If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Psychotropic Drugs Perfect Killing Machine ... MUST READ
On 9/9/10 10:28 AM, carole wrote:
"Bob wrote in message ... On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 21:58:28 +1000, in misc.health.alternative, wrote: No, this ng is concerned with the uselessness and dangers of drugs, merely to counter all the pharmaceutical apologists that populate it. It isn't up to you to decide that Carole. The users themselves make the decision by participation. Peter b said "No Carole, there is nothing in the charter about discussion of dangers of pharmaceutical drugs. You just like to add things which are unnecessary or inflammatory, don't you?" Which is true, the red herrings you toss in to discussions are designed to do exactly what? Read what you wrote before my response, moron. There are only about 1 or 2 real alties in the group, the vast majority being pro pharmaceutical. Well I happen to be pro-truth. and pro-evidence. That's all very nice bob, but what happens when the evidence is stolen or otherwise goes missing? What evidence are you talking about, Carole. you mean the stuff you keep calling suppressed which can be found by the hundreds of books and web sites? Remember rummy's quote - There are things we know we know, things we know we don't know, and things we don't know that we don't know. These books would fall into the "things we know we don't know" category. ie the knowledge is there but the practise of it is suppressed. They DDT it with propaganda, and exile the treatments to mexico then do writeups in conventional sources to say it didn't work. Did it ever occur to you that these treatments don't work? There is no big conspiracy. The knowledge is not there. The only thing that is there is ignorance - you're a great example of that. Really Carole? You don't have a clue. Evidence which is missing will stand out like a glaring red light, just because it is missing. Like a line of prose with a word missing, the Evidence tells a story, the missing evidence will be just like the missing word. One need not make up through speculation and conspiracy wishes missing evidence.. There are intelligence agencies which run around the world finding and confiscating evidence of anything that is to be kept from the public, for whatever contrived reason that best fits with plausible deniability, ie "concern for the public good", "making the world a safer place", "national security" ...take your pick. More conspiracy theory. What a piece of work! Do you really think you are in a position to understand how the system works? I am in a far better position than you, are Carole, because I can understand what I read. I understand the evidence and the technicalities and the "Jargon" as you call it often which is the Precision of the Language developed to discuss the evidence. No, I don't think you're in a better position unfortunately because as a skeptic you look for any reasons to discredit anything that doesn't fit in with the status quo. You are a "yes" man posing as an independent thinker. What you're missing is that there is no evidence that the treatment works. There is no conspiracy. There is nothing to discredit because it doesn't work. There is nothing to cover up. I hope you don't thing you are an independent thinker - you're not a thinker at all. You're a front for alternative medicine. Look at the stupid web page you advertise. "Outlawing books that tell me how to heal myself (such as Stale Food Versus Fresh Food) is racketeering activity. Fallacy, you haven't shown books actually tell you how to heal yourself. What the medical gangsters have done to Rife, Hoxsey, Gerson, Ivy, Durovic, Privitera, Krebs, Koch, Crane, Sorry We already debunk the claims to show that Rife's story isn't how you and others presented it Carole. You really need to ditch your skeptic dictionary bob. "Debunking" ...what does that tell us? That you (as a skeptic) have decided using your little (inadequate) processes that some therapy or theory isn't valid. You have yet to show it is valid. All you say is that people are out to get you or the treatment. You have yet to show valid clinical data that the treatment works or to reference any valid evidence. Warner, Keller, Ghadiali, Beard, Taylor, Wright, Brodie, Naessens, Burzynski, Halstead, Richardson, Thurston, Pixley, Bolles and many others are great crimes, nearly invariably done in the name of "protecting the public." " Who are you citing about, Carole. and many of those people you claim as visionaries were crackpots. (Young and Kock) Take them one by one and I'll look into them. I'm not going to do the whole list ...one will do for now. And don't use conventional sources to look them up, or wikipedia, the establishment approved encyclopedia. Were is your own evidence about the foot fungus? That right you have none. and most of what you do post, is basically nothing but fallacies. Exactly what I mean bob. Until you get given evidence, you don't believe anything. Which is how science works carole. your anecdotal account is called a story unless backed by evidence. In all things, the burden of proof is the onus of the claimant. There are problems with that MO though - the evidence can be confiscated, there may be reasons such as expense that don't allow satisfactory tests, or the science might not agree with conventional thinking, a whole list of reasons for no evidence - and vice versa. Things WITH evidence may not be satisfactory for various reasons. You're looking for a conspiracy where there is none. There is no evidence that the treatment works. Period. You live in your own little world, and the idea of a bigger picture where things are manipulated from high up the food chain doesn't compute with you. You do not understand I do see the bigger picture. I understand how the system works and work with it. It is why I am successful person. It all depends on your definition of success - different people have different definitions. All societies develop systems and methods. What you claim as conspiracy is just you anto-social behavior. Oh so you're into playing "blame the victim". Its not the fault of the corrupt system, its the fault of the person talking about it. What you're claiming is conspiracy is just your stupidity looking for a way to believe something where there is no evidence, e.g., alternative medicine works - there is no evidence that it works. In fact, that is the definition of alternative medicine. If it were proven medicine, it would be proven medicine. In reality, there are two types of medicine: 1) Medicine that works. 2) Medicine that doesn't work. Alternative medicine goes here. You think that showing some peer reviewed study or some randomed controlled clinical study shows the evidence and that the evidence can never be wrong. No It could be wrong. when it is wrong it will be shown to be wrong sooner or later. that reason it will show up wrong sooner or later is because those test and data should be tested and replicated and if they are not in agreement then we know something is wrong. Maybe but in the meantime? Don't waste time and money on unproven treatments, particularly when there is no valid scientific reason why they should work. That's why when you cite a web page which shows the only person which could even preform the tests or see the results claimed was just one person, it is self-evidence that something isn't right. What you don't understand is that there are very few pieces of scientific evidence that haven't got a opposing view, or that can't be controlled or manipulated. Sorry, Carole that is your claim, it is up to you to prove it. carole www.conspiracee.com You still haven't proven it. Jeff |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
BOSTON, MA -- Psychotropic Medications Overprescribed in Foster-Care | fx | Spanking | 0 | November 2nd 07 07:13 AM |
BOSTON, MA -- Psychotropic Medications Overprescribed in Foster-Care | fx | Foster Parents | 0 | November 2nd 07 07:13 AM |
if you take prescription drugs, you need to read | [email protected] | General | 0 | February 20th 07 12:31 AM |
Are Parents Increasing The Need For Psychotropic Drugs? | Jan Drew | Kids Health | 0 | September 19th 06 06:40 AM |
2/3 Fosters TX on psychotropic *chemical restraints* One on 17 | Fern5827 | Spanking | 0 | November 12th 04 03:38 PM |