article , enigma wrote: oh, i would, but public schools have gotten worse here since i was in school. the whole budget cutting & teaching to the test, which *only* covers literacy & maths, has left little to no time for teachers to teach anything *except* reading & maths. it's shocking that schools have dropped geography, social studies, sciences, arts, music... it's horrifying that less than 20% of high school students can find Mexico on a map! Perhaps I shouldn't tell you this, but they were telling those stories about American school students back when I was in high school (well, what you'd probably think of as middle school) back in the early 1980s -- except then, they couldn't find Washington DC. i really wouldn't *be* bashing public education if they actually put the education back in I'm surprised, though, that the budget cuts have been able to go as far as mk discussion indicates. Our public education is provided by State governments here, but although we have a Basic Skills Test that is run in Year 3 and Year 5, we haven't had anything like the 'curriculum crunch' that your schools have had. I suspect it is because the amount of time spent in each curriculum area is largely set by state regulation. Also, the state government regulates private schools, to ensure their curriculum is to standard, so you lan similar things wherever you are. I know nothing about education in Lee's state, so I can't comment; but it's definitely not true that *all* public schools have dropped social studies, history, the sciences, art, and music. In my state, the required annual curriculum testing includes social studies/geography/history and science - of course the schools haven't dropped them. I don't really know whether arts and music instruction have suffered in recent years. When I was in school, art was nonexistent and music was minimal - it's certainly no worse than that. The 2 public schools my daughter has attended offered both. (This is one of the poorest states in the U.S., by the way). I don't have any particular devotion to public schools or private schools - my daughter has attended both and is now in a public school, and my almost-5-year-old will be in private school at least through kindergarten. Which is better depends on local circumstances, what the parents want, and what suits the child best. Clisby |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
So what??!!!
enigma wrote:
Look i go to a great school. And i am one of the smartest kids at my school [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] (for that matter, uzbekistan? but wales? please show me a person who has never, ever heard of wales.) have you ever been to the US? i can assure you there are many people here that have never heard of Wales... OTOH, how much difference is there between Welsh Gaelic & Irish or Scottish Gaelic? lee no clue thought that they were different lang. -- Message posted via http://www.familykb.com |
#118
|
|||
|
|||
So what??!!!
Tori M wrote:
We did long division in fith grade.. isnt that normal? A little bit in fourth but the main stuff I remember was in fith. My (public schooled) kids were doing long division by third grade because (gasp!) our schools meet the kids at their level and challenge them with material appropriate to their needs. Best wishes, Ericka |
#119
|
|||
|
|||
So what??!!!
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 10:05:38 -0500, Ericka Kammerer wrote:
Tori M wrote: We did long division in fith grade.. isnt that normal? A little bit in fourth but the main stuff I remember was in fith. My (public schooled) kids were doing long division by third grade because (gasp!) our schools meet the kids at their level and challenge them with material appropriate to their needs. Precisely as the should be doing, IMNSHO. Our district, on the other hand, bought whole-heartedly into "constructivist math." The proponents usually state that it allows children to explore math concepts and come up with their own, intuitive understanding of how math works. My interpretation is that they expect children to independently derive math concepts from first principals, in eight years - concepts that took everyone else 2000+ years of rigorous study to derive. And all this without being taught the most basic math facts and functions. A local parents group has a website, http://www.teachusmath.com , that goes into more detail about the issues with the program. It's not as up-to-date as it could be, but you'll get the general idea of the issues. - Rich -- Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum immane mittam. |
#120
|
|||
|
|||
So what??!!!
Clisby wrote:
I know nothing about education in Lee's state, so I can't comment; but it's definitely not true that *all* public schools have dropped social studies, history, the sciences, art, and music. In my state, the required annual curriculum testing includes social studies/geography/history and science - of course the schools haven't dropped them. I don't really know whether arts and music instruction have suffered in recent years. When I was in school, art was nonexistent and music was minimal - it's certainly no worse than that. The 2 public schools my daughter has attended offered both. (This is one of the poorest states in the U.S., by the way). Obviously, there is tremendous variation from state to state and district to district because of the way we run and fund public schools. It is true that overall, there are issues with de-emphasizing whatever courses aren't being tested and dropping non-core academics like art, music, and recess. The proportion of public elementary schools with no scheduled recess runs from 7 percent (for first grade) to 13 percent (for sixth grade). Ninety-nine percent of public schools have P.E. The average number of minutes of combined recess and P.E. time per week in public schools runs from 208 minutes (sixth grade) to 222 minutes (first grade). As of 2000, music instruction was available in 94 percent of public elementary schools (72 percent of elementary schools had full time music teachers on staff). As of 2000, visual arts instruction was available at 87 percent of public elementary schools (55 percent of elementary schools had full time art teachers on staff at that school). During the '98-'99 school year, 77 percent of regular public elementary schools sponsored field trips to arts performances, 65 percent to museums or art galleries, 38 percent sponsored visiting artists, 22 percent sponsored artists-in-residence, and 51 percent sponsored after school arts activities. Now, this isn't nearly as good as I'd like to see, and these programs are definitely threatened (so I wouldn't want to encourage complacency), but clearly Lee's public schools are down near the bottom of the pack for US public schools. We should all be concerned that such problems exist (and that the means of funding public education encourages this sort of disparity), but it doesn't mean that all public schools are in the same boat, and it *certainly* doesn't mean that all students with a public education are illiterate and innumerate. Best wishes, Ericka |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|