If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
2ND Tasering reported 12yo girl hooky player
http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/loc...childtasered,0
,1981442.story?coll=sfla-home-headlines "The first incident had already exposed the department to more criticism for its use of Tasers, which it has begun distributing in greater numbers to officers. "The police could have handled this better,'' said the 6-year-old boy's mother, Kathy Rojas. "They did not have to shoot him.'' Parker said that, in light of the disclosure of the second incident, the department will review its policy. " Email story Oy Vey! But let Momma try that? Straight to DCF and its helpful ministrations. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Fern-
Notice how quickly the "cohort" turned on each other in this one (I love it). I even see lav and kane advocating what they used to call assault. lav even shares a personal assault case she perp'd during her career. I wonder if there had been a parent or court advocate to press charges how she would have defended herself (as they claim the non-existent reasonable force statutes--hummm...food for thought---such hypocrits). Non-spanker by choice, Chris C. TX "I too have worked extensively with children, but rather than the majority of my experience being with teens it has been in young children, especially children under the age of seven. Of course an out of control 6 year old needs to be subdued, but with the number of adults present in this situation, this could have been accomplished without electric shock. I experienced stitches from a severely disturbed four year old before I could reach him and hold him. I had no other adults to help me and seven other children were present. While stitches in my scalp weren't particularly pleasant, this injury was not life threatening to me, and I was able to subdue the child without hitting/hurting him or exposing him to a potentially lethal electric shock."-lav (Fern5827) wrote in message ... http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/loc...childtasered,0 ,1981442.story?coll=sfla-home-headlines "The first incident had already exposed the department to more criticism for its use of Tasers, which it has begun distributing in greater numbers to officers. "The police could have handled this better,'' said the 6-year-old boy's mother, Kathy Rojas. "They did not have to shoot him.'' Parker said that, in light of the disclosure of the second incident, the department will review its policy. " Email story Oy Vey! But let Momma try that? Straight to DCF and its helpful ministrations. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Chris C. (non spanker by choice) replied:
Notice how quickly the "cohort" turned on each other in this one (I love it). I even see lav and kane advocating what they used to call assault. lav even shares a personal assault case she perp'd during her career. I wonder if there had been a parent or court advocate to press charges how she would have defended herself (as they claim the non-existent reasonable force statutes--hummm...food for thought---such hypocrits). Non-spanker by choice, Chris C. TX "I too have worked extensively with children, but rather than the majority of my experience being with teens it has been in young children, especially children under the age of seven. Of course an out of control 6 year old needs to be subdued, but with the number of adults present in this situation, this could have been accomplished without electric shock. I experienced stitches from a severely disturbed four year old before I could reach him and hold him. I had no other adults to help me and seven other children were present. While stitches in my scalp weren't particularly pleasant, this injury was not life threatening to me, and I was able to subdue the child without hitting/hurting him or exposing him to a potentially lethal electric shock."-lav (Fern5827) wrote in message ... http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/loc...childtasered,0 ,1981442.story?coll=sfla-home-headlines "The first incident had already exposed the department to more criticism for its use of Tasers, which it has begun distributing in greater numbers to officers. "The police could have handled this better,'' said the 6-year-old boy's mother, Kathy Rojas. "They did not have to shoot him.'' Parker said that, in light of the disclosure of the second incident, the department will review its policy. " Email story Oy Vey! But let Momma try that? Straight to DCF and its helpful ministrations. Reply: This case, of course, has national implications. Someone also reported that tasers are not supposed to be utilized where the subject is less than 60 lbs. Supposedly the little boy weighed 53 lbs. Now, while I know the LEO cannot weigh the child, I also know they undego training to enable them to disarm folks without using weapons. By that reasoning, Lavonne should have tasered the 4 yo who attacked her. Wonder why he attacked her? No child ever attacked me in my professional career. Chris C. wrote: BTW, where is the Chris Dugan? ON hiatus, found a full-time job, or just thoroughly discredited? Subject: 2ND Tasering reported 12yo girl hooky player From: (Chris C.) Date: 11/16/2004 11:40 AM Eastern Standard Time Message-id: Fern- Notice how quickly the "cohort" turned on each other in this one (I love it). I even see lav and kane advocating what they used to call assault. lav