If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Acceptable losses...
On 17 Jan 2004 23:35:59 -0800, (Greg Hanson)
wrote: Bobb wrote Gee.. sounds to me big business missed a golden opportunity. We could still have merry-go-rounds with a law mandating helmuts, knee pads, and helmuts. Of course that would have led to speed controls, age limits, terms of use, warning signs, parental control, safety inspections and daily monitoring. New jobs could have been created with the possible inclusion of advanced technology to shut down, speed up, or sense over-load conditions. It still not too late... cuz I see see slides here and there. And, what about swings? Bobb: Helmut is a German first name vs. Helmet. Do you actually read or watch world news? Perhaps the prime minister's name from news became a bit like a subliminal suggestion. Thanks for posting a list like this before. Spelling Nazi's are pukes that can't think. If he were trying to change the meaning of something you'd be right to correct. But since it is either a typo or a simple spelling error, you prove your pukehood. Nice going, scumsucker. Despite my sometimes zealous attacks on bobb for what he and I disagree about he is ten times the man you are, and 20 times the caring human being, but then it's not all that hard, given who you are. As for the labels: if it weren't for assholes that are suit happy, would these strange warning labels all be needed? I'm particularly taken with the one on children not being allowed to play in the clothes dryer. Wanna bet that a child hasn't been hurt by being put in a clothes dryer by a parent, or allowing a child to play in the laundry room unsupervised? I wonder how closely these children were being supervised, and if maybe a larger warning label would have tipped off the stupid parent that children that young should not be left unattended? I don't know if the parents sued the owners and manufacturers though...but I'll bet they considered it if they were anything like YOU. http://www.childrensdefense.org/chil...n/2002_601.php And that piece is actually an attempt to blame "the state" for the problem, instead of WHO THE STATE ACTUALLY IS...sick as it makes my stomach, YOU, asshole, are The State... And......... I thought long and hard about posting this one. It's really too much to bear thinking about too closely, but I want people to know what you are and what you stand for, along with your asshole buddies that pretend to want to reform CPS when in fact all they want to do is dance in the blood of the families that have contact with CPS...so I'm going to post it: http://www.freedomofthought.com/archives/000420.html Don't think too much about it. It's just another "We Doan Need No Steenkin' CPS" article, after all. And next you'll assholes will be claiming it's all CPS fault. But returning to the thought on The State, and the fact you are a citizen patoooeeee: While you don't vote, you don't earn money and you don't pay taxes, you STILL ARE THE STATE...and you express all this concern for matters you do NOTHING about but babble by whining and complaining and agitating in a USENET newsgroup...tsk, Whore, tsk. Get a job at least. Hell, some people are doing any kind of labor in your area...at least that's what your butt buddy The Leakin' Deakin' showed us with a newspaper citation (that he failed to read and made mistaken claims about R R R R R). Get off your ass, apologize to the court, and the SO, and hit the road. If you admitted your guilt and the mother claimed she was kicking you out...do you have any idea how that might impress the court? They are waiting for her to show some guts and dump you. I don't pray of course, but I'll make an exception. I'll be happy to pray to any and all gods that she does wake up and whip your ass out of the house if it will make it happen. The little girl deserves to know that her mother loves her more than she loves YOU, a ****ing gigolo whore. Sleep well. We are all wishing you the best of a new year. Kane Wackiest Warning Labels Ever Warning on a bottle of drain cleaner: "If you do not understand, or cannot read, all directions, cautions and warnings, do not use this product." That warning is the first place winner of the 2004 Wacky Warning Label Contest. The Michigan Lawsuit Abuse Watch, a group whose goal is to show that the fear of frivolous lawsuits has led to a loss of corporate common sense, sponsors the annual contest for the wackiest warning labels. "Wacky warning labels are a sign of our lawsuit-plagued times," Robert B. Dorigo Jones, president of the nonprofit Michigan Lawsuit