If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Funky SIDS finding
PREGNANT WOMEN: OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%.
It is easy to allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%. See THE SOLUTION below. FUNKY SIDS FINDING "[A] shift in certification of deaths from SIDS to other causes of sudden unexpected infant death...could account for 90% of the drop in the SIDS rates..." --Michael H. Malloy, MD (and MacDorman) Pediatrics. 2005 May;115(5):1247-53. PubMed abstract OPEN LETTER (archived for global access at http://groups.google.com) Michael H. Malloy, MD Department of Pediatrics University of Texas Medical Branch 301 University Blvd Galveston, TX 77555-0526 USA Michael, Regardless whether shift in classification of SIDS deaths to other causes can account for 90% of the drop in SIDS rates... Here are some possible contributing factors to SIDS deaths and other causes of "sudden unexpected infant death"... MD-obstetricians are temporarily asphyxiating EVERY CESAREAN BABY - robbing them of up to 50% of their blood volume, according to retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG (quoted below). MD-obstetricians are also routinely closing birth canals and routinely keeping birth canals closed when babies get stuck as they pull with hands, forceps and/or vacuum extractors. MD-obstetricians sometimes pull so hard on tiny spines that they rip spinal nerves out of tiny spinal cords. Some babies die - some babies get paralyzed - most "only" suffer gruesome spinal manipulation. ALL spinal manipulation is gruesome with the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30%. MD-obstetricians are also slicing vaginas and abdomens en masse - surgically/fraudulently inferring that everything possible is being done/has been done to allow the birth canal to open - even as they close the birth canal the "extra" up to 30%. MD-obstetricians are lying to cover-up. See the Four OB Lies... Even if robbing babies of up to 30% of pelvic outlet area and up to 50% of their blood volume does not contribute to death rates. Please help stop MD-obstetricians from engaging in these bizarre birth behaviors. Thanks. Sincerely, Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon PS THE FOUR OB LIES OB LIE #1. After MASSIVE change in the AP pelvic outlet diameter was clinically demonstrated in 1911 and radiographically demonstrated in 1957, the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that pelvic diamaters DON'T CHANGE at delivery. OB LIE #2. After Ohlsen pointed out in 1973 that pelvic diameters DO change - the authors of Williams Obstetrics began erroneously claiming that their most frequent delivery position - dorsal - widens the outlet. OB LIE #3. After I pointed out in 1992 that dorsal CLOSES - and so does semisitting - the authors of Williams Obstetrics - put the correct biomechanics in their 1993 edition - but kept in their text (in the same paragraph!) - the dorsal widens bald lie that first called my attention to their text... OB LIE #4. OBs are actually KEEPING birth canals closed when babies get stuck - and claiming they are doing everything to allow the birth canal open maximally. (ACOG Shoulder Dystocia video - also forceps and vacuum births are performed with the mother in lithotomy.) See Make birth better: Dan Rather, before you leave CBS... http://health.groups.yahoo.com -/group/chiro-list/message/2983 I noted some of the OB lies in an Open Letter to the FTC years ago... http://home1.gte.net/gastaldo/ -part2ftc.html RELEVANT AMA PRINCIPLES OF MEDICAL ETHICS.... "[AMA physician[s] shall...strive to expose those physicians...who engage in fraud or deception." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...seek changes in those requirements which are contrary to the best interests of the patient." "[AMA p]hysician[s] shall...make relevant information available to patients, colleagues, and the public..." http://www.psych.org/psych_pra -ct/ethics/ethics_opinions53101 -.cfm Relevant quote from the AMA website: "[P]hysicians must strive to ensure patient safety and should play a central role in identifying, reducing, and preventing health care errors. Ã, This responsibility exists even in the absence of a patient-physician relationship." http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pu b/category/11968.html AMA physicians are ignoring their own stated ethics - babies be damned. MASSIVE BABY BLOOD ROBBERY Retired obstetrician George Malcolm Morley, MB ChB FACOG indicates that OBs are robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. This is happening to EVERY CESAREAN BABY, according to Dr. Morley: "ACOG's routine treatment (B138) of these depressed neonates is immediate cord clamping to obtain cord blood pH studies. The child's only functioning source of oxygen - the placenta - is