even shares a personal assault case she perp'd during her career. I wonder if there had been a parent or court advocate to press charges how she would have defended herself (as they claim the non-existent reasonable force statutes--hummm...food for thought---such hypocrits). Non-spanker by choice, Chris C. TX "I too have worked extensively with children, but rather than the majority of my experience being with teens it has been in young children, especially children under the age of seven. Of course an out of control 6 year old needs to be subdued, but with the number of adults present in this situation, this could have been accomplished without electric shock. I experienced stitches from a severely disturbed four year old before I could reach him and hold him. I had no other adults to help me and seven other children were present. While stitches in my scalp weren't particularly pleasant, this injury was not life threatening to me, and I was able to subdue the child without hitting/hurting him or exposing him to a potentially lethal electric shock."-lav (Fern5827) wrote in message ... http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/loc...childtasered,0 ,1981442.story?coll=sfla-home-headlines "The first incident had already exposed the department to more criticism for its use of Tasers, which it has begun distributing in greater numbers to officers. "The police could have handled this better,'' said the 6-year-old boy's mother, Kathy Rojas. "They did not have to shoot him.'' Parker said that, in light of the disclosure of the second incident, the department will review its policy. " Email story Oy Vey! But let Momma try that? Straight to DCF and its helpful ministrations. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Chris C.
You are the one who has for years been claiming there is a cohort on alt.parenting.spanking. Kane, I, and others have attempted to refute this, telling you that this is not a cohort. While we may share a common goal to protect children from physical assault in the form of spanking, we have many different ideas about how this shoud happen, and we often disagree with each other. Kane's and my dialogue should put to rest any cohort claims. I would not expect to see that claim from you again, considering your advanced degrees and understanding of intelligent debate. LaVonne Chris C. wrote: Fern- Notice how quickly the "cohort" turned on each other in this one (I love it). I even see lav and kane advocating what they used to call assault. lav even shares a personal assault case she perp'd during her career. I wonder if there had been a parent or court advocate to press charges how she would have defended herself (as they claim the non-existent reasonable force statutes--hummm...food for thought---such hypocrits). Non-spanker by choice, Chris C. TX "I too have worked extensively with children, but rather than the majority of my experience being with teens it has been in young children, especially children under the age of seven. Of course an out of control 6 year old needs to be subdued, but with the number of adults present in this situation, this could have been accomplished without electric shock. I experienced stitches from a severely disturbed four year old before I could reach him and hold him. I had no other adults to help me and seven other children were present. While stitches in my scalp weren't particularly pleasant, this injury was not life threatening to me, and I was able to subdue the child without hitting/hurting him or exposing him to a potentially lethal electric shock."-lav (Fern5827) wrote in message ... http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/loc...childtasered,0 ,1981442.story?coll=sfla-home-headlines "The first incident had already exposed the department to more criticism for its use of Tasers, which it has begun distributing in greater numbers to officers. "The police could have handled this better,'' said the 6-year-old boy's mother, Kathy Rojas. "They did not have to shoot him.'' Parker said that, in light of the disclosure of the second incident, the department will review its policy. " Email story Oy Vey! But let Momma try that? Straight to DCF and its helpful ministrations. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
From what I have been able to look up Ms. Carlson you are the only one
providing misinformation on this group. I would never take a class from such a dishonest and manipulative teacher. You have nothing to offer but your hypocrisy and your propaganda. I believe the term cohort fits you and Mr. Kane well. I'm sure the collective here agrees (and in your world that's all that matters). Stop attacking those you can't even refute.