Abuse Watch group, said in the news release announcing the contest winners. "It used to be that if someone spilled coffee in their lap, they simply called themselves clumsy. Today, too many people are calling themselves an attorney." Second place: On a snow sled: "Bewa sled may develop high speed under certain snow conditions." Third place: On a 12-inch-high storage rack for compact discs: "Do not use as a ladder." Fourth place: A 5-inch fishing lure with three nasty steel hooks advises it is "Harmful if swallowed." Too bad fish can't read! Previous winners in the "Wacky Warning Label Contest" are presented here for your amusement and amazement: A warning on an electric router made for carpenters cautions, "This product not intended for use as a dental drill." A warning label found on a baby stroller cautions the user: "Remove child before folding." A bottle of prescription sleeping pills says, "Warning: May cause drowsiness." A sticker on a toilet at a public facility in Ann Arbor, Michigan actually warns: "Recycled flush water unsafe for drinking." A CD player carries this unusual warning: "Do not use the Ultradisc2000 as a projectile in a catapult." An "Aim-n-Flame" fireplace lighter cautions, "Do not use near fire, flame, or sparks." A label on a hand-held massager advises consumers not to use "while sleeping or unconscious." A container of underarm deodorant says, "Caution: Do not spray in eyes." A cartridge for a laser printer warns, "Do not eat toner." A household iron warns users: "Never iron clothes while they are being worn." A label with a hair dryer reads, "Never use hair dryer while sleeping." A 13-inch wheel on a wheelbarrow warns: "Not intended for highway use." A cardboard car sunshield that keeps sun off the dashboard warns, "Do not drive with sunshield in place." A bathroom heater says: "This product is not to be used in bathrooms." A can of self-defense pepper spray warns users: "May irritate eyes." A warning on a pair of shin guards manufactured for bicyclists says: "Shin pads cannot protect any part of the body they do not cover." A popular manufactured fireplace log warns: "Caution: Risk of Fire." A box of birthday cake candles says: "DO NOT use soft wax as ear plugs or for any other function that involves insertion into a body cavity." "Do not use snow blower on the roof." "Do not allow children to play in the dishwasher." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Acceptable losses...
Suit happy eh?
If CPS people didn't misrepresent, report selectively, LIE, cheat, steal on the job, they might not be getting sued for their abuses. Aren't law suits partly to cause wrongs to be corrected? Why wouldn't you WANT those wrongs to be corrected? Any particular reason? I'm particularly taken with the one on children not being allowed to play in the clothes dryer. Wanna bet that a child hasn't been hurt by being put in a clothes dryer by a parent, or allowing a child to play in the laundry room unsupervised? I wonder how closely these children were being supervised, and if maybe a larger warning label would have tipped off the stupid parent that children that young should not be left unattended? You WONDER about some HYPOTHETICAL imagined family? What are their names? Maybe you could create them on that computer game "The Sims" and call a caseworker on them. By the way, in "The Sims" the caseworker provides no service plan and never brings the child back. Unlike reality, the caseworker does not automatically remove kids because they took one away before. Ya got a giant idiot label to put over caseworker desks? How about "Lie on our paperwork and this state will prosecute you. Families are at stake."? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Acceptable losses...
THROWING CHILDREN INTO CLOTHES DRYERS.
Where the heck did THAT come from? Kane says I'm sick? Why THANK YOU. Reforming CPS from the inside? The experts who have studied the agency culture have said that meaningful reform from within is impossible. They've had MORE than TEN YEARS after they were told to put various avenues of redress into place. Times up. Time for law suits. The Federal Judges in IL and across the US agree. That one supervising a Consent Decree is steamed. CT and a few other state CPS agencies are now getting more FEDERAL guidance thanks to their abject ineptitude. Bureaucracy is about THE WORST way to actually get something done. Big Brother only does WORSE than parents. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Acceptable losses...
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Acceptable losses...
