If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
How to drive no-spanks nuts
For starters, remind no-spanks that they are the tip of the tail trying
to wag the dog. Like a 2-year-old throwing a tantrum on a toy store floor, they try to make up for their lack of real power by making a lot of noise to get what they want. Moreover, much like the 2-year-old, they need to learn that the world does not revolve around them. Then, remind no-spanks that, even on a good day, politically expedient laws are merely a temporary means to an end. If large numbers of people do not quickly buy into the agenda perpetuate by those laws, then, in time, the laws become worse than useless; they become a mockery. Russians never really bought into the notion of absolute gender equality mandated by the Soviet constitution. Thus, when the Soviet Union collapsed, Russians quickly resumed their old way of doing things. What feminists in America declared to be *domestic violence* in Russia skyrocketed when the Soviet Union collapsed. Yet, in reality, it was just the old Russian way of doing things taking its accustomed place among the people. Remote peoples to the East of Moscow had a much easier time adjusting to the new way of doing old things since they were too far from Moscow for Soviet policy to have much effect. The fringe republics in the Soviet Union had about as much use for bureaucrats in Moscow as Southerners have for the same species in Washington. Next, remind no-spanks that even if the *win* in the short term, they will lose over time. The world belongs to those who breed rather than to those to try to tell those who breed how to raise their children. Parents really do have the final say in how children are raised. There never has been, there never will be enough money and disposable manpower to police parents who breed. To make matters worse, feminist-inspired lone parenting is absolutely deadly to children! Moreover, there is an aging gray panther in America that will leap on and politically devour any politician that diverts social security retirement funding to harass their grandchildren with grandiose social engineering schemes. For the most part, they also have a particular dislike for taxes that go to fund things that do not benefit things about which they care. After that, remind no-spanks that their flagship public school system is sinking. Whether it is California, Michigan, or Texas, there is almost open legislative season on benefit packages. That includes retirement. As the economy continues to wobble, guaranteed incremental salaries will be next to be tossed overboard. Although educators are fond of saying, "It's about the children," the reality is more self-serving. It has really been about that pension and the all-but-free healthcare. As schools become more dysfunctional and benefits dwindle, those with any real abilities will find something else to do with their talents. Already, despite feminists raging that they *owe* the sisterhood, a whole subculture of highly educated women are staying home to raise their children. Not listening to the sisterhood, they bred and are basking in the glory of motherhood. Well-educated and networking, no one is telling them that they must or cannot spank their kids! Having a lawyer in the family also helps. In the above are sown the seeds to no-spank destruction. It matters little whether some parents spank while others do not. Parents should be allowed to decide what is best for their children. Anyone believing that they have a better child-raising scheme is then free to prove it with their own offspring free from the tip of the tail trying to wag the dog. In the end, it is the idea that parents can be free to choose that drives no-spanks nuts. Their entire agenda depends on their dictatorial powers. The problem is that, despite all their pretensions, they have neither the brains nor the bite to be the head. That right belongs to parents. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
How to drive no-spanks nuts
Opinions wrote: For starters, remind no-spanks that they are the tip of the tail trying to wag the dog. So far the dog is wagging more and more, the tail less and less. Anyone following the news knows that. Like a 2-year-old throwing a tantrum on a toy store floor, they try to make up for their lack of real power by making a lot of noise to get what they want. But we are getting what we want. It's you that are tantruming over it. You are losing power in this issue, we are gaining. Or don't you read the news we kindly post here for you? Or could it be you have a bad case of Ostrich? Moreover, much like the 2-year-old, they need to learn that the world does not revolve around them. Odd, I'd have sworn the spankers were the ones convinced of that. You wouldn't be projecting just a tad, now wouldjah? You are finding out that the world doesn't revolve around spanking. Then, remind no-spanks that, even on a good day, politically expedient laws are merely a temporary means to an end. All laws are that, Observer. All. If large numbers of people do not quickly buy into the agenda perpetuate by those laws, then, in time, the laws become worse than useless; they become a mockery. I'll