-Jim Carlson LaVonne wrote in message ... Chris C. You are the one who has for years been claiming there is a cohort on alt.parenting.spanking. Kane, I, and others have attempted to refute this, telling you that this is not a cohort. While we may share a common goal to protect children from physical assault in the form of spanking, we have many different ideas about how this shoud happen, and we often disagree with each other. Kane's and my dialogue should put to rest any cohort claims. I would not expect to see that claim from you again, considering your advanced degrees and understanding of intelligent debate. LaVonne Chris C. wrote: Fern- Notice how quickly the "cohort" turned on each other in this one (I love it). I even see lav and kane advocating what they used to call assault. lav even shares a personal assault case she perp'd during her career. I wonder if there had been a parent or court advocate to press charges how she would have defended herself (as they claim the non-existent reasonable force statutes--hummm...food for thought---such hypocrits). Non-spanker by choice, Chris C. TX "I too have worked extensively with children, but rather than the majority of my experience being with teens it has been in young children, especially children under the age of seven. Of course an out of control 6 year old needs to be subdued, but with the number of adults present in this situation, this could have been accomplished without electric shock. I experienced stitches from a severely disturbed four year old before I could reach him and hold him. I had no other adults to help me and seven other children were present. While stitches in my scalp weren't particularly pleasant, this injury was not life threatening to me, and I was able to subdue the child without hitting/hurting him or exposing him to a potentially lethal electric shock."-lav (Fern5827) wrote in message ... http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/loc...childtasered,0 ,1981442.story?coll=sfla-home-headlines "The first incident had already exposed the department to more criticism for its use of Tasers, which it has begun distributing in greater numbers to officers. "The police could have handled this better,'' said the 6-year-old boy's mother, Kathy Rojas. "They did not have to shoot him.'' Parker said that, in light of the disclosure of the second incident, the department will review its policy. " Email story Oy Vey! But let Momma try that? Straight to DCF and its helpful ministrations. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
By "that clique" I assume you mean those of us who oppose spanking and
other forms of corporal punishment as a discipline technique. I don't know of anyone who has turned people into CPS for not agreeing, including those of us who view corporal punishment and spanking as assault and believe all forms of corporal punishment should be legally banned. It would be very difficult to turn someone "into CPS" based on what is said on a non-moderated ng. This ng was formed around 1994 and was mean to be a ng designated for the purpose of discussing the pro's and con's of spanking, and alternative discipline strategies. I have been a regular poster on the ng shortly after it was formed. Recruiting other people to post here is a good idea, providing they stay on topic and hopefully refrain from name calling and personal insults. I doubt that this would convince those of us who have been around for years and who are fairly regular posters to leave. I know I would welcome honest debate with new individuals. LaVonne jcalhoun wrote: Fern & Chris C., I find it nice to see people that can express themselves without fear or intimidation. Does that clique like to turn people into CPS for not agreeing with them on this group? Let me know. I have several other groups I can recruit people to post in here. --Maybe they will leave if the group floods them out.-Jim (Fern5827) wrote in message ... Chris C. (non spanker by choice) replied: Notice how quickly the "cohort" turned on each other in this one (I love it). I even see lav and kane advocating what they used to call assault. lav even shares a personal assault case she perp'd during her career. I wonder if there had been a parent or court advocate to press charges how she would have defended herself (as they claim the non-existent reasonable force statutes--hummm...food for thought---such hypocrits). Non-spanker by choice, Chris C. TX "I too have worked extensively with children, but rather than the majority of my experience being with teens it has been in young children, especially children under the age of seven. Of course an out of control 6 year old needs to be subdued, but with the number of adults present in this situation, this could have been accomplished without electric shock. I experienced stitches from a severely disturbed four year old before I could reach him and hold him. I had no other adults to help me and seven other children were present. While stitches in my scalp weren't particularly pleasant, this injury was not life threatening to me, and I was able to subdue the child without hitting/hurting him or exposing him to a potentially lethal electric shock."-lav (Fern5827) wrote in message ... http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/loc...childtasered,0 ,1981442.story?coll=sfla-home-headlines "The first incident had already exposed the department to more criticism for its use of Tasers, which it has begun distributing in greater numbers to officers. "The police could have handled this better,'' said the 6-year-old boy's mother, Kathy Rojas. "They did not have to shoot him.'' Parker said that, in light of the disclosure of the second incident, the department will review its policy. " Email story Oy Vey! But let Momma try that? Straight to DCF and its helpful ministrations. Reply: This case, of course, has national implications. Someone also reported that tasers are not supposed to be utilized where the subject is less than 60 lbs. Supposedly the little boy weighed 53 lbs. Now, while I know the LEO cannot weigh the child, I also know they undego training to enable them to disarm folks without using weapons. By that reasoning, Lavonne should