"Kane" wrote in message om... On 17 Jan 2004 23:35:59 -0800, (Greg Hanson) wrote: Bobb wrote Gee.. sounds to me big business missed a golden opportunity. We could still have merry-go-rounds with a law mandating helmuts, knee pads, and helmuts. Of course that would have led to speed controls, age limits, terms of use, warning signs, parental control, safety inspections and daily monitoring. New jobs could have been created with the possible inclusion of advanced technology to shut down, speed up, or sense over-load conditions. It still not too late... cuz I see see slides here and there. And, what about swings? Bobb: Helmut is a German first name vs. Helmet. Do you actually read or watch world news? Perhaps the prime minister's name from news became a bit like a subliminal suggestion. Thanks for posting a list like this before. Spelling Nazi's are pukes that can't think. If he were trying to change the meaning of something you'd be right to correct. But since it is either a typo or a simple spelling error, you prove your pukehood. Nice going, scumsucker. Despite my sometimes zealous attacks on bobb for what he and I disagree about he is ten times the man you are, and 20 times the caring human being, but then it's not all that hard, given who you are. As for the labels: if it weren't for assholes that are suit happy, would these strange warning labels all be needed? I'm particularly taken with the one on children not being allowed to play in the clothes dryer. Wanna bet that a child hasn't been hurt by being put in a clothes dryer by a parent, or allowing a child to play in the laundry room unsupervised? I wonder how closely these children were being supervised, and if maybe a larger warning label would have tipped off the stupid parent that children that young should not be left unattended? Kids explore. They love cliimbing inside or things.. even cardboard boxes and the like. How many became hurt or injured from a dishwasher? How many people know know knives are sharp? How many even read the labels on breakfast food boxes (except to pass time), care, or even undertand labels or any sort. Even kids come with warning labels, today. Yeh, their not stuck to his body or printed his forehead but they do exist. They are just as foolish ... they are all too readily enforced by do-gooders and hand-wringing know--it-alls. bobb I don't know if the parents sued the owners and manufacturers though...but I'll bet they considered it if they were anything like YOU. http://www.childrensdefense.org/chil...n/2002_601.php And that piece is actually an attempt to blame "the state" for the problem, instead of WHO THE STATE ACTUALLY IS...sick as it makes my stomach, YOU, asshole, are The State... And......... I thought long and hard about posting this one. It's really too much to bear thinking about too closely, but I want people to know what you are and what you stand for, along with your asshole buddies that pretend to want to reform CPS when in fact all they want to do is dance in the blood of the families that have contact with CPS...so I'm going to post it: http://www.freedomofthought.com/archives/000420.html Don't think too much about it. It's just another "We Doan Need No Steenkin' CPS" article, after all. And next you'll assholes will be claiming it's all CPS fault. But returning to the thought on The State, and the fact you are a citizen patoooeeee: While you don't vote, you don't earn money and you don't pay taxes, you STILL ARE THE STATE...and you express all this concern for matters you do NOTHING about but babble by whining and complaining and agitating in a USENET newsgroup...tsk, Whore, tsk. Get a job at least. Hell, some people are doing any kind of labor in your area...at least that's what your butt buddy The Leakin' Deakin' showed us with a newspaper citation (that he failed to read and made mistaken claims about R R R R R). Get off your ass, apologize to the court, and the SO, and hit the road. If you admitted your guilt and the mother claimed she was kicking you out...do you have any idea how that might impress the court? They are waiting for her to show some guts and dump you. I don't pray of course, but I'll make an exception. I'll be happy to pray to any and all gods that she does wake up and whip your ass out of the house if it will make it happen. The little girl deserves to know that her mother loves her more than she loves YOU, a ****ing gigolo whore. Sleep well. We are all wishing you the best of a new year. Kane Wackiest Warning Labels Ever Warning on a bottle of drain cleaner: "If you do not understand, or cannot read, all directions, cautions and warnings, do not use