let my black friends know what's coming then. 0;- Russians never really bought into the notion of absolute gender equality mandated by the Soviet constitution. You a russian are yah? Heck, the US obviously has a long way to go for there to be true gender FAIRNESS. (It's not about equality really. It's about fairness. And where the world isn't fair, was make politically expedient laws to move it in that direction. Eventually the reactionaries come along, no matter how much kicking and squalling we are treated to along the way.) Thus, when the Soviet Union collapsed, Russians quickly resumed their old way of doing things. Oh? What feminists in America declared to be *domestic violence* in Russia skyrocketed when the Soviet Union collapsed. Of course. Domestic Violence is the handmaiden smile of social unrest and economic disruption. It happens here as well. Check with the police. They'll let you in on the secret. Honest. Yet, in reality, it was just the old Russian way of doing things taking its accustomed place among the people. So domestic violence is just a cultural given women will have to put with. I suggest they start arming themselves and running down males and executing them then. Because according to your logic, the "politically expedient" law won't work. Of course what I know is that they will continue to try and gain protection through the law. Remote peoples to the East of Moscow had a much easier time adjusting to the new way of doing old things since they were too far from Moscow for Soviet policy to have much effect. The fringe republics in the Soviet Union had about as much use for bureaucrats in Moscow as Southerners have for the same species in Washington. What is all the babbling about the old Soviet Union? Can't come up with a cogent argument to deal with the obvious child assault that takes place, according to our laws except for this one exception of children, so you are looking for these poorly fitting emotionally focused analogies? Next, remind no-spanks that even if the *win* in the short term, they will lose over time. Really? So women can expect to be disenfranchised and lose the vote, not be able to contract in their own name, and children can expect to go back to the mills, and blacks pick up the shakles again? I can hardly wait to see what they will do when they catch you if you are part of the attempt. The world belongs to those who breed Now you wish to claim that childless people are without rights and have no possession of the planet but you breeders do? rather than to those to try to tell those who breed how to raise their children. Breeding doesn't make parents. Parenting does. And rather a lot of breeders fail, and a great many non-breeders parent very well indeedy. In fact the breeders that can't parent wind up with their children being parented by the non-breeders that can parent quite often. Parents really do have the final say in how children are raised. Yes, but being a breeder isn't being a parent. Lots of people breed, drop their pups, and then drop them off somewhere for others to take care of. I think of them as kin to the Cowbird. There never has been, there never will be enough money and disposable manpower to police parents who breed. That's okay. We don't discourage easily. We'll likely never have total control of the oceans either, but we study them and work to make changes to preserve the oceanic ecosystem. That's how decent humans work. Kind of drives you into the nutso tirades, now doesn't it? To make matters worse, feminist-inspired lone parenting is absolutely deadly to children! Really? Your proof please? And the old saw of x number of children in trouble are in single parent households. How do we know that's bs? Why easy. The ranting pundits, such as yourself, fail to include the children that are in trouble that are from two parent households. Moreover, there is an aging gray panther in America that will leap on and politically devour any politician that diverts social security retirement funding to harass their grandchildren with grandiose social engineering schemes. Odd. My experience is that the aging Gray Panther contingent is among the first to leap on their good for nothing kin and report them to the authorities for abusing and neglecting the children. And often those same Panthers end up with the child to raise, and more often than not in single parent households.....R R R R R R....try looking up the data. I keep it on my desk. For the most part, they also have a particular dislike for taxes that go to fund things that do not benefit things about which they care. And one of the things they care deeply about are their grandchildren, grand neices and nephews, that are being abused and neglected. After that, remind no-spanks that their flagship public school system is sinking. Whether it is California, Michigan, or Texas, there is almost open legislative season on benefit packages. That includes retirement. As the economy continues to wobble, guaranteed incremental salaries will be next to be tossed overboard. So now the schools are about to go, and all because the spankers can't paddle kids in school in some states, and it's spreading. R R R R R Although educators