amputated together with 30% to 50+% of its natural blood volume. Total asphyxia is imposed until the lungs function, and the depressed (asphyxiated, hypovolemic) child starts its extra-uterine life in hypovolemic shock... B138 was first published in 1993. Every cesarean section baby, every depressed child, every premie, and every child born with a neonatal team in the delivery room has its cord clamped immediately to facilitate the panicked rush to the resuscitation table. The current epidemic of immediate cord clamping coincides with an epidemic of autism...For the trial lawyers, it is essential that the 'true genesis' of cerebral palsy remains unknown, because that 'true genesis' (B.138) is a standard of medico-legal care..." http://www.cordclamping.com/ac ---og-cp.htm In cases where the baby MUST be resuscitated after birth - I am still wondering why pediatricians have to sever the baby's access to blood and oxygen and rush baby across the room to resuscitate. Why can't neonatal resuscitation stations be designed so that mother and baby can be wheeled underneath (or between) with baby's natural oxygenation/transfusion device still intact? No one has answered this question. My thanks to Canadian Grandmother Donna Young for calling my attention to the immediate cord clamping mass child abuse. A GOOD SIGN: Oregon Health & Science University/OHSU - Oregon's only medical school - stopped promoting immediate cord clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisittin g delivery online after I complained. OHSU's link to the misinformation is now dead - or rather - one is re-routed to www.ohsuwomenshealth.com... See Birth child abuse: Oregon's only medical school (OHSU) http://health.groups.yahoo.com -/group/chiro-list/message/2986 (If anyone can find a page where OHSU is still promoting immediate cord clamping and birth-canal-closing/semisittin g delivery, I would like to know about it.) PREGNANT WOMEN: By using semisitting and dorsal delivery, OBs are closing birth canals up to 30%. Also, when babies get stuck, OBs KEEP women semisitting and dorsal - they KEEP the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30% as they pull with hands, forceps and vacuums. ANOTHER PROBLEM: By immediately clamping cords, OBs are temporarily asphyxiating babies and robbing them of up to 50% of their blood volume - see the astonishing quote from Dr. Morley above. THE SOLUTION: 1. To allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%, simply roll onto your side as you push your baby out - BUT BEWARE - some OBs will let pregnant women "try" alternative delivery positions - but will roll them back to semisitting/dorsal - close their birth canals the "extra" up to 30% for the actual delivery. Talk to your OB. 2. To allow your baby to have the "extra" up to 50% of blood volume, do not let the OB or midwife clamp the umbilical cord until it has stopped pulsating and your baby is pink and breathing and not in need of resuscitation. NOTE #1: Allowing the birth canal to open the "extra" up to 30% will not prevent all episiotomies or c-sections or forceps/vacuum use - but OBs have no business closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30% in the first place. NOTE #2: There are rare cases where the OB must clamp immediately - but they are indeed rare. OBs are routinely clamping cords immediately - routinely robbing babies of up to 50% of their blood volume. Talk to your OB today. I am hoping that state boards of chiropractic and physical therapy will inform pregnant women of the danger and seek Writs of Mandamus to compel state medical boards and attorney generals to simply do their jobs and stop the obvious birth crimes... See Birth Danger: Cal Chiro Bd - SIMPLE QUESTION http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/3526 I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical students MDs are TRAINED to perform obvious child abuse which sometimes kills. Thanks for reading everyone. Todd Dr. Gastaldo Hillsboro, Oregon USA "Do the right thing, no matter the cost..." --Valerie M. Parisi, M.D., M.P.H., M.B.A. Dean, School of Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston PREGNANT WOMEN: Scroll up for THE SOLUTION This Open Letter will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive. Search http://groups.google.com for "Funky SIDS finding" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SIDS mattress fumes | Greegor | General | 1 | February 26th 05 03:58 PM |
Co-Sleeping Safety Studies | Joshua Levy | Kids Health | 1 | August 31st 04 08:14 AM |
SIDS Genetic Link | M,a,r,k P,r,o,b,e,r,t-August 19, 2004 | Kids Health | 19 | August 25th 04 07:38 PM |
SIDS research "flawed;"clues ignored: researcher | JG | Kids Health | 5 | December 10th 03 02:01 PM |
Cosleeping SIDS risk--study | Herself | General | 0 | December 5th 03 10:00 AM |