this product." That warning is the first place winner of the 2004 Wacky Warning Label Contest. The Michigan Lawsuit Abuse Watch, a group whose goal is to show that the fear of frivolous lawsuits has led to a loss of corporate common sense, sponsors the annual contest for the wackiest warning labels. "Wacky warning labels are a sign of our lawsuit-plagued times," Robert B. Dorigo Jones, president of the nonprofit Michigan Lawsuit Abuse Watch group, said in the news release announcing the contest winners. "It used to be that if someone spilled coffee in their lap, they simply called themselves clumsy. Today, too many people are calling themselves an attorney." Second place: On a snow sled: "Bewa sled may develop high speed under certain snow conditions." Third place: On a 12-inch-high storage rack for compact discs: "Do not use as a ladder." Fourth place: A 5-inch fishing lure with three nasty steel hooks advises it is "Harmful if swallowed." Too bad fish can't read! Previous winners in the "Wacky Warning Label Contest" are presented here for your amusement and amazement: A warning on an electric router made for carpenters cautions, "This product not intended for use as a dental drill." A warning label found on a baby stroller cautions the user: "Remove child before folding." A bottle of prescription sleeping pills says, "Warning: May cause drowsiness." A sticker on a toilet at a public facility in Ann Arbor, Michigan actually warns: "Recycled flush water unsafe for drinking." A CD player carries this unusual warning: "Do not use the Ultradisc2000 as a projectile in a catapult." An "Aim-n-Flame" fireplace lighter cautions, "Do not use near fire, flame, or sparks." A label on a hand-held massager advises consumers not to use "while sleeping or unconscious." A container of underarm deodorant says, "Caution: Do not spray in eyes." A cartridge for a laser printer warns, "Do not eat toner." A household iron warns users: "Never iron clothes while they are being worn." A label with a hair dryer reads, "Never use hair dryer while sleeping." A 13-inch wheel on a wheelbarrow warns: "Not intended for highway use." A cardboard car sunshield that keeps sun off the dashboard warns, "Do not drive with sunshield in place." A bathroom heater says: "This product is not to be used in bathrooms." A can of self-defense pepper spray warns users: "May irritate eyes." A warning on a pair of shin guards manufactured for bicyclists says: "Shin pads cannot protect any part of the body they do not cover." A popular manufactured fireplace log warns: "Caution: Risk of Fire." A box of birthday cake candles says: "DO NOT use soft wax as ear plugs or for any other function that involves insertion into a body cavity." "Do not use snow blower on the roof." "Do not allow children to play in the dishwasher." |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Acceptable losses...
"Greg Hanson" wrote in message m... Suit happy eh? If CPS people didn't misrepresent, report selectively, LIE, cheat, steal on the job, they might not be getting sued for their abuses. Aren't law suits partly to cause wrongs to be corrected? Why wouldn't you WANT those wrongs to be corrected? Hmmm... in view of the number of post regarding a certain incident Greg, it's easy to point out what one sees as wrong.. another sees as a right. What one sees as harmful... another does not. In the eyes of many life is not fair, just, or equal but it does have to do with which side of the fence you stand and to a large degree.. motivation. Money? Lack of personal responsibility? Or taking on the responsibities of others?. bobb Any particular reason? I'm particularly taken with the one on children not being allowed to play in the clothes dryer. Wanna bet that a child hasn't been hurt by being put in a clothes dryer by a parent, or allowing a child to play in the laundry room unsupervised? I wonder how closely these children were being supervised, and if maybe a larger warning label would have tipped off the stupid parent that children that young should not be left unattended? You WONDER about some HYPOTHETICAL imagined family? What are their names? Maybe you could create them on that computer game "The Sims" and call a caseworker on them. By the way, in "The Sims" the caseworker provides no service plan and never brings the child back. Unlike reality, the caseworker does not automatically remove kids because they took one away before. Ya got a giant idiot label to put over caseworker desks? How about "Lie on our paperwork and this state will prosecute you. Families are at stake."? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Acceptable losses...