have tasered the 4 yo who attacked her. Wonder why he attacked her? No child ever attacked me in my professional career. Chris C. wrote: BTW, where is the Chris Dugan? ON hiatus, found a full-time job, or just thoroughly discredited? Subject: 2ND Tasering reported 12yo girl hooky player From: (Chris C.) Date: 11/16/2004 11:40 AM Eastern Standard Time Message-id: Fern- Notice how quickly the "cohort" turned on each other in this one (I love it). I even see lav and kane advocating what they used to call assault. lav even shares a personal assault case she perp'd during her career. I wonder if there had been a parent or court advocate to press charges how she would have defended herself (as they claim the non-existent reasonable force statutes--hummm...food for thought---such hypocrits). Non-spanker by choice, Chris C. TX "I too have worked extensively with children, but rather than the majority of my experience being with teens it has been in young children, especially children under the age of seven. Of course an out of control 6 year old needs to be subdued, but with the number of adults present in this situation, this could have been accomplished without electric shock. I experienced stitches from a severely disturbed four year old before I could reach him and hold him. I had no other adults to help me and seven other children were present. While stitches in my scalp weren't particularly pleasant, this injury was not life threatening to me, and I was able to subdue the child without hitting/hurting him or exposing him to a potentially lethal electric shock."-lav (Fern5827) wrote in message ... http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/loc...childtasered,0 ,1981442.story?coll=sfla-home-headlines "The first incident had already exposed the department to more criticism for its use of Tasers, which it has begun distributing in greater numbers to officers. "The police could have handled this better,'' said the 6-year-old boy's mother, Kathy Rojas. "They did not have to shoot him.'' Parker said that, in light of the disclosure of the second incident, the department will review its policy. " Email story Oy Vey! But let Momma try that? Straight to DCF and its helpful ministrations. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
And what exactly have you been able to look up? And exactly what
misinformation have I provided on alt.parenting.spanking? As far as never taking a class from me, I suspect that will never be a problem. You would have to apply to my university and be accepted into the licensure program. This is a moot point. You believe the term "cohort" fits Kane and I. That's okay. You can believe whatever you want to believe. If you read the definition of "cohort" you will realize that this term is inappropriate. Kane and I disagree about many things, and this was evident on the ng dialogue between Kane and I. What I think we do not disagree on is the idea of spanking as an appropriate way to discipline children. By the way, if you are uncomfortable using first names (Ms. Carlson; Mr. Kane), I would suggest you use the correct salutation for me. The correct salutation is Dr. Carlson. However, I prefer to be called LaVonne. Thank you. LaVonne jcalhoun wrote: From what I have been able to look up Ms. Carlson you are the only one providing misinformation on this group. I would never take a class from such a dishonest and manipulative teacher. You have nothing to offer but your hypocrisy and your propaganda. I believe the term cohort fits you and Mr. Kane well. I'm sure the collective here agrees (and in your world that's all that matters). Stop attacking those you can't even refute.-Jim Carlson LaVonne wrote in message ... Chris C. You are the one who has for years been claiming there is a cohort on alt.parenting.spanking. Kane, I, and others have attempted to refute this, telling you that this is not a cohort. While we may share a common goal to protect children from physical assault in the form of spanking, we have many different ideas about how this shoud happen, and we often disagree with each other. Kane's and my dialogue should put to rest any cohort claims. I would not expect to see that claim from you again, considering your advanced degrees and understanding of intelligent debate. LaVonne Chris C. wrote: Fern- Notice how quickly the "cohort" turned on each other in this one (I love it). I even see lav and kane advocating what they used to call assault. lav even shares a personal assault case she perp'd during her career. I wonder if there had been a parent or court advocate to press charges how she would have defended herself (as they claim the non-existent reasonable force statutes--hummm...food for thought---such hypocrits). Non-spanker by choice, Chris C. TX "I too have worked extensively with children, but rather than the majority of my experience being with teens it has been in young children, especially children under the age of seven. Of course an out of control 6 year old needs to be subdued, but with the number of adults present in this situation, this could have been accomplished without electric shock. I experienced stitches from a severely disturbed four year old before I could reach him and hold him. I had no other adults to help me and seven other children were present. While stitches in my scalp weren't particularly pleasant, this injury was not life threatening to me, and I was able to subdue the child without hitting/hurting him or exposing him to a potentially lethal electric shock."-lav (Fern5827) wrote in message ... http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/loc...childtasered,0 ,1981442.story?coll=sfla-home-headlines "The first incident had already exposed the department to more criticism for its use of Tasers, which it has begun distributing in greater numbers to officers. "The police could have handled this better,'' said the 6-year-old boy's mother, Kathy Rojas. "They did not have to shoot him.'' Parker said that, in light of the disclosure of the second incident, the department will review its policy. " Email story Oy Vey! But let Momma try that? Straight to DCF and its helpful ministrations. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On 16 Nov 2004 08:40:14 -0800, (Chris C.) wrote:
