If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Kane9 Kaught lying again!
On 6 Apr 2004, Kane wrote: On 6 Apr 2004 18:59:34 -0700, (Alina) wrote: (Kane) wrote in message om... I do? I forget if I mentioned the size in the ng. text attachment wouldn't be very large. You did :-) http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...g.goog le.com Yep, and 80 pages in a text document, even with some simple charts would hardly be a load for an e-mail. This is a 180 degrees turn from: "I hope Gerald and "Alina" have a high speed connection to the internet. That's a lot of graphics to send." I had made the offer to anyone he and I both knew in the ng. That's why I was questioning sending it to you. He could know you, or even be you, and intercept it and pretend all along he had it. His veracity has been questioned many times here. LOL! This is a contradiction to the claim by Kane: "My research skills are formidable, as some twits here have found out the hard way." Come on, Kane! You are either a very bad LIAR or very STUPID! ;-) Doan |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Kane9 Kaught lying again!
Doan:
Did you notice that time months ago when Doug caught Kane in a LIE about something, and Kane acknowledged his own deviousness by saying (yes but they don't know that!)? He has no qualms about playing games of misdirection and sophistry. He's like a therapist using LIES to manipulate somebody, with no ethical qualms. What do you think the target feels like when they realize he duped them? Kane actually seems to think he is superior to everybody, except the few ""experts"" he is a groupie of. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Kane9 Kaught lying again!
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Kane9 Kaught lying again!
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 22:43:24 -0700, Doan wrote:
On 6 Apr 2004, Alina wrote: (Kane) wrote in message om... I do? I forget if I mentioned the size in the ng. text attachment wouldn't be very large. You did :-) http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...g.goog le.com Oops! Kane0 got caught with his lies once again. ;-) Here is the quote: All I said was I forgot if I mentioned the size, not that I didn't mention the size. Forgetting and stating one has forgotten is now lying? YOu need language lessons again. You are assigned, on penalty if you do not, as being recognized as the liar YOU are, to look up "lie," "lying," and "liar" and provide us with any authority that supports your claim that fogetting and saying so constitutes in itself, lying. "I hope Gerald and "Alina" have a high speed connection to the internet. That's a lot of graphics to send." Yep, and I forgot I said that. That IS why I said I forgot IF I said anything about the size. Now show us were I lied again. And here are more of Kane0's lies in the past: Dec 2, 2003 "I never stated that I had read it. Yep, I never stated I read it. That doesn't say I read it or not. Notice the date. Have you a reference to a date prior to Dec 2, 03 where I said I had read it? I've only quoted the article on his study and cited his quotes in that article as to his findings. No lie there, and plenty of evidence I and others have quoted the magazine article, not the study. You want the study, you are free to get it and challenge his findings, but until then, you are obviously flapping your arms and pretending you are flying." And certainly no lie there, or if there is please point it out to me. Dec 5, 2003 "The Embry study. You haven't gotten it yet, have you? I have. Long long ago." Yep. Had it for ages. But I never said so on this ng, which of course would make it obvious I never said I read it either. I simply said I'd only quoted the magazine who quoted Embry. Let me see now. Dec 5 comes after Dec 2. Having and "stating" I had it are two different things, now aren't they? Liar! Liar! Pants on fire! :-) You need to sit in pail of water little boy. Show me where I lied. R R R R R R I never said I had the study or read it before we had that conversation you site. How could I possibly be lying saying I never said I had it? All you need to do is find someplace prior to Dec 2nd where I said I had it or READ it to make me a liar. Want to try again? The same old Droaning lies. While calling others liars. I find you absolutely fascinating to watch in your public exhibitions. Doan Silly boy. Stop spanking your monkey in public. Kane |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Kane9 Kaught lying again!
On 7 Apr 2004, Kane wrote:
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 22:43:24 -0700, Doan wrote: On 6 Apr 2004, Alina wrote: (Kane) wrote in message om... I do? I forget if I mentioned the size in the ng. text attachment wouldn't be very large. You did :-) http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...g.goog le.com Oops! Kane0 got caught with his lies once again. ;-) Here is the quote: All I said was I forgot if I mentioned the size, not that I didn't mention the size. Oh, what a tangled web we weaved! ;-) Forgetting and stating one has forgotten is now lying? More weasel words! :-) YOu need language lessons again. More weasel words! ;-) You are assigned, on penalty if you do not, as being recognized as the liar YOU are, to look up "lie," "lying," and "liar" and provide us with any authority that supports your claim that fogetting and saying so constitutes in itself, lying. LOL! "I hope Gerald and "Alina" have a high speed connection to the internet. That's a lot of graphics to send." Yep, and I forgot I said that. That IS why I said I forgot IF I said anything about the size. More weaseling! ;-) Now show us were I lied again. LOL! And here are more of Kane0's lies in the past: Dec 2, 2003 "I never stated that I had read it. Yep, I never stated I read it. That doesn't say I read it or not. Notice the date. Have you a reference to a date prior to Dec 2, 03 where I said I had read it? Oct 12, 2003: "When he did this study, I have read, he started with the opposite belief, that more and better punishments would be the answered. He was surprised." You even boasted: "Write him for a list of peer reviews. I'm sure he'd accomodate. Tell him Kane sent you." I've only quoted the article on his study and cited his quotes in that article as to his findings. No lie there, and plenty of evidence I and others have quoted the magazine article, not the study. Have you googled yourself? ;-) You want the study, you are free to get it and challenge his findings, but until then, you are obviously flapping your arms and pretending you are flying." And certainly no lie there, or if there is please point it out to me. LOL! Dec 5, 2003 "The Embry study. You haven't gotten it yet, have you? I have. Long long ago." Yep. Had it for ages. But I never said so on this ng, which of course would make it obvious I never said I read it either. I simply said I'd only quoted the magazine who quoted Embry. More weaseling! ;-) Let me see now. Dec 5 comes after Dec 2. Having and "stating" I had it are two different things, now aren't they? Liar! Liar! Pants on fire! :-) You need to sit in pail of water little boy. The heat is on your butt! ;-) Show me where I lied. R R R R R R On this newsgroup! :-) I never said I had the study or read it before we had that conversation you site. How could I possibly be lying saying I never said I had it? Weasel! ;-) All you need to do is find someplace prior to Dec 2nd where I said I had it or READ it to make me a liar. Want to try again? Already have! The same old Droaning lies. While calling others liars. Looking in the mirror, Kane? :-) I find you absolutely fascinating to watch in your public exhibitions. So is Alina with yours! ;-) Doan Silly boy. Silly "never-spanked" boy! :-) Stop spanking your monkey in public. Stop calling people "smelly-****" in public, "never-spanked" boy! Kane0 Kan't! Doan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The Kane9 Kan't dance continues... | Kane | General | 1 | February 22nd 04 03:57 AM |
lying | Kane | General | 1 | February 18th 04 06:02 AM |
lying | Kane | General | 0 | February 13th 04 07:30 PM |
Lying | Kane | General | 0 | February 13th 04 06:58 PM |
Another child killed in kincare | Kane | General | 39 | February 12th 04 06:55 PM |