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 10:43:45 -0600, "bobb"
wrote: "Kane" wrote in message . com... On 17 Jan 2004 23:35:59 -0800, (Greg Hanson) wrote: Bobb wrote Gee.. sounds to me big business missed a golden opportunity. We could still have merry-go-rounds with a law mandating helmuts, knee pads, and helmuts. Of course that would have led to speed controls, age limits, terms of use, warning signs, parental control, safety inspections and daily monitoring. New jobs could have been created with the possible inclusion of advanced technology to shut down, speed up, or sense over-load conditions. It still not too late... cuz I see see slides here and there. And, what about swings? Bobb: Helmut is a German first name vs. Helmet. Do you actually read or watch world news? Perhaps the prime minister's name from news became a bit like a subliminal suggestion. Thanks for posting a list like this before. Spelling Nazi's are pukes that can't think. If he were trying to change the meaning of something you'd be right to correct. But since it is either a typo or a simple spelling error, you prove your pukehood. Nice going, scumsucker. Despite my sometimes zealous attacks on bobb for what he and I disagree about he is ten times the man you are, and 20 times the caring human being, but then it's not all that hard, given who you are. As for the labels: if it weren't for assholes that are suit happy, would these strange warning labels all be needed? I'm particularly taken with the one on children not being allowed to play in the clothes dryer. Wanna bet that a child hasn't been hurt by being put in a clothes dryer by a parent, or allowing a child to play in the laundry room unsupervised? I wonder how closely these children were being supervised, and if maybe a larger warning label would have tipped off the stupid parent that children that young should not be left unattended? Kids explore. Yep. Age appropriate exploration is something I scream at people about when they try to stop children from doing it....BY SPANKING AND OTHERWISE PUNISHING THE CHILD. They love cliimbing inside or things.. even cardboard boxes and the like. Yep. Age appropriate exploration is something I scream at people about when they try to stop children from doing it....BY SPANKING AND OTHERWISE PUNISHING THE CHILD. How many became hurt or injured from a dishwasher? Not too many because parents with brains don't let them climb inside and pull the door shut behind them. Nor do they, like the mom that decided her baby was wet and the clothes dryer would be just the thing, turn the damn dishwasher on with a baby inside. How many people know know knives are sharp? Actually I've found people generally to be pretty stupid about knives, and other tools. How many even read the labels on breakfast food boxes (except to pass time), care, or even undertand labels or any sort. People are dumb, aren't they? I mean look at these ngs. Even kids come with warning labels, today. Yeh, their not stuck to his body or printed his forehead but they do exist. Please explain. Mommies been trading info on babies for a hundred thousand years or so. Putting it in writing is the same as putting other important information in writing...a habit we humans seem too have developed long ago. They are just as foolish ... Info on how to care for babies is foolish? Hmmm...I'll have to give that some deeeeeep thought. they are all too readily enforced by do-gooders and hand-wringing know--it-alls. Actually YOU are as guilty of that as anyone, and you are mostly badly informed, so YOU are peddling the dangerous stuff and should be stopped, but there you are.....blithely babbling on with your nonsesen and no one stopping you. Why should we stop folks that have better information and are much more reliable than YOU bobb? bobb Got another one in the 10 ring bobb. I knew you'd drop out of sanity mode and return to your gobbling and scratchin' Kane I don't know if the parents sued the owners and manufacturers though...but I'll bet they considered it if they were anything like YOU. http://www.childrensdefense.org/chil...n/2002_601.php And that piece is actually an attempt to blame "the state" for the problem, instead of WHO THE STATE ACTUALLY IS...sick as it makes my stomach, YOU, asshole, are The State... And......... I thought long and hard about posting this one. It's really too much to bear thinking about too closely, but I want people to know what you are and what you stand for, along with your asshole buddies that pretend to want to reform CPS when in fact all they want to do is dance in the blood of the families that have contact with CPS...so I'm going to post it: http://www.freedomofthought.com/archives/000420.html Don't think too much about it. It's just another "We Doan Need No Steenkin' CPS" article, after all. And next you'll assholes will be claiming it's all CPS fault. But returning to the thought on The State, and the fact you are a citizen patoooeeee: While you don't vote, you don't earn money and you don't pay taxes, you STILL ARE THE STATE...and you express all this concern for matters you do NOTHING about but babble by whining and complaining and agitating in a USENET