Fern- Notice how quickly the "cohort" turned on each other in this one (I love it). Of course you do, because you project your mindset and biases on our exchange. I don't feel the least bit attacked by LaVonne, and I presume she'd tell me if she felt attacked by me. I am sure, for instance, that we both seek, even in the points of our disagreement, the safety of the child as the first order of business. LaVonne and I don't even agree on child rearing discipline methods. I'm something of a purist on non-PUNISHMENT, not just non-physical punishment. If I read LaVonne correctly, she advocates some aversive responses. I can't recall the ones she's suggested. So far she hasn't come back at me claiming I'm attacking her, as in "turned on each other" nor do I feel attacked by her because she disagrees with me. The difference in our exchange, compared to those I have with just a few of "the collective" of compulsives, is that I don't consider LaVonne mentally disabled, and I do you. I don't consider her stupid, and I do you. I don't consider her a compulsive or any kind of liar, and I do you, both. I don't consider her ignorant, and I do you. We could disagree even more, as some of the people in this and other ngs and I disagree more on this issue, and I'd still not feel attacked, nor would I be attacking them. I only attack the dangerous. And I consider you that. I even see lav and kane advocating what they used to call assault. Really? Please show us this adocating of assault. lav even shares a personal assault case she perp'd during her career. I wonder if there had been a parent or court advocate to press charges how she would have defended herself (as they claim the non-existent reasonable force statutes--hummm...food for thought---such hypocrits). Restraint is not assault. Do you then, given LaVonne's statement below, claim that the restraint she describes should not be used on children and that it is assault? In the instance she described exactly what method would you use to keep the child, and others safe, without restraint? And don't say, time out...because you have to move the child to that time out if they do not wish to go...as an out of control child will not...you have to restrain them to move them. Are you ready? GO! I await your answer. Nor is a cop applying force assault unless it meets the legal criteria. And every time they use force they risk the charge of assault. Damn brave folks. I have written Miami and congratulated the officers and urged the policy makers to go very carefully in review of the use of taser and this case and not get carried away by idiots such as you playing politics with people's lives. In both instances neither child was hurt. And they are alive. Non-spanker by choice, How many children do you have, Chris C.? I own no part of the moon, and I don't go there, by choice. Is that a special quality I have then? Or could it be I can't get there? Chris C. TX You better be a non-spanker if you have no kids. You go around spankig other's children or grownups and you'll wind up where I think you'd deserve to be, in jail. And the law agrees with me. Your "choice" would be between non-spanking and going to jail. Whoppdeedoo. Kane "I too have worked extensively with children, but rather than the majority of my experience being with teens it has been in young children, especially children under the age of seven. Of course an out of control 6 year old needs to be subdued, but with the number of adults present in this situation, this could have been accomplished without electric shock. I experienced stitches from a severely disturbed four year old before I could reach him and hold him. I had no other adults to help me and seven other children were present. While stitches in my scalp weren't particularly pleasant, this injury was not life threatening to me, and I was able to subdue the child without hitting/hurting him or exposing him to a potentially lethal electric shock."-lav (Fern5827) wrote in message ... http://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/loc...childtasered,0 ,1981442.story?coll=sfla-home-headlines "The first incident had already exposed the department to more criticism for its use of Tasers, which it has begun distributing in greater numbers to officers. "The police could have handled this better,'' said the 6-year-old boy's mother, Kathy Rojas. "They did not have to shoot him.'' Parker said that, in light of the disclosure of the second incident, the department will review its policy. " Email story Oy Vey! But let Momma try that? Straight to DCF and its helpful ministrations. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|