are fond of saying, "It's about the children," the reality is more self-serving. It has really been about that pension and the all-but-free healthcare. As schools become more dysfunctional and benefits dwindle, those with any real abilities will find something else to do with their talents. The schools are not becoming more dysfunctional, Observer. And teachers teach because they like to teach, far more than for the salary. Such claims about the school system are the dishonest claims of those that are working to profit themselves by taking over (selling curriculum) the teaching. Check up on William Bennett, his associations and associates in the past decade. You'll see. Already, despite feminists raging that they *owe* the sisterhood, a whole subculture of highly educated women are staying home to raise their children. You are imagining things again. Women are doing both. Having careers and taking time out for children. Not listening to the sisterhood, they bred and are basking in the glory of motherhood. Of course. What are men doing? Well-educated and networking, no one is telling them that they must or cannot spank their kids! Having a lawyer in the family also helps. Sorry. You are wrong. No one is telling them they can't spank their kids. Legally, except for Minnesota, they are covered. What we are telling them is that they should study up (which most are quite willing to do and have done....the ranks of non-spankers is filled with this former professional women that have decided to "breed.") because the law is coming that will require them to use other methods. Many of them are at the forfront of the no spank movement. Take Ms Lawrence of the ban The Rod noteriety. She's a stay at home mom, and a christian. She has a great deal of support. Check out her website sometime. In fact, check out the no-spank websites to get a better picture of the truth. The movement is growing and has been for about 20 years. My part in it is closer to 40 years. In the above are sown the seeds to no-spank destruction. R R R R R R ....kick and scream little compulsive. It matters little whether some parents spank while others do not. Oh? By whose definition? Parents should be allowed to decide what is best for their children. And if they decide death is best? Anyone believing that they have a better child-raising scheme is then free to prove it with their own offspring free from the tip of the tail trying to wag the dog. Yep. Have done so. Have watched thousands of others do it as well. We are millions strong, Obsessive. You are losing. It's that simple. In the end, it is the idea that parents can be free to choose that drives no-spanks nuts. No, because that's simply not true. They are not free to choose anything at all, Observer. Their entire agenda depends on their dictatorial powers. Nope. On the power of a democratic humane society. The problem is that, despite all their pretensions, they have neither the brains nor the bite to be the head. And you do? That right belongs to parents. What's interesting, logically, is in the fact that the no-spank ranks are made up nearly exclusively of those that are parents. Non-parents are a tiny minority in this movement. Your logic is, as usual, impeccable, Obsessive. R R R R R 0:- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
How to drive no-spanks nuts
Moreover, much like the 2-year-old, they need to learn that the
world does not revolve around them. So sad that so many adults still live in autocratic times. Since the rule of the land is democracy, why do some insist on practicing fascism in their homes? I would highly recommend that you read up on Positive Discipline, to teach children respect, resilience, responsibility, empathy, WITHOUT Rewards or Punishment. Try it, you'll LOVE it ! and your kids most likely will not need to see a therapist or a probation officer later on ;-) unfortunately some parents, instead of implementing Positive Discipline which requires that THEY control their own anger issues, much like a two year old tantrum, prefer the easy way out by spanking, blaming, shaming on inflicting pain, or by drugging the kids. I do understand that conscious parenting takes time and effort, but it is well worth it !! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
How to drive no-spanks nuts
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Good Response!!! How to drive no-spanks nuts
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
misc.kids FAQ on Allergies and Asthma (part 2/4) | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 2 | April 30th 05 05:24 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Allergies and Asthma (part 1/4) | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 3 | March 30th 05 06:34 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Allergies and Asthma (part 1/4) | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 3 | February 16th 04 10:00 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Allergies and Asthma (part 1/4) | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 3 | December 15th 03 09:44 AM |
Tics that can drive you absolutely freakin nuts! | chiam margalit | General (moderated) | 6 | November 10th 03 02:19 PM |