newsgroup...tsk, Whore, tsk. Get a job at least. Hell, some people are doing any kind of labor in your area...at least that's what your butt buddy The Leakin' Deakin' showed us with a newspaper citation (that he failed to read and made mistaken claims about R R R R R). Get off your ass, apologize to the court, and the SO, and hit the road. If you admitted your guilt and the mother claimed she was kicking you out...do you have any idea how that might impress the court? They are waiting for her to show some guts and dump you. I don't pray of course, but I'll make an exception. I'll be happy to pray to any and all gods that she does wake up and whip your ass out of the house if it will make it happen. The little girl deserves to know that her mother loves her more than she loves YOU, a ****ing gigolo whore. Sleep well. We are all wishing you the best of a new year. Kane Wackiest Warning Labels Ever Warning on a bottle of drain cleaner: "If you do not understand, or cannot read, all directions, cautions and warnings, do not use this product." That warning is the first place winner of the 2004 Wacky Warning Label Contest. The Michigan Lawsuit Abuse Watch, a group whose goal is to show that the fear of frivolous lawsuits has led to a loss of corporate common sense, sponsors the annual contest for the wackiest warning labels. "Wacky warning labels are a sign of our lawsuit-plagued times," Robert B. Dorigo Jones, president of the nonprofit Michigan Lawsuit Abuse Watch group, said in the news release announcing the contest winners. "It used to be that if someone spilled coffee in their lap, they simply called themselves clumsy. Today, too many people are calling themselves an attorney." Second place: On a snow sled: "Bewa sled may develop high speed under certain snow conditions." Third place: On a 12-inch-high storage rack for compact discs: "Do not use as a ladder." Fourth place: A 5-inch fishing lure with three nasty steel hooks advises it is "Harmful if swallowed." Too bad fish can't read! Previous winners in the "Wacky Warning Label Contest" are presented here for your amusement and amazement: A warning on an electric router made for carpenters cautions, "This product not intended for use as a dental drill." A warning label found on a baby stroller cautions the user: "Remove child before folding." A bottle of prescription sleeping pills says, "Warning: May cause drowsiness." A sticker on a toilet at a public facility in Ann Arbor, Michigan actually warns: "Recycled flush water unsafe for drinking." A CD player carries this unusual warning: "Do not use the Ultradisc2000 as a projectile in a catapult." An "Aim-n-Flame" fireplace lighter cautions, "Do not use near fire, flame, or sparks." A label on a hand-held massager advises consumers not to use "while sleeping or unconscious." A container of underarm deodorant says, "Caution: Do not spray in eyes." A cartridge for a laser printer warns, "Do not eat toner." A household iron warns users: "Never iron clothes while they are being worn." A label with a hair dryer reads, "Never use hair dryer while sleeping." A 13-inch wheel on a wheelbarrow warns: "Not intended for highway use." A cardboard car sunshield that keeps sun off the dashboard warns, "Do not drive with sunshield in place." A bathroom heater says: "This product is not to be used in bathrooms." A can of self-defense pepper spray warns users: "May irritate eyes." A warning on a pair of shin guards manufactured for bicyclists says: "Shin pads cannot protect any part of the body they do not cover." A popular manufactured fireplace log warns: "Caution: Risk of Fire." A box of birthday cake candles says: "DO NOT use soft wax as ear plugs or for any other function that involves insertion into a body cavity." "Do not use snow blower on the roof." "Do not allow children to play in the dishwasher." |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Acceptable losses...
On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 10:50:27 -0600, "bobb" wrote:
"Greg Hanson" wrote in message om... Suit happy eh? If CPS people didn't misrepresent, report selectively, LIE, cheat, steal on the job, they might not be getting sued for their abuses. Aren't law suits partly to cause wrongs to be corrected? Why wouldn't you WANT those wrongs to be corrected? Hmmm... in view of the number of post regarding a certain incident Greg, it's easy to point out what one sees as wrong.. another sees as a right. What one sees as harmful... another does not. In the eyes of many life is not fair, just, or equal but it does have to do with which side of the fence you stand and to a large degree.. motivation. Money? Lack of personal responsibility? Or taking on the responsibities of others?. R R R R R....bobb, he's a narcissist.. He just LOOOOOOVES it when you "talk dirty." E E E E E narcissist = subset of sociopath = no conscience Get the picture? bobb Kane |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Acceptable losses...
Isn't "acceptable losses" kinda' the same as: "Collateral Damage"?
Many parents & others seem to believe that children ARE collateral. Just a thought, for what it's worth... Sherman. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|